In:
PLOS Biology, Public Library of Science (PLoS), Vol. 21, No. 5 ( 2023-5-9), p. e3002111-
Abstract:
Atypical chemokine receptors (ACKRs) scavenge chemokines and can contribute to gradient formation by binding, internalizing, and delivering chemokines for lysosomal degradation. ACKRs do not couple to G-proteins and fail to induce typical signaling induced by chemokine receptors. ACKR3, which binds and scavenges CXCL12 and CXCL11, is known to be expressed in vascular endothelium, where it has immediate access to circulating chemokines. ACKR4, which binds and scavenges CCL19, CCL20, CCL21, CCL22, and CCL25, has also been detected in lymphatic and blood vessels of secondary lymphoid organs, where it clears chemokines to facilitate cell migration. Recently, GPR182, a novel ACKR-like scavenger receptor, has been identified and partially deorphanized. Multiple studies point towards the potential coexpression of these 3 ACKRs, which all interact with homeostatic chemokines, in defined cellular microenvironments of several organs. However, an extensive map of ACKR3, ACKR4, and GPR182 expression in mice has been missing. In order to reliably detect ACKR expression and coexpression, in the absence of specific anti-ACKR antibodies, we generated fluorescent reporter mice, ACKR3 GFP/+ , ACKR4 GFP/+ , GPR182 mCherry/+ , and engineered fluorescently labeled ACKR-selective chimeric chemokines for in vivo uptake. Our study on young healthy mice revealed unique and common expression patterns of ACKRs in primary and secondary lymphoid organs, small intestine, colon, liver, and kidney. Furthermore, using chimeric chemokines, we were able to detect distinct zonal expression and activity of ACKR4 and GPR182 in the liver, which suggests their cooperative relationship. This study provides a broad comparative view and a solid stepping stone for future functional explorations of ACKRs based on the microanatomical localization and distinct and cooperative roles of these powerful chemokine scavengers.
Type of Medium:
Online Resource
ISSN:
1545-7885
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pbio.3002111
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pbio.3002111.g001
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pbio.3002111.g002
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pbio.3002111.g003
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pbio.3002111.g004
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pbio.3002111.g005
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pbio.3002111.g006
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pbio.3002111.g007
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pbio.3002111.g008
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pbio.3002111.t001
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pbio.3002111.s001
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pbio.3002111.s002
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pbio.3002111.s003
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pbio.3002111.s004
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pbio.3002111.s005
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pbio.3002111.s006
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pbio.3002111.s007
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pbio.3002111.s008
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pbio.3002111.s009
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pbio.3002111.s010
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pbio.3002111.r001
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pbio.3002111.r002
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pbio.3002111.r003
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pbio.3002111.r004
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pbio.3002111.r005
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pbio.3002111.r006
Language:
English
Publisher:
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Publication Date:
2023
detail.hit.zdb_id:
2126773-X
Bookmarklink