Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
  • 1
    In: Biology of Blood and Marrow Transplantation, Elsevier BV, Vol. 22, No. 3 ( 2016-03), p. 432-440
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1083-8791
    Language: English
    Publisher: Elsevier BV
    Publication Date: 2016
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 3056525-X
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2057605-5
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 126, No. 23 ( 2015-12-03), p. 1841-1841
    Abstract: Background: Light chain amyloidosis (AL) is characterized by tissue deposition of misfolded proteins that cause multisystem organ dysfunction. Current treatments, including chemotherapy and autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation (AHCT), target plasma cells producing pathogenic amyloid proteins. The development of amyloid protein targeted monoclonal antibody therapy has led to an increased need for objective measurements of clinical response. The 6-minute walk test (6MWT) has been used for years as the primary outcome measure to monitor disease severity in clinical trials of heart failure (HF). For example, HF trials with cardiac devices MIRACLE (Abraham, 2002) and MUSTIC (Cazeau, 2001) demonstrated important therapeutic effects based on an improved 6MWT distance of 39 meters and a change of 23%, respectively. These findings, in conjunction with improvement in other markers of disease activity, lead to approval of cardiac resynchronization for the management of HF. Our primary objective was to determine the impact of chemotherapy on changes in 6MWT in patients with AL cardiac amyloid and correlate these changes with cardiac biomarkers. Patients and Methods: We retrospectively analyzed outcomes of 22 AL amyloid patients with cardiac involvement. Subjects performed 6MWT at diagnosis and at the end of planned initial chemotherapy. All patients received bortezomib (B)-based chemotherapy. About half received chemotherapy alone (45%) and the others received B-based induction chemotherapy followed by AHCT (55%). To identify factors associated with changes in 6MWT, we analyzed cardiac response and changes in New York Heart Association (NYHA) class, troponin I, brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) and left ventricular ejection fraction (LV EF). Cardiac response was defined as BNP decrease of 30% or NYHA class decrease ≥ 2 in subjects with baseline NYHA class 3 or 4 (adapted from Comenzo, 2012). Results: At baseline, 59% (n=13) of patients were modified AL amyloid cardiac stage I/II and 41% (n=9) stage III. The median percent change in 6MWT was an increase in 26.5% with a median change of 90 meters (range, -120 to 365), p 〈 0.001. Overall, 81% (n=18) had improvement in 6MWT distance, 9% (n=2) declined and 9% (n=2) were unchanged. Patients had reassessment of 6MWT a median of 13.5 months from diagnosis. Hematological responses (HR) included CR (36%), VGPR (36%), PR (23%) and SD (5%). HR was not associated with change in 6MWT. Fifty percent (n=11) experienced a cardiac response. By Wilcoxon rank sum test, variables that were associated with improvement in 6MWT included improved BNP, LV EF, troponin I, NYHA class and cardiac response (all p 〈 0.001). The median follow-up of patients was 2.15 years (range, 1.10 - 7.20). By multivariate analysis, patients with a cardiac response had significantly better improvement in 6MWT disease compared with patients without cardiac response (p=0.02). A cardiac response was associated with a median increase of 170 meters of distance traveled by 6MWT when compared with patients having no cardiac response. All other variables tested were not statistically significant. Conclusion: In AL amyloid patients with cardiac involvement, the 6MWT can be used as an objective marker of functional improvement complementing biochemical and imaging parameters of response. Furthermore, treatment of cardiac amyloidosis with contemporary standard regimens has a major impact on the disease process by a number of objective parameters. Patients experiencing a cardiac response had substantial improvements in 6MWT. The 6MWT should be incorporated in trials of patients with cardiac amyloid. Disclosures Cornell: Prothena: Research Funding.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Hematology
    Publication Date: 2015
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 3
    In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 126, No. 23 ( 2015-12-03), p. 5363-5363
    Abstract: Introduction Proteasome inhibitors (PI) bortezomib (B) and carfilzomib (C) are cornerstone therapies for multiple myeloma (MM). An increased incidence of PI-induced cardiac adverse events (CAEs) has been reported in patients receiving C. However, risk factors for cardiac toxicity in this population remain unclear. Our objective is to evaluate the incidence of CAEs associated with C compared with B and identify risk factors for developing events. Patients and Method This was a retrospective analysis of 96 consecutive patients treated for MM at Vanderbilt University from 2011 to 2014 who received B (n=44) and/or C (n=52). Patients in the C group had been previously treated with B, whereas patients in the B group did not have exposure to C. No patients studied were included in both cohorts. We evaluated the clinical features and frequency of CAEs (grade II-IV heart failure, acute coronary syndrome, left ventricular dysfunction, atrial fibrillation/flutter, thromboembolism, systemic hypertension, pulmonary hypertension, orthostatic hypotension, or sudden cardiac death). To identify factors that predisposed patients to CAEs, we analyzed duration of PI therapy, 10-year atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) risk (calculated risk of myocardial infarction or stroke), gender, use of antithrombotic (antiplatelet/anticoagulant) and antihypertensive medications, prior history of cardiac events, and disease cytogenetic profile. Patients with a prior history of cardiac events were followed by a cardio-oncologist during the course of treatment. Results Table 1 shows patient characteristics. Twenty-five patients experienced CAEs (B, 13% (n=12); C, 25% (n=13)). Cumulative incidence (CI) of CAEs was not significantly different in patients on C compared with B (log-rank test P = 0.41) (Figure 1). Heart failure was the most common type of CAE (Table 2). CAEs occurred after a median of 90 days (range, 4-456) with C and 63.5 days (range, 5-336) with B. By univariate analysis, more patients in the C group were prior smokers, underwent stem cell transplantation and had more prior lines of therapy. More patients in the B group used antithrombotic and ACE inhibitor agents. There were no other significant differences in the use of antihypertensive, antiarrhythmic, and lipid-lowering medications between cohorts. Multivariate analysis showed that male gender (HR 5.3, 95% CI 1.5-18.0, P = 0.007) was an independent risk factor for developing CAEs. Patients taking antithrombotic agents had a lower risk of CAE compared with those not on these therapies (HR 0.1, 95% CI 0.04-0.54, P = 0.004). While ASCVD risk was not predictive of CAEs, patients with a prior history of cardiac events who were followed by a cardio-oncologist experienced fewer CAEs (HR 0.2, 95% CI 0.05-0.72, P = 0.014). Longer duration of PI use resulted in decreasing risk of CAE (HR 0.8, 95% CI 0.7-0.9, P = 0.010). There were no interactions between these outcomes. Conclusions In this series, the incidence of CAEs associated with C did not differ significantly from that of B. We found that events occurred early in therapy. Male gender was an independent risk factor for CAEs. Use of antithrombotic therapy was associated with significantly reduced risk of CAEs. These data suggest that patients may benefit from antithrombotic therapy and follow-up by a cardio-oncologist while on PI therapy, particularly if there is a prior history of cardiac events. Table 1. Bortezomib % (n=44) Carfilzomib % (n=52) P-value ASCVD Risk 0.43 0-10% 46 50 10-20% 29 36 〉 20% 26 14 Male Gender 57 71 0.82 Median Age, y 61 (38-91) 60 (36-86) 0.20 Past Smoker 26 51 0.02 Type II Diabetes 11 17 0.41 Hyperlipidemia 27 27 0.97 Kidney Disease 9 12 0.70 Prior History of Cardiac Event 59 60 0.96 Median Duration on Bortezomib, d 229 203 0.67 Median Duration on Carfilzomib, d 87.5 ACE Inhibitor Use 32 13 0.03 Antithrombotic Use 48 23 0.01 ISS Stage 0.72 III 34 25 FISH Risk 0.13 Standard/Intermediate 93 85 High 7 15 Median Prior Lines of Therapy 0 (0-4) 2 (0-8) 〈 0.001 Stem Cell Transplant 45 65 0.05 Table 2. Cardiac adverse events Bortezomib Carfilzomib P-value Total Cardiac Adverse Events* 19 17 0.08 Heart Failure 9 6 Acute Coronary Syndrome 1 2 Left Ventricular Dysfunction 0 1 Atrial Fibrillation/Flutter 2 2 Thromboembolism 2 2 Systemic Hypertension 3 3 Pulmonary Hypertension 0 1 Orthostatic Hypotension 2 0 Sudden Cardiac Death 0 0 *Some patients had multiple events Figure 1. Cumulative incidence of cardiac adverse events Figure 1. Cumulative incidence of cardiac adverse events Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Hematology
    Publication Date: 2015
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 4
    In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 124, No. 21 ( 2014-12-06), p. 1125-1125
    Abstract: Early lymphocyte recovery (ELC) is associated with improved outcomes of hematologic malignancies after autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (auto-SCT). ELC, its composition and impact on outcome depends on many variables; however there is limited data on ELC after different mobilization strategies (G-CSF [G] vs. G + high dose cyclophosphamide [GC] vs. G + plerixafor [GP]). Results from a recent study showed that GP based mobilization can affect the number and subsets of immune competent cells contained in the graft. We studied whether these differences are associated with immune reconstitution (ELC), engraftment, or long-term outcomes. We retrospectively identified patients undergoing auto-SCT at the Nashville VA Transplant Center between January 2000 and December 2010 in our CIBMTR database. Disease response was determined by standard CIBMTR response criteria. At our center, GP mobilization is reserved for patients who failed prior mobilization, to rescue G or GC mobilization, or as upfront usage in heavily pre-treated patients. Our patient cohort primarily included patients with multiple myeloma (MM) and lymphoma (LY). We had evaluable data on 333 patients (MM=196; LY=127; others=10). Comparative analysis of different mobilization methods are summarized in Table 1. Median number of regimens pre-SCT for MM was 2 (range 1-5) and for lymphoma 2 (range1-7). Among LY patients, 60 (47.3%) patients were in complete remission (CR), 58 (45.7%) in partial remission (PR) and 9 (7%) had stable disease (SD). Among MM patients, 69 (35.2%) were in CR or very good partial remission (VGPR) pre-transplant, 105 (53.5%) were in PR, and 14 (7.1%) had SD. There was no significant difference between disease response status among different mobilization methods for either the MM or LY patients. A higher absolute WBC count was seen in grafts after GP mobilization compared to G or GC (p=0.01), despite a majority of patients having received GP mobilization after failed G or GC mobilization, or as a rescue regimen (n=20 [89%]). Similarly, absolute lymphocyte counts were higher in grafts mobilized after GP compared to G or GC (p=0.01). All patients engrafted and there was no difference in time to WBC or platelet engraftment between mobilization methods. Although the GP cohort was more heavily treated than the other cohorts ( 〉 2 regimens for GP 82%, vs. G 72% vs. GC 58% [p=0.02]), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) of G vs. GC vs. GP at 2-years was not significantly different between MM and LY cohorts (Table 1). In summary, grafts mobilized with GP exhibited major differences in graft composition in conjunction with favorable post- transplant outcomes compared with grafts mobilized with G or GC. GP mobilization accelerated lymphocyte engraftment in this heavily treated group compared to G or GC. For patients proceeding to transplant heavily pre-treated, GP is a better mobilization method to ensure a robust graft is collected while avoiding the need for multiple stem cell collections and providing similar outcomes as patients less heavily treated and mobilized by G or GC. A prospective randomized controlled trial would elucidate whether progression free survival and overall survival might be improved by utilizing GP mobilization as a first-line therapy rather than as a rescue method. Table 1. Graft composition and outcomes of different stem cell mobilization methods Variable G (n=97) GC (n=213) GP (n=23) P value Numbers of regimens pre-SCT, median 2.2 (95% CI, 2.0-2.4) 1.9 (1.8-2.0) 2.3 (1.9-2.7) 0.02 WBC in graft, median (range) 184.8 (12-777.7) 138.6 (11-542) 286.1 (186-400.3) 0.01 Absolute lymphocyte in graft (x103), median (range) 128.1 (13-321.1) 73.9 (3.4-433.6) 161.2 (47.4-302.0) 0.01 ANC 〉 500 (days), median (range) 16 (11-25) 15 (7-86) 18 (13-24) 0.16 Platelets 〉 20 (days), median (range) 13 (9-22) 12 (7-18) 12 (10-21) 0.07 OS (2 year) Lymphoma 74.5 77.9 72.7 0.054 Multiple myeloma 89.6 74.4 72 0.76 PFS (2 year) Lymphoma 58.2 57.6 46.1 0.1 Multiple myeloma 66.3 49 60 0.21 Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Hematology
    Publication Date: 2014
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 5
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    OMICS Publishing Group ; 2015
    In:  Journal of Blood Disorders & Transfusion Vol. 06, No. 02 ( 2015)
    In: Journal of Blood Disorders & Transfusion, OMICS Publishing Group, Vol. 06, No. 02 ( 2015)
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 2155-9864
    Language: Unknown
    Publisher: OMICS Publishing Group
    Publication Date: 2015
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. Further information can be found on the KOBV privacy pages