Kooperativer Bibliotheksverbund

In: Blood Advances, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 6, No. 1 ( 2022-01-11), p. 327-338

Abstract: Lymphoma represents a heterogeneous hematological malignancy (HM), which is characterized by severe immunosuppression. Patients diagnosed of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) during the course of HM have been described to have poor outcome, with only few reports specifically addressing lymphoma patients. Here, we investigated the clinical behavior and clinical parameters of a large multicenter cohort of adult patients with different lymphoma subtypes, with the aim of identifying predictors of death. The study included 856 patients, of whom 619 were enrolled prospectively in a 1-year frame and were followed-up for a median of 66 days (range 1-395). Patients were managed as outpatient (not-admitted cohort, n = 388) or required hospitalization (n = 468), and median age was 63 years (range 19-94). Overall, the 30- and 100-days mortality was 13% (95% confidence interval (CI), 11% to 15%) and 23% (95% CI, 20% to 27%), respectively. Antilymphoma treatment, including anti-CD20 containing regimens, did not impact survival. Patients with Hodgkin’s lymphoma had the more favorable survival, but this was partly related to significantly younger age. The time interval between lymphoma diagnosis and COVID-19 was inversely related to mortality. Multivariable analysis recognized 4 easy-to-use factors (age, gender, lymphocyte, and platelet count) that were associated with risk of death, both in the admitted and in the not-admitted cohort (HR 3.79 and 8.85 for the intermediate- and high-risk group, respectively). Overall, our study shows that patients should not be deprived of the best available treatment of their underlying disease and indicates which patients are at higher risk of death. This study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04352556.

Type of Medium: Online Resource

ISSN: 2473-9529 , 2473-9537

URL: Article

DOI: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2021005691

Language: English

Publisher: American Society of Hematology

Publication Date: 2022

detail.hit.zdb_id: 2876449-3

In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 138, No. Supplement 1 ( 2021-11-05), p. 2496-2496

Abstract: Introduction: We recently demonstrated in a large multicentre study that sGA can identify fit older patients with aggressive lymphoma able to tolerate first-line intensive treatment with curative intent and to obtain similar results than younger people (Merli at al JCO 2021). Regardless of age, about 40% of patients with aggressive lymphoma are either refractory or will eventually relapse after treatment with curative intent. Salvage platinum-based regimens followed by ASCT in responsive disease is a standard of care to obtain longer second remission. However, in many case series, patients over 65 years are excluded from the transplant approach because of potential severe toxicities of high-dose therapy in older patients. This study was designed to evaluate the feasibility and activity of high-dose treatment followed by ASCT in older FIT patients with R/R aggressive lymphoma selected with a sGA. Methods: Patients with R/R aggressive lymphoma after one line of treatment, aged between 65 and 75, and FIT to sGA were eligible for the study. Salvage treatment could be chosen between R-DHAP, R-ICE or other platinum or gemcitabine-containing regimens and stem cells were mobilized after 1 or 2 cycles. Patients achieving at least partial response after 3 courses and who remained FIT to sGA evaluation were eligible for ASCT and were conditioned with either BEAM or FEAM. Results: From May 2014 to August 2019, seventy-five patients from 16 FIL centres were enrolled and 70 were eligible for the study. Sixty-six of them had a diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, one had follicular 3b, 2 mantle cell and 1 Burkitt histology. Salvage treatment was R-DHAP in 48 patients, R-ICE in seven and gemcitabine or oxalyplatinum containing regimens in the remaining ones. Overall response rate after three courses was 44% (21 complete and 10 partial remission). Among the 39 unresponsive patients, 29 had progressive and 4 stable disease, 2 patients died of septic shock and heart failure during salvage and 4 patients withdrew their consent to ASCT. Four patients relapsed soon after response achievement before undergoing the transplant. ASCT was performed in 27 patients with a median of 5.6 x 10 6 CD34/Kg reinfused. No differences emerged in demographic and clinical characteristics between patients reaching the ASCT timepoint or not (Tab 1a). By intention to treat analysis, 2-y overall survival (OS) and PFS of the entire intention-to-treat population were 65% (95%CI: 50-76%) and 34% (95%CI: 22-46%) respectively, without differences according to age (Tab 1b). After a median of 27 months, 2-y OS was 79% (95CI: 51-86%) and EFS 56% (95CI: 32-75%). Twenty-four patients obtained a complete remission (CR) and 20 of them are in continuous CR after more than 12 months. Three patients progressed 1-8 months after ASCT and died. Most common non-hematologic grade 3-4 adverse events were gastrointestinal (10%) and infectious (8%). Conclusion: This study shows that sGA can identify older patients with R/R aggressive lymphoma who are able to tolerate and can benefit from high-dose therapy and ASCT. The poor response to second-line immunochemotherapy remains the major drawback of this approach since less than 50% of patients could actually receive ASCT. Nevertheless the 2-y survival of 65% in the intention to treat population is remarkable and sets the stage for the evaluation of new approaches such as CAR-T or bispecific antibodies also in older patients. A next step should be to explore the usefulness of sGA in the selection of candidates to these innovative treatments. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Tucci: Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Gentili: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Musuraca: janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; incyte: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Cavallo: ROCHE: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Servier: Speakers Bureau; Gilead: Speakers Bureau. Zilioli: Roche, Italfarmaco: Consultancy, Honoraria; MSD, Janssen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel, Accommodations; Gentili, Takeda, Gilead, Servier: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Other: travel expenses, accommodation. Merli: EUSA Pharma: Other: Travel, Accomodations, Expenses; Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel, Accomodations, Expenses; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel, Accomodations, Expenses; MSD: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Gilead Science: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel, Accomodations, Expenses; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel, Accomodations, Expenses; Celgene: Other: Travel, Accomodations, Expenses. Marcheselli: sandoz: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Rossi: Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Alexion: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Astellas: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy, Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Jazz: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sanofi: Honoraria; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Type of Medium: Online Resource

ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020

URL: Article

DOI: 10.1182/blood-2021-149649

Language: English

Publisher: American Society of Hematology

Publication Date: 2021

detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3

detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7

In: The Lancet Haematology, Elsevier BV, Vol. 7, No. 10 ( 2020-10), p. e737-e745

Type of Medium: Online Resource

ISSN: 2352-3026

URL: Article

DOI: 10.1016/S2352-3026(20)30251-9

Language: English

Publisher: Elsevier BV

Publication Date: 2020

In: Clinical Lymphoma Myeloma and Leukemia, Elsevier BV, Vol. 18, No. 10 ( 2018-10), p. e401-e419

Type of Medium: Online Resource

ISSN: 2152-2650

URL: Article

DOI: 10.1016/j.clml.2018.06.018

Language: English

Publisher: Elsevier BV

Publication Date: 2018

detail.hit.zdb_id: 2540998-0

detail.hit.zdb_id: 2193618-3

In: Bone Marrow Transplantation, Springer Science and Business Media LLC, Vol. 50, No. 2 ( 2015-02), p. 282-288

Type of Medium: Online Resource

ISSN: 0268-3369 , 1476-5365

URL: Article

DOI: 10.1038/bmt.2014.231

Language: English

Publisher: Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Publication Date: 2015

detail.hit.zdb_id: 2004030-1

In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 138, No. Supplement 1 ( 2021-11-05), p. 4391-4391

Abstract: Background: Inotuzumab-ozogamicin (IO) is one of the drugs of choice for relapse/refractory (R/R) acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). Patients who received IO in a clinical trial had a CR rate of approximately 81% and a median overall survival of approximately 8 months, superior to best available therapy and numerically comparable with blinatumomab. Toxicities were generally manageable, veno-occlusive disease/ sinusoidal obstruction syndrome (VOD/SOS) was reported as a rare adverse event possibly linked to the drug that require attention, especially during hematopoietic stem cell transplant after IO. Data on IO effectiveness in the real-life setting are generally lacking, for the low incidence of the disease and the high number of possible therapies that are emerging. Methods: INO-CD22 (NCT03898128) is a real-life study collecting data on safety, effectiveness and indirect costs of IO therapy in R/R ALL. Twenty-four Italian institutions enrolled patients who received IO in the post-market expanded access program or with national health system reimbursement. This study was approved by the ethical committee (Prot.9296/2018). Here we present preliminary results of effectiveness and treatment emergent toxicity. Results: From 2014, we collected data of 65 patients who received IO and were evaluable for effectiveness and toxicity. Median age at start of IO was 47 years (IQR 27-61), 35 patients (53.9%) were male, 14 (21.5%) had Ph+ ALL. 12 patients (18.5%) received IO after 1 previous line of therapy, 16 (24.6%) after 2 previous lines, and 37 (56.9%) after more than 2 lines. In our patient set, 37 (56.9%) patients received IO after blinatumomab failure and 24 (36.9%) after an allogenic HSCT. Nine patients (13.8%) received IO after an history of mild to moderate liver-related adverse events. Median number of IO courses administered was 1 (IQR 1-2). Three patients do not complete course 1, as they died for infection (2) and cerebral hemorrhage (1). Of the 60 patients who were alive after a course of IO, 56 have evaluable data, 47 (83.9%) obtained a complete remission with IO. Particularly, CR was obtained in 9/11 (81.8%), 11/15 (73.3%), and 27/30 (90.0%) evaluable patients who received IO as a 1 st, 2 nd or & gt;2 nd salvage, respectively. Twenty-four out of 30 (80.0%) evaluable patients who received IO after blinatumomab failure and 17/18 (94.5%) patients who already received an HSCT achieve CR with IO. With a median follow-up of 25.7 months (95% C.I. 19.8-34.3), median OS was 7.5 months (95% C.I. 5.8-10.0). Median OS was 7.5 months (95% C.I. 2.7-18.6), 9.0 months (95% C.I. 5.8-15.8), and 6.4 months (95% C.I. 4.5-12.8) in patients who received one previous line of treatment, two lines of treatment, and more than two lines of treatment, respectively (figure A). Median PFS was 4.1 months (95% C.I. 0.1-13.21), 6.7 months (95% C.I. 0.1-12.4), and 5.0 months (95% C.I. 3.12-7.9) in patients who received one previous treatment line, two previous lines, and more than two lines, respectively. Patients who received IO after blinatumomab failure had a median OS of 6.0 months (figure C, 95% C.I. 4.7-9.3). Patients who received IO after an HSCT had a median OS of 6.4 months (figure C, 95% C.I. 3.1-24.7). Twenty-five patient (38.5%) received an HSCT after IO therapy, of 22 (88.0 %) in CR, and 1 (6.7%) after further salvage therapies (chemotherapy). During IO therapy, 1 treatment related toxic death and 1 treatment related VOD/SOS, 1 grade 5 infection (AE), 9 grade 3-4 AEs, and 25 grade 1-2 AEs were noted. The most common AEs during IO therapy were Thrombocytopenia (reported in 7 (10.8%) of patients), infections (reported in 6 (9.2%) of patients) and liver tox adverse events (reported in 6 (9.2%) of patients). Overall, 7 VOD-SOS were reported, and the incidence was higher during transplant. Conclusions: Our data confirm in the real-life setting the great effectiveness of IO in term of CR. OS was comparable with data reported in clinical trials, even in a patient population that was not selected with inclusion criteria. OS and CR rate was not dramatically diminished in patients who already received HSCT nor in patients who already received blinatumomab. Safety of IO treatment was confirmed. IO is an easy-to-administer and safe therapy with a very high rate of expected CR in all the contexts and that confer promising expectation of survival. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Papayannidis: Novartis: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria; AbbVie: Honoraria; Astellas: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria. Fracchiolla: Amgen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Jazz: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Gilead: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Abbvie: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Di Raimondo: Amgen: Honoraria; AbbVie: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria; Jazz Pharmaceutical: Honoraria; Janssen Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria; Bristol Myers Squibb: Honoraria. Lanza: Pfizer: Research Funding; Abbvie: Consultancy; Jazz: Consultancy; Sanofi: Consultancy. Borlenghi: Amgen, Janssen: Consultancy. Sica: Pfizer: Honoraria. Corradini: AbbVie, ADC Theraputics, Amgen, Celgene, Daiichi Sankyo, Gilead/Kite, GSK, Incyte, Janssen, KyowaKirin, Nerviano Medical Science, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi, Takeda: Honoraria; AbbVie, ADC Theraputics, Amgen, Celgene, Daiichi Sankyo, Gilead/Kite, GSK, Incyte, Janssen, KyowaKirin, Nerviano Medical Science, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi, Takeda: Consultancy; KiowaKirin; Incyte; Daiichi Sankyo; Janssen; F. Hoffman-La Roche; Kite; Servier: Consultancy; Amgen; Takeda; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel and accommodations; Novartis; Gilead; Celgene: Consultancy, Other: Travel and accommodations; BMS: Other: Travel and accommodation; Sanofi: Consultancy, Honoraria; Incyte: Consultancy; Novartis, Janssen, Celgene, BMS, Takeda, Gilead/Kite, Amgen, AbbVie: Other: travel and accomodations. Luppi: Abbvie: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; Sanofi: Honoraria; MSD: Honoraria; Gilead Science: Honoraria, Other: Travel grant; Daiichi-Sankyo: Honoraria; Jazz Pharma: Honoraria. Pane: Novartis Pharma SAS;: Research Funding; AbbVie; Amgen; Novartis: Other: Travel, accommodation, expenses; AbbVie; Amgen; Novartis, GSK, Incyte: Speakers Bureau; AbbVie; Amgen; Novartis, GSK , Incyte: Consultancy. Passamonti: Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; AbbVie: Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Martinelli: Stemline Therapeutics: Consultancy; Astellas: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Roche: Consultancy; Incyte: Consultancy; Celgene /BMS: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Abbvie: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Daichii Sankyo: Consultancy; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy.

Type of Medium: Online Resource

ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020

URL: Article

DOI: 10.1182/blood-2021-149157

Language: English

Publisher: American Society of Hematology

Publication Date: 2021

detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3

detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7

In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 128, No. 22 ( 2016-12-02), p. 4161-4161

Abstract: From November 2012 to July 2014, brentuximab vedotin (BV) was available in Italy for patients with relapsed Hodgkin's lymphoma (HL) outside a clinical trial context based on a local disposition of the Italian Drug Agency (AIFA) issued according to a national law (Law 648/96: "medicinal products that are provided free of charge on the national health service"). A large Italian observational retrospective study was conducted on the use of BV in the everyday clinical practice to check if clinical trial results are confirmed even in a real life context. Primary endpoint was the best response; secondary endpoints were the overall response rate at the end of the treatment, duration of response, survival and the safety profile. BV was infused intravenously at the dose of 1.8 mg/kg every 3 weeks. A total of 234 HL patients were treated in 40. All patients had histologically documented CD30+ HL; 49% had relapsed and 51% had refractory disease. Patients were heavily pretreated with a median of 3 previous therapies (including autologous stem cell transplant [SCT] in the 69% of cases). Best response was observed after a median of 4 cycles in 140 patients (59.8%): 74 (31.6%) patients obtained a complete response (CR) and 66 (28.2%) achieved a partial response (PR); overall response rate at the end of the treatment was 48.3% (62 CR and 51 PR). The best response rate was higher in the elderly subset ( 〉 60 years): 14 (50%) CR and 5 (17.8%) PR. Disease free survival was 26.3% at 29 months and progression free survival 31.9% at 55 months. We identified 30 long term responders (patients with a response ≥ 12 months) of whom 18 are still in CR, 7 with a consolidative SCT and 11 without any consolidative procedure. Duration of response did not differ who achieved at least PR and then either did or did not undergo consolidative SCT. All patients were included in the safety profile for the analysis; in general, the treatment was well tolerated in everyday clinical practice and the toxicity profile was closely similar to the previously published data; no death has been linked to BV-induced toxicity. This preliminary analysis could indicate that BV displays a number of features favoring its use as a bridge to transplant in patients with active disease who achieve a suboptimal response to salvage treatment. Even in a real life context, BV induces clinical responses quite rapidly, i.e. within the first 4 cycles in most responders, thus permitting the timely application of the transplantation phase. BV displays a favorable toxicity profile, without overlapping toxicities with most of the agents employed in high-dose conditioning regimens. Furthermore, for HL patients ineligible for transplant or for who transplant failed, may represent a feasible effective therapeutic option. Disclosures Rusconi: Janssen: Consultancy, Other: Congress attendance; Teva: Consultancy, Other: Congress attendance; Takeda: Consultancy. Spina:Teva Pharmaceuticals Industries: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Speaker Fee; Mundipharma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Speaker Fee. Zinzani:Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; MorphoSys: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celegene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Type of Medium: Online Resource

ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020

URL: Article

DOI: 10.1182/blood.V128.22.4161.4161

Language: English

Publisher: American Society of Hematology

Publication Date: 2016

detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3

detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7

In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 110, No. 11 ( 2007-11-16), p. 3692-3692

Abstract: Purpose- Emerging evidence suggests that stem and progenitor cells derived from bone marrow can improve cardiac function and perhaps outcome in patients after acute myocardial infarction (AMI). In this single-centre randomised trial, we evaluated whether intracoronary transfer of autologous bone-marrow stem cells can affect not only global left ventricular (LV) function (nuclear scintigraphy) but also autonomic control (heart rate variability, HRV) and baroreflex sensitivity (BRS) at 12 months’ follow-up. Methods- After successful percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and residual LV dysfunction, 33 patients were randomly assigned to either a control group (n=17) that received optimum postinfarction treatment, or a bone-marrow-stem-cell group (n=16) that received optimum treatment plus intracoronary infusion of autologous bone-marrow stem cells 4±1 days after PCI. Test analyses were done by two investigators blinded for treatment assignment. Results- Global LVEF at baseline (determined 3±1 days after PCI) was 36.2±9.4 in controls and 35.1±9.8 in the bone-marrow cell group (P=NS). After 12 months, mean global LVEF had increased by 25% in the control group but 41% in the treated group with an anti-remodeling effect in the latter: LVEDV increased by 12% in the control vs 2% in the treated group (P & lt;0.05). This was associated with improved HRV (SD −20ms vs +644 ms in the treated group P & lt;0.01), particularly in the parasympathetic-related oscillation (HF +85.7±216 ms vs. +289.3±366 ms) and higher BRS (+3.4±11.7 vs +8.7±6.3 ms/mmHg) (control vs treated, P & lt;0.05 in all comparisons). Cell transfer did not increase the risk of adverse clinical events, in-stent restenosis, or proarrhythmic effects. In 12 months follow-up 4 exitus (24%) were observed in the control group vs. only 1 (6%) in the treated group Conclusions- The improvement of left-ventricular systolic function and prognosis in AMI patients by intracoronary transfer of autologous bone-marrow-cells may be mediated by higher vagal tone. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00437710).

Type of Medium: Online Resource

ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020

URL: Article

DOI: 10.1182/blood.V110.11.3692.3692

Language: English

Publisher: American Society of Hematology

Publication Date: 2007

detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3

detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7

In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 132, No. Supplement 1 ( 2018-11-29), p. 2890-2890

Abstract: Background and aims The amount of clinical and biological data stored within clinical trials is growing exponentially. Data warehousing (DW) is useful for systematic global evaluation of information collected in trials: the highly translational FIL(Fondazione Italiana Linfomi)-MCL0208 trial has been used to test DW to improve data quality and to discover putative associations [Zaccaria, ASH 17]. In this study we developed an engineered prognostic model, focusing on easily accessible clinical variables. For this purpose, we exploited hierarchical clustering with the aim of seeking hidden patterns of interest in large datasets. Hence, these tools allowed to develop a novel prognostic model: the engineered MIPI index (e-MIPI). Herein we present the first results, on baseline clinical characteristics:clustering analysis and definition of a signature of predictive variablesconstruction of the e-MIPI to detect patients' risk of relapsecomparison with known prognostic indexes for MCLvalidation of the signature on independent subset of patients. Methods Data were retrieved from electronic case report forms of the phase III, multicenter FIL-MCL0208 trial (NCT02354313) for younger MCL patients [Cortelazzo, EHA 15]. The study enrolled 300 subjects, with median followup of 51 months. In this work we employed baseline clinical data and May '18 as survival outcomes cut-off. For the present analysis, we started from 32 baseline features: 7 were not eligible due to number of missing values (MVs ≥40). Features with 〈 15 MVs were imputed by median of observations. Secondly, 18 not binary variables were dichotomized, to be compared to the 7 binary ones: normal vs abnormal range or lower vs higher than a recognized cut-off value. Patients were thus split in 2 subsets, training (n=185) and validation (n=115): for the training set, only patients with no MVs were chosen. Clustering analysis was performed to discriminate different groups of patients. Thus, we applied a recursive feature reduction, according to regression modeling, to extrapolate a restricted signature predictive of both progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Survival analyses were done according to e-MIPI classes via both multivariate Cox and Kaplan-Maier modeling. Therefore, the e-MIPI classification was compared to known prognostic models [Hoster, Blood 08]. Finally, the signature was tested on the validation set: if any variable of the e-MIPI was missing (MVs=36, 29 and 15 for albumin - alb, Ki67 and flowcytometric peripheral blood invasion - flowpb) data mining (K-nn) technique was employed for imputation. Clustering and statistical analyses were implemented via MATLAB© and SPSS©. Results Training set: the clustering analysis allowed to define 3 groups of subjects: C1 (n=71), C2 (n=77) and C3 (n=37), showing significantly different PFS and OS. Thus, the e-MIPI index was modeled based on a signature of 9 significant features (fig 1): histologic bone marrow infiltration (bminf), flowpb, Ki67, B symptoms, platelets (plts), ldh, white blood cells (wbc), hemoglobin (hb) and alb levels. The re-clustering of the training set according to the e-MIPI confirmed the original patients clustering with 83% of accuracy. Figure 2A depicts the PFS curves stratified for the e-MIPI: C1, C2 and C3 groups have been renamed as low (L), intermediate (I) and high (H) e-MIPI risk classes, respectively. Each comparison reached the statistical significancy: I vs L, p=0.010; H vs I, p=0.023, outperforming in our series both the MIPI-St (H vs I risk, p=0.801) and MIPI-Bio (I vs L risk, p=0.665, fig. 2B) classifications. Validation set: the e-MIPI allowed to discriminate 3 groups of subjects C1 (n=32), C2 (n=59) and C3 (n=24). Actually, the e-MIPI on the validation set (fig. 2C) confirmed the results of the training set, overall improving the MIPI-St stratification (H vs I, p=0.059 ⇒ p=0.049), even if without reaching the statistical significancy on the I vs L comparison (p=0.24 ⇒ p=0.15), due to the limited number of events in this series. Discussion e-Mipi is a new first prognostic index derived from hierarchical clustering. Our results indicate that this approach might allow to model engineered prognostic indexes based on comprehensive analysis of large datasets. Even if promising, it needs validation through its application to independent series of MCL patients. Additional efforts aiming at integrating biological variables in the model are ongoing. Disclosures Gaidano: Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Morphosys: Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria. Ladetto:Celgene: Honoraria; Sandoz: Honoraria; Jannsen: Honoraria; Roche: Honoraria; Abbvie: Honoraria; Acerta: Honoraria.

Type of Medium: Online Resource

ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020

URL: Article

DOI: 10.1182/blood-2018-99-114168

Language: English

Publisher: American Society of Hematology

Publication Date: 2018

detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3

detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7

In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 118, No. 21 ( 2011-11-18), p. 1782-1782

Abstract: Abstract 1782 The aims of LE.P.RE. study include the identification of clinical and biological factors associated with clinical response and toxicity of lenalidomide monotherapy in relapsed/refractory CLL patients enrolled from 9 Italian centers. Lenalidomide treatment schedule starts with 5 mg daily and increases of 5 mg daily every two weeks, up to 25 mg daily or maximum tolerated dose. Therapy is scheduled to be administered for 12 courses (1 course = 4 weeks) unless disease progression or excessive toxicity are observed. Here we show preliminary results about the first 20 enrolled patients up to the 4th treatment course. Patients received a mean daily lenalidomide dose of 8 mg in the 1st course, 10 mg in the 2nd, 14 mg in the 3rd and 4th. Four patients left the study at the 1st course (1 acute renal failure ARF, 1 infection, 1 second neoplasia likely related to CLL, 1 consent withdrawal) and 3 patients at the 3rd (1 Tumor Flare Reaction TFR, 1 infection, 1 thrombocytopenia). The observed toxicities are listed in Table 1. After the 4th course, 13 patients were evaluable for response: 9 partial response (PR), 3 progressive disease (PD) and 1 stable disease (SD) [ORR 69%]. Table 1 Hematological and extra hematological toxicities (n° tot cases=20) grade n° cases grade n° cases Thrombocytopenia 03/04/11 7 TLS 2 1 Neutropenia 03/04/11 14 TFR 1-2 4 Anemia 03/04/11 2 Second Neoplasia 1 Death 1 ARF 02/03/11 3 Infection 03/04/11 3 We compared the levels of several cytokines measured by ELISA in plasma of the 20 patients at baseline and day+8 of therapy. We observed a significant increase of IL2 Receptor (mean 55,31 vs 112,14 ng/ml; p 〈 0,001), IL2 (14,15 vs 17,27 pg/ml; p=0,019), CCL3 (5,21 vs 21,23 pg/ml; p 〈 0,001), CCL4 (24,76 vs 72,99 pg/ml; p=0,003), IL10 (2,65 vs 6,33 pg/ml; p=0,001), IL1b (0,94 vs 2,77 pg/ml; p=0,048), TNFa (35,00 vs 140,59 pg/ml; p 〈 0,001) and IL8 (0,31 vs 3,50 pg/ml; p=0,037) and a decrease of Thrombospondin 1 (693 vs 488 ng/ml; p=0,037). Interestingly, we found that IL1b level decreased from baseline to day+8 in the 4 non responder (PD+SD) patients while increasing in the 9 responder (PR) patients. Moreover, we found that the 5 patients that experienced TFR or tumor lysis syndrome TLS had significantly higher CCL3 level at baseline than the other 15 patients (p=0,025). We also studied peripheral blood cell subsets (T, B, NK, monocyte, dendritic and endothelial cells) in the 20 patients by flow cytometry. From baseline to day+8 we observed a significant increase of the Thelper1/Thelper2 ratio (p 〈 0,001), T cytotoxic1/Tcytotoxic2 ratio (p=0,001) and memory T cells % (p 〈 0,001) as well as a decrease of naïve T cells % (p 〈 0,001) and mean CD69 expression on T cells (p=0,016). Moreover, the expression of CD40 (p=0,001), CD80 (p=0,018), CD86 (p=0,003) and CD95 (p=0,008) were found to be increased on B-CLL cells. Finally, we observed a decrease of endothelial progenitors cells (EPC) (p=0,032) and live circulating endothelial cells (CEC) (p 〈 0,001) and an increase of dead CEC (p 〈 0,001). Interestingly, there was a significant difference in activated CEC (mean 53,57 vs 81,63 CEC %; p=0,031) and resting CEC (46,54 vs 18,37; p=0,031) at baseline between responders and non responders, respectively. Moreover, the patients exhibiting TFR or TLS showed a higher % of CD4+CD3+ cells (p=0,009) and CD4+CD8+ cells (p=0,036) at day+8 than the others. In conclusion: (i) the increase of inflammatory cytokines IL2R, IL2, CCL3, CCL4, IL10, IL1b and TNFa observed from baseline to day+8 suggests that lenalidomide can induce immune activation; (ii) the augmentation of IL2, IL2R and memory T cells and the decrease of naïve T cells noticed from baseline to day+8 indicate that lenalidomide can promote T cell activation; (iii) the shift toward Thelper1 and Tcytotoxic1 phenotypes and the increased expression of co-stimulatory molecules on B-CLL cells observed from baseline to day+8 suggest that lenalidomide can promote an active T cell response against leukemic cells; (iv) the alterations in EPC and CEC noticed from baseline to day+8 suggest that lenalidomide may also have an anti angiogenic action. Moreover, our preliminary data seem to show interesting biological differences among CLL patients that respond or do not respond to lenalidomide treatment, which if replicated in additional patients and with increasing time on therapy could give important information for predicting which patients may best respond to therapy or may experience TFR or TLS. Disclosures: Maffei: CELGENE CORPORATION: Research Funding. Off Label Use: Lenalidomide, a thalidomide analogue, is an immunomodulatory drug (IMiD) with antitumoural activity reported in various malignant disorders including multiple myeloma and myelodysplastic syndrome. At preclinical level, lenalidomide has shown to decrease the production of several prosurvival cytokines. This drug is also reported to modulate an effector cell immune response through the activation of T and natural killer cells, inducing apoptosis directly on tumour cells. Currently available data indicate that lenalidomide is active also in heavily pre-treated CLL patients. However, in order to reduce toxicity and to optimize the therapeutic index of lenalidomide treatment in CLL patients, it is necessary to identify features of tumour cells that differ between responder and non responder patients. Hence, we propose a multicenter, phase II study designed in order to identify potential predictive factors correlating with response and toxicity to Lenalidomide treatment in relapsed/refractory CLL patients. Martinelli:CELGENE CORPORATION: Research Funding. Debbia:CELGENE CORPORATION: Research Funding. Rigolin:CELGENE CORPORATION: Research Funding. Rizzotto:CELGENE CORPORATION: Research Funding. Castelli:CELGENE CORPORATION: Research Funding. Bonacorsi:CELGENE CORPORATION: Research Funding. Bulgarelli:CELGENE CORPORATION: Research Funding. Fiorcari:CELGENE CORPORATION: Research Funding. Zucchini:CELGENE CORPORATION: Research Funding. Santachiara:CELGENE CORPORATION: Research Funding. Forconi:CELGENE CORPORATION: Research Funding. Rossi:CELGENE CORPORATION: Research Funding. Laurenti:CELGENE CORPORATION: Research Funding. Palumbo:CELGENE CORPORATION: Research Funding. Vallisa:CELGENE CORPORATION: Research Funding. Cuneo:CELGENE CORPORATION: Research Funding. Gaidano:CELGENE CORPORATION: Research Funding. Luppi:CELGENE CORPORATION: Research Funding. Marasca:CELGENE CORPORATION: Research Funding.

Type of Medium: Online Resource

ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020

URL: Article

DOI: 10.1182/blood.V118.21.1782.1782

Language: English

Publisher: American Society of Hematology

Publication Date: 2011

detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3

detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7