In:
ELECTROPHORESIS, Wiley, Vol. 30, No. S1 ( 2009-06)
Abstract:
In order to overcome the limitations of carrier ampholyte generated pH gradients, IPGs were developed in the late 1970s. However, the 2‐DE pattern we included in the first publication on IEF with IPGs [Bjellqvist et al ., J. Biochem. Biophys. Methods 1982, 6 , 317–339] was far from being competitive to O'Farrell's high‐resolution 2‐DE with carrier ampholytes. Our 2‐DE pattern in this article was, more or less, only a proof of principle. It was, however, the beginning of a long journey of stepwise improved 2‐DE protocols we developed in our laboratory and summarized in the reviews published in Electrophoresis 1988, 9 , 531–546 and in Electrophoresis 2000, 21 , 1037–1053. Milestones were the design of the IPG strip, and the “reduction‐alkylation equilibration protocol” of IPG strips after IEF for the efficient transfer of proteins from first to second dimension. The protocol of 2‐DE with IPGs has been constantly refined, e.g . by the generation of tailor‐made IPGs with different pH intervals from the acidic to the basic extremes (pH 2.5–12), and extended separation distances for improved resolution. In the present review, a historical outline from the technical difficulties encountered during the development of 2‐DE with IPGs, to the establishment of the actual “standard protocol” will be given, as well as the modified procedures for the separation of very acidic, very alkaline, low‐abundance and hydrophobic proteins, followed by a brief discussion of the advantages and technical challenges of gel‐based proteomic technologies.
Type of Medium:
Online Resource
ISSN:
0173-0835
,
1522-2683
DOI:
10.1002/elps.v30.10s
DOI:
10.1002/elps.200900051
Language:
English
Publisher:
Wiley
Publication Date:
2009
detail.hit.zdb_id:
1475486-1
SSG:
12
Bookmarklink