In:
PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science (PLoS), Vol. 16, No. 12 ( 2021-12-23), p. e0259996-
Abstract:
To evaluate (1) the relationship between heating, ventilation, and air conditioning (HVAC) systems and bioaerosol concentrations in hospital rooms, and (2) the effectiveness of laminar air flow (LAF) and high efficiency particulate air (HEPA) according to the indoor bioaerosol concentrations. Methods Databases of Embase, PubMed, Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, and Web of Science were searched from 1st January 2000 to 31st December 2020. Two reviewers independently extracted data and assessed the quality of the studies. The samples obtained from different areas of hospitals were grouped and described statistically. Furthermore, the meta-analysis of LAF and HEPA were performed using random-effects models. The methodological quality of the studies included in the meta-analysis was assessed using the checklist recommended by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Results The mean CFU/m 3 of the conventional HVAC rooms and enhanced HVAC rooms was lower than that of rooms without HVAC systems. Furthermore, the use of the HEPA filter reduced bacteria by 113.13 (95% CI: -197.89, -28.38) CFU/m 3 and fungi by 6.53 (95% CI: -10.50, -2.55) CFU/m 3 . Meanwhile, the indoor bacterial concentration of LAF systems decreased by 40.05 (95% CI: -55.52, -24.58) CFU/m 3 compared to that of conventional HVAC systems. Conclusions The HVAC systems in hospitals can effectively remove bioaerosols. Further, the use of HEPA filters is an effective option for areas that are under-ventilated and require additional protection. However, other components of the LAF system other than the HEPA filter are not conducive to removing airborne bacteria and fungi. Limitation of study Although our study analysed the overall trend of indoor bioaerosols, the conclusions cannot be extrapolated to rare, hard-to-culture, and highly pathogenic species, as well as species complexes. These species require specific culture conditions or different sampling requirements. Investigating the effects of HVAC systems on these species via conventional culture counting methods is challenging and further analysis that includes combining molecular identification methods is necessary. Strength of the study Our study was the first meta-analysis to evaluate the effect of HVAC systems on indoor bioaerosols through microbial incubation count. Our study demonstrated that HVAC systems could effectively reduce overall bioaerosol concentrations to maintain better indoor air quality. Moreover, our study provided further evidence that other components of the LAF system other than the HEPA filter are not conducive to removing airborne bacteria and fungi. Practical implication Our research showed that HEPA filters are more effective at removing bioaerosols in HVAC systems than the current LAF system. Therefore, instead of opting for the more costly LAF system, a filter with a higher filtration rate would be a better choice for indoor environments that require higher air quality; this is valuable for operating room construction and maintenance budget allocation.
Type of Medium:
Online Resource
ISSN:
1932-6203
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0259996
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0259996.g001
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0259996.g002
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0259996.g003
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0259996.g004
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0259996.g005
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0259996.g006
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0259996.g007
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0259996.g008
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0259996.t001
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0259996.t002
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0259996.t003
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0259996.t004
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0259996.t005
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0259996.t006
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0259996.t007
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0259996.t008
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0259996.t009
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0259996.s001
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0259996.s002
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0259996.s003
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0259996.s004
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0259996.s005
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0259996.s006
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0259996.r001
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0259996.r002
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0259996.r003
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0259996.r004
Language:
English
Publisher:
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Publication Date:
2021
detail.hit.zdb_id:
2267670-3
Bookmarklink