Kooperativer Bibliotheksverbund

In: Clinical Cancer Research, American Association for Cancer Research (AACR), Vol. 14, No. 23 ( 2008-12-01), p. 7924-7929

Abstract: Purpose: This study aimed to assess the safety and feasibility of administering volociximab, a chimeric monoclonal antibody that specifically binds to α5β1 integrin, and to determine the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and preliminary evidence of antitumor activity. Experimental Design: Patients with advanced solid malignancies were treated with escalating doses of volociximab i.v. administered over 60 minutes. Blood samples were assayed to determine plasma pharmacokinetic parameters, detect human antichimeric antibody formation, and determine the saturation of α5β1 sites on peripheral blood monocytes. Results: Twenty-one patients received 223 infusions of volociximab at doses ranging from 0.5 to 15 mg/kg i.v. on days 1, 15, 22, 29, and 36; and weekly thereafter. Treatment was well tolerated, and dose-limiting toxicity was not identified over the range examined. Mild (grade 1 or 2), reversible fatigue was the principal toxicity of volociximab at the highest dose levels of 10 and 15 mg/kg. Nausea, fever, anorexia, headache, vomiting, and myalgias were mild and infrequent, and there was no hematologic toxicity. Volociximab had biexponential distribution; clearance was inversely related to increasing dose, and the half-life at 15 mg/kg was estimated as being 30 days. Three patients tested positive for anti-volociximab antibodies. Saturation of monocyte α5β1 integrin sites was dose-dependent up to 15 mg/kg. There was one minor response (renal, 7 months) and one durable stable disease (melanoma, 14 months). Conclusions: Volociximab can be safely administered at 15 mg/kg i.v. per week. The absence of severe toxicities and preliminary activity at the highest dose level warrants further disease-directed studies.

Type of Medium: Online Resource

ISSN: 1078-0432 , 1557-3265

URL: Article

DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-08-0378

Language: English

Publisher: American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)

Publication Date: 2008

detail.hit.zdb_id: 1225457-5

detail.hit.zdb_id: 2036787-9

In: Cancer Research, American Association for Cancer Research (AACR), Vol. 71, No. 8_Supplement ( 2011-04-15), p. 4716-4716

Abstract: Background: The RAS/RAF/MEK/ERK signaling pathway, which is deregulated in a variety of tumor types, plays a major role in mediating cell growth and differentiation. GDC-0973 is a potent, selective, orally bioavailable MEK1/2 inhibitor which has shown antitumor activity in preclinical models. Methods: A phase I dose-escalation study using a 3+3 design was initiated in patients (pts) with solid tumors to evaluate the safety and pharmacokinetic (PK) characteristics of GDC-0973. FDG-PET was evaluated as a pharmacodynamic (PD) marker. Pts were treated QD with oral GDC-0973 on a 21-day on/7-day off (21/7) or a 14-day on/14-day off (14/14) dosing schedule. Serial plasma samples for GDC-0973 pharmacokinetic (PK) analysis were collected following first dose (Day 1) and last dose (Day 21 or Day 14, respectively) in Cycle 1. At expansion stages, pts with RAS or RAF mutant tumors were treated at the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of the 21/7 or 14/14 schedule, and underwent serial FDG-PET scans (baseline, C1D10-14 (steady state) and C1D26-28 (trough). Results: In the 21/7 dose escalation, 36 pts enrolled in eight successive cohorts (0.05 mg/kg-80 mg). Dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) reported were Grade 4 hepatic encephalopathy (40 mg), Grade 3 diarrhea (80 mg) and Grade 3 rash (60 mg and 80 mg). On a 21/7 dosing schedule, the MTD was 60 mg, and the most frequent adverse events (AE) attributed to GDC-0973 by the investigator were diarrhea, rash, nausea, fatigue, dry skin, and edema. In the 14/14 dose escalation, 16 pts enrolled in four successive cohorts (60-125 mg). The DLTs reported were Grade 3 rash (125 mg) and Grade 3 blurred vision associated with presence of reversible subretinal fluid (125 mg). On a 14/14 dosing schedule, the MTD was 100 mg, and the most frequent AEs attributed to GDC-0973 by the investigator were diarrhea, rash, pruritus, nausea, vomiting, blurred and impaired vision, fatigue, and abdominal pain. Preliminary GDC-0973 PK data showed dose-proportional increases in Cmax and AUC, and a mean elimination half-life of approximately 40 hours. With daily oral dosing, there was approximately 2.5-fold accumulation, consistent with the GDC-0973 half-life and dosing interval. Of 17 patients in the 21/7 cohort with PET scans read to date, 9 (53%) had a partial metabolic response ( & gt; 20% decrease in mean SUVmax from baseline) in at least one timepoint. Of 6 patients in the 14/14 cohort with PET scans read to date, 5 (83%) had a partial metabolic response in at least one timepoint. Confirmed partial responses were observed in 3 melanoma patients, of which two had BRAFV600E mutation. Six pts with prolonged stable disease (≥ 5 mo) were observed to date. Conclusion: GDC-0973 is generally well tolerated and has signs of antitumor activity. Preliminary analysis indicates GDC-0973 has linear PK with a half-life that allows once daily dosing. Updated data will be presented. Citation Format: {Authors}. {Abstract title} [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 102nd Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2011 Apr 2-6; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2011;71(8 Suppl):Abstract nr 4716. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2011-4716

Type of Medium: Online Resource

ISSN: 0008-5472 , 1538-7445

URL: Article

DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.AM2011-4716

Language: English

Publisher: American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)

Publication Date: 2011

detail.hit.zdb_id: 2036785-5

detail.hit.zdb_id: 1432-1

detail.hit.zdb_id: 410466-3

In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 138, No. Supplement 1 ( 2021-11-05), p. 3534-3534

Abstract: Background: Cirmtuzumab (Cirm) is a humanized monoclonal antibody that inhibits the tumor promoting activity of ROR1 and has demonstrated additive/synergistic activity with many anticancer agents, including ibrutinib (Ibr). Methods: Patients (Pts) with relapsed or refractory (RR) MCL or treatment-naïve (TN) or RR CLL were enrolled. In Part 1 (Dose Escalation), doses of Cirm IV q2wks x5 then q4wks of 2-16 mg/kg and 300 or 600 mg were examined. Safety of Cirm alone was assessed during the first 28 days, then Ibr was started at approved doses for each indication. Cirm 600 mg IV q2wks x3 then q4wks in combination with Ibr starting day 0 was chosen as the recommended dosing regimen for use in Part 2 (Expansion) and Part 3 (CLL only, Cirm/Ibr vs. Ibr). MCL Part 1 is closed, and Part 2 is open for enrollment. CLL Parts 1, 2 & 3 are closed for enrollment. Results: As of 18Jun2021 data cutoff, 28, 34 and 28 pts were treated in MCL Parts 1 & 2, CLL Parts 1 & 2, and CLL Part 3 (Cirm/Ibr (n=18) or Ibr (n=10)). In Parts 1 & 2 MCL, the median number (#) of prior systemic regimens was 1.5 (1-4) including pts relapsing after Ibr (n=4), auto-SCT (n=6), auto-SCT/allo-SCT (n=1), or auto-SCT/CAR-T (n=1). Ki-67 ≥30% and extra-nodal disease was present in 54% and 68% of pts, respectively. The median # of prior systemic regimens for CLL Parts 1 & 2 and CLL Part 3 (RR), was 2 (1-15) including auto-SCT (n=1), and 2 (1-6). Pts entered with Rai staging ≥ Grade 2 in 71% and 64%. Safety (MCL and CLL): Most frequent treatment emergent (TEAEs) (≥30%) for both MCL and CLL pts treated with Cirm/Ibr (N=80), (all grades; regardless of causality) included contusion & fatigue (both 40.0%), and diarrhea (37.5%). Most frequent (≥5%) Grade ≥3 TEAEs, regardless of causality included hypertension (10.0%), fatigue, neutropenia, pneumonia, and atrial fibrillation (all 6.3%), leukocytosis and anemia (both 5.0%). Grade ≥3 TEAEs of myelosuppression, regardless of causality, include anemia (5.0%), thrombocytopenia (1.3%), and neutropenia (6.3%). Most TEAEs in MCL or CLL pts were considered related by Investigator to Ibr alone 64% or 84% vs. Cirm alone 14.3% or 16%. Efficacy (MCL): The best response of 20 evaluable pts in Parts 1 & 2 included CR 35%, PR 45%, SD 10%, and 10% PD. At a median follow-up of 14.9 mos., the objective response rate (ORR), clinical benefit rate (CBR) and median duration of response (DOR) for overall, ≥30% Ki-67, and & gt;1 prior systemic regimen subgroups, were 80%, 90% and (not reached) NR (95% CI: 11.9, NR), 81.8%, 81.8% and 13.8 (95% CI: 8.7, NR), and 90%, 100% and NR (95% CI: 8.7, NR). Responses occurred in all evaluable pts who received prior SCT+/- CAR-T (4CR, 2PR) or prior Ibr (2CR, 2PR). The median PFS (mPFS) for overall, pts achieving CR, and & gt;1 prior systemic regimen subgroups were all NR with varying 95% CI: (16.5, NR), (0.03, NR), and (0.03, NR). Efficacy (CLL): The best response of 34 evaluable pts in Parts 1 & 2 included 94.1% ORR, 11.8% CR, 82.3% PR/PR-L, and 5.9% SD for a CBR of 100%. In Part 3, evaluable Cirm/Ibr TN (n=8) or RR (n=7) and Ibr TN (n=4) or RR (n=3) arms achieved 100% or 85.7% and 100% or 100% ORR, 12.5% or 0% and 0% or 0% CR, 87.5% or 85.7% and 100% or 100% PR/PR-L, 0% or 14.3% and 0% or 0% SD. No pts had PD as best response. All pts had a CBR of 100%. For Parts 1 & 2, at a median follow-up of 24.8 mos., the DOR for overall and & gt;1 prior systemic regimen subgroups, was NR (8.3, 35.9) and NR (12.0, 29.6). In Part 3, at a median follow-up of 14.7 mos., the DOR for TN or RR Cirm/Ibr and Ibr arms is NR (7.7, 18.6) or NR (9.2, 14.8) and NR (11.2, 18.5) or NR (8.3, 14.2). The mPFS (Parts 1 & 2) for overall, pts achieving CR, and & gt;1 prior systemic regimen subgroups were NR (9.1, 35.8), NR (95% CI: 22.5, NR), and NR (9.1, 35.2). In Part 3, mPFS for TN or RR Cirm/Ibr and Ibr arms is all NR. Conclusions: Cirm/Ibr is well-tolerated. ORR, CR, DOR, and mPFS were similar across all subgroups of MCL and CLL pts regardless of number of prior systemic regimens or poor risk factors. Striking responses were observed in patients with MCL as evidenced by a mPFS that was NR (95% CI: 16.5, NR), CR of 35%, and a DOR of NR (95% CI: 11.9, NR) within the study period. These data compare very favorably to the mPFS of 12.8 mos, CR of 20%, and a DOR of 18.6 mos., reported for Ibr alone (Rule 2017). For CLL pts treated with Cirm/Ibr, results continue to be encouraging as they mature. The study is ongoing, with MCL enrollment expanded to include Cirm + Ibr in pts who have had an inadequate response to an Ibr regimen, or who are refractory to approved BTKi agents. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Lee: Oncternal: Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Seagen: Research Funding; BMS: Honoraria, Research Funding; Aptitude Health: Honoraria; Guidepoint: Honoraria; Century Therapeutics: Consultancy; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria. Choi: Abbvie: Other: Institution: Research Grant/Funding; Pharmacyclics: Other: Institution: Research Grant/Funding; Oncternal: Other: Institution: Research Grant/Funding; Velosbio: Other: Institution: Research Grant/Funding; Merck: Other: Institution: Research Grant/Funding; Geron: Other: Institution: Research Grant/Funding. Siddiqi: Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AstraZeneca: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Juno Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; BeiGene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Pharmacyclics LLC, an AbbVie Company: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Kite Pharma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Janssen: Speakers Bureau; Oncternal: Research Funding; TG Therapeutics: Research Funding. Wierda: Acerta Pharma Inc.: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics LLC, an AbbVie Company: Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Research Funding; Cyclacel: Research Funding; Karyopharm: Research Funding; Xencor: Research Funding; Oncternal Therapeutics, Inc.: Research Funding; KITE Pharma: Research Funding; Miragen: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; Gilead Sciences: Research Funding; Juno Therapeutics: Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding; GSK/Novartis: Research Funding; Sunesis: Research Funding; Loxo Oncology, Inc.: Research Funding; Genzyme Corporation: Consultancy; AbbVie: Research Funding. Tuscano: BMS: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding; Acrotech: Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Abbvie: Research Funding. Leslie: Abbvie: Consultancy, Honoraria; PCYC/Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Karyopharm Therapeutics: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; AstraZeneca: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; BeiGene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; ADC Therapeutics: Consultancy; Celgene/BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; TG Therapeutics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Kite, a Gilead Company: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Epizyme: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Seagen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Merck: Consultancy. Breitmeyer: Oncternal Therapeutics: Current Employment, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Yazji: Oncternal Therapeutics: Current Employment. Wang: Oncternal Therapeutics: Current Employment. Wang: OMI: Honoraria; Moffit Cancer Center: Honoraria; Chinese Medical Association: Honoraria; Newbridge Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria; DTRM Biopharma (Cayman) Limited: Consultancy; InnoCare: Consultancy, Research Funding; Scripps: Honoraria; Mumbai Hematology Group: Honoraria; VelosBio: Consultancy, Research Funding; BioInvent: Research Funding; Hebei Cancer Prevention Federation: Honoraria; Epizyme: Consultancy, Honoraria; Anticancer Association: Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Lilly: Research Funding; Physicians Education Resources (PER): Honoraria; Dava Oncology: Honoraria; Clinical Care Options: Honoraria; Molecular Templates: Research Funding; BeiGene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Acerta Pharma: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Imedex: Honoraria; Juno: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Genentech: Consultancy; Loxo Oncology: Consultancy, Research Funding; Kite Pharma: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Miltenyi Biomedicine GmbH: Consultancy, Honoraria; The First Afflicted Hospital of Zhejiang University: Honoraria; Bayer Healthcare: Consultancy; BGICS: Honoraria; CAHON: Honoraria; Oncternal: Consultancy, Research Funding; CStone: Consultancy. Jamieson: Forty Seven Inc.: Patents & Royalties. Kipps: Genentech-Roche: Consultancy; Gilead Sciences: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Roche: Honoraria, Other; MD Anderson Cancer Center: Research Funding; Velos: Research Funding; CRIM: Research Funding; Indy Hematology Review: Other; TG Therapeutics: Other; Verstem: Other, Speakers Bureau; University of California, San Diego: Current Employment; Pharmacyclics/AbbVie: Honoraria, Research Funding; Breast Cancer Research Foundation: Research Funding; SCOR - The Leukemia and Lymphoma Society: Research Funding; National Cancer Institute/NIH: Honoraria, Research Funding; Genentech/Roche: Honoraria; European Research Initiative on CLL (ERIC): Honoraria; Genetech: Honoraria, Other; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other, Research Funding; Bionest Partner: Other; DAVA Pharmaceuticals: Speakers Bureau; DAVAOncology: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other, Speakers Bureau; Oncternal Therapeutics, Inc.: Current holder of stock options in a privately-held company, Other: Stock or other ownership, Patents & Royalties: Cirmtuzumab was developed by Thomas J. Kipps in the Thomas J. Kipps laboratory and licensed by the University of California to Oncternal Therapeutics, Inc., which provided stock options and research funding to the Thomas J. Kipps laboratory., Research Funding; Moores Cancer Center: Current Employment; MedImmune Inc: Research Funding; GlaxoSmithKline: Research Funding; Gilead Sciences, Inc.: Honoraria, Research Funding; Genentech, Inc.: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Pharmacyclics LLC, an Abbvie Company: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel, Accommodations, Expenses, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Celgene Corporation: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Abbott Laboratories: Consultancy, Research Funding.

Type of Medium: Online Resource

ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020

URL: Article

DOI: 10.1182/blood-2021-148779

Language: English

Publisher: American Society of Hematology

Publication Date: 2021

detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3

detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7

In: Investigational New Drugs, Springer Science and Business Media LLC, Vol. 34, No. 5 ( 2016-10), p. 604-613

Type of Medium: Online Resource

ISSN: 0167-6997 , 1573-0646

URL: Article

DOI: 10.1007/s10637-016-0374-3

Language: English

Publisher: Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Publication Date: 2016

detail.hit.zdb_id: 2009846-7

SSG: 15,3

In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 40, No. 16_suppl ( 2022-06-01), p. 7520-7520

Abstract: 7520 Background: Zilovertamab (Zilo) is a humanized monoclonal antibody that inhibits the tumor promoting activity of ROR1 and has demonstrated additive/synergistic activity with many anti-cancer agents, including ibrutinib (Ibr). Methods: Patients (Pts) with relapsed or refractory (RR) MCL or treatment-naïve (TN) or RR CLL were enrolled. In Part 1 (Dose Escalation), multiple doses were examined. Zilo 600 mg IV starting q2wks x3 then q4wks + Ibr qD was selected as the recommended dosing regimen for use in Part 2 (Expansion) and Part 3 (CLL only, Zilo+Ibr vs. Ibr alone). Results: As of 18Jan2022 data cutoff, 26 evaluable RR MCL pts, including pts who received prior Ibr (5) or auto-SCT (7), and 34 evaluable CLL pts (12 TN and 22 RR) were enrolled into Parts 1 & 2. In Part 3, 22 evaluable pts were randomized (2:1) to receive either Zilo+Ibr (15) or Ibr (7). Safety: Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) (≥30%, N = 84), regardless of relationship, included fatigue (41.7%), contusion (39.3%), and diarrhea (38.1%). Most common (≥5%) Grade ≥3 TEAEs included hypertension (10.7%), pneumonia (7.1%), atrial fibrillation, fatigue, and neutropenia (all 6.0%). Grade ≥3 neutrophil decrease observed in 9.4% or 17.6%, platelet decrease in 12.5% or 2.9%, or hemoglobin decrease in 9.4% or 0% of pts with MCL or CLL, respectively in Parts 1 & 2. Investigators scored TEAEs as due to Ibr in 78.1% or 85.3%, or to Zilo in 15.6% or 23.5% of pts with MCL or CLL, respectively. Efficacy (MCL): Objective response rate (ORR) was 80.8% (34.6% CR, 46.2% PR). ORR for pts with prior Ibr was 80% (2CR, 2PR) and median duration of response (mDOR) was 13.7 months (M) (95%CI: 11.93, NE). ORR was 100% in pts who had prior SCT+/- CAR-T (5CR, 2PR), and mDOR was 34.1 M (95% CI 13.84, NE). Overall median PFS (mPFS) was 35.9 M (95% CI: 17.3, NE) at median follow-up of 15.0 M. For MCL pts with TP 53 aberrancy (6), Ki67 〉 30% (13), ≥ 3 prior lines of therapies (4), blastoid histology (3), bulky disease ≥5 cm (4), intermediate MIPIb (6), or high MIPIb (11), the mPFS (in M) was 17.3 (95% CI: 2.85, NE), Not Reached (NR) (95% CI: 2.85, NE), 35.9 (95% CI: 16.52, NE), NR (min 9.18, max 27.87), 26.6 (95% CI: 0.03, NE), 35.9 (min 8.30, max 35.9) or 16.5 (95% CI: 2.72, NE). Efficacy (CLL): In Parts 1 & 2 ORR was 91.2% (8.8% CR, 82.3% PR/PR-L), and 8.8% had stable disease (SD). At median follow-up of 31.4 M, mDOR was 33.5 M and mPFS was NR (95% CI: 36.3, NE); the mPFS (in M) for pts with 1, 2, or ≥ 3 prior therapies was NR (min 19.3, max 41.3), NR (min 31.3, max 36.8) or 36.3 (95% CI: 15.7, NE). At median follow-up of 21.1 M in Part 3, mPFS was NR for TN or RR in both Zilo+Ibr and Ibr arms. Conclusions: Zilo+Ibr is well-tolerated. Striking responses were observed in MCL pts, with mPFS of 35.9 M (95% CI: 17.3, NE) and CR of 34.6%, which compares favorably to mPFS of 12.8 M (95% CI 8.5, 16.6) and CR of 20% reported for single agent Ibr (Rule 2017). For CLL, ORR and PFS compare very favorably to Ibr monotherapy data (Byrd 2019). Clinical trial information: NCT03088878.

Type of Medium: Online Resource

ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755

URL: Article

DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2022.40.16_suppl.7520

Language: English

Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)

Publication Date: 2022

detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5

In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 140, No. Supplement 1 ( 2022-11-15), p. 566-568

Type of Medium: Online Resource

ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020

URL: Article

DOI: 10.1182/blood-2022-167153

Language: English

Publisher: American Society of Hematology

Publication Date: 2022

detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3

detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7

In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 33, No. 15_suppl ( 2015-05-20), p. TPS3633-TPS3633

Type of Medium: Online Resource

ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755

URL: Article

DOI: 10.1200/jco.2015.33.15_suppl.tps3633

Language: English

Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)

Publication Date: 2015

detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5

In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 33, No. 15_suppl ( 2015-05-20), p. 2518-2518

Type of Medium: Online Resource

ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755

URL: Article

DOI: 10.1200/jco.2015.33.15_suppl.2518

Language: English

Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)

Publication Date: 2015

detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5

In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 19, No. 17 ( 2001-09-01), p. 3766-3770

Abstract: PURPOSE: To evaluate the outcome of high-dose chemotherapy (HDCT) and autologous or allogeneic hematopoietic transplantation in patients with peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL) who experienced disease recurrence after prior conventional chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of 36 PTCL patients from the University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center treated between 1989 and 1998 with HDCT and autologous or allogeneic hematopoietic transplantation. RESULTS: A total of 36 patients were studied (29 received autologous transplantation, and seven received allogeneic transplantation). The overall survival rate at 3 years was 36% (95% confidence interval [CI], 23% to 59%), and the progression-free survival (PFS) rate was 28% (95% CI, 16% to 49%). The pretransplant serum lactate dehydrogenase level was the most important prognostic factor for both survival and PFS rates (P 〈 .001). A Pretransplant International Prognostic Index score of ≤ 1 indicated a superior survival rate (P = .036) but not an improved PFS rate. A median follow-up of 43 months (range, 13 to 126 months) showed 13 patients (36%) were still alive with no evidence of disease. CONCLUSION: Our results are comparable to the published data on HDCT in B-cell non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma (NHL) patients despite the fact that patients with PTCL are known to have a worse outcome compared with B-cell NHL patients. Considering the dismal outcome of conventional chemotherapy in PTCL patients, these data suggest the hypothesis that the poor prognostic implication of T-cell phenotyping in NHL might be overcome by frontline HDCT and transplantation.

Type of Medium: Online Resource

ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755

URL: Article

DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2001.19.17.3766

Language: English

Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)

Publication Date: 2001

detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5

In: Expert Opinion on Investigational Drugs, Informa UK Limited, Vol. 11, No. 8 ( 2002-08), p. 1161-1170

Type of Medium: Online Resource

ISSN: 1354-3784 , 1744-7658

URL: Article

DOI: 10.1517/13543784.11.8.1161

Language: English

Publisher: Informa UK Limited

Publication Date: 2002

detail.hit.zdb_id: 2030114-5

SSG: 15,3