Format:
Online-Ressource
Content:
Abstract: To answer the question, "What are the best ways to communicate uncertainties to public audiences, at-risk communities, and stakeholders during public health emergency events?" we conducted a systematic review of published studies, grey literature, and media reports in English and other United Nations (UN) languages: Arabic, Chinese, French, Russian, and Spanish. Almost 11,500 titles and abstracts were scanned of which 46 data-based primary studies were selected, which were classified into four methodological streams: Quantitative-comparison groups; Quantitative-descriptive survey; Qualitative; and Mixed-method and case-study. Study characteristics (study method, country, emergency type, emergency phase, at-risk population) and study findings (in narrative form) were extracted from individual studies. The findings were synthesized within methodological streams and evaluated for certainty and confidence. These within-method findings were next synthesized across methodological streams
Note:
Veröffentlichungsversion
,
begutachtet (peer reviewed)
,
In: Review of Communication Research ; 7 (2019) ; 67-108
Language:
English
DOI:
10.12840/ISSN.2255-4165.019
URN:
urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-61189-5
URL:
https://doi.org/10.12840/ISSN.2255-4165.019
URL:
https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-61189-5
URL:
https://d-nb.info/1187192295/34
URL:
https://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/61189
Bookmarklink