Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
Filter
Type of Material
Type of Publication
Consortium
Language
  • 1
    UID:
    (DE-627)1629636274
    ISSN: 0008-7262
    In: Case Western reserve law review, Cleveland, Ohio : School, 1967, 60(2010), 4, Seite 957-996, 0008-7262
    In: volume:60
    In: year:2010
    In: number:4
    In: pages:957-996
    Language: English
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    UID:
    (DE-627)1830445774
    ISBN: 9781108488570
    In: The Cambridge handbook of disaster law and policy, Cambridge : Cambridge University Press, 2022, (2022), Seite 525-540, 9781108488570
    In: year:2022
    In: pages:525-540
    Language: English
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 3
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Washington, D.C :World Bank,
    UID:
    (DE-602)edocfu_990044055340402883
    Format: XIX, 225 S.
    ISBN: 0821371061 , 9780821371053 , 9780821371060
    Language: English
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 4
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Washington, D.C. : World Bank | [Ann Arbor, Michigan] : [ProQuest]
    UID:
    (DE-603)37951821X
    Format: xix, 225 p.
    ISBN: 9780821371060 , 0821371061
    Note: "Global HIV/AIDS program and legal vice presidency, the World Bank , Includes bibliographical references and index
    Language: English
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 5
    UID:
    (DE-627)1835220401
    Format: 1 Online-Ressource (7 p)
    Content: Potential shortages of medical resources and services related to COVID-19 present government officials and emergency planners with difficult choices. If resources become too scarce, health care professionals and institutions may need to implement triage protocols adopting crisis standards of care. COVID-19 patient surges tested the health care system in March and April 2020, and highlighted the need to prepare to accommodate larger patient capacity in the near future. As a primary consideration, governments and health care institutions should utilize existing powers and resources to avoid shortages and mitigate their severity. If shortages do occur, most states have begun to develop crisis standards of care protocols to assist in making decisions about allocating scarce resources. These protocols attempt to maximize the number of lives saved. Many protocols give priority access to health care and other essential workers. These protocols should be structured to facilitate fair and equitable access, although several have been found to be inconsistent with federal anti-discrimination law. Legal issues that may arise in this context include liability for health care professionals and institutions who decide to not allocate resources to patients who later suffer harm, and civil rights concerns over discrimination in the protocols or their implementation. Liability shields have been put in place by many states to protect health care professionals from lawsuits based on allocation decisions. Federal and state officials should support efforts to clarify and incorporate protections into crisis standards of care plans that prioritize anti-discrimination, fairness, and equity in allocation decision making.This paper was prepared as part of Assessing Legal Responses to COVID-19, a comprehensive report published by Public Health Law Watch in partnership with the de Beaumont Foundation and the American Public Health Association
    Note: In: Burris, S., de Guia, S., Gable, L., Levin, D.E., Parmet, W.E., Terry, N.P. (Eds.) (2020). Assessing Legal Responses to COVID-19. Boston: Public Health Law Watch , Nach Informationen von SSRN wurde die ursprüngliche Fassung des Dokuments July 31, 2020 erstellt
    Language: English
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 6
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Washington, D.C : World Bank
    UID:
    (DE-604)BV049077344
    Format: 1 Online-Ressource (xix, 225 Seiten) , 23 cm
    Edition: Online-Ausg
    ISBN: 0821371061 , 9780821371060
    Note: "Global HIV/AIDS program and legal vice presidency, the World Bank , Includes bibliographical references and index
    Additional Edition: Erscheint auch als Druck-Ausgabe, Paperback ISBN 978-0-8213-7105-3
    Language: English
    URL: Volltext  (URL des Erstveröffentlichers)
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 7
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Washington, D.C : World Bank
    UID:
    (DE-602)b3kat_BV049077344
    Format: 1 Online-Ressource (xix, 225 Seiten) , 23 cm
    Edition: Online-Ausg
    ISBN: 0821371061 , 9780821371060
    Note: "Global HIV/AIDS program and legal vice presidency, the World Bank , Includes bibliographical references and index
    Additional Edition: Erscheint auch als Druck-Ausgabe, Paperback ISBN 978-0-8213-7105-3
    Language: English
    URL: Volltext  (URL des Erstveröffentlichers)
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 8
    UID:
    (DE-627)1790928184
    Format: 1 Online-Ressource (9 p)
    Content: The charges filed by Michigan prosecutors against state public health officials related to the Legionnaires' disease outbreak in Flint raise difficult questions about accountability and responsibility for public health officials. Judging by the facts as alleged in the criminal charges, the circumstances in the Michigan case appear to be extreme and not representative of the usual ways that public health officials make difficult decisions with the public's interest at heart. Accountability is vital, but those concerned with good public health leadership must distinguish between reasonable decisions made in good faith that nevertheless turn out to be incorrect and unreasonable actions that harm public health and deserve accountability. Several viable options exist to achieve accountability when things go wrong and public health decision-making leads to harm
    Note: In: 132 (6) Public Health Reports 676-678 (2017) , Nach Informationen von SSRN wurde die ursprüngliche Fassung des Dokuments July 30, 2017 erstellt
    Language: English
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 9
    UID:
    (DE-627)1792126956
    Format: 1 Online-Ressource (24 p)
    Content: The political acceptance and policy implementation of the right to health long remained uncertain in the United States, leaving it until recently as the only developed nation without policies to realise universal health coverage. By reengaging longstanding debates on government obligations to secure the health of every American, the 2010 Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (Affordable Care Act or ACA) draws on an internationally recognised conception of a human right to health, seeking to progressively realise the ‘highest attainable standard of physical and mental health' through policies that ensure the availability, accessibility, acceptability, and quality of health care. With the US Supreme Court upholding the constitutionality of most key aspects of the Affordable Care Act, this precedent-setting decision has created an imperative for health care reform in the United States and a model for realising universal health coverage pursuant to the right to health. This article examines the evolution, implementation, and implications of US efforts to realise health-related rights through health care policy. In the evolution of norms for health, Part 2 examines the intertwined history of US development of a right to health in international law and implementation through national health care reforms. Culminating in the promulgation of the 2010 Affordable Care Act, Part 3 analyses how this national policy effort corresponds with the principles of the international right to health – even as it neglects any explicit recognition of the right to health. With the Affordable Care Act immediately challenged as a violation of the US Constitution, Part 4 looks to the first major challenges to the Affordable Care Act, analysing the Supreme Court's decision on these challenges. As the Supreme Court has now largely upheld the government's constitutional authority for health care reform, Part 5 considers the continuing challenges to the Affordable Care Act and the precedential impact of this decision on rights-based health reforms throughout the world. This article concludes with a hopeful assessment of the role of the United States as it moves progressively toward universal health coverage and frames an agenda for renewed American participation in global efforts to realise the highest attainable standard of health
    Note: In: 13 Human Rights Law Review (2013) , Nach Informationen von SSRN wurde die ursprüngliche Fassung des Dokuments January 31, 2013 erstellt
    Language: English
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 10
    UID:
    (DE-627)1836819463
    Format: 1 Online-Ressource (12 p)
    Content: Of all the vulnerable groups that face stigmatization in our society, persons with mental disabilities are perhaps the most disadvantaged. The litany of abuses perpetrated against persons with mental disabilities is long and sadly varied. Persons with mental disabilities have been involuntarily confined without due process or adequate cause, subjected to squalid living conditions, denied appropriate care and treatment both within and outside of institutions, and confronted with daunting physical and social barriers that prevent their full participation in society. Moreover, the widespread recognition of this mistreatment has not prevented it from continuing to occur in multiple locations around the world. Despite occasional examples of deep caring and compassion, the vast majority of communities continue to treat persons with mental disabilities according to the hurtful and incorrect stereotypes of incompetency and dangerousness. This article explores the changing norms in mental health systems around the world. Frequently, these systems - and the societies that implement them - fail to protect the health and well-being of persons with mental disabilities. In order to remedy these historical and ongoing problems, mental health policies should incorporate human rights standards and corresponding notions of fairness and justice. More specifically, mental health law and policy should provide due process and humane treatment for persons housed in institutional settings, facilitate individualized mental health care plans and community care wherever possible, and recognize the right to health in the form of public access to mental health care
    Note: In: Georgetown Journal of International Affairs, Vol. 9, pp. 83-92, Winter/Spring 2008 , Nach Informationen von SSRN wurde die ursprüngliche Fassung des Dokuments Winter/Spring 2008 erstellt
    Language: English
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. Further information can be found on the KOBV privacy pages