feed icon rss

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
  • 1
    UID:
    b3kat_BV011399395
    Format: VIII, 406 S. , graph. Darst.
    ISBN: 3540631232
    Language: English
    Subjects: Economics
    RVK:
    Keywords: Verkehr ; Wohlfahrtseffekt ; Verkehr ; Soziale Kosten ; Verkehr ; Mobilität ; Soziale Kosten ; Verkehrspolitik ; Nachhaltigkeit ; Umweltverträglichkeit ; Aufsatzsammlung
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    [Paris] : Joint Transport Research Centre
    UID:
    gbv_61896276X
    Format: Online-Ressource (29 S.) , graph. Darst.
    Series Statement: Discussion paper / Joint Transport Research Centre 2010-6
    Content: Passenger vehicles are a major source of greenhouse gas emissions and prodigious consumers of petroleum, making their fuel economy an important focus of energy policy. Whether or not the market for fuel economy functions efficiently has important implications for both the type and intensity of energy and environmental policies for motor vehicles. There are undoubtedly imperfections in the market for fuel economy but their consequences are difficult to quantify. The evidence from econometric studies, mostly from the US, is reviewed and shown to vary widely, providing evidence for both significant under- and over-valuation and everything in between. Market research is scarce, but indicates that the rational economic model, in general, does not appear to be used by consumers when comparing the fuel economy of new vehicles. Some recent studies have stressed the role of uncertainty and risk or loss aversion in consumers’ decision making. Uncertainty plus loss aversion appears to be a reasonable theoretical model of consumers’ evaluation of fuel economy, with profound implications for manufacturers’ technology and design decisions. The theory implies that markets will substantially undervalue fuel economy relative to its expected present value. It also has potentially important implications for welfare analysis of alternative policy instruments.
    Note: Literaturverz. S. 26 - 29 , Systemvoraussetzungen: Acrobat Reader.
    Language: English
    Keywords: Arbeitspapier ; Graue Literatur
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 3
    UID:
    b3kat_BV047935324
    Format: 1 Online-Ressource (29 Seiten) , 21 x 29.7cm
    Series Statement: OECD/ITF Joint Transport Research Centre Discussion Papers
    Content: Passenger vehicles are a major source of greenhouse gas emissions and prodigious consumers of petroleum, making their fuel economy an important focus of energy policy. Whether or not the market for fuel economy functions efficiently has important implications for both the type and intensity of energy and environmental policies for motor vehicles. There are undoubtedly imperfections in the market for fuel economy but their consequences are difficult to quantify. The evidence from econometric studies, mostly from the US, is reviewed and shown to vary widely, providing evidence for both significant under- and over-valuation and everything in between. Market research is scarce, but indicates that the rational economic model, in general, does not appear to be used by consumers when comparing the fuel economy of new vehicles. Some recent studies have stressed the role of uncertainty and risk or loss aversion in consumers' decision making. Uncertainty plus loss aversion appears to be a reasonable theoretical model of consumers' evaluation of fuel economy, with profound implications for manufacturers' technology and design decisions. The theory implies that markets will substantially undervalue fuel economy relative to its expected present value. It also has potentially important implications for welfare analysis of alternative policy instruments
    Language: English
    URL: Volltext  (URL des Erstveröffentlichers)
    URL: Volltext  (URL des Erstveröffentlichers)
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 4
    Book
    Book
    Washington, D.C. u.a. : American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy
    UID:
    b3kat_BV008622127
    Format: XXVI, 356 S. , graph. Darst.
    ISBN: 0918249171
    Language: English
    Keywords: USA ; Straßenverkehr ; Treibhauseffekt ; Klimaänderung ; Straßenverkehr ; Treibhauseffekt ; Klimaänderung ; Straßenverkehr ; Umweltverschmutzung ; Reduktion ; Konferenzschrift
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 5
    UID:
    b3kat_BV046871815
    Format: 1 Online-Ressource (VIII, 408 p. 6 illus)
    Edition: 1st ed. 1997
    ISBN: 9783642590641
    Content: Modern transportation systems have pervasive and far-reaching effects on society and the environment. Mobility and other benefits of modern transportation arrive with many, serious undesired consequences:deaths and injuries in transport accidents, pollution of air,water and groundwater,noise congestion, greenhouse gas emissions etc. Governments and markets both play critical roles in providing infrastructure and operating and policing transportation systems. As world transport systems expand and become increasingly motorized, the transportation community is searching for transportation systems that are both efficient and sustainable.In this book leading international researchers explore the issues and concepts and define the state of knowledge concerning transportation's full costs and benefits
    Additional Edition: Erscheint auch als Druck-Ausgabe ISBN 9783540631231
    Additional Edition: Erscheint auch als Druck-Ausgabe ISBN 9783642590658
    Language: English
    Subjects: Economics
    RVK:
    Keywords: Verkehr ; Mobilität ; Soziale Kosten ; Verkehrspolitik ; Nachhaltigkeit ; Umweltverträglichkeit ; Verkehr ; Wohlfahrtseffekt ; Aufsatzsammlung
    URL: Volltext  (URL des Erstveröffentlichers)
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 6
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    [Washington, D.C.] :Assessment and Standards Division, Office of Transportation and Air Quality, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,
    UID:
    edoccha_9961073450502883
    Format: 1 online resource (xv, 64 pages) : , digital, PDF file
    Note: Title from title screen (viewed June 23, 2010). , "March 2010." , "EPA-420-R-10-008." , "EPA contract no. DE-AC05-000R22725."
    Language: English
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 7
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    [Washington, D.C.] :Assessment and Standards Division, Office of Transportation and Air Quality, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,
    UID:
    edocfu_9961073450502883
    Format: 1 online resource (xv, 64 pages) : , digital, PDF file
    Note: Title from title screen (viewed June 23, 2010). , "March 2010." , "EPA-420-R-10-008." , "EPA contract no. DE-AC05-000R22725."
    Language: English
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 8
    UID:
    edocfu_9958123292002883
    Format: 1 online resource (29 p. )
    Series Statement: OECD/ITF Joint Transport Research Centre Discussion Papers, no.2010/06
    Content: Passenger vehicles are a major source of greenhouse gas emissions and prodigious consumers of petroleum, making their fuel economy an important focus of energy policy. Whether or not the market for fuel economy functions efficiently has important implications for both the type and intensity of energy and environmental policies for motor vehicles. There are undoubtedly imperfections in the market for fuel economy but their consequences are difficult to quantify. The evidence from econometric studies, mostly from the US, is reviewed and shown to vary widely, providing evidence for both significant under- and over-valuation and everything in between. Market research is scarce, but indicates that the rational economic model, in general, does not appear to be used by consumers when comparing the fuel economy of new vehicles. Some recent studies have stressed the role of uncertainty and risk or loss aversion in consumers’ decision making. Uncertainty plus loss aversion appears to be a reasonable theoretical model of consumers’ evaluation of fuel economy, with profound implications for manufacturers’ technology and design decisions. The theory implies that markets will substantially undervalue fuel economy relative to its expected present value. It also has potentially important implications for welfare analysis of alternative policy instruments.
    Language: English
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 9
    UID:
    almafu_9958123292002883
    Format: 1 online resource (29 p. )
    Series Statement: OECD/ITF Joint Transport Research Centre Discussion Papers, no.2010/06
    Content: Passenger vehicles are a major source of greenhouse gas emissions and prodigious consumers of petroleum, making their fuel economy an important focus of energy policy. Whether or not the market for fuel economy functions efficiently has important implications for both the type and intensity of energy and environmental policies for motor vehicles. There are undoubtedly imperfections in the market for fuel economy but their consequences are difficult to quantify. The evidence from econometric studies, mostly from the US, is reviewed and shown to vary widely, providing evidence for both significant under- and over-valuation and everything in between. Market research is scarce, but indicates that the rational economic model, in general, does not appear to be used by consumers when comparing the fuel economy of new vehicles. Some recent studies have stressed the role of uncertainty and risk or loss aversion in consumers’ decision making. Uncertainty plus loss aversion appears to be a reasonable theoretical model of consumers’ evaluation of fuel economy, with profound implications for manufacturers’ technology and design decisions. The theory implies that markets will substantially undervalue fuel economy relative to its expected present value. It also has potentially important implications for welfare analysis of alternative policy instruments.
    Language: English
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. Further information can be found on the KOBV privacy pages