UID:
almafu_9959245820002883
Format:
1 online resource.
ISBN:
3-89785-858-4
Series Statement:
Logical Analysis and History of Philosophy / Philosophiegeschichte und logische Analyse ; v. 15
Content:
The central aim of this volume is to foster a new understanding of Aristotle’s Sophistical Refutations and thereby to enrich our knowledge of the beginnings of logical analysis. An important service for the scientific community to support this aim is the edition of a new translation of Aristotle’s work into English. The contributions discussing the original work were inspired by a onference in 2009 in Berlin which was the first one exclusively dedicated to Sophistical Refutations of Aristotle and brought together nearly everyone working on the main topics Aristotle deals with in that work. In Aristotle we see the onset of systematic theorizing about argumentation, including an account of the ways in which arguments, despite of being incorrect, may appear to be correct and of the relations between different types of argumentation (in science, in discussions with various purposes, in everyday life), but also of the connections with more general philosophical issues, like the meaning of words and the ontological status of universals. Fallacious Arguments in Ancient Philosophy It is, however, primarily because of its account of argumentation that Aristotle’s Sophistical Refutations, together with the Topics, has caught the attention of those working in the field of argumentation theory. This collection shows that the study of argumentation theory in Ancient Philosophy, and with Aristotle in particular, is in good shape. At least some of the points made in the articles brought together here will withstand scrutiny and will advance our understanding of the beginnings of logical analysis. The authors: Jonathan Adler (†), Susanne Bobzien, Robert Bolton, Luca Castagnoli, Louis-André Dorion, Paolo Fait, Adrian Frey, Pieter Sjoerd Hasper, Wolfgang Kienzler, Colin Guthrie King, Raina Kirchhoff, Ermelinda Valentina di Lascio, Yakir Levin, Christof Rapp, Carrie Swanson - the first translation of Aristotle’s Sophistical Refutations (transl. by P.S. Hasper)
Note:
Cover -- Titel -- Inhalt -- Christof Rapp & -- Pieter Sjoerd Hasper: Introduction -- Aristotles Sophistical Refutations. A Translation. (by Pieter Sjoerd Hasper) -- Ermelinda Valentina di Lascio: The Theoretical Rationale Behind Aristotles Classification of the Linguistic Fallacies in the Sophistical Refutations -- Luca Castagnoli: Aristotle on Begging the Question. Between Dialectic, Logic and Epistemology -- Christof Rapp: Fallacious Arguments in Aristotles Rhetoric II.24 -- Susanne Bobzien: How to Give Someone Horns: Paradoxes of Presupposition in Antiquity -- Colin Guthrie King: False Índoxa and fallacious argumentation -- Carrie Swanson: Aristotles Expansion of the Taxonomy of Fallacy in De Sophisticis Elenchis 8 -- Paolo Fait: The False Validating Premiss in Aristotles Doctrine of Fallacies. An Interpretation of Sophistical Refutations 8 -- Robert Bolton: Dialectic, Peirastic and Scientific Method in Aristotles Sophistical Refutations -- Pieter Sjoerd Hasper: Between Science and Dialectic. Aristotles Account of Good and Bad Peirastic Arguments in the Sophistical Refutations -- Louis-André Dorion: Aristotle and the Socratic elenchos -- History of Philosophy in General - Philosophiegeschichte im Allgemeinen -- Raina Kirchhoff: Zum Begriff der einfachen Supposition im 13. Jhdt -- Yakir Levin: Spinozas Substance Monism -- Jonathan Adler: The Reasoning and Lapses of James The Will to Believe -- Wolfgang Kienzler: The Logical Square and the Table of Oppositions. Five Puzzles about the Traditional Square of Opposition Solved by Taking up a Hint from Frege -- Adrian Frey: Die Verteidigung des Logizismus: Carnaps Versuch von 1930 -- List of Contributors - Liste der Autoren.
Additional Edition:
ISBN 1-336-02654-5
Additional Edition:
ISBN 3-89785-164-4
Language:
English
Bookmarklink
