Kooperativer Bibliotheksverbund

UID:

Format: 1 online resource.

ISBN: 9780197685488

Series Statement: Inalienable rights series

Content: Written by David Pozen, this is an authoritative and first-of-its-kind critical constitutional history of the war on drugs that shows how drug prohibition was shaped by constitutional law, and how constitutional law was shaped by drug prohibition.

Note: Also issued in print: 2024.

Additional Edition: Print version : ISBN 9780197685457

Language: English

DOI: 10.1093/oso/9780197685457.001.0001

URL: Oxford Academic

URL: Volltext  (kostenfrei)

URL: Volltext  (kostenfrei)

URL: kostenfrei

URL: kostenfrei

URL: kostenfrei

URL: Inhaltsverzeichnis

UID:

Format: viii, 341 Seiten

ISBN: 9780231184984 , 9780231184991

Note: Includes index

Additional Edition: Erscheint auch als Online-Ausgabe ISBN 978-0-231-54580-8

Language: English

Subjects: Law

Keywords: USA ; USA Freedom of Information Act ; Informationsfreiheit ; Geschichte ; Aufsatzsammlung ; Aufsatzsammlung

URL: Inhaltsverzeichnis

UID:

Format: 1 online resource

ISBN: 9780231551991

Content: Americans of all political persuasions fear that “free speech” is under attack. This may seem strange at a time when legal protections for free expression remain strong and overt government censorship minimal. Yet a range of political, economic, social, and technological developments have raised profound challenges for how we manage speech. New threats to political discourse are mounting—from the rise of authoritarian populism and national security secrecy to the decline of print journalism and public trust in experts to the “fake news,” trolling, and increasingly subtle modes of surveillance made possible by digital technologies.The Perilous Public Square brings together leading thinkers to identify and investigate today’s multifaceted threats to free expression. They go beyond the campus and the courthouse to pinpoint key structural changes in the means of mass communication and forms of global capitalism. Beginning with Tim Wu’s inquiry into whether the First Amendment is obsolete, Matthew Connelly, Jack Goldsmith, Kate Klonick, Frederick Schauer, Olivier Sylvain, and Heather Whitney explore ways to address these dangers and preserve the essential features of a healthy democracy. Their conversations with other leading thinkers, including Danielle Keats Citron, Jelani Cobb, Frank Pasquale, Geoffrey R. Stone, Rebecca Tushnet, and Kirsten Weld, cross the disciplinary boundaries of First Amendment law, internet law, media policy, journalism, legal history, and legal theory, offering fresh perspectives on fortifying the speech system and reinvigorating the public square.

Note: Frontmatter -- , CONTENTS -- , INTRODUCTION -- , 1. IS THE FIRST AMENDMENT OBSOLETE? -- , 2. FROM THE HECKLER’S VETO TO THE PROVOCATEUR’S PRIVILEGE -- , 3. STRAINING (ANALOGIES) TO MAKE SENSE OF THE FIRST AMENDMENT IN CYBERSPACE -- , 4. INTERMEDIARY IMMUNITY AND DISCRIMINATORY DESIGNS -- , 5. THE DE-AMERICANIZATION OF INTERNET FREEDOM -- , 6. CRISIS IN THE ARCHIVES -- , 7. AUTHORITARIAN CONSTITUTIONALISM IN FACEBOOKLAND -- , CONTRIBUTORS -- , INDEX , In English.

Language: English

Subjects: Political Science

Keywords: Aufsatzsammlung

DOI: 10.7312/poze19712

URL: https://doi.org/10.7312/poze19712

URL: https://www.degruyter.com/isbn/9780231551991

URL: https://doi.org/10.7312/poze19712

URL: https://www.degruyter.com/isbn/9780231551991

URL: lizenzpflichtig

URL: lizenzpflichtig

URL: Cover

URL: Inhaltsverzeichnis

UID:

Format: ix, 396 Seiten

ISBN: 9780231197137 , 9780231197120

Content: "Americans of all political persuasions fear that "free speech" is under attack. This may seem strange at a time when legal protections for free expression remain strong and overt government censorship minimal. Yet a range of political, economic, social, and technological developments have raised profound challenges for how we manage speech. New threats to political discourse are mounting-from the rise of authoritarian populism and national security secrecy to the decline of print journalism and public trust in experts to the "fake news," trolling, and increasingly subtle modes of surveillance made possible by digital technologies. The Perilous Public Square brings together leading thinkers to identify and investigate today's multifaceted threats to free expression. They go beyond the campus and the courthouse to pinpoint key structural changes in the means of mass communication and forms of global capitalism. Beginning with Tim Wu's inquiry into whether the First Amendment is obsolete, Matthew Connelly, Jack Goldsmith, Kate Klonick, Frederick Schauer, Olivier Sylvain, and Heather Whitney explore ways to address these dangers and preserve the essential features of a healthy democracy. Their conversations with other leading thinkers, including Danielle Citron, Jelani Cobb, Frank Pasquale, Geoffrey Stone, Rebecca Tushnet, and Kirsten Weld, cross the disciplinary boundaries of First Amendment law, internet law, media policy, journalism, legal history, and legal theory, offering fresh perspectives on fortifying the speech system and reinvigorating the public square"--

Note: This volume grew out of, and includes, a series of papers entitled "Emerging threats" published from September 2017 to October 18 at the website of the Knight First Amendment Institute at Columbia University--ECIP Introduction , Includes bibliographical references and index

Additional Edition: ISBN 9780231551991

Additional Edition: Erscheint auch als Online-Ausgabe The perilous public square New York : Columbia University Press, 2020

Additional Edition: Erscheint auch als Online-Ausgabe The perilous public square New York : Columbia University Press, 2020 ISBN 9780231551991

Language: English

Subjects: Political Science

Keywords: USA ; Redefreiheit ; Grundrecht ; Aufsatzsammlung

URL: Inhaltsverzeichnis

UID:

Format: 27, [14] S. , graph. Darst. , 22 cm

Series Statement: Working paper series / National Bureau of Economic Research 12932

Note: Literaturverz. S. 22 - 25

Additional Edition: Erscheint auch als Online-Ausgabe

Language: English

URL: Volltext  (kostenfrei)

UID:

Format: 1 online resource (352 pages)

ISBN: 0-231-54580-0

Content: Today, transparency is a widely heralded value, and the U.S. Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) is often held up as one of the transparency movement’s canonical achievements. Yet while many view the law as a powerful tool for journalists, activists, and ordinary citizens to pursue the public good, FOIA is beset by massive backlogs, and corporations and the powerful have become adept at using it for their own interests. Close observers of laws like FOIA have begun to question whether these laws interfere with good governance, display a deleterious anti-public-sector bias, or are otherwise inadequate for the twenty-first century’s challenges.Troubling Transparency brings together leading scholars from different disciplines to analyze freedom of information policies in the United States and abroad—how they are working, how they are failing, and how they might be improved. Contributors investigate the creation of FOIA; its day-to-day uses and limitations for the news media and for corporate and citizen requesters; its impact on government agencies; its global influence; recent alternatives to the FOIA model raised by the emergence of “open data” and other approaches to transparency; and the theoretical underpinnings of FOIA and the right to know. In addition to examining the mixed legacy and effectiveness of FOIA, contributors debate how best to move forward to improve access to information and government functioning. Neither romanticizing FOIA nor downplaying its real and symbolic achievements, Troubling Transparency is a timely and comprehensive consideration of laws such as FOIA and the larger project of open government, with wide-ranging lessons for journalism, law, government, and civil society.

Note: Frontmatter -- , Contents -- , Acknowledgments -- , Introduction: Troubling Transparency / , PART I. FOIA'S HISTORICAL AND CONCEPTUAL FOUNDATIONS -- , 1. How Administrative Opposition Shaped the Freedom of Information Act / , 2. Positive Rights, Negative Rights, and the Right to Know / , 3. FOIA as an Administrative Law / , PART II. FOIA AND THE NEWS MEDIA -- , 4. The Other FOIA Requesters / , 5. State FOI Laws: More Journalist-Friendly, or Less? / , 6. FOIA and Investigative Reporting: Who's Asking What, Where, and When-and Why It Matters / , PART III. THEORIZING TRANSPARENCY TACTICS -- , 7. The Ecology of Transparency Reloaded / , 8. Monitoring the U.S. Executive Branch Inside and Out: The Freedom of Information Act, Inspectors General, and the Paradoxes of Transparency / , 9. Output Transparency vs. Input Transparency / , 10. Open Data: The Future of Transparency in the Age of Big Data / , 11. Striking the Right Balance: Weighing the Public Interest in Access to Agency Records Under the Freedom of Information Act / , PART IV. COMPARATIVE PERSPECTIVES -- , 12. The Global Influence of the United States on Freedom of Information / , 13. Transparency as Leverage or Transparency as Monitoring? U.S. and Nordic Paradigms in Latin America / , 14. Structural Corruption and the Democratic-Expansive Model of Transparency in Mexico / , List of Contributors -- , Index , Issued also in print. , In English.

Additional Edition: ISBN 0-231-18498-0

Language: English

DOI: 10.7312/poze18498

UID:

Format: 1 online resource (ix, 396 pages)

ISBN: 0-231-55199-1

Content: Americans of all political persuasions fear that “free speech” is under attack. This may seem strange at a time when legal protections for free expression remain strong and overt government censorship minimal. Yet a range of political, economic, social, and technological developments have raised profound challenges for how we manage speech. New threats to political discourse are mounting—from the rise of authoritarian populism and national security secrecy to the decline of print journalism and public trust in experts to the “fake news,” trolling, and increasingly subtle modes of surveillance made possible by digital technologies.The Perilous Public Square brings together leading thinkers to identify and investigate today’s multifaceted threats to free expression. They go beyond the campus and the courthouse to pinpoint key structural changes in the means of mass communication and forms of global capitalism. Beginning with Tim Wu’s inquiry into whether the First Amendment is obsolete, Matthew Connelly, Jack Goldsmith, Kate Klonick, Frederick Schauer, Olivier Sylvain, and Heather Whitney explore ways to address these dangers and preserve the essential features of a healthy democracy. Their conversations with other leading thinkers, including Danielle Keats Citron, Jelani Cobb, Frank Pasquale, Geoffrey R. Stone, Rebecca Tushnet, and Kirsten Weld, cross the disciplinary boundaries of First Amendment law, internet law, media policy, journalism, legal history, and legal theory, offering fresh perspectives on fortifying the speech system and reinvigorating the public square.

Note: Includes index. , Frontmatter -- , CONTENTS -- , INTRODUCTION -- , 1. IS THE FIRST AMENDMENT OBSOLETE? -- , 2. FROM THE HECKLER’S VETO TO THE PROVOCATEUR’S PRIVILEGE -- , 3. STRAINING (ANALOGIES) TO MAKE SENSE OF THE FIRST AMENDMENT IN CYBERSPACE -- , 4. INTERMEDIARY IMMUNITY AND DISCRIMINATORY DESIGNS -- , 5. THE DE-AMERICANIZATION OF INTERNET FREEDOM -- , 6. CRISIS IN THE ARCHIVES -- , 7. AUTHORITARIAN CONSTITUTIONALISM IN FACEBOOKLAND -- , CONTRIBUTORS -- , INDEX , In English.

Additional Edition: ISBN 0-231-19712-8

Language: English

DOI: 10.7312/poze19712