Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
  • 1
    In: Annals of Oncology, Elsevier BV, Vol. 26, No. 4 ( 2015-04), p. 822-825
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0923-7534
    Language: English
    Publisher: Elsevier BV
    Publication Date: 2015
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2003498-2
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    In: European Journal of Cancer, Elsevier BV, Vol. 82 ( 2017-09), p. 16-24
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0959-8049
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: Elsevier BV
    Publication Date: 2017
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1120460-6
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468190-0
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 82061-1
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 3
    In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 122, No. 21 ( 2013-11-15), p. 3036-3036
    Abstract: Recent data from phase III clinical trials showed that in previously untreated patients (pts) with indolent (low-grade) non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma (iNHL) bendamustine plus rituximab (BR) resulted in superior progression-free survival (STiL NHL 1-2003) and non-inferior response rates (STiL NHL 1-2003 and BRIGHT) compared to R-CHOP. Since clinical trials are restricted to highly selected pts, we here investigated effectiveness of BR and R-CHOP in unselected pts treated in routine practice by German office-based haematologists. Methods The open, longitudinal, multicentre, clinical registry on lymphoid neoplasms (TLN Registry, ClinicalTrial.gov registry NCT00889798) prospectively collects data on the treatment of pts with lymphoid B-cell neoplasms as administered by a network of German office-based haematologists. Pts are followed for 5 years. A broad set of data regarding patient and tumour characteristics, comorbidities, all systemic treatments and response rates, progression-free survival and overall survival are recorded. Automated plausibility and completeness checks with subsequently generated queries by the electronic data capture system ensure data reliability. In addition, data managers regularly check for plausibility and issue queries. Since May 2009, 111 sites have recruited a total of 2897 pts. Results 633 pts with iNHL (52% follicular, 13% mantle cell lymphoma), recruited at the onset of their 1st-line therapy and treated with BR (82%) or R-CHOP (18%), were included in this analysis. The choice of the regimen was upon the decision of the treating physician in accordance with the patient´s informed consent. Pts were median 69 years (yrs) old (range 24-93 yrs), 54% were male, 55% had tumour stage IV (Ann Arbor), 24% presented with B symptoms, 25% with bulky disease, and 61% with at least one comorbidity. Clinical and tumour characteristics differed between pts receiving BR or R-CHOP: Pts treated with BR were older (median 70 vs. 61 yrs; p 〈 0.0001), presented more often with stage IV disease (59% vs. 40%; p=0.0002) or comorbidities (63% vs. 50%; p=0.009), whereas pts treated with R-CHOP were more often diagnosed with follicular lymphoma (72% vs. 48%; p 〈 0.0001) and presented more frequently with bulky disease (39% vs. 21%; p=0.0003). Objective response rate (ORR) as assessed by the local site was comparable between the two regimens: 91% of pts receiving BR (39% complete response (CR)) and 94% receiving R-CHOP (43% CR) responded to 1st-line therapy. Both regimens were applied with median 6 cycles. In univariate analyses young age, male sex, follicular subtype and absence of comorbidities were significantly associated with an objective clinical response to the 1st-line regimen. In a multiple logistic regression analysis adjusted for type of 1st-line regimen (BR vs. R-CHOP) and age at the onset of therapy, the likelihood for response was lower for older pts (OR=0.96; p=0.017), while the type of 1st-line regimen had no effect (OR=1.19; p=0.738). At this point, the small number of non-responders (n=36) precluded analyses of more than two potential confounders. After a median follow-up of 15 months (maximum 39 mth), 94% of pts receiving BR are alive and 4% received 2nd-line therapy. In pts receiving R-CHOP 91% are alive and 9% pts received 2nd-line therapy. Overall, 4% are lost to follow-up. Conclusion Our data show that previously untreated pts with iNHL receiving BR or R-CHOP in routine practice differ, with BR preferentially given to pts with a less favourable prognostic profile. Nevertheless, response rates to 1st-line treatment with BR or R-CHOP appeared to be comparable. These results support response data from the NHL 1-2003 (StiL) and the BRIGHT study. BR: bendamustine + rituximab ± prednisone │ R-CHOP: cyclophosphamide + doxorubicin + vincristine ± prednisone + rituximab Disclosures: Knauf: Mundipharma, Janssen, Roche Pharma: Consultancy, Honoraria.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Hematology
    Publication Date: 2013
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 4
    In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 118, No. 21 ( 2011-11-18), p. 4606-4606
    Abstract: Abstract 4606 Introduction: The treatment of patients with Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL) has changed significantly over the last years. To select an appropriate treatment, multiple factors have to be considered. In particular, the stage of disease, patient’s age, comorbidities and personal preferences, respectively, influence decision making. The clinical tumor registry on lymphoid neoplasms (TLN Registry) conducted by the iOMEDICO AG in collaboration with the Arbeitskreis Klinische Studien (AKS) and the Kompetenznetz Maligne Lymphome (KML) was established to collect data on the daily practice treatment of 3000 non-selected patients with lymphoid neoplasms. Here, we present data regarding treatment and sequences of regimes in patients (pts) with CLL treated by office-based hematologists in Germany. Methods: While targeting 500 CLL pts, the registry prospectively collects data on pts characteristics, tumor history, treatment, response rates and sequences of regimes. In addition data on adverse drug reactions and concomitant diseases are documented. CLL pts older than 18 years receiving a first- or second line therapy which has started no longer than 4 weeks before patient enrolment can be recruited into the registry if informed written consent is present. All pts are followed for 5 years. Currently, 116 sites across Germany are participating. Results: The TLN Registry started in May 2009. Currently, 492 pts with CLL have been recruited. The mean age at the start of first line therapy is 69 years. The majority of pts (63%) are male. About 20% of the pts in first line therapy are treated within clinical trials. Median time between diagnosis and start of first line therapy is 22 months (range 0 – 285 months). Most of the pts receive Bendamustine/Rituximab (BR, 34%) or Fludarabin/Cyclophosphamide/Rituximab (FCR, 21%) in first line therapy. Overall, 97% of the first line therapies were successful (91% CR/PR, 6% SD). In particular, 99% of BR (98% CR/PR, 1% SD) and 100% of FCR (98% CR/PR, 2% SD) therapies were successful. Over time, a change in treatment selection becomes apparent. 50% of the pts started first line therapy before October 2009. They mainly received BR (19%), Bendamustine (16%), FCR (16%) or Chlorambucil (15%), respectively. Pts starting first line therapy after October 2009 mainly received BR (43%) or FCR (24%). Bendamustine-containing regimens are more often used as first line therapy in pts older than 75 years as compared to younger ones (62% vs. 42%). Fludarabine-containing regimens are more often used in pts younger than 75 years (37% vs. 6%). Similar to the first line therapy, BR is the most often used second line therapy (52%). About 41% of the pts have completed first line therapy and have not yet started second line therapy. The median treatment-free interval since the end of the first line therapy is 10 months. Data on second line therapy are available in 24% of the pts. The majority of these pts (73%) were recruited at the start of second line therapy. Most of them receive BR as second line therapy after first line therapy either with Chlorambucil (17%) or Bendamustine (13%). The median treatment-free interval between the end of first line therapy and the start of second line therapy is 16 months (range 1 – 49 months). Conclusion: The registry provides an overview on particularities and changes in routine treatment of pts with CLL treated by office-based hematologists in Germany. Implementation of new standards affecting treatment preferences are currently under evaluation. BR and FCR are widely accepted and very effective as first line therapies. Our data indicate that age is an important factor for selecting the appropriate treatment. Further analyses will investigate additional variables influencing the choice of treatment. With more data becoming available the sequences of regimes and their effectiveness can be analyzed. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Hematology
    Publication Date: 2011
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 5
    In: Clinical Lymphoma Myeloma and Leukemia, Elsevier BV, Vol. 22, No. 8 ( 2022-08), p. e777-e787
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 2152-2650
    Language: English
    Publisher: Elsevier BV
    Publication Date: 2022
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2540998-0
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2193618-3
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 6
    In: Hematological Oncology, Wiley, Vol. 33, No. 1 ( 2015-03), p. 15-22
    Abstract: Various treatment options exist for patients with chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL). Clinical registries provide insight into routine treatment and identify changes in treatment over time. The Tumour Registry Lymphatic Neoplasms prospectively collects data on the treatment of patients with lymphoid B‐cell neoplasm as administered by office‐based haematologists in Germany. Data on patient and tumour characteristics, co‐morbidities, systemic treatments, and outcome parameters are recorded. Eight hundred and six patients with CLL were recruited between May 2009 and August 2013. At the start of first‐line treatment, median age was 71 years, 64% were male, and 44% had a Binet stage C disease. The most frequently used first‐line/second‐line regimens were bendamustine + rituximab (BR, 56%/55%), fludarabine + cyclophosphamide + rituximab (FCR, 22%/11%), and bendamustine (B, 5%/9%). Chlorambucil was used in only 7% (first‐line) and 6% (second‐line) of patients. Patients treated with FCR were younger and healthier than patients treated with BR. Overall, 91% of first‐line treatments were successful (40% complete response). Real‐life patient populations differ considerably from patients treated in randomized controlled trials. BR and FCR dominate the first‐line and second‐line treatments of CLL by office‐based haematologists in Germany. Future analysis will investigate progression‐free and overall survival times. © 2014 The Authors. Hematological Oncology Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0278-0232 , 1099-1069
    URL: Issue
    Language: English
    Publisher: Wiley
    Publication Date: 2015
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2001443-0
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 7
    In: Hematological Oncology, Wiley, Vol. 39, No. 3 ( 2021-08), p. 313-325
    Abstract: Owing to its heterogeneity and rarity, management of disseminated marginal zone B‐cell lymphoma (MZL) remains largely understudied. We present prospective data on choice of systemic treatment and survival of patients with MZL treated in German routine practice. Of 175 patients with MZL who had been documented in the prospective clinical cohort study Tumour Registry Lymphatic Neoplasms (NCT00889798) collecting data on systemic treatment, 58 were classified as extranodal MZL of mucosa‐associated lymphoid tissue (MALT) and 117 as non‐MALT MZL. We analyzed the most commonly used first‐line and second‐line chemo(immuno)therapies between 2009 and 2016 and examined objective response rate (ORR), progression‐free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and prognostic factors for survival. Compared to patients with MALT MZL, those with non‐MALT MZL more often presented with bone marrow involvement (43% vs. 14%), Ann Arbor stage III/IV (72% vs. 57%) and were slightly less often in good general condition (ECOG = 0; 41% vs. 47%). In German routine practice, rituximab‐bendamustine for a median of 6 cycles was the most frequently used first‐line (76%) and second‐line treatment (36%), with no major differences between MZL subtypes. The ORR for patients encompassing any positive response was 81%. For patients with MALT and non‐MALT MZL, respectively, 5‐years PFS was 69% (95% CI 52%–81%) and 66% (95% CI 56%–75%), 5‐years OS 79% (95% CI 65%–89%) and 75% (95% CI 66%–83%). Cox proportional hazards models showed a significantly increased risk of mortality for higher age in all patient groups. Our prospective real world data give valuable insights into the management and outcome of non‐selected patients with MZL requiring systemic treatment and can help optimize therapy recommendations.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0278-0232 , 1099-1069
    URL: Issue
    Language: English
    Publisher: Wiley
    Publication Date: 2021
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2001443-0
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 8
    In: European Journal of Haematology, Wiley, Vol. 103, No. 5 ( 2019-11), p. 460-471
    Abstract: R‐CHOP (rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, prednisone) is the standard therapy for patients with previously untreated diffuse large B‐cell lymphomas (DLBCL). Dose‐dense two‐weekly ‘R‐CHOP‐14’ was not superior over three‐weekly ‘R‐CHOP‐21’ in randomised clinical trials (RCTs). We present real‐world data on effectiveness of R‐CHOP‐14 and R‐CHOP‐21 in patients with DLBCL treated in German routine practice. Methods We identified 582 patients with DLBCL treated with R‐CHOP‐14 or R‐CHOP‐21 in 92 sites from the prospective clinical cohort study Tumour Registry Lymphatic Neoplasms. Patients’ schedules were classified by (a) length of the initial first cycle and (b) length of cycles 1‐4. Results About 55% of patients received R‐CHOP‐21, 45% R‐CHOP‐14, in median 6 cycles. 51% and 55% of patients, respectively, were able to continue their initial R‐CHOP‐14 and R‐CHOP‐21 schedule. While most characteristics between the patient cohorts were similar, patients receiving R‐CHOP‐21 presented slightly more often with tumour stage I and lower IPI risk. 3‐year overall survival of patients with R‐CHOP‐14 and R‐CHOP‐21 did not differ: 84% vs 84% (first cycle), 87% vs 89% (cycles 1‐4). Conclusions Patients with DLBCL in Germany are slightly more likely to receive R‐CHOP‐21 than R‐CHOP‐14. Both schedules are similarly effective in routine practice confirming the results from RCTs.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0902-4441 , 1600-0609
    URL: Issue
    Language: English
    Publisher: Wiley
    Publication Date: 2019
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2027114-1
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 9
    In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 120, No. 21 ( 2012-11-16), p. 4605-4605
    Abstract: Abstract 4605 Introduction With the FDA and EMA approval of Bendamustine and Rituximab new treatment options have recently become available to patients (pts) with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). Clinical registries provide insight into real-life treatment of pts. They can help to answer the question whether patients may benefit from new research findings. Methods The clinical registry on lymphoid neoplasms (TLN Registry), conducted by iOMEDICO in collaboration with the Arbeitskreis Klinische Studien (AKS) and the Kompetenznetz Maligne Lymphome (KML), prospectively collects data on the treatment of pts with lymphoid B-cell neoplasms as administered in hematology outpatient centres in Germany. Pts are followed for 5 years. A broad set of data regarding patient and tumor characteristics, comorbidities, all systemic treatments, response rates, progression-free survival and overall survival are recorded. Since May 2009, 106 sites have actively recruited a total of 2579 pts. Results From the overall sample, 420 pts received systemic 1st-line treatment for CLL. 65% of pts are male, mean age at time of primary diagnosis was 66 years (yrs) and at start of therapy 69 yrs. Tumor stage was 20% Binet A, 35% Binet B and 45% Binet C. 68% of pts (n=285) were diagnosed with at least one comorbidity, mainly hypertension (37%) or diabetes (15%); the average Charlson Comorbity Index of 0.7 indicates that overall pts have few comorbities. Rituximab is part of the 1st-line treatment in 82% (n=345) of pts with CLL. Bendamustine is part of the 1st-line treatment in 59% (n=247) of pts with CLL. It is mostly applied in combination with Rituximab (BR, 51%, n=213). Further 7% (n=28) receive Bendamustin as monotherapy. Fludarabine is part of the 1st-line treatment in 31% (n=132) of pts with CLL. It is applied in combination with Cyclophosphamide and Rituximab (FCR, 25%, n=103), as monotherapy (4%, n=15) or in combination with Cyclophosphamide (FC, 1%, n=6). Chlorambucil is part of the 1st-line treatment in 7% (n=31) of pts with CLL. It is applied as monotherapy (4%, n=15) or in combination with Rituximab (2%, n=10). Pts receiving BR, FCR or Chlorambucil differ. Pts characteristics indicate that BR and Chlorambucil are applied preferably in elderly pts (mean 70.1 (BR) vs. 75.7 (Chlorambucil) vs. 63.4 (FCR) yrs). Also, BR is given preferably in advanced stages of the disease as compared to FCR (Binet C 49% vs. 34%). The use of BR has increased from 41% in 2009 to 57% in 2011, while the use of FCR has decreased from 33% in 2009 to 17% in 2011. Of all pts with CLL in the TLN, 181 have received 2nd-line treatment. Rituximab is part of the 2nd-line treatment in 76% (n=137) of pts with CLL. Bendamustine is part of the 2nd-line treatment in 66% (n=120) of pts with CLL. It is mostly applied in combination with Rituximab (BR, 56%, n=101). Further 10% (n=18) receive Bendamustin as monotherapy. Fludarabine is part of the 2nd-line treatment in 20% (n=37) of pts with CLL. It is applied in combination with Cyclophosphamide and Rituximab (FCR, 10%, n=18), as monotherapy (5%, n=9) or in combination with Cyclophosphamide (FC, 3%, n=5). Chlorambucil is part of the 2nd-line treatment in 4% (n=7) of pts with CLL. It is mostly applied in combination with Rituximab (2%, n=4). Conclusion Rituximab and Bendamustine are the most frequently used drugs for the treatment of CLL in German hematology outpatient centres. The use or BR has significantly increased since 2009. In contrast, the use of FCR has decreased and only a minority of pts receive Chlorambucil. This indicates that in Germany Chlorambucil is no longer considered the “standard of care” for elderly pts with CLL. These data also show that results from clinical trials are quickly implemented into daily practice. The impact of these new treatment options on quality of life and survival remains to be of central interest in the future. Disclosures: Knauf: Mundipharma GmbH: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Hematology
    Publication Date: 2012
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 10
    In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 122, No. 21 ( 2013-11-15), p. 4181-4181
    Abstract: Fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, rituximab (FCR) is currently considered the standard of care for medically fit patients (pts) with untreated chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL). However, due to its significant haematological toxicity other, potentially less toxic regimens are currently under investigation. Results of the phase III trial CLL 10 of the German CLL-Study Group (GCLLSG) comparing FCR to bendamustine, rituximab (BR) are eagerly awaited. Since clinical trials are restricted to highly selected pts, we here investigated effectiveness of BR and FCR in unselected pts with CLL treated in routine practice by German office-based haematologists. Methods The open, longitudinal, multicentre, clinical registry on lymphoid neoplasms (TLN Registry, ClinicalTrial.gov registry NCT00889798) prospectively collects data on the treatment of pts with lymphoid B-cell neoplasms as administered by a network of German office-based haematologists. Pts are followed for 5 years. A broad set of data regarding patient and tumour characteristics, comorbidities, all systemic treatments and response rates, progression-free survival and overall survival are recorded. Automated plausibility and completeness checks with subsequently generated queries by the electronic data capture system ensure data reliability. In addition, data managers regularly check for plausibility and issue queries. Since May 2009, 111 sites have actively recruited a total of 2897 pts. Results 381 pts with CLL, recruited at the onset of their 1st-line therapy and treated with BR (69%) or FCR (31%), were included in this analysis. The choice of the regimen was upon the decision of the treating physician in accordance with the patient´s informed consent. Pts are median 70 years (yrs) old (range 21-90 yrs), 68% male, 42% have Binet stage C, 27% present with B symptoms, 13% with bulky disease and 66% with at least one comorbidity. Clinical and tumour characteristics differ between pts receiving BR or FCR: Pts treated with BR are older (median 71 vs. 65 yrs; p 〈 0.0001) and present more often with Binet C (45% vs. 35%) or comorbidities (67% vs. 62%). Objective response rate (ORR) was assessed by the local site: 93% of pts receiving BR and 95% receiving FCR responded to 1st-line therapy; the clinical complete remission rate (CR) was reported to be 49% after BR and 39% after FCR, respectively. Both regimens were applied with median 6 cycles. In univariate analyses none of the parameters tested (type of 1st-line regimen, age, sex, B symptoms, bulky disease, tumour stage, comorbidities) had a significant impact on the response rate. Also, in a multivariate logistic regression model adjusted for the type of regimen (BR vs. FCR) and age neither factor had a significant impact on the response rate. At this point the small number of non-responders (n=17) precluded calculation of models adjusted for more than two parameters. After a median observation time of 17 months (maximum 40 mth), 93% of pts receiving BR are alive and 8% have received 2nd-line therapy. In pts receiving FCR 96% are alive and 6% have received 2nd-line therapy. Overall 5% of pts are lost to follow-up. Conclusion Our data show that previously untreated pts with CLL receiving BR or FCR in routine practice differ, with BR preferentially given to older pts with comorbidities. Nevertheless, response rates to 1st-line treatment with BR or FCR are comparable, even after statistical adjustment for age at the start of therapy. If the CLL10 trial confirms these results, BR could present an alternative 1st-line treatment to medically fit pts with CLL. BR: bendamustine + rituximab ± prednisone │ FCR: fludarabine + cyclophosphamide + rituximab ± prednisone Disclosures: Knauf: Mundipharma, Janssen, Roche Pharma: Consultancy, Honoraria.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Hematology
    Publication Date: 2013
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. Further information can be found on the KOBV privacy pages