ISSN:
1475-9276
Content:
The role of competition and cooperation in relation to the goal of health equity is examined in this paper. The authors explain why the win-lose mentality associated with avoidable competition is ethically questionable and less effective than cooperation in achieving positive outcomes, particularly as it relates to health and health equity. Competition, which differentiates winners from losers, often with the winner-takes-all reward system, inevitably leads to a few winners and many losers, resulting in social inequality, which, in turn, engenders and perpetuates health inequity. Competitive market-driven approaches to healthcare—brought about by capitalism, neo-liberalization, and globalization, based primarily on a competitive framework—are shown to have contributed to growing inequities with respect to the social determinants of health, and have undermined equal opportunity to access health care and achieve health equity. It is possible to redistribute income and wealth to reduce social inequality, but globalization poses increasing challenges to policy makers. John Stuart Mill provided a passionate, philosophical defense of cooperatives, followed by Karl Polanyi who offered an insightful critique of both state socialism and especially the self-regulating market, thereby opening up the cooperative way of shaping the future. We cite Hannah Arendt’s “the banality of evil” to characterize the tragic concept of “ethical fading” witnessed in business and everyday life all over the world, often committed (without thinking and reflecting) by ordinary people under competitive pressures. To promote equity in health for all, we recommend the adoption of a radically new cooperation paradigm, applied whenever possible, to everything in our daily lives. (Vorlage)
In:
International journal for equity in health, London : BioMed Central, 2002, 16(2017), 12, Seite 13, 1475-9276
In:
volume:16
In:
year:2017
In:
number:12
In:
pages:13
Language:
English
DOI:
10.1186/s12939-016-0508-4
Bookmarklink
