Format:
1 Online-Ressource (257 Seiten)
ISBN:
9783030954239
Series Statement:
Interdisciplinary Studies in Human Rights Series v.8
Note:
Description based on publisher supplied metadata and other sources
,
Intro -- Preface -- Contents -- Abbreviations -- Chapter 1: Introduction -- 1.1 Aims of the Study -- 1.2 Raising the Issue -- 1.3 Scope of the Study -- 1.4 Working Definitions -- 1.5 Research Questions -- 1.6 Methodology of the Study -- 1.7 Structure of the Study -- References -- Chapter 2: Discussions on the Enforcement of Morality -- 2.1 Legal Philosophical Background -- 2.1.1 Moral Enforcement by Law -- 2.1.2 Implications of Legal Paternalism -- 2.2 Case Study in Korea: Adultery -- 2.2.1 Previous Decisions: Constitutional -- 2.2.2 The Decision of 2015: Unconstitutional -- 2.3 Case Study in Korea: Prohibition on Marriage Between Same Surnames and Same Places of Origin -- 2.3.1 The Background of the Marriage Bans -- 2.3.2 Criticism Based on the Principle of Proportionality -- 2.4 Conclusion -- References -- Chapter 3: Legal Recognition of Same-Sex Relationships in Korea and Europe -- 3.1 Sexual Orientation as Grounds Not to Discriminate -- 3.2 Background Information in South Korea -- 3.3 Legal Recognition of Same-Sex Relationships in Europe -- 3.4 Convergence and Divergence -- 3.5 Conclusion -- References -- Chapter 4: The Principle of Non-Discrimination and Anti-Discrimination Law -- 4.1 The Principle of Non-Discrimination in the European System of Human Rights -- 4.1.1 General Discussion -- 4.1.2 The Importance of the Comparator -- 4.2 Standards of Equality Test in Korea -- 4.2.1 The Prohibition of Arbitrariness -- 4.2.2 The Principle of Proportionality -- 4.2.3 Case Study of the Constitutional Court of Korea -- 4.3 The Principle of Non-Discrimination in the US -- 4.3.1 Case Study of the US Supreme Court -- 4.3.2 Comparative Analysis of the Korean Case -- 4.4 The Principle of Equality in Germany -- 4.4.1 The Prohibition of Arbitrariness (''Willkürverbot'') -- 4.4.2 The Principle of Proportionality (''Verhältnismäßigkeit'')
,
4.5 Anti-Discrimination Law -- 4.5.1 EU Anti-Discrimination Law -- 4.5.2 German Equality Law -- 4.5.3 British Equality Law -- 4.5.4 Legislation of Anti-Discrimination Law in Korea -- 4.5.5 Towards Korean Anti-Discrimination Legislations -- 4.6 Conclusion -- References -- Chapter 5: Principle of Proportionality in the Case Law of the ECtHR -- 5.1 Development of the Proportionality in a European Context -- 5.2 Proportionality Analysis in the Case Law of the ECtHR -- 5.2.1 Jurisprudence of Article 8 (Right to Respect for Private and Family Life) ECHR -- 5.2.1.1 Legitimate Aim -- 5.2.1.2 Suitability Test -- 5.2.1.3 Necessity Test -- 5.2.1.4 Proportionality in the Narrow Sense -- 5.2.2 Jurisprudence of Article 10 (Freedom of Expression) ECHR -- 5.2.2.1 Legitimate Aim and Suitability Test -- 5.2.2.2 Necessity Test -- 5.2.2.3 Proportionality in the Narrow Sense -- 5.2.3 Jurisprudence of Article 11 (Freedom of Assembly and Association) ECHR -- 5.2.3.1 The Principle of Legality -- 5.2.3.2 Legitimate Aim -- 5.2.3.3 Proportionality in the Narrow Sense -- 5.3 The Role of Courts and the Proportionality -- 5.4 Conclusion -- References -- Chapter 6: Other Relevant Concepts in the Case Law of the ECtHR -- 6.1 Positive Obligation of the State -- 6.1.1 General Discussions -- 6.1.2 Application in the Case Law -- 6.2 The Margin of Appreciation Doctrine -- 6.2.1 General Discussions -- 6.2.2 Application in the Case Law -- 6.3 The Core Right Argument -- 6.4 The Consensus Argument -- 6.5 Conclusion -- References -- Chapter 7: Case Analysis: Non-Criminalization of Same-Sex Relations -- 7.1 Towards Non-Criminalization of Same-Sex Relations in Korea -- 7.1.1 Criminalization of Same-Sex Relations in Korea -- 7.1.2 Cases of the Constitutional Court of Korea (''CCK'') -- 7.1.3 Criticizing the Constitutional Court Decisions -- 7.1.3.1 Violation of the Principle of Legality
,
7.1.3.2 Violation of the Principle of Proportionality -- 7.1.3.3 Violation of the Principle of Non-Discrimination -- 7.1.4 Comparative Analysis with the ECtHR Cases -- 7.2 Non-Criminalization of Same-Sex Relations in India -- 7.2.1 Criminalization of Same-Sex Relations in India -- 7.2.2 The Supreme Court Decisions of India -- 7.3 Discussions in the United States -- 7.3.1 Getting Rid of the Sodomy Law -- 7.3.2 Further Discussions -- 7.4 Conclusion -- References -- Chapter 8: Case Analysis: Same-Sex Marriage -- 8.1 The Proportionality in the Same-Sex Marriage Cases of the ECtHR -- 8.1.1 Positive State Obligations in the Same-Sex Marriage Cases of the ECtHR -- 8.1.2 The Principle of Proportionality in Same-Sex Marriage Cases -- 8.2 Discussions of Same-Sex Marriage in Korea -- 8.2.1 General Discussion of Same-Sex Marriage -- 8.2.2 Legal Recognition of Same-Sex Marriage in Korea -- 8.3 Legalizing Same-Sex Marriage in Taiwan -- 8.3.1 The Decision of the Constitutional Court of China (Taiwan) -- 8.3.2 Explication of the Decision -- 8.4 Case Analysis: Inter-American Court of Human Rights -- 8.5 Conclusion -- References -- Chapter 9: General Conclusion -- 9.1 Summary of Findings -- 9.2 Suggestions for Further Research -- 9.3 Personal Reflection -- 9.4 Towards the Protection of Sexual Minorities in Korea -- References
Additional Edition:
Erscheint auch als Druck-Ausgabe Lee, Hyun Jung Discrimination Based on Sexual Orientation Cham : Springer International Publishing AG,c2022 ISBN 9783030954222
Language:
English
Subjects:
Law
Keywords:
Europäische Union
;
Südkorea
;
Homosexualität
;
Sexuelle Orientierung
;
Geschlechtsidentität
;
Menschenrecht
;
Diskriminierungsverbot
;
Rechtsvergleich
;
Hochschulschrift
Bookmarklink
