Kooperativer Bibliotheksverbund

UID:

Format: 1 online resource (276 p.)

ISBN: 2-7606-4502-9

Note: Front Matter -- , Table des matières -- , Introduction -- , Les fondations -- , Les leçons d’une exploration dans le passé -- , Les acteurs de l’innovation -- , Les attentes envers les nouvelles technologies -- , L’intelligence artificielle au Québec: « révolution » et ressources publiques -- , L’humanitaire, l’expertise et les promesses de l’IA -- , La reconnaissance faciale automatique promue au rang de nécessité sociale -- , Les fausses promesses de la blockchain -- , Le progrès médical -- , L’économie morale des promesses en oncologie pédiatrique -- , La promesse d’accélération en cancérologie -- , L’entrepreneuriat du soi dans le champ biomédical -- , Les technologies et la vision de l’énergie éternelle -- , La captation et le stockage du CO2: une promesse de durabilité? -- , La gestion des déchets nucléaires français -- , Une vision technologique: le cas de l’Institut de recherche d’Hydro-Québec -- , Collaborateurs -- , Remerciements -- , Liste des tableaux et figures , In French.

Additional Edition: ISBN 2-7606-4501-0

Language: French

DOI: 10.1515/9782760645028

URL: Volltext  (kostenfrei)

URL: Volltext  (kostenfrei)

URL: kostenfrei

URL: kostenfrei

URL: Cover

UID:

Format: 239 S. , zahlr. Ill.

ISBN: 9782903824556

Language: French

Subjects: Art History

Keywords: Marcion, Pierre-Benoit 1769-1840 ; Frankreich ; Möbel ; Geschichte 1800-1840 ; Katalog ; Werkverzeichnis

URL: Inhaltsverzeichnis

UID:

Format: 1 Online-Ressource (circa 51 Seiten) , Illustrationen

Series Statement: OECD food, agriculture and fisheries papers no. 98

Content: The Research Impact Assessment (RIA) is expected to increase the efficiency with which public funds are used, and to improve more broadly the functioning of the research and innovation system and its contribution to address a wide range of socio-economic and environmental issues. Both standard economic approaches, which aim to estimate the economic benefits of research investments, and case-study approaches, which aim to analyse the processes of impact generation, have been applied to agricultural research in practice. Standard economic approaches generally focus on public research as information on private efforts in agricultural research is limited, and on economic impacts such as productivity growth. Case studies provide richer information, through a narrative, and highlight the complex relationships among the various variables, events and actors, but it is difficult to standardise results and scale them up. The challenge for RIA is to take into account broader impacts that go beyond science and economic impacts, and to improve knowledge on impact-generating mechanisms. This has become more difficult as agricultural research and innovation systems are increasingly open and complex, and changing quickly. Observation of practices applied to agricultural research in five selected organisations confirms the difference found in RIA between academic research and in practice. In both, the assessment systems pursue the same objectives: 1) Learning: enhance the know-how to produce an environment conducive to socio-economic impact; 2) Capacity building: spread the culture of socio-economic impact to its researchers; and 3) Reporting to stakeholders: from accountability purposes to advocacy targeted to various audiences. The accountability objective, including estimating returns on the financial investment, poses complex challenges and is in tension with the learning and capacity building objectives. The future of RIA will depend on the capacity to improve estimation methods and gather quality information (which also takes into account non-economic impacts) and the sharing of good practices.

Language: English

Keywords: Amtsdruckschrift ; Arbeitspapier ; Graue Literatur

DOI: 10.1787/5339e165-en

URL: Volltext

URL: lizenzpflichtig

UID:

Format: 1 Online-Ressource

ISBN: 9782802803638

Content: Les modifications profondes de notre système socio-culturel font émerger des questions éthiques nouvelles, à l'intérieur de toutes les disciplines qui ont l'homme pour objet, telles l'esthétique, la philosophie, la politique, le droit, la médecine. Pour comprendre ces questions, par-delà leur « actualité ponctuelle », dans le flux vivant de leur constitution, leur approche doit être patiente, complexe, parfois aussi éprouvante qu'une initiation au parcours du labyrinthe. C'est cette tâche difficile que les auteurs de ce livre ont tenté d'amorcer. Leurs contributions sont issues du cycle de leçons publiques qui ont été organisées durant l'année académique 1984-1985, par l'École des sciences philosophiques et religieuses des Facultés universitaires Saint-Louis à Bruxelles

Note: French

Language: French

URL: kostenfrei

UID:

Format: 312 Seiten : , Diagramme, Karte ; , 22 cm.

ISBN: 978-2-406-10373-8 , 978-2-406-10374-5

Series Statement: Histoire des Temps modernes 8

Language: French

Subjects: History

Keywords: Umland ; Soziale Situation ; Justiz

URL: Rezension

URL: Buchcover

URL: Klappentext

URL: Inhaltsverzeichnis

URL: Rezension

UID:

Format: 1 Online-Ressource (50 Seiten)

Series Statement: OECD Food, Agriculture and Fisheries Papers

Content: The Research Impact Assessment (RIA) is expected to increase the efficiency with which public funds are used, and to improve more broadly the functioning of the research and innovation system and its contribution to address a wide range of socio-economic and environmental issues. Both standard economic approaches, which aim to estimate the economic benefits of research investments, and case-study approaches, which aim to analyse the processes of impact generation, have been applied to agricultural research in practice. Standard economic approaches generally focus on public research as information on private efforts in agricultural research is limited, and on economic impacts such as productivity growth. Case studies provide richer information, through a narrative, and highlight the complex relationships among the various variables, events and actors, but it is difficult to standardise results and scale them up.

Content: The challenge for RIA is to take into account broader impacts that go beyond science and economic impacts, and to improve knowledge on impact-generating mechanisms. This has become more difficult as agricultural research and innovation systems are increasingly open and complex, and changing quickly. Observation of practices applied to agricultural research in five selected organisations confirms the difference found in RIA between academic research and in practice. In both, the assessment systems pursue the same objectives: 1) Learning: enhance the know-how to produce an environment conducive to socio-economic impact; 2) Capacity building: spread the culture of socio-economic impact to its researchers; and 3) Reporting to stakeholders: from accountability purposes to advocacy targeted to various audiences.

Content: The accountability objective, including estimating returns on the financial investment, poses complex challenges and is in tension with the learning and capacity building objectives. The future of RIA will depend on the capacity to improve estimation methods and gather quality information (which also takes into account non-economic impacts) and the sharing of good practices

Language: English

DOI: 10.1787/5339e165-en

URL: Volltext  (URL des Erstveröffentlichers)

URL: Volltext  (URL des Erstveröffentlichers)

UID:

Format: 556 pages , 105 x 148 mm

Edition: Mikrofiche-Ausgabe Lille Atelier national de reproduction des thèses$h2014 2 microfiches

Uniform Title: Making credible expertise : Codex Alimentarius and the FAO-WHO experts committees in the international regulatory process for food safety

Content: L’expertise scientifique ...

Content: The scientific expertise, produced for the Codex Alimentarius by international committees of the FAO and the WHO, has a growing central role in the regulation of food production and international trade. It is this role and the questions arising from the relation between science and policy that this research work explores by analyzing the “credibilization processes” of expertise. The theoretical framework articulates Sociology of organizations, Sociology of science as well as central concepts of political sociology. The relationship between science and policy is known to be unstable. The FAO-WHO’s expertise is even more unstable with regard to its participation in the international normalization/standardization which has an enforceable power over national regulation systems. This dissertation demonstrates that the “credibilization processes” in which different actors are involved (experts, institutions, regulators, industries, consumers…) enables to reduce this instability. By engaging in these processes, actors obtain the resources to negotiate their position in the relationship to their advantage, and are able to avoid criticism at the same time. We consider the “credibilization processes” as a set of strategies aiming at strengthening “the subject’s ability to state and to take action”, a notion that exceeds the limits of “authority” and “legitimacy”, other central notions. Processes are grasped by analyzing strategies and behavior of institutions as well as experts in their transnational networks and in the course of FAO-WHO collective expertise. The “credibilization processes” rest upon three interdependent dimensions: a procedural credibilization, a collaborative credibilization and a deliberative credibilization. This research illustrates an expertise that is inseparable from the “credibilization processes”. The credibilization is both the result of interdependencies along the expertise, and a prerequisite for interdependencies to exist in order to produce an expertise. The “credibilization processes” analysis unveils a plural expertise, more specifically in between a “traditional” model and a “precautionary” model. Finally, this dissertation questions the relevance of maintaining science and policy separated; a separation always reasserted by national and international authorities, but remaining however implicitly adjusted in practice

Note: Bibliogr. p.477-493 , Reproduction de : Thèse de doctorat : Sociologie : Paris, EHESS : 2012

Additional Edition: Erscheint auch als Druck-Ausgabe Crédibiliser pour expertiser : le Codex Alimentarius et les comités d'experts FAO-OMS dans la production réglementaire internationale de sécurité sanitaire des aliments / Antoine Debure [S.l.] : [s.n.], 2012

Language: French

Keywords: Hochschulschrift

UID:

Format: 126 S , Ill

Series Statement: Collection reperes 61

Language: Undetermined

UID:

Format: 233 S.

Original writing title: 大西岛女王

Original writing publisher: 北京 : 地质出版社

Uniform Title: L'Atlantide

Note: SBB-PK Berlin

Language: Chinese

UID:

Format: Seiten 803-985

Series Statement: Ethnos volume 83, number 5 (December 2018)

Language: English