Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
  • 1
    In: Neurosurgical Focus, Journal of Neurosurgery Publishing Group (JNSPG), Vol. 50, No. 5 ( 2021-05), p. E7-
    Abstract: Surgical management of spinal metastases at the cervicothoracic junction (CTJ) is highly complex and relies on case-based decision-making. The aim of this multicentric study was to describe surgical procedures for metastases at the CTJ and provide guidance for clinical and surgical management. METHODS Patients eligible for this study were those with metastases at the CTJ (C7–T2) who had been consecutively treated in 2005–2019 at 7 academic institutions across Europe. The Spine Instability Neoplastic Score, neurological function, clinical status, medical history, and surgical data for each patient were retrospectively assessed. Patients were divided into four surgical groups: 1) posterior decompression only, 2) posterior decompression and fusion, 3) anterior corpectomy and fusion, and 4) anterior corpectomy and 360° fusion. Endpoints were complications, surgical revision rate, and survival. RESULTS Among the 238 patients eligible for inclusion this study, 37 were included in group 1 (15%), 127 in group 2 (53%), 18 in group 3 (8%), and 56 in group 4 (24%). Mechanical pain was the predominant symptom (79%, 189 patients). Surgical complications occurred in 16% (group 1), 20% (group 2), 11% (group 3), and 18% (group 4). Of these, hardware failure (HwF) occurred in 18% and led to surgical revision in 7 of 8 cases. The overall complication rate was 34%. In-hospital mortality was 5%. CONCLUSIONS Posterior fusion and decompression was the most frequently used technique. Care should be taken to choose instrumentation techniques that offer the highest possible biomechanical load-bearing capacity to avoid HwF. Since the overall complication rate is high, the prevention of in-hospital complications seems crucial to reduce in-hospital mortality.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1092-0684
    Language: Unknown
    Publisher: Journal of Neurosurgery Publishing Group (JNSPG)
    Publication Date: 2021
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2026589-X
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    In: Acta Neurochirurgica, Springer Science and Business Media LLC, Vol. 164, No. 1 ( 2022-01), p. 15-23
    Abstract: Social Media (SoMe) is becoming increasingly used in the medical community, and its use has been related with academic productivity. However, utilization of SoMe in the European neurosurgical community has not been assessed systematically. Methods An online search was undertaken to discover SoMe accounts of (1) national and related neurosurgical societies listed on the EANS website, (2) neurosurgical journals present on EANS website, (3) neurosurgery centers within EANS member countries, as listed on their website. SoMe accounts of Facebook, Twitter, YouTube, and Instagram were searched for journals and societies, and Twitter, Instagram, and Facebook for neurosurgery departments. The number of likes/followers/subscribers was recorded. Results Five (31%) neurosurgery journals had a SoMe presence. The highest number of followers, likes, and tweets was found for JNNP , and Journal of Neurological Surgery Part B had the most subscribers and video views. SoMe usage was identified for 11 national (28.2%) and 2 multi-national neurosurgical societies. From these, the French Society of Neurosurgery had the largest number of Facebook followers ( 〉  2800) and Likes ( 〉  2700), the Society of British Neurological Surgeons had the largest number of Twitter followers ( 〉  2850), whereas EANS overall had the most followers on Twitter  〉  5100 and Facebook  〉  5450. A total of 87 SoMe neurosurgery center accounts were found on either Facebook, Instagram or Twitter, for 64 of 1000 centers (6.4%) in 22 of 40 different countries (55%). Of these 67% (n = 43/64) arose from 6 countries (England, Germany, Italy, Romania, Turkey, Ukraine). There were more Facebook accounts (n = 42) than Instagram accounts (n = 23) or Twitter accounts (n = 22). Conclusion SoMe use amongst neurosurgical societies and departments in Europe is very limited. From our perspective, explanations are lacking for the correlated numbers to the market shares of SoMe in the respective countries. Further research, including a survey, to follow up on this important topic should be undertaken among EANS members.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0001-6268 , 0942-0940
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: Springer Science and Business Media LLC
    Publication Date: 2022
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1464215-3
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. Further information can be found on the KOBV privacy pages