Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
Filter
  • American Society of Hematology  (3)
  • 1
    In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 132, No. Supplement 1 ( 2018-11-29), p. 1472-1472
    Abstract: Background: Clonal hematopoiesis of indeterminate potential (CHIP) is an age-related condition characterized by somatic mutations in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) of otherwise healthy adults that has been associated with increased risk of developing hematological malignancies. Clonal hematopoiesis has been shown to be present in patients with therapy-related myeloid neoplasms (therapy-related acute myeloid leukemia, t-AML) / therapy-related myelodysplastic syndrome, t-MDS) at the time of their primary cancer diagnosis and before exposure to treatment. Such clones expand under selective pressure from cytotoxic treatment for the primary cancer and can subsequently give rise to overt myeloid neoplasms. Somatic mutations in the gene encoding the TP53-inducible protein phosphatase Mg2+/Mn2+ 1D (PPM1D) were initially reported in PBMC of patients with solid tumors (breast, ovary, lung) and lymphoma. They are associated with older age and seem to reflect prior exposure to cytotoxic treatment. Moreover, the mutations, all of which are nonsense or frameshift mutations in exon 6, have been described as one of the most recurrent mutations in CHIP and to be frequent in t-MDS. Methods and results: To resolve this issue and to determine whether clones harboring PPM1D mutations that expand into CHIP after cytotoxic therapy for solid tumors drive leukemogenesis and might be useful as markers to identify patients at risk for t-MDS/t-AML development, we performed PPM1D mutational analysis in 87 patients with de novo AML and in 49 patients with t-AML. As mutations in TP53 as a representative DNA damage response gene are rare in de novo AML, we enriched our de novo AML patient cohort towards poor risk cases with complex karyotypes in order to increase the chance of identifying PPM1D mutations. Patients with core-binding factor AML were excluded from the analysis. Using the published frequency of 15% PPM1D mutations in t-MDS (Lindsley RC et al., N Engl J Med 2017;376(6):536-547) as surrogate for the expected frequency in t-AML, a minimum of 44 t-AML patients was determined to be required to allow for the detection of mutations of PPM1D in t-AML (Chi square with Fisher's exact test for independent groups, α-error 0.05, power 0.8). We performed focused mutational analysis by targeted Sanger sequencing of PPM1D exon 6 on DNA from bone marrow mononuclear cells or PBMC at diagnosis of de novo or t-AML samples taken prior to treatment initiation. Overall, only one patient with de novo AML (1/87, 1.2%) proved mutation positive. He was diagnosed with AML, FAB M4, at the age of 57 years and harbored a complex karyotype with marker chromosomes in the absence of a TP53 mutation. Unexpectedly, none of the 49 patients with t-AML harbored a mutation in PPM1D. Conclusion: In this study, we found that PPM1D mutations, which frequently occur in CHIP especially following prior cytotoxic therapy, are uncommon in AML, whether de novo or after prior cytotoxic therapy. These data are in contrast to previous observations on a high frequency of PPM1D mutations in t-MDS samples relative to primary MDS (15% vs. 3%, Lindsley RC et al., N Engl J Med 2017;376(6):536-547). Our findings suggest that while cytotoxic therapy favors the expansion of PPM1D-mutant CHIP clones, possibly even up to the development of t-MDS, mutations in PPM1D seem to be irrelevant for progression to t-AML. Disclosures Stoelzel: Neovii: Speakers Bureau. Rollig:Bayer: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding. Thiede:AgenDix: Other: Ownership; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding. Ehninger:GEMoaB Monoclonals GmbH: Employment, Equity Ownership; Bayer: Research Funding; Cellex Gesellschaft fuer Zellgewinnung mbH: Employment, Equity Ownership.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Hematology
    Publication Date: 2018
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 128, No. 22 ( 2016-12-02), p. 2869-2869
    Abstract: Introduction: Cytogenetic testing is routinely performed in newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (AML) for risk stratification. Elaborate risk classifications based on karyotyping are provided by both the European Leukemia Net (ELN) and the Medical Research Council (MRC). Complex aberrant, monosomal and abnl(17p) karyotypes confer a poor prognosis. In cytogenetic studies, chromosome aberrations that cannot be identified due to gross rearrangement, thereby preventing the allocation to a specific chromosome, are designated as "Marker Chromosomes" (MC). The significance of MC as prognostic factor for AML has remained elusive so far. In this study we have assessed frequency, cytogenetic characteristics and prognostic impact of MC as well as their underlying biological origin. Given the gross structural chromosomal damage inherent to MC we speculated that they may arise from chromothripsis, a recently described phenomenon of chromosome fragmentation in a single catastrophic event. Patients and Methods: Patients recruited intwo large consecutive, prospective, randomized, multicenter clinical trials for newly diagnosed non-M3 AML patients from the German Study Alliance Leukemia (SAL) were analyzed (AML96, NCT00180115; AML2003, NCT00180102). All karyotypes were retrospectively screened for MC. For the detection of chromothripsis array-CGH was used. For each sample 50 ng of DNA were hybridized to an Affymetrix® CytoScan HD Oligo/SNP-array and scanned with the Affymetrix GeneChip® Scanner 3000 7G. Chromothripsis was defined according to the criteria of Rausch et al., which require at least 10 switches in segmental copy number involving two or three distinct copy number states on a single chromosome. Results: MC were detectable in 165/1026 (16.1%) of aberrant non-CBF karyotype cases. Adverse-risk karyotypes displayed a higher frequency of MC (40.3% in complex aberrant, 26.5% in adverse-risk as defined by MRC criteria and 41.2% in abnl(17p) karyotypes, p 〈 .001 each). MC were associated with a poorer prognosis compared to other non-CBF aberrant karyotypes as well as with lower remission rates (CR+CRi; 36.0% vs. 55.8% in AML96 ≤60 years, p=0.01; 14.3% vs. 44.1% in AML2003, p 〈 0.001), inferior event-free survival (2.24 vs. 6.54 months, p 〈 0.001; 3.45 vs. 8.03 months, p 〈 0.001) and overall survival (5.72 vs. 11.87 months, p 〈 0.001; 8.68 vs. 20.78, p=0.01). In multivariate analysis with co-variables age, prior MDS, therapy-related AML and adverse-risk cytogenetics according to MRC criteria, MC independently predicted poor prognosis in AML96 ≤60 years but not in AML2003 with its higher allogeneic transplantation rate. As detected by array-CGH, in about one third of MC karyotypes (18/49, 36.7%, including 3 cases with 8 or 9 copy number switches) MC had arisen from chromothripsis, whereas this phenomenon was virtually undetectable in a control group of complex aberrant karyotypes without MC (1/34) (p 〈 0.001). Chromothripsis in MC karyotypes typically involved one single chromosome (n=11), with two or three chromosomes affected in 5 and 2 patients, respectively. There was no predilection for a particular chromosome. MC karyotypes positive for chromothripsis were characterized by a particularly high degree of karyotype complexity as compared to those that were negative for chromothripsis (complex aberrant 100% vs. 64.5% p 〈 0.01; abnl(17p) 50.0% vs. 16.1%, p=0.01). In 12/18 (66.7%) cases, at least one of the chromothriptic chromosomes was reported as loss in the karyotype formula, suggesting that the grouping of a chromothriptic chromosome as a marker is paralleled by a putative loss of the affected chromosome. The chromothripsis positive MC karyotype subgroup had a particularly dismal prognosis with a combined CR+CRi rate of 2/16 vs. 10/31 (p=0.14). It also displayed inferior event-free and overall survival, though statistical significance was not reached for either endpoint, likely due to the already poor prognosis of the entire MC positive group. Conclusion: This is the first study showing that MC are a frequent finding predominantly in adverse-risk AML and associated with particularly poor prognosis. Our data provide evidence that a substantial portion of MC arise from chromothripsis. Disclosures Thiede: AgenDix: Employment, Other: Ownership.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Hematology
    Publication Date: 2016
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 3
    In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 129, No. 10 ( 2017-03-09), p. 1333-1342
    Abstract: Marker chromosomes are frequently found in AML, particularly among aneuploid adverse-risk karyotypes and confer a poor prognosis. About one-third of marker and ring chromosome karyotypes arise from chromothripsis.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Hematology
    Publication Date: 2017
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. Further information can be found on the KOBV privacy pages