feed icon rss

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
  • 1
    UID:
    b3kat_BV002042832
    Format: XXVII, 752 S. , Ill., graph. Darst., Kt.
    ISBN: 3805513402
    Language: English
    Subjects: Medicine
    RVK:
    Keywords: Bilharziose ; Bilharziose ; Kontrolle ; Bilharziose ; Epidemiologie
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    London : Bloomsbury Academic | London : Bloomsbury Publishing
    UID:
    gbv_101852939X
    Format: 1 Online-Ressource (x, 214 pages)
    Edition: 2014
    ISBN: 9781474233767 , 9781474233736 , 9781474233743
    Series Statement: Key debates in educational policy
    Content: "Dyslexia is often presented as a clearly delineated condition that can be diagnosed on the basis of appropriate cognitive tests with corresponding forms on intervention. However, this approachable text explores the issues behind this assertion in bringing together leading figures in the field to debate dyslexia. Julian Elliott shows that understandings and usage of the dyslexia label vary substantially with little consensus or agreement and in putting forward his critique draws upon research in several disciplinary fields to demonstrate the irrationality of these arguments. Roderick I. Nicolson demonstrates that current approaches to understanding, identification and support of dyslexia are catastrophically flawed in terms of their failure to consider the developmental nature of dyslexia. He develops two themes: first that the underlying cause of dyslexia is 'delayed neural commitment' for skills and neural circuits, and second that the cause of the reading disability is the introduction of formal instruction before the dyslexic child's neural circuits for executive function are sufficiently developed. He argues that a more effective and cost-effective approach to identification and support involves 'assessment for dyslexia' rather than 'of dyslexia'. Elliott and Nicolson respond to the points each other raise before Andrew Davis investigates how far the key claims of Elliott and Nicolson can withstand close conceptual investigation, and explores the inherent limitations of scientific research on this topic, given the value and conceptual issues concerned."--
    Content: Machine generated contents note: Series Editor's Preface -- Key Debates in Educational Policy, Christopher Winch -- Notes on Contributors -- Introduction, Andrew Davis -- Part One Developmental Dyslexia: The Bigger Picture, Roderick I. Nicolson -- Part Two Dyslexia: Beyond the Debate, Julian Elliott -- Part Three Response to Julian Elliott, Roderick I. Nicolson -- Part Four Response to Roderick I. Nicolson, Julian Elliott -- Afterword: Some Philosophical Reflections, Andrew Davis -- Bibliography -- Index
    Note: Includes bibliographical references and index
    Additional Edition: ISBN 9781474233750
    Additional Edition: Erscheint auch als Druck-Ausgabe Elliott, Julian, 1955 - Dyslexia London : Bloomsbury Academic, 2016 ISBN 9781474233750
    Language: English
    Subjects: Education , Medicine
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Keywords: Dyslexie ; Dyslexie
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. Further information can be found on the KOBV privacy pages