Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
  • 1
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Wiley ; 2022
    In:  Journal of Accounting Research Vol. 60, No. 1 ( 2022-03), p. 45-95
    In: Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley, Vol. 60, No. 1 ( 2022-03), p. 45-95
    Abstract: Firm life‐cycle stage reflects a firm's current strategic direction toward exploration independent of age or size. We provide evidence that young life‐cycle firms are particularly vulnerable to negative innovation consequences from financial regulation but do not appear to experience any compensating financial reporting quality (FRQ) benefits. Using a generalized difference‐in‐differences design around Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002 (SOX), we document a significant reduction in both research and development (R & D) spending and innovation outputs for young life‐cycle stage firms after regulation. Declines in innovation manifest both from the diversion of scarce resources and from the imposition of an organizational culture mismatched to the pursuit of explorative innovation, resulting in a less generalizable and less diversified patent portfolio. However, we find no evidence that improvements to FRQ materialize to offset these costs. Event study analyses suggest that this negative impact was expected by market participants, and postregulation returns confirm this expectation.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0021-8456 , 1475-679X
    URL: Issue
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: Wiley
    Publication Date: 2022
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2060654-0
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 219360-7
    SSG: 3,2
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    American Economic Association ; 2021
    In:  Journal of Economic Perspectives Vol. 35, No. 4 ( 2021-11-01), p. 97-122
    In: Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, Vol. 35, No. 4 ( 2021-11-01), p. 97-122
    Abstract: A large social science research literature examines the effects of prisons on crime and socioeconomic inequality, but the penal institution itself is often a black box overlooked in the analysis of its effects. This paper examines prisons and their role in rehabilitative programs and as venues for violence, health and healthcare, and extreme isolation through solitary confinement. Research shows that incarcerated people are participating less today than in the 1980s in prison programs, and they face high risks of violence, disease, and isolation. Prison conditions suggest the mechanisms that impair adjustment to community life after release provide a more complete account of the costs of incarceration and indicate the performance of prisons as moral institutions that bear a responsibility for humane and decent treatment.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0895-3309
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Economic Association
    Publication Date: 2021
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2010186-7
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 623018-0
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 3
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences (INFORMS) ; 2023
    In:  Management Science Vol. 69, No. 5 ( 2023-05), p. 3048-3079
    In: Management Science, Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences (INFORMS), Vol. 69, No. 5 ( 2023-05), p. 3048-3079
    Abstract: This paper examines an innovation in capital formation that has spurred contentious debate: the Umbrella Partnership Corporation (“Up-C”) IPO. Advisors and underwriters argue that the Up-C deal structure is a driver of post-IPO value and, thus, is a value-enhancing means of raising capital that may be one solution to concerns regarding the drop in the number of publicly traded companies. Consistent with these claims, recent research suggests that organizing soon-to-be public businesses as pass-through entities (as is the case for Up-Cs) leads to superior future performance. Yet, broadening the analysis to consider abnormal stock performance and post-IPO litigation of a larger and more recent sample of exclusively Up-C IPOs, we conclude just the opposite. While the Up-C deal structure increases IPO valuations and predicts positive post-IPO operating performance, the return performance of Up-C IPOs indicates that Up-C deals harm public shareholders. Further, despite their superior earnings performance, Up-C IPOs face a significantly higher rate of post-IPO litigation as compared with non-Up-C IPOs. Because IPO investors seemingly do not anticipate the myriad ways in which the Up-C deal structure might facilitate opportunism by pre-IPO owners, they frequently turn to litigation as an ex-post settling-up mechanism. Consequently, our paper offers the first empirical evidence of downsides associated with the Up-C deal structure for public shareholders and, in so doing, affords the rarity of having academic evidence lead (as opposed to respond to) a controversial debate. This paper was This paper was accepted by Victoria Ivashina, finance. Funding: The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial support of the NYU Stern School of Business, the J. Reuben Clark Law School, and the Marriott School of Business. Supplemental Material: Data are available at https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2022.4454 .
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0025-1909 , 1526-5501
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences (INFORMS)
    Publication Date: 2023
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 206345-1
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2023019-9
    SSG: 3,2
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. Further information can be found on the KOBV privacy pages