Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
  • 1
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Walter de Gruyter GmbH ; 2009
    In:  Klio Vol. 91, No. 2 ( 2009-12), p. 406-434
    In: Klio, Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Vol. 91, No. 2 ( 2009-12), p. 406-434
    Abstract: Cn. Pompeius Magnus is undoubtedly best known for his great commands of 67 and 66 BCE and his subsequent role as ally, then enemy, of Iulius Caesar. Nonetheless, comprehensive scrutiny of Pompeius’ track record from 79 to 70 BCE reveals that this was perhaps the most remarkable and ground breaking stage of his career. In 78, in the face of yet another civil war, the Senate charged Rome’s first ever eques triumphalis with an independent propraetorian commission, under the auspices of the consul Q. Lutatius Catulus. In 77, Pompeius flatly ignored Catulus’ direct orders to disband his army, eager to secure a major role in the war against Sertorius and his Spanish associates. After a long and acerbic debate, the Senate eventually decided to have the People appoint Pompeius to an extraordinary proconsulship. By virtue of an unprecedented provision, the equestrian proconsul was, moreover, authorized to command in Spain on an equal footing with the consular proconsul Metellus Pius, the princeps ciuitatis of the time. In 71, Pompeius boldly decided to stand for the consulship of 70, in collusion with M. Licinius Crassus. As he ran on a decidedly popular platform and, once again, refused to disband his legions, the conscript Fathers had little choice but to grant dispensation from the Cornelian Law as well as a second public triumph. This paper will argue that, in political and constitutional terms, Pompeius played an instrumental role in burying Sulla’s constitutional settlement, and that his extraordinary career in the seventies BCE set a fateful example for the next couple of decades.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0075-6334
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: Walter de Gruyter GmbH
    Publication Date: 2009
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2229818-6
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 3233-5
    SSG: 0
    SSG: 1
    SSG: 6,12
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Ediciones Universidad de Salamanca ; 2018
    In:  Studia Historica: Historia Antigua Vol. 36, No. 0 ( 2018-12-23), p. 31-
    In: Studia Historica: Historia Antigua, Ediciones Universidad de Salamanca, Vol. 36, No. 0 ( 2018-12-23), p. 31-
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 2530-4100 , 0213-2052
    URL: Issue
    Language: Unknown
    Publisher: Ediciones Universidad de Salamanca
    Publication Date: 2018
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2564229-7
    SSG: 6,14
    SSG: 7,36
    SSG: 8
    SSG: 7,34
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 3
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Cambridge University Press (CUP) ; 2016
    In:  Journal of Roman Archaeology Vol. 29 ( 2016), p. 389-410
    In: Journal of Roman Archaeology, Cambridge University Press (CUP), Vol. 29 ( 2016), p. 389-410
    Abstract: In 29 B.C., after his victories over Marcus Antonius ( cos. 44, 34) and Cleopatra at Actium and in Egypt, Caesar Octavi(an)us, or Imperator Caesar Divi f., as he then wanted to be known, returned to Rome as the uncontested master of the Roman world. He did so in a carefully managed pageant that culminated with his triple triumph on 13, 14 and 15 Sextilis (the month later renamed Augustus in his honour) and the opening of the Temple of Divus Iulius in the Forum Romanum shortly thereafter, on the 18th. These ceremonies marked the culmination of his claim — a pompous declaration already made in the autumn of 36 in the aftermath of Naulochus — that he had put an end to war on “land and sea” throughout the world. While the relevant entries in the Fasti Triumphales are lost, Cassius Dio produces a fairly accurate précis of Octavian's triple triumph. The first day was the triumph over the Pannonians and the Dalmatians, the Iapydes and their neighbours, and some German and Gallic tribes; the second day commemorated the naval victory at Actium, the ; the third and final triumph, the most costly and magnificent of them all, was over Egypt. Dio clarifies that the Egyptian spoils proved so rich and bountiful that they covered the expense and lustre of all three triumphal processions.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1047-7594 , 2331-5709
    Language: English
    Publisher: Cambridge University Press (CUP)
    Publication Date: 2016
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2749402-0
    SSG: 6,14
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 4
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Brill ; 2015
    In:  Mnemosyne Vol. 68, No. 4 ( 2015-07-2), p. 605-640
    In: Mnemosyne, Brill, Vol. 68, No. 4 ( 2015-07-2), p. 605-640
    Abstract: Apuleius’ Apologia has consistently drawn scholarly attention as an example of soaring rhetoric from the Second Sophistic and for being the only remaining account of a trial for illegal magic from the early Empire. This study opts for a different approach. It uses the Apologia as a window into the culture of Roman provincial high society by examining Apuleius’ motivations for demanding his accusers bring formal charges against him, as well as the social factors that pushed the preceding conflict to such a dramatic climax. The main contention of this inquiry is that the actions of both Apuleius and his enemies reveal the paramount importance of honor as a cultural driver of conflict, and particularly its vocalization in the parry and riposte of insults and humiliation that ultimately resulted in a theatrical courtroom confrontation. The results of this micro-study in Roman provincial life should thus provide a useful complement to both Ifie & Thompson’s excellent paper on Rank, Social Status and Esteem in Apuleius (1977-1978) as well as J.E. Lendon’s magisterial Empire of Honour. The Art of Government in the Roman World (1997). It also adds a practical dimension to Lateiner’s detailed analysis of Apuleius’ literary strategies of humiliation and embarrassment in his Metamorphoses (2001).
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0026-7074 , 1568-525X
    RVK:
    Language: Unknown
    Publisher: Brill
    Publication Date: 2015
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2043485-6
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 206288-4
    SSG: 6,14
    SSG: 6,12
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. Further information can be found on the KOBV privacy pages