In:
eLife, eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd, Vol. 6 ( 2017-05-09)
Abstract:
Species of ancient humans and the extinct relatives of our ancestors are typically described from a limited number of fossils. However, this was not the case with Homo naledi. More than 1500 fossils representing at least 15 individuals of this species were unearthed from the Rising Star cave system in South Africa between 2013 and 2014. Found deep underground in the Dinaledi Chamber, the H. naledi fossils are the largest collection of a single species of an ancient human-relative discovered in Africa. After the discovery was reported, a number of questions still remained. These questions included: why were so many fossils from a single species found at the one site, and how did they come to rest so far into the cave system? Possible explanations such as H. naledi living in the cave or being washed in by a flood were considered but ruled out. Instead, the evidence was largely consistent with intact bodies being deliberately disposed of in the cave and then decomposing. Now, Hawks et al. – who include many of the researchers who were involved in the discovery of H. naledi – report that yet more H. naledi fossils have been unearthed from a second chamber in the Rising Star cave system, the Lesedi Chamber. The chamber is 30 meters below the surface and there is no direct route between it and the Dinaledi Chamber. Again, the evidence is most consistent with the bodies arriving intact into the chamber, and there were no signs that the remains had been exposed to the surface environment. Also like the Dinaledi Chamber, no remains of other ancient humans or their relatives were found in the Lesedi Chamber. In total, 133 fossils of H. naledi have been found in this second chamber representing at least three individuals: two adults and a juvenile. However, and as Hawks et al. point out, only a small volume of the chamber has been excavated so far, and so there are likely more fossils still to be found. The fossils in the Lesedi Chamber are similar to those found before but include intact examples of bones, like the collarbone, that were previously known only from fragments. Perhaps the most impressive among the new fossils is a relatively complete skull that is part of a partial skeleton. The skull could have housed a brain that was 9% larger than the maximum estimate calculated from the previous H. naledi fossils. Though these new fossils provide us with yet more information about H. naledi, some questions still remain unanswered – the material from the Lesedi Chamber is undated, for example. However, a related study by Dirks et al. does give an estimate for the age of the fossils from the Dinaledi Chamber, while Berger et al. provide an explanation for why this date might be much younger than was previously predicted.
Type of Medium:
Online Resource
ISSN:
2050-084X
DOI:
10.7554/eLife.24232.001
DOI:
10.7554/eLife.24232.002
DOI:
10.7554/eLife.24232.003
DOI:
10.7554/eLife.24232.004
DOI:
10.7554/eLife.24232.005
DOI:
10.7554/eLife.24232.006
DOI:
10.7554/eLife.24232.007
DOI:
10.7554/eLife.24232.008
DOI:
10.7554/eLife.24232.009
DOI:
10.7554/eLife.24232.010
DOI:
10.7554/eLife.24232.011
DOI:
10.7554/eLife.24232.012
DOI:
10.7554/eLife.24232.013
DOI:
10.7554/eLife.24232.014
DOI:
10.7554/eLife.24232.015
DOI:
10.7554/eLife.24232.016
DOI:
10.7554/eLife.24232.017
DOI:
10.7554/eLife.24232.018
DOI:
10.7554/eLife.24232.019
DOI:
10.7554/eLife.24232.020
DOI:
10.7554/eLife.24232.021
DOI:
10.7554/eLife.24232.022
DOI:
10.7554/eLife.24232.023
DOI:
10.7554/eLife.24232.024
DOI:
10.7554/eLife.24232.025
DOI:
10.7554/eLife.24232.026
DOI:
10.7554/eLife.24232.027
DOI:
10.7554/eLife.24232.028
DOI:
10.7554/eLife.24232.029
DOI:
10.7554/eLife.24232.030
DOI:
10.7554/eLife.24232.031
DOI:
10.7554/eLife.24232.032
DOI:
10.7554/eLife.24232.033
DOI:
10.7554/eLife.24232.034
DOI:
10.7554/eLife.24232.035
DOI:
10.7554/eLife.24232.036
DOI:
10.7554/eLife.24232.037
DOI:
10.7554/eLife.24232.038
DOI:
10.7554/eLife.24232.039
DOI:
10.7554/eLife.24232.040
DOI:
10.7554/eLife.24232.041
DOI:
10.7554/eLife.24232.042
DOI:
10.7554/eLife.24232.043
DOI:
10.7554/eLife.24232.044
DOI:
10.7554/eLife.24232.045
DOI:
10.7554/eLife.24232.046
DOI:
10.7554/eLife.24232.047
DOI:
10.7554/eLife.24232.048
DOI:
10.7554/eLife.24232.049
DOI:
10.7554/eLife.24232.050
DOI:
10.7554/eLife.24232.051
Language:
English
Publisher:
eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd
Publication Date:
2017
detail.hit.zdb_id:
2687154-3
Bookmarklink