Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
  • 1
    In: ASU Arbeitsmedizin Sozialmedizin Umweltmedizin, Alfons W. Gentner Verlag GmbH & Co. KG, Vol. 2021, No. 05 ( 2021-05-04), p. 276-284
    Abstract: Working from home even after the coronavirus pandemic? Advantages and disadvantages from a business perspective Aims: This article provides an overview of the business perspective on working from home even after the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. Reasons for and against an expansion of working from home are analyzed. Method: The analyses are based on the fourth wave of the “Businesses in the COVID-19 crisis” study, in which businesses were asked in detail about their current experiences with and future plans for working from home. For the descriptive analyses, only businesses in which the possibility of working from home exists in principle were taken into account (n = 1,059). Results: Working from home has become more important in German businesses during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. At the same time, the majority of businesses are aiming to return to their pre-crisis levels. About one fifth of the businesses plan to expand working from home in the future. Large businesses in particular want to expand their options. Businesses that want to reduce the proportion of staff working from home or teleworking again after the crisis state that the activities of the employees are not suitable for working from home. When businesses want to expand working from home options, they most often aim to improve the flexibility and work-life balance of their employees. Conclusion: Increasing work-from-home activities poses new challenges for occupational safety and health, and company regulations on the organization of work-from-home activities are gaining in importance. Large businesses in particular see a possible perceived unequal treatment of employees as a future issue. Keywords: working from home – home office – teleworking – mobile working – business survey – SARS-CoV-2 pandemic
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0944-6052
    Language: Unknown
    Publisher: Alfons W. Gentner Verlag GmbH & Co. KG
    Publication Date: 2021
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    In: ASU Arbeitsmedizin Sozialmedizin Umweltmedizin, Alfons W. Gentner Verlag GmbH & Co. KG, Vol. 2020, No. 09 ( 2020-09-01), p. 562-569
    Abstract: Who is affected by high work intensity? Identifying and reducing potential hazards Objectives: The health of employees is under threat from excessively high work intensity. Despite numerous studies emphasising the growing significance of work intensity, still not enough is known about the workplaces where increased work intensity is occurring or what form of work is affected. In order to evaluate levels of work intensity amongst employees in a more differentiated way, this article describes various dimensions of high work intensity according to occupational segments and requirement levels. We also discuss what the findings mean for operational practice. Methods: The data basis for the analyses was the BiBB/BAUA Employment Survey 2018 (the Federal Institute for Vocational Education and Training, in cooperation with the Federal Institute for Occupational Safety and Health), a representative cross-sectional survey of some 20,000 employed persons in Germany. Results: The results of the analysis show that the demands of high work intensity affect all the occupational groups observed here. It also becomes clear that the observed dimensions of high work intensity – multitasking, pressure to perform or meet deadlines, frequent interruptions, working very quickly and at the limits of individual capabilities – occur in all occupational segments and at all levels of requirement. These dimensions occur to varying degrees and in varying combinations, however, and are often displayed as a “bundle of work-related stress”. This means on the one hand that specific work intensity profiles can be identified for the occupational groups observed. On the other hand it is also possible to detect overarching patterns: multitasking is particularly common in the service sector, for example, where customer contact plays a greater role. Conclusions: The fact that high work intensity is noticeable in different ways in the groups of employees considered on the one hand, and that commonalities are also apparent across occupations on the other, indicates that both the level of work intensity and its structure are related to overarching job characteristics, work organisation processes and other workplace-related organisational frameworks. For workplace design these multiple causes mean that the focus should not only be on individual working activities or stressors but that a more holistic approach is also needed, e.g. working time organisation, work organisation processes or business models and their effects on employees. The results emphasise the need to establish throughout the company an awareness of health risks caused by high work intensity. The established instruments of occupational health and safety should serve as a basis for shaping developments. Keywords: work intensity – work organisation – occupational health and safety – recommendation for action
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0944-6052
    Language: Unknown
    Publisher: Alfons W. Gentner Verlag GmbH & Co. KG
    Publication Date: 2020
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. Further information can be found on the KOBV privacy pages