Content:
Every year, through mass drug administration (MDA), hundreds of millions of the world's poorest people receive a single annual dose of one or more drugs to eliminate certain parasitic worm or bacterial infections. Some of these infections, mostly prevalent in tropical areas, have traditionally been neglected from the public health and research point of view. These conditions, collectively known as the neglected tropical diseases (NTDs), still cause, at the cusp of the second decade of the 21st century, a significant amount of morbidity and mortality. The existing control measures for NTD have an enormous potential, although there are still some challenges that require further investigation. For some diseases, alternative strategies may be needed, including longer duration of MDA programmes or modified drug regimens. For other diseases, such as yaws, the work must start almost from scratch, since little has been achieved in terms of control of this disease in the past 50 years. Although eight NTDs affect the region, two diseases pose a major public health problem in the South Pacific Islands, namely yaws and lymphatic filariasis and are the basis for his thesis. These two infections were selected for a number of reasons. First, they affect the South Pacific region disproportionately. Secondly, little research has been conducted in the past years. And third, but more importantly, several epidemiological, technological and historical factors make these two diseases amenable to elimination. Safe and effective tools and interventions to achieve these targets are available and concerted efforts to scale them up are likely to lead to success. Yaws is one of the most neglected of the NTDs. Yaws was one of the first diseases to be targeted for eradication on a global scale, efforts which almost led to the disease disappearance as a result of a massive treatment program started in the 1950s. After the successful eradication campaigns the primary health care systems were supposed to give the last push towards eradication of yaws. However a combination of various factors including poor political commitment and limited funding resulted in a progressive abandonment of efforts and the resurgence of the disease. Every new case of yaws was the disappointing confirmation that the public health world had missed a great opportunity. Today yaws has resurged in many tropical areas and presents new challenges including its unknown epidemiological situation, the attenuated clinical forms of the disease, a poor awareness and knowledge among health care workers, the lack of knowledge about the effectiveness of classic treatment with penicillin and, an obvious need for research into simplified administration schemes or new antibiotic treatments, particularly oral ones. There is an enormous knowledge gap regarding current reliable epidemiological information about the disease. Certainly we know little about the burden in the three Melanesian countries where the disease is highly endemic, Papua New Guinea, Solomon Islands and, Vanuatu. In Solomon Islands and Vanuatu there are indications that Yaws is widespread and prevalent, but we know that the diagnosis is unreliable. This takes us to the next point, what does a diagnosis of yaws mean? Overall the natural history of the disease in this era, where it is often subject to inadequate antibiotic pressure, is very unclear. Some authors have suggested that yaws appears to be attenuated in both Solomon Islands and Vanuatu. They state that bone involvement in yaws is now rare and implies that yaws is a mild disease not requiring efforts for elimination. However, the first paper of this thesis describes the epidemiology of yaws in Lihir Island (Papua New Guinea, PNG) and shows a high rate of classical primary ulcers (almost 60%) and significant bone and periosteal involvement (more than 15%), suggesting that attenuation" is not an important issue. When we look at the diagnostic criteria for yaws, signs and symptoms alone are still used often in many areas to diagnose the disease. This reliance on clinical findings was the result of the difficulty of performing serological tests in remote areas. Today, available rapid serological tests are simple, rapid, inexpensive and useful for guiding confirmation of cases, making them adequate tools for the diagnosis and monitoring of the disease. The clinical diagnosis of yaws is complicated because its clinical manifestations may be unspecific. Thus, it is possible that a significant proportion of yaws cases may in fact have been falsely diagnosed. We show, in the first article, that in our experience only 60% of the cases with a clinical suspicion of yaws were finally confirmed by serologic tests. Therefore, a proper diagnosis of yaws requires the interpretation of clinical findings with reference to laboratory results and the epidemiologic history of the patient. Serological testing in yaws is not only important for diagnostic accuracy, but also is very helpful in defining the disease's evolution and eventual cure after treatment. Rapid plasma regain (RPR) titres should decline within 6-12 months, becoming negative in less than 2 years. The second article of this thesis combines a clinical and serological approach to assess the response after treatment with benzathine benzylpenicillin, and it identifies an overall 20% treatment failure. This could be related to resistance to the antimicrobial drug used or to re-infection caused. The distinction between re-infection and true resistance to antibiotic treatment is difficult to make but these failures are worrisome. This article also proposes a multivariate model performed to identify independent determinants of failure that affected the outcome after treatment. The risk for reinfection caused by repeated contact with infected children seems to be a pivotal predictor of failure. Low baseline titters (〈1:32) of RPR are also an important and independent predictor of failure, possibly as a result of the greater difficulty in resolving chronic infections which are usually accompanied by low titters. With yaws re-emerging, the development of new strategies against this infection aimed at simplifying its treatment and potentially re-focussing strategies towards its eradication seems essential. Injectable penicillin is still effective but management with an oral drug that can be easily administered on a large scale should be the preferred method for treatment. To date, there had been no studies that directly compared the efficacy of penicillin with any of the potentially alternative agents shown to work in the treatment of the non-venereal treponematoses. The fourth paper in this thesis has shown that a single-dose of oral azithromycin is non-inferior to benzathine benzylpenicillin for the treatment of yaws in children in PNG. In an open-label randomised trial, at 6-month follow-up, 96% of patients treated with azithromycin were cured, as were 93% in the benzathine benzylpenicillin group. The prospects of eliminating and eventually eradicating yaws may now be enhanced by the use of a single-dose of oral azithromycin in mass drug administration campaigns. Community based mass administration of azithromycin has been widely used in many locations for the control of trachoma, which, like yaws, is a disease of poor rural communities in developing countries, and has been used in a more limited way to control granuloma inguinale and outbreaks of venereal syphilis. Elimination of yaws and lymphatic filariasis in the South-Pacific Islands is now considered biologically feasible and programmatically attainable. The Global Programme to Eliminate Lymphatic Filariasis (GPELF) has expanded quickly to reach the target of elimination by 2020. On the other hand the strategy to eliminate yaws is again at the centre of discussions and given that infected humans are the only source of disease, its eradication could be achieved within a very relatively short time. The fifth article of the thesis comprehensively reviews antimicrobial treatments and elimination strategies against yaws. In order to control yaws and push it towards elimination, we propose to move away from penicillin to azithromycin and use mass treatment campaigns of the entire population in endemic communities irrespective of the prevalence. Also, to make sure all cases are tracked down and treated, strict follow-up measures and selective mass treatment will be required until zero case prevalence is reached. Importantly, we suggest testing the principle of interrupting transmission in pilot implementation studies, including prevalence surveys to assess the impact of the intervention and macrolide resistance monitoring which in our opinion will be essential evaluation tools to guide us towards a sustainable elimination. Lymphatic filariasis (LF), caused by the mosquito-borne nematode Wuchereria Bancrofti, is a major public-health problem in the Melanesian countries. Annual MDA over five yea ...
Note:
Dissertation Universitat de Barcelona 2012
Language:
English
Bookmarklink
