Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Ecosystem services of urban green spaces in African countries—perspectives and challenges

  • Published:
Urban Ecosystems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The concept of ecosystem goods and services is increasingly used to describe how biodiversity and ecosystems are linked to human well-being and that it should be placed at the core of sustainable urban development. Predictions of a tremendous future increase of urbanization in Africa necessitate an investigation into the research on ecosystem goods and services in the urban green infrastructure of Africa. Ecosystem goods and services (ES) are described as the benefits humans derive directly or indirectly from ecosystem functions and are classified as supporting, provisioning, regulating and cultural services. A literature study focusing on journal papers was conducted. Additionally a case study based on two masters studies was further refined. ES studies in African cities are biased towards South Africa and include assessments and economic valuations in which several different methods were used to determine direct consumptive and non-consumptive and indirect use values. Emphasis was placed on the multifunctional nature of ES. The main objectives of these studies were to sensitize policy makers, planners and the general public about the importance of biodiversity and ES. Ecosystem-based adaptation is discussed as the most appropriate approach in terms of applying knowledge about ES and their values in African cities as many residents still rely on ES from natural areas, but the major ecological, economic and political challenges are acknowledged. A case study focusing on domestic gardens (private green spaces) have indicated that the demand and supply of certain ES differ along a socio-economic gradient due to poor service delivery and smaller plots in the poorer areas mainly due to the legacy of separate development of the past. Where provisioning services are mainly outsourced in cities, it was found that plant species useful as food, medicine, etc. were more frequent in the gardens of poorer residents than in those of more affluent areas. The tendency to pay more for residential properties close to public open spaces, as in Europe, could not be statistically proven in the more affluent areas of a South African city, although the property values in proximity of public open spaces in some of the areas studied were lower than further away.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allsopp MH, De Lange WJ, Veldtman R (2008) Valuing insect pollination services with cost replacement. PLoS One 3(9):e3128. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0003128

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bhatti M, Church A (2004) Cultivating natures: homes and gardens in late modernity. Sociol 35(2):365–383

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolund P, Hunhammar S (1999) Ecosystem services in urban areas. Ecol Econ 29:293–301

    Google Scholar 

  • Bromilow C (2001) Problem plants of South Africa. A guide to the identification and control of more than 300 invasive plants and other weeds. Briza Publications, Pretoria

    Google Scholar 

  • Cabe Space (2005) Paying for parks: Eight models for funding urban green space. London: Route: London, p 6 http://www.cabe.org.uk/files/Paying-for-parks-full-report.pdf Accessed 20 Apr 2009

  • Cho S, Poudyal NC, Roberts RK (2008) Spatial analysis of the amenity value of green open space. Ecol Econ 66:403–416

    Google Scholar 

  • Cilliers EJ (2009) Bridging the green-value-gap: a South African approach. Int J Soc Human Sc 3:615–620

    Google Scholar 

  • Cilliers EJ (2010a) Rethinking sustainable development: the economic value of green spaces. Dissertation, North West University, South Africa. (http://hdl.handle.net/10394/4567)

  • Cilliers SS (2010b) Social aspects of urban biodiversity: An overview. In: Müller N, Werner P, Kelsey JG (eds) Urban biodiversity and design. Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford, pp 81–100

    Google Scholar 

  • Cilliers SS, Bouwman H, Drewes JE (2009) Comparative urban ecological research in developing countries. In: McDonnell MJ, Hahs AK, Breuste JH (eds) Ecology of cities and towns: A comparative approach. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 90–111

    Google Scholar 

  • Cilliers SS, Drewes JE, Du Toit MJ, Cilliers DP (2011) Urban ecology: Policy issues resolved and unresolved. In: Geyer HS (ed) International handbook of urban policy, Volume 3: Issues in the developing world. Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, pp 225–245

    Google Scholar 

  • Cilliers SS, Siebert SJ, Davoren E, Lubbe CS (2012) Social aspects of urban ecology in developing countries, with an emphasis on urban domestic gardens. In: Richter M, Weiland U (eds) Applied urban ecology: A global framework. Wiley-Blackwell, Chichester, pp 123–138

    Google Scholar 

  • Colding J (2007) Ecological land-use complementation for building resilience in urban ecosystems. Landscape Urban Plann 81:46–55

    Google Scholar 

  • Colding J (2011) The role of ecosystem services in contemporary urban planning. In: Niemelä J, Breuste JH, Elmqvist T, Guntenspergen G, James P, McIntyre N (eds) Urban ecology: Patterns, processes and applications. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 228–237

    Google Scholar 

  • Costanza R, d’Arge R, de Groot R, Farber S, Grasso M, Hannon B, Limburg K, Naeem S, O’Neill RV, Paruelo J, Raskin RG, Sutton P, van den Belt M (1997) The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature 387:253–260

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cowling RM, Egoh B, Knight AT, O’Farrell PJ, Reyers B, Rouget M, Roux DJ, Welz A, Wilhelm-Rechmann A (2008) An operational model for mainstreaming ecosystem services for implementation. P Natl Acad Sci USA 105(28):9483–9488

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Crane P, Kinzig A (2005) Nature in the metropolis. Science 308:1225–11225

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Daniels GD, Kirkpatrick JB (2006) Comparing the characteristics of front and back domestic gardens in Hobart, Tasmania, Australia. Landscape Urban Plan 78:344–352

    Google Scholar 

  • Davenport NA, Shackleton CM, Gambiza J (2012) The direct use value of municipal commonage goods and servcies to urban households in the eastern cape, South Africa. Land Use Policy 29:548–557

    Google Scholar 

  • De Groot RS, Wilson MA, Boumans RMJ (2002) A typology for the classification, description and valuation of ecosystem functions, goods and services. Ecol Econ 41:393–408

    Google Scholar 

  • De Groot RS, Alkemade R, Braat L, Hein L, Willemen L (2010) Challenges in integrating the concept of ecosystem services and values in landscape planning, management and decision making. Ecol Complex 7:260–272

    Google Scholar 

  • Defrancesco E, Rosato P, Rossetto L (2006) The appraisal approach to valuing environmental resources. In: Valuing complex natural resource systems: The case of the Lagoon of Venice, Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing, pp 40–57

  • Dobbs C, Escobedo FJ, Zipperer WC (2011) A framework for developing urban forest ecosystem services and goods indicators. Landscape Urban Plan 99:196–206

    Google Scholar 

  • Drechsel P, Dongus S (2010) Dynamics and sustainability of urban agriculture: examples from sub-Saharan Africa. Sustain Sci 5:69–78

    Google Scholar 

  • Egoh BN, Reyers B, Rouget M, Richardson DM, Le Maitre DC, Van Jaarsveld AS (2008) Mapping ecosystem services for planning and management. Agric Ecosyst Environ 127:135–140

    Google Scholar 

  • Egoh BN, Reyers B, Rouget M, Richardson DM (2011) Identifying priority areas for ecosystem service management in South African grasslands. J Environ Manage 92:1642–1650

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Elmqvist T (2011) Introduction to Ecosystem services, and social systems in urban landscapes. In: Niemelä J, Breuste JH, Elmqvist T, Guntenspergen G, James P, McIntyre N (eds) Urban ecology: Patterns, processes and applications. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 191–192

    Google Scholar 

  • Escobedo FJ, Kroeger T, Wagner JE (2011) Urban forests and pollution mitigation: analyzing ecosystem services and disservices. Environ Pollut 159:2078–2087

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Farber SC, Costanza R, Wilson MA (2002) Economic and ecological concepts for valuing ecosystem services. Ecol Econ 41:375–392

    Google Scholar 

  • Fausold CJ, Lilieholm R (1999) The economic value of open space: a review and synthesis. Environ Manage 23(3):307–320

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher B, Turner RK, Morling P (2009) Defining and classifying ecosystem services for decision making. Ecol Econ 68:643–653

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaston KJ, Warren PH, Thompson K, Smith RM (2005) Urban domestic gardens (IV): the extent of the resource and its associated features. Biodivers Conserv 14:3327–3349

    Google Scholar 

  • Glen HF (2002) Cultivated plants of southern Africa—names, common names, literature. Jacana, Johannesburg

    Google Scholar 

  • Goddard MA, Benton TG, Dougill AJ (2010) Scaling up from gardens: biodiversity conservation in urban environments. Trends Ecol Evol 25:90–98

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Head L, Muir P, Hampel E (2004) Australian backyard gardens and the journey of migration. Geogr Rev 94(3):326–347

    Google Scholar 

  • Hougner C, Colding J, Söderqvist T (2006) Economic valuation of a seed dispersal service in the Stockholm National Urban Park, Sweden. Ecol Econ 59:364–374

    Google Scholar 

  • Jo H-K, McPherson EG (2001) Indirect carbon reduction by residential vegetation and planting strategies in Chicago, USA. J Environ Manage 61:165–177

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kestermont B, Frendo L, Zaccaï E (2011) Indicators of the impacts of development on environment: a comparison of Africa and Europe. Ecol Indic 11:848–856

    Google Scholar 

  • Kinzig AP, Warren PS, Martin CA, Hope D, Katti M (2005) The effects of human socioeconomic status and cultural characteristics on urban patterns of biodiversity. Ecol Soc 10(1):23, [online] URL: http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol10/iss1/art23/

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirkpatrick JB, Daniels GD, Zagorski T (2007) Explaining variation in front gardens between suburbs of Hobart, Tasmania, Australia. Landscape Urban Plan 79:314–322

    Google Scholar 

  • Kithiia J, Lyth A (2011) Urban wildscapes and green spaces in Mombasa and their potential contribution to climate change adaptation and mitigation. Environ Urban 23(1):251–265

    Google Scholar 

  • Korsgaard L, Schou JS (2010) Economic valuation of aquatic ecosystem services in developing countries. Water Policy 12:20–31

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuruneri-Chitepo C, Shackleton CM (2011) The distribution, abundance and composition of street trees in selected towns of the Eastern Cape, South Africa. Urban For Urban Gree 10:247–254

    Google Scholar 

  • Lannas KSM, Turpie JK (2009) Valuing the provisioning services of wetlands: contrasting a rural wetland with a peri-urban wetland in South Africa. Ecol Soc 14(2):18, [online] URL: http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol4/iss2/art18/

    Google Scholar 

  • Le Maitre DC, O’Farrell PJ, Reyers B (2007) Ecosystem services in South Africa: a research theme that that can engage environmental, economic and social scientists in the development of sustainability science? S Afr J Sci 103:367–374

    Google Scholar 

  • Loram A, Tratalos J, Warren PH, Gaston KJ (2007) Urban domestic gardens (X): the extent and structure of the resource in five major cities. Landscape Ecol 22:601–615

    Google Scholar 

  • Lubbe CS (2011) Comparison of the urban domestic garden flora along a socio-economic gradient in the Tlokwe City Municipality. Dissertation, North West University, South Africa

  • Lubbe CS, Siebert SJ, Cilliers SS (2010) Political legacy of South Africa affects the plant diversity patterns of urban domestic gardens along a socioeconomic gradient. Sci Res Essays 5(19):2900–2910

    Google Scholar 

  • Luttik J (2000) The value of trees, water and open space as reflected by house prices in the Netherlands. Landscape Urban Plan 48(3):161–167

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyytimäki J, Sipilä M (2009) Hopping on one leg – the challenge of ecosystem disservices for urban green management. Urban For Urban Gree 8:309–315

    Google Scholar 

  • Mathieu R, Freeman C, Aryal J (2007) Mapping private gardens in urban areas using object-oriented techniques and very high-resolution satellite imagery. Landscape Urban Plan 81:179–192

    Google Scholar 

  • May J, Rogerson CM (1995) Poverty and sustainable cities in South Africa: the role of urban cultivation. Habitat Int 19(2):165–181

    Google Scholar 

  • McConnachie MM, Shackleton CM (2010) Public green space inequality in small towns in South Africa. Habitat Int 34:244–248

    Google Scholar 

  • McDonald RI (2009) Ecosystem service demand and supply along the urban-to-rural gradinet. J Conserv Plan 5:1–14

    Google Scholar 

  • McDonald RI, Marcotullio P (2011) Global effects of urbanization on ecosystem services. In: Niemelä J, Breuste JH, Elmqvist T, Guntenspergen G, James P, McIntyre N (eds) Urban ecology: Patterns, processes and applications. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 193–205

    Google Scholar 

  • McKinney ML (2006) Urbanisation as a major cause of biotic homogenization. Biol Conserv 127:247–260

    Google Scholar 

  • Meadows M (1999) The ecological resource base: biodiversity and conservation. The geography of South Africa in a changing world. Oxford University Press South Africa, Cape Town

    Google Scholar 

  • Mertz O, Ravnborg HM, Lövei GL, Nielsen I, Konijnendijk CC (2007) Ecosystem services and biodiversity in developing countries. Biodivers Conserv 16:2729–2737

    Google Scholar 

  • Millenium Ecosystem Assessment (2003) Ecosystems and human well-being: A framework for assessment. Island Press, Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Millenium Ecosystem Assessment (2005) Millenium ecosystem assessment synthesis report. Island Press, Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Molebatsi LY, Siebert SJ, Cilliers SS (2010) The Tswana tshimo: a homegarden system of useful plants with a particular layout and function. Afr J Agric Res 5(21):2952–2963

    Google Scholar 

  • Mougeot LJA (ed) (2005) Agropolis, the social, political and environmental dimesnions of urban agriculture. Earthscan, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Niemelä J, Saarela S-R, Söderman T, Kopperoinen L, Yli-Pelkonen V, Väre S, Kotze DJ (2010) Using the ecosystem approach for better planning and conservation of urban green spaces: a Finland case study. Biodivers Conserv 19:3225–3243

    Google Scholar 

  • Nowak D, Crane DE, Stevens JC (2006) Air pollution removal by urban trees and scrubs in the United States. Urban For Urban Gree 4:115–123

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Farrell PJ, WJ Dl, Le Maitre DC, Reyers B, Blignaut JN, Milton SJ, Atkinson D, Egoh B, Maherry A, Colvin C, Colwing RM (2011) The posibilities and pitfalls presented by a pragmatic approach to ecosystem service valuation in an arid biodiversity hotspot. J Arid Environ 75:612–623

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Farrell PJ, Andersen PML, Le Maitre D, Holmes PM (2012) Insights and opportunities offered by a rapid ecosystem service assessment in promoting a conservation agenda in an urban biodiversity hotspot. Ecol Soc 17(3):27

    Google Scholar 

  • Patel Z (2006) Of questionable value: the role of practitioners in building sustainable cities. Geoforum 37:682–694

    Google Scholar 

  • Pedlowski MA, Carneiro da Silva VA, Corabi Adell JJ, Heynen NC (2002) Urban forest and environmental inequality in Campos dos Goytacazes, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Urban Ecosyst 6:9–20

    Google Scholar 

  • Philadelphia Parks Alliance (2008) How much value does the City of Philadelphia receive from its park and recreation system? A report by the Trust for Public Land’s Centre for City Park Excellence for the Philadelphia Parks Alliance. Philadelphia, USA

  • Pickett STA, Cadenasso ML, Grove JM, Groffman PM, Band LE, Boone CG, Burch WR Jr, Grimmond CSB, Horn J, Jenkins JC, Law NL, Nilon CH, Pouyat RV, Szlavecz K, Warren PS, Wilson PA (2008) Beyond urban legends: an emerging framework of urban ecology, as illustrated by the Baltimore ecosystem study. BioScience 58:139–150

    Google Scholar 

  • Pienaar K (2000) The South African what flower is that? Struik Publishers, Cape Town

    Google Scholar 

  • Redwood M (ed) (2009) Agriculture in urban planning, generating livelihoods and food security. Earthscan, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Ring I, Hansjürgens B, Elmqvist T, Wittmer H, Sukhdev P (2010) Challenges in framing the economics of ecosystems and biodiversity: the TEEB initiative. Curr Opin Environ Sust 2:15–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts DC (2008) Thinking globally, acting locally – institutionalizing climate change at the local government level in Durban, South Africa. Environ Urban 20(2):521–537

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts DC (2010) Prioritizing climate change adaptation and local level resilience in Durban, South Africa. Environ Urban 2292:397–413

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts DC, Diederichs N (2001) Durban’s local agenda 21 programme: tackling sustainable development in a post-apartheid city. Environ Urban 14(1):189–201

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts DC, Boon R, Croucamp P, Mander M (2005) Resource economics as a tool for open space planning Durban, South Africa. In: Trzyna T (ed) The Urban Imperative, urban outreach strategies for protected area agencies. IUCN-California Institute of Public Affairs, Sacramento, pp 44–48

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts DC, Boon R, Diederichs N, Douwes E, Govender N, McInnes A, McLean C, O’Donoghue S, Spires M (2011) Exploring ecosystem-based adaptation in Durban, South Africa: “learning-by-doing” at the local government coal face. Environ Urban 24(1):1–29

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogerson CM (1998) Urban agriculture and urban poverty alleviation: South African debates. Agrekon 37(2):171–188

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandström UF (2002) Green infrastructure planning in urban Sweden. Plann Pract Res 17(4):373–385

    Google Scholar 

  • Schäffler A (2011) Enhancing resilience between people and nature in urban landcapes. Dissertation, Stellenbosch University, South Africa

  • Schmidt SJ (2008) The evolving relationship between open space preservation and local planning practice. J Plan Hist 7(2):91–112

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider A, Logan KE, Kucharik CJ (2012) Impacts of urbanization on ecosystem goods and services in the U.S. Corn Belt. Ecosystems 15:519–541

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schuyt KD (2005) Economic consequences of wetland degradation for local populations in Africa. Ecol Econ 53:177–190

    Google Scholar 

  • Shackleton CM, Shackleton S (2006) Household wealth status and natural resource use in the Kat River valley, South Africa. Ecol Econ 57:306–317

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon D, McGregor D, Nsiah-Gyabaah K (2004) The changing urban-rural interface of African cities: definitional issues and an application to Kumasi, Ghana. Environ Urban 16(2):235–247

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith RM, Thompson K, Hodgson JG, Warren PH, Gaston KJ (2006) Urban domestic gardens (IX): composition and richness of the vascular plant flora, and implications for native biodiversity. Biol Conserv 129:312–322

    Google Scholar 

  • StatSoft, Inc. (2011). STATISTICA (data analysis software system), version 10. www.statsoft.com

  • Stoffberg GH, Van Rooyen MW, Van der Linde MJ, Groeneveld HT (2008) Predicting the growth in tree height and crown size of three street tree species in the City of Tshwane, South Africa. Urban For Urban Gree 7:259–264

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoffberg GH, Van Rooyen MW, Van der Linde MJ, Groeneveld HT (2010) Carbon sequestration estimates of indigenous street trees in the City of Tswane, South Africa. Urban For Urban Gree 9:9–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Swift MJ, Izac A-MN, van Noordwijk M (2004) Biodiversity and ecosystem services in agricultural landscapes – are we asking the right questions? Agric Ecosyst Environ 104:113–134

    Google Scholar 

  • TEEB (2010) The economics of ecosystems and biodiversity: mainstreaming the economics of nature. A synthesis of the approach, conclusions and recommendations of TEEB. Available at: www.teebweb.org

  • TEEB (2011) The economics of ecosystems and biodiversity: TEEB Manual for Cities – Ecosystem services in urban management. Available at: www.teebweb.org

  • Thompson C (2002) Urban open space in the 21st century. Landscape Urban Plan 2(7):59–72

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson K, Austin KC, Smith RM, Warren PH, Angold PG, Gaston KJ (2003) Urban domestic gardens (I): putting small-scale plant diversity in context. J Veg Sci 14:71–78

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson K, Hodgson JG, Smith RM, Warren PH, Gaston KJ (2004) Urban domestic gardens (III): composition and diversity of lawn floras. J Veg Sci 15:373–378

    Google Scholar 

  • Tibaijuka, A, 2010. Balanced development for Africa: The cities of the future – beyond chaotic urbanisation. 1027th Wilton Park Conference, West Sussex, United Kingdon. Presentation on Balanced Development for Africa. UN-HABITAT

  • Tratalos J, Fuller RA, Warren PH, Davies RG, Gaston KJ (2007) Urban form, biodiversity potential and ecosystem services. Landscape Urban Plan 83:308–317

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner RK, Paavola J, Cooper P, Farber S, Jessamy V, Georgiou S (2003) Valuing nature: lessons learned and future research directions. Ecol Econ 46:493–510

    Google Scholar 

  • Turpie JK, Marais C, Blignaut JN (2008) The working for water programme: evolution of a payments for ecosystem service mechanism that addresses both poverty and ecosystem service delivery in South Africa. Ecol Econ 65:788–798

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyrväinen L (1997) The amenity value of the urban forest: an application of the hedonic pricing method. Landsc Urban Plan 37(3–4):211–222

    Google Scholar 

  • Tzoulas KK, Korpela K, Venn S, Yli-Pelkonen V, Kazmierczak A, Niemelä J, James P (2007) Promoting ecosystem and human health in urban areas using green infrastructure: a literature review. Landscape Urban Plan 81:167–178

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations (2008) World urbanization prospects: the 2007 revision. Executive Summary. http://www.un.org/esa/population/publications/wup2007/2007WUP_ExecSum_web.pdf

  • Van Wilgen BW, Reyers B, Le Maitre DC, Richardson DM, Schonegevel L (2008) A biome-scale assessment of the impact of invasive alien plants on ecossytem servcies in South Africa. J Environ Manage 89:336–349

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Van Wyk B-E (2005) Food plants of the world. Briza Publications, Pretoria

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Wyk B-E, Gericke N (2000) People’s plants: a guide to useful plants of Southern Africa. Briza Publications, Pretoria

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Wyk B-E, Van Oudtshoorn B, Gericke N (1997) Medicinal plants of South Africa. Briza Publications, Pretoria

    Google Scholar 

  • Venard (1995) Urban Planning and Environment in Sub-Saharan Africa, UNCEDPaper no. 5 (AFTES) World Bank, Washington D.C.

  • Webb NL (2011) When enough, is enough? Advocacy, evidence and criticism in the field of urban agriculture in South Africa. Dev South Afr 28(2):195–208

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams NSG, Schwartz MW, Vesk PA, Mccarthy MA, Hahs AK, Clemants SE, Corlett RT, Duncan RP, Norton BA, Thompson K, McDonnell MJ (2009) A conceptual framework for predicting the effects of urban environments on floras. J Ecol 97:4–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolf KL (2004) Public value of nature: Economics of Urban trees, parks and open space. Design with spirit. Edmond, Environmental Design Research Association, Washington, p 5

    Google Scholar 

  • Woolley H, Swanwick C, Dunnet N (2003) Nature, role and value of green space in towns and cities: an overview. http://www.atypom-link.com/ALEX/doi/abs/10.2148/benv.29.2.94.54467. Accessed 18 Sept 2009

  • Wu JG (2011) A landscape approach for sustainability science. In: Weinstein MP and Turner RE (eds.), Sustainability science: The emerging paradigm and the urban environment. Springer

  • Zagorski T, Kirkpatrick JB, Stratford E (2004) Gardens and the bush: gardeners’ attitudes, garden types and invasives. Aust Geogr Stud 42(2):207–220

    Google Scholar 

  • Zezza A, Tasciotti L (2010) Urban agriculture, poverty, and food security: empirical evidence from a sample of developing countries. Food Policy 35:265–273

    Google Scholar 

  • Zobola AM, Mkabela QN (2006) Traditional knowledge transfer of activities practised by Zulu women to manage medicinal and food plant gardens. Afr J Range For Sci 23:77–80

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Environmental Sciences and Development, North-West University, Private Bag X6001, Potchefstroom, 2520, South Africa

    Sarel Cilliers, Juaneé Cilliers, Rina Lubbe & Stefan Siebert

Authors
  1. Sarel Cilliers
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Juaneé Cilliers
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Rina Lubbe
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Stefan Siebert
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sarel Cilliers.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cilliers, S., Cilliers, J., Lubbe, R. et al. Ecosystem services of urban green spaces in African countries—perspectives and challenges. Urban Ecosyst 16, 681–702 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-012-0254-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-012-0254-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation