CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · South Asian J Cancer
DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-1775846
Original Article

The Islanded Nasolabial Flap: A Versatile and Reliable Flap for Reconstruction in Cancers of the Oral Cavity

Amar Jain
1   Department of Surgical Oncology, Chirayu Medical College and Hospital, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India
,
1   Department of Surgical Oncology, Chirayu Medical College and Hospital, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India
,
Deepak Bhojwani
1   Department of Surgical Oncology, Chirayu Medical College and Hospital, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India
,
Abhishek Sharma
2   Department of Surgery, Mahaveer Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India
› Author Affiliations

Abstract

Zoom Image
Sandeep Ghosh

On the Indian subcontinent, oral cancer represents a significant health burden. Local flaps offer a viable alternative to free flaps in specific reconstructive scenarios where free flaps may not be feasible. The islanded nasolabial flap, based on the facial artery, proves to be a robust and versatile option for single-stage reconstructions of oral cavity defects. In this study, we share our experience employing the islanded nasolabial flap at a high-volume cancer center in Central India for reconstructing buccal mucosa and tongue defects. This prospective observational study focused on approximately 76 patients diagnosed with squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity (specifically, the anterior 2/3rd of the tongue and buccal mucosa) at our cancer hospital between August 2021 and January 2023. Initially, 76 patients were included; however, four patients were subsequently excluded due to inadvertent facial vein injury during neck dissection caused by level IB node invasion. Consequently, 72 patients underwent islanded nasolabial flap reconstruction and were monitored for postoperative complications and functional outcomes. Our study's patients fell within the age range of 24 to 81 years, with the majority between 40 and 50 years old. Most of our patients had carcinoma affecting the anterior two-thirds of the tongue (61.11%), followed by carcinoma of the buccal mucosa (38.88%). Surgical site infection occurred in four patients (5.55%) at the donor site, and one patient (1.38%) experienced flap necrosis after tongue carcinoma surgery. However, the majority of our patients (93.05%) experienced no postoperative complications. Speech intelligibility was good for all patients (100%) with buccal mucosa cancer. A significant portion of patients (78.57%) could tolerate a normal diet, while 21.42% required a soft diet. Among patients with tongue carcinoma, 56.81% had good speech intelligibility, and 43.18% had acceptable speech intelligibility. Regarding swallowing capacity assessment, 65.90% of patients tolerated a normal diet, and 34.09% could manage a soft diet. None of our patients had poor speech intelligibility, and none depended on a liquid diet or tube feeding. This study underscores the versatility of the islanded nasolabial flap in oral cancer resection reconstruction. The islanded nasolabial flap proves to be a straightforward, effective, and reliable technique with a low incidence of complications and exceptional functional outcomes, establishing it as a valuable reconstructive option for small-to-medium-sized oral defects. This is particularly noteworthy for high-volume centers and regions with limited resources.

Authors' Contributions

Sandeep Ghosh and Amar Jain conceptualized the study. Sandeep Ghosh and Amar Jain helped in methodology. Sandeep Ghosh, Amar Jain, Deepak Bhojwani, and Abhishek Sharma contributed to data collection. Sandeep Ghosh helped in original draft preparation. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.


Data Availability

The data supporting the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.


Informed Consent

Written informed consent was obtained from the patients for publication of this work.


Data Availability

The data supporting the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.




Publication History

Article published online:
06 October 2023

© 2023. MedIntel Services Pvt Ltd. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)

Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
A-12, 2nd Floor, Sector 2, Noida-201301 UP, India

 
  • References

  • 1 Lam L, Samman N. Speech and swallowing following tongue cancer surgery and free flap reconstruction–a systematic review. Oral Oncol 2013; 49 (06) 507-524
  • 2 Nakatsuka T, Harii K, Asato H. et al. Analytic review of 2372 free flap transfers for head and neck reconstruction following cancer resection. J Reconstr Microsurg 2003; 19 (06) 363-368 , discussion 369
  • 3 Yanai C, Kikutani T, Adachi M, Thoren H, Suzuki M, Iizuka T. Functional outcome after total and subtotal glossectomy with free flap reconstruction. Head Neck 2008; 30 (07) 909-918
  • 4 Singh S, Singh RK, Pandey M. Nasolabial flap reconstruction in oral cancer. World J Surg Oncol 2012; 10 (01) 227
  • 5 Fang QG, Li ZN, Zhang X, Liu FY, Xu ZF, Sun CF. Clinical reliability of radial forearm free flap in repair of buccal defects. World J Surg Oncol 2013; 11: 26
  • 6 Eckardt AM, Kokemüller H, Tavassol F, Gellrich NC. Reconstruction of oral mucosal defects using the nasolabial flap: clinical experience with 22 patients. Head Neck Oncol 2011; 3: 28
  • 7 Kallappa S, Shah N. Outcome of nasolabial flap in the reconstruction of head and neck defects. Indian J Surg Oncol 2019; 10 (04) 577-581s
  • 8 Bertha A. Suganthy R. Anatomical variations in termination of common facial vein. JCDR 2011; 5 (01) 24-27
  • 9 Goyal R, Singh CV, Jain S, Parveen S, Gupta P, Gupta D. Our experience with nasolabial flaps in soft tissue reconstruction of oral malignancy; feasible option in rural set up. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2022; 74 (Suppl. 02) 2533-2538
  • 10 Chakrabarti S, Gupta DK, Gupta M. et al. Versatility and reliability of islanded pedicled nasolabial flap in head and neck cancer reconstruction. Laryngoscope 2020; 130 (08) 1967-1972
  • 11 Shah GH, Misra G, Meena A. Pedicled islanded nasolabial flap tunneled under mandible for tongue reconstruction. J Maxillofac Oral Surg 2021; 20 (01) 100-104
  • 12 Cai YC, Li C, Zeng DF. et al. Comparative analysis of radial forearm free flap and anterolateral thigh flap in tongue reconstruction after radical resection of tongue cancer. ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec 2019; 81 (5-6): 252-264