Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The unfolding of the Korean client- and counselor-rated real relationship and the counseling outcome in Korea

  • Published:
Asia Pacific Education Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to examine the unfolding of counselor-client-rated real relationships over the course of counseling as well as to verify whether the change rate is associated with the treatment outcome with a Korean sample. In this study, data were collected from 71 Korean counselor/client dyads; the clients and counselors completed real-relationship measures (KRRI-C, KRRI-T) to assess the strength of their real relationship after the first, third, fifth, and eighth session of the counseling. Clients also completed the outcome measure (KOQ-30) before the first session and at the end of the eighth session. To analyze this, latent growth curve modeling (LGCM) was used. The results of the analysis are as follows: first, both client-rated and counselor-rated real relationship significantly increased linearly over the course of counseling sessions. Second, the client’s initial ratings and the change rate of the real relationship were significantly related with the treatment outcome. Third, the counselor’s initial ratings and the change rate of the real relationship were not related with the treatment outcome. Implications for future research and counseling practice are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ain, S. (2011). The Real Relationship, Therapist Self-Disclosure, and Treatment Progress: A Study of Psychotherapy Dyads (Doctoral dissertation, University of Maryland).

  • Ain, S. & Gelso, C. J. (2008). Chipping away at the blank screen: Self-disclosure, the real relationship, and therapy outcome. Poster presented at the annual convention of the North American Society for Psychotherapy Research, New Haven, CT.

  • Ain, S. & Gelso, C. J. (2011). Client and therapist perceptions of the real relationship and therapist self-disclosure: A study of dyads. Paper presented at the 2011 Convention of the North American Society for Psychotherapy Research, Banff, Alberta, Canada

  • Cho, H., & Seo, Y. S. (2017). Korean counselors’ perceptions of the real relationship in counseling process. Asia Pacific Education Review, 18(1), 135–146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Choi, H. N. (2011). Validation study of the Korean version of Real Relationship Inventory-Therapist form. Korea Journal of Counseling., 12(1), 143–158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Choi, H. N., Lee, E. J., & Kim, M. H. (2015). The unfolding of the real relationship in counseling: Effect of counselor and client attachment. Korea Journal of Counseling, 16(6), 135–158.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Roten, Y., Fischer, M., Drapeau, M., Beretta, V., Kramer, U., Favre, N., et al. (2004). Is one assessment enough? Patterns of helping alliance development and outcome. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy, 11(5), 324–331.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foreman, S. A., & Marmar, C. R. (1985). Therapist actions that address initially poor therapeutic alliances in psychotherapy. American Journal of Psychiatry, 142, 922–926.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freud, S. (1957). Future prospects of psychoanalytic psychotherapy. In J. Strachey (Ed. & Trans.), Standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud (Vol. 11, pp. 139–151). London, England: Hogarth Press. (Original work published 1910)

  • Fuertes, J. N., Gelso, C. J., Owen, J. J., & Cheng, D. (2013). Real relationship, working alliance, transference/countertransference and outcome in time-limited counseling and psychotherapy. Counseling Psychology Quarterly, 26(3–4), 294–312.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuertes, J. N., Mislowack, A., Brown, S., Gur-Arie, S., Wilkinson, S., & Gelso, C. J. (2007). Correlates of the real relationship in psychotherapy: A study of dyads. Psychotherapy Research, 17, 423–430.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaston, L. (1990). The concept of the alliance and its role in psychotherapy: Theoretical and empirical considerations. Psychotherapy, 27, 143–153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gelso, C. J. (2009). The real relationship in a post-modern world: Theoretical and empirical explorations. Psychotherapy Research, 19, 253–264.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gelso, C. J. (2011). The real relationship in Psychotherapy: The hidden foundation of change. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gelso, C. J., & Carter, J. A. (1985). The relationship in counseling and psychotherapy. The Counseling Psychologist, 13, 155–243.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gelso, C. J., & Carter, J. A. (1994). Components of the psychotherapy relationship: Their interaction and unfolding during treatment. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 41, 296–306.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gelso, C. J., & Hayes, J. A. (1998). The psychotherapy relationship: Theory, research, and practice. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gelso, C. J., Kelly, F. A., Fuertes, J. N., Marmarosh, C., Holmes, S. E., Costa, C., et al. (2005). Measuring the real relationship in psychotherapy: Initial validation of the therapist form. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 52, 640–649.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gelso, C. J., Kivlighan, D. M., Busa-Knepp, J., Spiegel, E. B., Ain, S., Hummel, A. M., et al. (2012). The unfolding of the real relationship and the outcome of brief psychotherapy. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 59, 495–506.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gelso, C. J., Kivlighan, D. M., Wine, B., Jones, A., & Friedman, S. (1997). Transference, insight, and the course of time-limited therapy. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 44, 209–217.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gelso, C. J., & Samstag, L. W. (2008). A tripartite model of the therapeutic relationship. In S. Brown & R. Lent (Eds.), Handbook of counseling psychology (pp. 267–283). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goden, B. R., & Robbins, S. B. (1990). The working alliance within time limited therapy. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 21(6), 476–481.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenson, R. R. (1967). The technique and practice of psychoanalysis (Vol. 1). New York: International Universities Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horvath, A. O., & Bedi, R. P. (2002). The alliance. In J. C. Norcross (Ed.), Psychotherapy relationships that work: Therapist contributions and responsiveness to patients (pp. 37–69). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horvath, A. O., Del Re, A. C., Flückiger, C., & Symonds, D. (2011). Alliance in individual psychotherapy. Psychotherapy: Theory Research, Practice, Training, 48, 9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horvath, A. O., & Marx, R. W. (1991). The development and decay of the working alliance during time-limited counseling. Canadian Journal of Counseling, 24, 240–259.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howard, K. I., Kopta, S. M., Krause, M. S., & Orlinsky, D. E. (1986). The dose–effect relationship in psychotherapy. American Psychologist, 41(2), 159–164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, F. A., Gelso, C. J., Fuertes, J. N., & Marmarosh, C. (2010). The real relationship inventory: Development and psychometric investigation of the client form. Psychotherapy Theory: Research, Practice, Training, 47(4), 540–553.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kenny, D. B., Kaniskan, B. D., & McCouach, B. (2014). The performance of RMSEA in models with small degrees of freedom. Sociological Methods & Research, 44(3), 486–507.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, C. D., Kwon, K. I., Han, Y. J., & Sohn, N. H. (2008). The Korean counselor’s factors which contribute to positive counseling outcomes. The Korea Journal of Counseling, 9(3), 961–986.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kivlighan, D. M., Gelso, C. J., Ain, S., Hummel, A. M., & Markin, R. D. (2015). The therapist, the client, and the real relationship: An actor–partner interdependence analysis of treatment outcome. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 62(2), 314–320.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kivlighan, D. M., Hill, C. E., Gelso, C. J., & Baumann, E. (2016). Working alliance, real relationship, session quality, and client improvement in psychodynamic psychotherapy: A longitudinal actor partner interdependence model. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 63(2), 149–161.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kivlighan, D. M., & Shaughnessy, P. (1995). Analysis of the development of the working alliance using hierarchical linear modeling. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 42(3), 338–349.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kivlighan, D. M., & Shaughnessy, P. (2000). Patterns of working alliance development: A typology of client’s working alliance ratings. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 47(3), 362–371.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knox, S., Hess, S. A., Peterson, D. A., & Hill, C. E. (1997). A qualitative analysis of client perceptions of the effects of helpful therapist self-disclosure in long-term therapy. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 44(3), 274–283. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.44.3.274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lambert, M. J., & Barley, D. E. (2002). Research summary on the therapeutic relationship and psychotherapy outcome. In J. C. Norcross (Ed.), Psychotherapy relationships that work (pp. 17–36). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, E., Yang, N., & Seo, E. (2007). A qualitative study on counseling in Korea. The Korea Journal of Counseling and Psychotherapy, 19(3), 587–607.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, E. J., & Choi, H. N. (2018). Longitudinal change patterns of working alliance and counseling outcome. Korean Journal of Counseling, 19(2), 365–385.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leong, F. T. L., & Lopez, S. (2006). Culture, race, and ethnicity in psychotherapy (Special issue). Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, Practice, Training, 43

  • LoCoco, G., Gullo, S., Prestano, C., & Gelso, C. J. (2011). Relation of the real relationship and the working alliance to the outcome of brief psychotherapy. Psychotherapy, 48(4), 359.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markin, R. D., Kivlighan, D. M., Gelso, C. J., Hummel, A. M., & Spiegel, E. B. (2014). Clients’ and therapists’ real relationship and session quality in brief therapy: An actor partner interdependence analysis. Psychotherapy, 51(3), 413–423.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marmarosh, C. L., Gelso, C. J., Markin, R. D., Majors, R., Mallery, C., & Choi, J. (2009). The real relationship in psychotherapy: Relationships to adult attachments, working alliance, transference, and therapy outcome. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 56(3), 337–350.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shonfeld-Ringel, S. (2001). A re-conceptualization of the working alliance in cross-cultural practice with non-Western clients: Integrating relational perspectives and multicultural theories. Clinical Social Work Journal, 29(1), 53–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Son, N. H., & Yu, S. K. (2012). A validity study on outcome questionnaire-30 (OQ-30) with Korean clients. Korea Journal of Counseling., 13(1), 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spiegel, E. B., Busa-Knepp, J., Ma, E., Markin, R. D., Ain, S., Hummel, A., Gelso, C. J. (2008). Unfolding of the real relationship and its connection to outcome. In Paper presented at the 116th annual convention of the American Psychological Association, Boston, MA.

  • Sue, D. W., & Sue, D. (1990). Counseling the culturally different: Theory and practice. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tichenor, V., & Hill, C. E. (1989). A comparison of six measures of the working alliance. Psychotherapy: Research and Practice, 26, 195–199.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vermeersch, D. A., Lambert, M. J., & Burlingame, G. M. (2000). Outcome questionnaire: Item sensitivity to change. Journal of Personality Assessment, 74, 242–261.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, J. C., Schein, J., & Mcullen, E. (2010). An examination of clients’ in-session changes and their relationship to the working alliance and outcome. Psychotherapy Research, 20, 224–233.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiley, M. O., & Ray, P. B. (1986). Counseling supervision by developmental level. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 33(4), 439–445.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wisch, A. F., & Mahalik, J. R. (1999). Male therapists’ clinical bias: Influence of client gender roles and therapist gender role conflict. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 46, 51–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodhouse, S. S., Schlosser, L. Z., Crook, R. E., Ligiero, D. P., & Gelso, C. J. (2003). Client attachment to therapist: Relations to transference and client recollections of parental caregiving. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 50(4), 395–408.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yu, J. Y. (2015). Validation study of the Korean version of real relationship inventory-client form. Master’s thesis, Sookmyung Women’s University.

  • Zilcha-Mano, S., Roose, S. P., Barber, J. P., & Rutherford, B. R. (2015). Therapeutic alliance in antidepressant treatment: Cause or effect of symptomatic levels? Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, 84, 177–182.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Sookmyung Women’s University, Seoul, Korea

    Eunju Lee

  2. Department of Education, College of Liberal Arts, Sookmyung Women’s University, Hyochangwon-gil 52, Yongsan-gu, Seoul, 140-742, Korea

    Han Na Choi

Authors
  1. Eunju Lee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Han Na Choi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Han Na Choi.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lee, E., Choi, H.N. The unfolding of the Korean client- and counselor-rated real relationship and the counseling outcome in Korea. Asia Pacific Educ. Rev. 20, 533–542 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-019-09586-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-019-09586-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation