Skip to main content
Log in

Randomized, double-blind comparison of famotidine with ranitidine in treatment of acute, benign gastric ulcer disease

Community-based study coupled with a patient registry

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
Digestive Diseases and Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A multicenter, double-blind, randomized controlled trial comparing the efficacy and safety of famotidine with ranitidine in the treatment of acute, benign gastric ulcer disease was coupled with a community-based gastric ulcer disease registry. One hundred ninety-five patients with endoscopically documented gastric ulcer disease were enrolled in the trial and randomly allocated to treatment with either famotidine 40 mg at bedtime or ranitidine 150 mg twice a day. Healing rates were similar in both groups: at four weeks 49% vs 48%, at six weeks 71% vs 69%, and at eight weeks 83% vs 81% for famotidine and for ranitidine, respectively. Pain relief, antacid tablet use, and adverse experiences were also similar in the two groups. Only 25% of patients entered in the gastric ulcer registry were enrolled in the trial. Given that patients with more severe or complicated gastric ulcer disease should be excluded from controlled trials of new drugs, the screening criteria used in the present study resulted in the findings being representative of a quarter of the patients seen in these practices. Therefore, coupling a patient registry with a clinical trial helps determine the applicability of its results. Famotidine 40 mg at bedtime is an effective and well-tolerated treatment of acute, benign gastric ulcer disease and is comparable in efficacy and safety to ranitidine 150 mg twice a day.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Chremos AN: Pharmacodynamics of Famotidine in Humans. Am J Med 81(suppl 4B):3–7, 1986

    Google Scholar 

  2. Dammann H-G, Muller P, Simon B: 24-hour intragastric acidity and single nighttime dose of three H2-blockers. Lancet 2:1078, 1983

    Google Scholar 

  3. Howard JM, Chremos AN, Collen MJ, McArthur KE, Cherner JA, Maton PN, Ciarleglio CA, Cornelius MJ, Gardner JD, Jensen RT: Famotidine, a new potent, long-acting histamine H2-receptor antagonist: Comparison with cimetidine and ranitidine in the treatment of Zollinger-Ellison syndrome. Gastroenterology 88:1026–1033, 1985

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. McCallum RW, Chremos AN, Kuljian B, Tupy-Visich MA, Huber PB: MK-208, a novel histamine H2-receptor inhibitor with prolonged antisecretory effects. Dig Dis Sci 30:1139–1144, 1985

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Staiger C, Korodnay B, DeVries JX, Weber E, Müller P, Simon B, Dammann H-G: Comparative effects of famotidine and cimetidine on antipyrine kinetics in healthy volunteers. Br J Clin Pharmacol 18:105, 1984

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Muller P, Simon B, Dammann H-G, Feurle G, Lichwald K, Schmidt-Gayk H: Acid secretion in man with single daily administration of H2 blockers. Schweiz Med Wochenschr 114:667–671, 1984

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Simon B, Muller P, Dammann H-G: Famotidine once-a-day in the therapy of acute, benign gastric ulcer: A worldwide experience. J Clin Gastroenterol 9(suppl 2):19–22, 1987

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Paoluzi P, Torsoli A, Bianchi-Porro G, Lazzaroni M, Barbara L, Corinaldesi R, Blasi A, Mangiameli A, Carratelli L, Cheli R, Bovero E, Dal Monte PR, D'Imperio N, Francavilla A, Doronzo F, Mazzacca G, Sabbatini F, Verme G, Ponti V, Speranza V, Lezoche E, Baglioni A, Carotenuto F, Matarazzo PF: Famotidine (MK-208) in the treatment of gastric ulcer. Digestion 32(suppl 1):38–44, 1985

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Sackett DL, Gent M: Controversy in counting the attributing events in clinical trials. N Engl J Med 301:1410–1412, 1979

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Aitchison J, Bacon-Shone J: Bayesian risk ratio analysis. Am Stat 35:254–257, 1981

    Google Scholar 

  11. Cupples LA, Heeren T, Schatzkin A, Colton T: Multiple testing of hypotheses in comparing two groups. Ann Intern Med 100:122–129, 1984

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Hirshowitz BI, DeLuca V, Graham D, Lorber S, Bright-Asare P, Katon R: Treatment of benign chronic gastric ulcer with ranitidine. A randomized, double-blind, and placebocontrolled six-week trial. J Clin Gastroenterol 8:371–376, 1986

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Isenberg JI, Peterson WL, Elashoff JD, Sandersfeld MA, Reedy TJ, Ippoliti AF, Van Deventer GM, Frankl H, Longstreth GF, Anderson DS: Healing of benign gastric ulcer with low-dose antacid or cimetidine: A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. N Engl J Med 308:1319–1324, 1983

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Ashton MG, Holdsworth CD, Ryan FP, Moore M: Healing of gastric ulcers after one, two, and three months of ranitidine. Br Med J 284:467–468, 1982

    Google Scholar 

  15. Dammann H-G, Huttemann W, Kalek HD, Rohner HG, Simon B: Comparative clinical trial of enprostil and ranitidine in the treatment of gastric ulcer. Am J Med 81(suppl 2a):80–84, 1986

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Ciclitira PJ, Machell RJ, Farthing MJG, Dick AP, Hunter JO: Double-blind controlled trial of cimetidine in the healing of gastric ulcer. Gut 20:730–734, 1977

    Google Scholar 

  17. Dyck WP, Belsito A, Fleshier B, Liebermann TR, Dickinson PB, Wood JM: Cimetidine and placebo in the treatment of benign gastric ulcer. A multicenter, double-blind study. Gastroenterology 74:410–415, 1978

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Hampton JR: Presentation and analysis of the results of clinical trials in cardiovascular disease. Br Med J 282:1371–1373, 1981

    Google Scholar 

  19. The EC/IC Bypass Study Group: Failure of extracranialintracranial arterial bypass to reduce the risk of ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med 313:1191–1200, 1985

    Google Scholar 

  20. Goldring S, Zervas N, Langfitt T: The extracranial-intracranial bypass study. A report of the committee appointed by the American Association of Neurological Surgeons to examine the study. N Engl J Med 316:817–820, 1987

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Sundt TM: Was the international randomized trial of extracranial-intracranial arterial bypass representative of the population of risk? N Engl J Med 316:814–816, 1987

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This work was supported, in part, by grants from the National Institutes of Health (AM37199, AM07166, HS04873, and HL17670) and by Merck, Sharp & Dohme Research Laboratories.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Brazer, S.R., Tyor, M.P., Pancotto, F.S. et al. Randomized, double-blind comparison of famotidine with ranitidine in treatment of acute, benign gastric ulcer disease. Digest Dis Sci 34, 1047–1052 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01536372

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01536372

Key words

Navigation