Abstract
The determination of the dose distribution is the key step for accurate dose delivery in brachytherapy as well as radiotherapy application. This research study contributes on the characterization of the 60Co high dose rate brachytherapy source model Co0.A86. We followed the recommendations of the American Association of Physicists in Medicine (AAPM) and European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology (ESTRO) on dose calculation. In addition, this study aims also to investigate the accuracy of TG-43 algorithms dose calculations in different mediums relevant to high dose rate brachytherapy. For algorithm implementation, we have used the GEANT4 Application for Emission Tomography Monte Carlo code to reach our goal. Furthermore, we compared the obtained results with the previous published results. The obtained dosimetric data sets are in good agreement with the quoted values in the previous studies, where the authors used different Monte Carlo codes.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
J. Richter, K. Baier, and M. Flentje, “Comparison of 60Co and 192Ir sources in high dose rate after loading brachytherapy,” Strahlenther. Onkol. 184, 187–192 (2008).
R. Nath, L. L. Anderson, G. Luxton, K. A. Weaver, J. F Williamson, and A. S. Meigooni, “Dosimetry of interstitial brachytherapy sources: Recommendations of the AAPM radiation therapy committee task group no. 43,” Med. Phys. 22, 209–234 (1995).
M. J. Rivard, B. M. Coursey, L. A. DeWerd, W. F. Hanson, M. Saiful Huq, G. S. Ibbott, M. G. Mitch, R. Nath, and J. F. Williamson, “Update of AAPM task group no. 43 report: A revised AAPM protocol for brachytherapy dose calculations,” Med. Phys. 31 (3), 633–674 (2004).
J. Perez-Calatayud, F. Ballester, R. K. Das, L. A. DeWerd, G. S. Ibbott, A. S. Meigooni, Z. Ouhib, M. J. Rivard, R. S. Sloboda, and J. F. Williamson, “Dose calculation for photon-emitting brachytherapy sources with average energy higher than 50 kev: Report of the AAPM and ESTRO,” Med. Phys. 39 (5), 2904–2929 (2012).
D.Granero, J. Perez-Calatayud, and F. Ballester, “Dosimetric study of a new Co-60 source used in brachytherapy,” Med. Phys. 34 (9), 3485–3488 (2007).
T. Palani Selvam and S. Bhola, “Egsnrc-based dosimetric study of the bebig HDR brachytherapy sources,” Med. Phys. 37 (3), 1365–1370 (2010).
R. Guerrero, J. F. Almansa, J. Torres, and A. M. Lallena, “Dosimetric characterization of the 60Co BEBIG Co0.A86 high dose rate brachytherapy source using penelope,” Phys. Med. 30 (8), 960–967 (2014).
S. Elboukhari, Kh. Yamni, H. Ouabi, T. Bouassa, and L. Ait Mlouk, “Dosimetric study for the new BEBIG 60Co HDR source used in brachytherapy in water and different media using Monte Carlo n-particle extended code,” Appl. Radiat. Isotopes, 159, 109087 (2020).
Ch. Kirisits, M. J. Rivard, D. Baltas, F. Ballester, M. de Brabandere, R. van der Laarse, Yu. Niatsetski, P. Papagiannis, T. Paulsen Hellebust, J. Perez-Calatayud, et al., “Review of clinical brachytherapy uncertainties: analysis guidelines of gec-estro and the AAPM,” Radiother. Oncol. 110 (1), 199–212 (2014).
L. A. DeWerd, G. S. Ibbott, A. S. Meigooni, M. G. Mitch, M. J. Rivard, K. E. Stump, B. R. Thomadsen, and J. L. M. Venselaar, “A dosimetric uncertainty analysis for photon-emitting brachytherapy sources: Report of aapm task group no. 138 and gec-estro,” Med. Phys. 38 (2), 782–801 (2011).
D. Sarrut, M. Bardies, N. Boussion, N. Freud, S. Jan, J.-M. Letang, G. Loudos, L. Maigne, S. Marcatili, Th. Mauxion, et al., “A review of the use and potential of the gate monte carlo simulation code for radiation therapy and dosimetry applications,” Med. Phys. 41, 064301 (2014).
D. Strulab, G. Santin, D. Lazaro, V. Breton, and Ch. Morel, “GATE (GEANT4 application for tomographic emission): A pet/spect general-purpose simulation platform,” Nucl. Phys. B Proc. Suppl. 125, 75–79 (2003).
NuDat 2.8 National Nuclear Data Center, Nuclear Data. https://www.nndc.bnl.gov/nudat2/. Accessed June 20, 2021.
M. J. Rivard, D. Granero, J. Perez-Calatayud, and F. Ballester, “Influence of photon energy spectra from brachytherapy sources on Monte Carlo simulations of kerma and dose rates in water and air,” Med. Phys. 37 (2), 869–876 (2010).
F. Ballester, D. Granero, J. Perez-Calatayud, E. Casal, S. Agramunt, and R. Cases, “Monte-Carlo dosimetric study of the BEBIG Co-60 HDR source,” Phys. Med. Biol. 50, N309 (2005).
J. H. Hubbell and S. M. Seltzer, Tables of X-Ray Mass Attenuation Coefficients and Mass Energy-Absorption Coefficients. XAAMDI. Natl. Inst. Standards Technol. https://www.nist.gov/. Accessed 1997.
D. R. White, R. V. Griffith, and I. J. Wilson, J. Report 46, Journal of the ICRU (1), NPI, INP, 1992.
P. D. Higgins, F. H. Attix, J. H. Hubbell, S. M. Seltzer, and M. J. Berger, “Mass energy-transfer and mass energy-absorption coefficients, including in-flight positron annihilation for photon energies 1 keV to 100 MeV,” NISTIR 4680 (NIST, 1992).
G. P. Fonseca, R. A. Rubo, R. A. Minamisawa, G. R. Dos Santos, P. C. G. Antunes, and H. Yoriyaz, “Determination of transit dose profile for a 192Ir HDR source,” Med. Phys. 40, 051717 (2013).
I. Mohammad Anwarul, M. Md Akramuzzaman, and G. Abu Zakaria, “Egsnrc Monte Carlo-aided dosimetric studies of the new BEBIG 60Co HDR brachytherapy source,” J. Contemp. Brachyther. 5, 148 (2013).
S. Sahoo, T. Palani Selvam, R. S. Vishwakarma, and G. Chourasiya, “Monte Carlo modeling of 60Co HDR brachytherapy source in water and in different solid water phantom materials,” J. Med. Phys. (India) 35, 15 (2010).
R. Wang and R. S. Sloboda, “Brachytherapy scatter dose calculation in heterogeneous media: II. Empirical formulation for the multiple-scatter contribution,” Phys. Med. Biol. 52, 5637 (2007).
R. E. P. Taylor, G. Yegin, and D. W. O. Rogers, “Benchmarking brachydose: Voxel based egsnrc Monte Carlo calculations of TG-43 dosimetry parameters,” Med. Phys. 34, 445– 457 (2007).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
About this article
Cite this article
Ait-Mlouk, L., Khalis, M., Ouabi, H. et al. A Monte Carlo Dosimetric Parameters of the 60Co High Dose Rate Brachytherapy and Investigation of TG43 Dose Accuracy in Different Media Using GATE v8.2 Code. Moscow Univ. Phys. 76 (Suppl 1), S68–S79 (2021). https://doi.org/10.3103/S002713492201012X
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3103/S002713492201012X