Skip to main content
Log in

Associations between the severity of medical and surgical complications and perception of surgeon empathy in esophageal and gastric cancer patients

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Supportive Care in Cancer Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

To assess the impact of global physician empathy and its three subdimensions (establishing rapport, emotional and cognitive processes) on the severity of postoperative complications in a sample of cancer patients.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed data on 256 patients with esogastric cancer from the French national FREGAT database. Empathy and its subdimensions were assessed using the patient-reported CARE scale and the severity of medical and surgical complications was reported with the Clavien-Dindo classification system. The usual covariates were included in multinomial logistic regression analyses.

Results

Physician empathy predicted the odds of reporting major complications. When patients perceived high empathy, they were less likely to report major complications compared to no complications (OR = .95, 95% CI = [.91–.99], p = .029). Among the three dimensions, only “establishing rapport” (OR = .84, 95% CI = [.73–.98], p = .019) and the “emotional process” (OR = .85, 95% CI = [.74–.98], p = .022) predicted major complications.

Conclusions

Physician empathy is essential before surgery. Further research is needed to understand the mechanisms associating empathy with health outcomes in cancer. Physicians should be trained to establish good rapport with patients, especially in the preoperative period.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Not available.

Code availability

N/A

References

  1. Lledo G, Mariette C, Raoul J-L, Dahan L, Landi B, Conroy T, Piessen G, Tougeron D, Créhange G, Lepillez V, Artru P, Drouillard A, Bosset J-F (2016) Cancer de l’œsophage - Société savante médicale française d’hépato-gastroentérologie et d’oncologie digestive. https://www.snfge.org/content/1-cancer-de-loesophage. Accessed 2 April 2019.

  2. Lee J-H, Park DJ, Kim H-H, Lee H-J, Yang H-K (2012) Comparison of complications after laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy and open distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer using the Clavien-Dindo classification. Surg Endosc 26:1287–1295. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-011-2027-0

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Djärv T, Lagergren P (2012) Quality of life after esophagectomy for cancer. Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 6:115–122. https://doi.org/10.1586/egh.11.91

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Karanicolas PJ, Graham D, Gönen M, Strong VE, Brennan MF, Coit DG (2013) Quality of life after gastrectomy for adenocarcinoma: a prospective cohort study. Ann Surg 257:1039–1046. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0b013e31828c4a19

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Hu L-Y, Ku F-C, Wang Y-P, Shen C-C, Hu Y-W, Yeh C-M, Chen P-M, Chiang H-L, Lu T, Chen T-J, Teng C-J, Liu C-J (2015) Anxiety and depressive disorders among patients with esophageal cancer in Taiwan: a nationwide population-based study, Support. Care Cancer Off J Multinatl Assoc Support Care Cancer23: 733–740. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-014-2403-0

  6. Hellstadius Y, Lagergren J, Zylstra J, Gossage J, Davies A, Hultman CM, Lagergren P, Wikman A (2017) A longitudinal assessment of psychological distress after oesophageal cancer surgery. Acta Oncol Stockh Swed 56:746–752. https://doi.org/10.1080/0284186X.2017.1287945

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Hong J, Wei Z, Wang W (2015) Preoperative psychological distress, coping and quality of life in Chinese patients with newly diagnosed gastric cancer. J Clin Nurs 24:2439–2447. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.12816

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Huang C-M, Tu R-H, Lin J-X, Zheng C-H, Li P, Xie J-W, Wang J-B, Lu J, Chen Q-Y, Cao L-L, Lin M (2015) A scoring system to predict the risk of postoperative complications after laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer based on a large-scale retrospective study. Medicine (Baltimore) 94:e812. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000000812

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Mohammadzadeh F, Noorkojuri H, Pourhoseingholi MA, Saadat S, Baghestani AR (2015) Predicting the probability of mortality of gastric cancer patients using decision tree. Ir J Med Sci 184:277–284. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11845-014-1100-9

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Antoni MH, Lutgendorf SK, Cole SW, Dhabhar FS, Sephton SE, McDonald PG, Stefanek M, Sood AK (2006) The influence of bio-behavioural factors on tumour biology: pathways and mechanisms. Nat Rev Cancer 6:240–248. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrc1820

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Axelrod DA, Goold SD (2000) Maintaining trust in the surgeon-patient relationship: challenges for the new millennium. Arch Surg Chic Ill 1960(135):55–61. https://doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.135.1.55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Shim E-J, Park JE, Yi M, Jung D, Lee K-M, Hahm B-J (2016) Tailoring communications to the evolving needs of patients throughout the cancer care trajectory: a qualitative exploration with breast cancer patients. BMC Womens Health 16:65. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12905-016-0347-x

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Mercer SW, Reynolds WJ (2002) Empathy and quality of care. Br J Gen Pract J R Coll Gen Pract 52(Suppl):S9-12

    Google Scholar 

  14. Del Canale S, Louis DZ, Maio V, Wang X, Rossi G, Hojat M, Gonnella JS (2012) The relationship between physician empathy and disease complications: an empirical study of primary care physicians and their diabetic patients in Parma, Italy. Acad Med J Assoc Am Med Coll 87:1243–1249. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0b013e3182628fbf

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Dambha-Miller H, Feldman AL, Kinmonth AL, Griffin SJ (2019) Association between primary care practitioner empathy and risk of cardiovascular events and all-cause mortality among patients with type 2 diabetes: a population-based prospective cohort study. Ann Fam Med 17:311–318. https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.2421

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Mercer SW, Higgins M, Bikker AM, Fitzpatrick B, McConnachie A, Lloyd SM, Little P, Watt GCM (2016) General practitioners’ empathy and health outcomes: a prospective observational study of consultations in areas of high and low deprivation. Ann Fam Med 14:117–124. https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.1910

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Yang N, Xiao H, Wang W, Li S, Yan H, Wang Y (2018) Effects of doctors’ empathy abilities on the cellular immunity of patients with advanced prostate cancer treated by orchiectomy: the mediating role of patients’ stigma, self-efficacy, and anxiety. Patient Prefer Adherence 12:1305–1314. https://doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S166460

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Regenbogen SE, Veenstra CM, Hawley ST, Hendren S, Ward KC, Kato I, Morris AM (2014) The effect of complications on the patient-surgeon relationship after colorectal cancer surgery. Surgery 155:841–850. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2013.12.011

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Neumann M, Bensing J, Mercer S, Ernstmann N, Ommen O, Pfaff H (2009) Analyzing the “nature” and “specific effectiveness” of clinical empathy: a theoretical overview and contribution towards a theory-based research agenda. Patient Educ Couns 74:339–346. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2008.11.013

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Gehenne L, Lelorain S, Anota A, Brédart A, Dolbeault S, Sultan S, Piessen G, Grynberg D, Baudry A-S, Christophe V (2020) Testing two competitive models of empathic communication in cancer care encounters: a factorial analysis of the CARE measure. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl.). https://doi.org/10.1111/ecc.13306

  21. Fredericks S, Guruge S, Sidani S, Wan T (2010) Postoperative patient education: a systematic review. Clin Nurs Res 19:144–164. https://doi.org/10.1177/1054773810365994

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Price S, Mercer SW, MacPherson H (2006) Practitioner empathy, patient enablement and health outcomes: a prospective study of acupuncture patients. Patient Educ Couns 63:239–245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2005.11.006

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Mariette C, Renaud F, Piessen G, Gele P, Copin M-C, Leteurtre E, Delaeter C, Dib M, Clisant S, Harter V, Bonnetain F, Duhamel A, Christophe V, Adenis A (2018) Fregat Working Group, The FREGAT biobank: a clinico-biological database dedicated to esophageal and gastric cancers. BMC Cancer 18:139. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-018-3991-8

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Mercer SW, Maxwell M, Heaney D, Watt GCM (2004) The consultation and relational empathy (CARE) measure: development and preliminary validation and reliability of an empathy-based consultation process measure. Fam Pract 21:699–705. https://doi.org/10.1093/fampra/cmh621

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien P-A (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240:205–213. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.sla.0000133083.54934.ae

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Razavi D, Delvaux N, Farvacques C, Robaye E (1989) Validation de la version française du H.A.D.S. dans une population de patients cancéreux hospitalisés. Rev Psychol Appliquée Paris 39:295–307

    Google Scholar 

  27. Brown-Johnson C, Schwartz R, Maitra A, Haverfield MC, Tierney A, Shaw JG, Zionts DL, Safaeinili N, ThadaneyIsrani S, Verghese A, Zulman DM (2019) What is clinician presence? A qualitative interview study comparing physician and non-physician insights about practices of human connection. BMJ Open. 9:e030831. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030831

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Lin JJ, Lake J, Wall MM, Berman AR, Salazar-Schicchi J, Powell C, Keller SM, Halm EA, Leventhal H, Wisnivesky JP (2014) Association of patient-provider communication domains with lung cancer treatment. J Thorac Oncol 9:1249–1254. https://doi.org/10.1097/JTO.0000000000000281

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Liu Y, Malin JL, Diamant AL, Thind A, Maly RC (2013) Adherence to adjuvant hormone therapy in low-income women with breast cancer: the role of provider-patient communication. Breast Cancer Res Treat 137:829–836. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-012-2387-8

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Senft N, Hamel LM, Penner LA, Harper FWK, Albrecht TL, Foster T, Eggly S (2018) The influence of affective behavior on impression formation in interactions between black cancer patients and their oncologists. Soc Sci Med 211:243–250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.06.022

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Cao W, Qi X, Yao T, Han X, Feng X (2016) How doctors communicate the initial diagnosis of cancer matters: cancer disclosure and its relationship with patients’ hope and trust. Psychooncology 26:640–648. https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.4063

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Zachariae R, Pedersen CG, Jensen AB, Ehrnrooth E, Rossen PB, von der Maase H (2003) Association of perceived physician communication style with patient satisfaction, distress, cancer-related self-efficacy, and perceived control over the disease. Br J Cancer 88:658–665. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6600798

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Pincus T, Holt N, Vogel S, Underwood M, Savage R, Walsh DA, Taylor SJC (2013) Cognitive and affective reassurance and patient outcomes in primary care: a systematic review. Pain 154:2407–2416. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pain.2013.07.019

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Feller L, Khammissa RAG, Ballyram R, Chandran R, Lemmer J (2019) Chronic psychosocial stress in relation to cancer. Middle East J Cancer 10:1–8. https://doi.org/10.30476/mejc.2019.44680

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Yoshida N, Nakamura K, Kuroda D, Baba Y, Miyamoto Y, Iwatsuki M, Hiyoshi Y, Ishimoto T, Imamura Y, Watanabe M, Baba H (2018) Preoperative smoking cessation is integral to the prevention of postoperative morbidities in minimally invasive esophagectomy. World J Surg 42:2902–2909. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-018-4572-3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Adiamah A, Skořepa P, Weimann A, Lobo DN (2019) The impact of preoperative immune modulating nutrition on outcomes in patients undergoing surgery for gastrointestinal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg 270:247–256. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000003256

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Petrillo A, Pompella L, Tirino G, Pappalardo A, Laterza MM, Caterino M, Orditura M, Ciardiello F, Lieto E, Galizia G, Castoro C, De Vita F (2019) Perioperative treatment in resectable gastric cancer: current perspectives and future directions. Cancers. 11. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers11030399

  38. Klevebro F, Elliott JA, Slaman A, Vermeulen BD, Kamiya S, Rosman C, Gisbertz SS, Boshier PR, Reynolds JV, Rouvelas I, Hanna GB, van Berge Henegouwen MI, Markar SR (2019) Cardiorespiratory comorbidity and postoperative complications following esophagectomy: a European multicenter cohort study. Ann. Surg. Oncol. 26:2864–2873. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-019-07478-6

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Garzón LQ, Koranyi S, Engelmann D, Philipp R, Scheffold K, Schulz-Kindermann F, Härter M, Mehnert A (2018) Perceived doctor-patient relationship and its association with demoralization in patients with advanced cancer. Psychooncology 27:2587–2593. https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.4823

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Westendorp J, Stouthard J, Meijers MC, Neyrinck BAM, de Jong P, van Dulmen S, van Vliet LM (2020) The power of clinician-expressed empathy to increase information recall in advanced breast cancer care: an observational study in clinical care, exploring the mediating role of anxiety. Patient Educ Couns. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2020.10.025

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Fung CSC, Hua A, Tam L, Mercer SW (2009) Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the CARE Measure in a primary care setting in Hong Kong. Fam Pract 26:398–406. https://doi.org/10.1093/fampra/cmp044

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Gleichgerrcht E, Decety J (2013) Empathy in clinical practice: how individual dispositions, gender, and experience moderate empathic concern, burnout, and emotional distress in physicians. PLoS ONE 8:e61526. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0061526

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Teding van Berkhout E, van Berkhout ET, Malouff JM (2016) The efficacy of empathy training: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Couns Psychol 63:32–41. https://doi.org/10.1037/cou0000093

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank all patients who participated in the study and also the clinicians who included their patients: Léonor Benhaim, Olivier Bouche, Frédéric Borie, Cécile Brigand, Nicolas Carrere, Denis Collet, Thierry Conroy, Jacques Jougon, Medhi Ouaissi, Brice Paquette, François Paye, Frédérique Peschaud, Christophe Penna, Denis Pezet, Marc Pocard, and Jean-Marc Regimbeau. Special thanks to Justine Lerooy and Christine Delaeter. We thank the Data Treatment Center for the administration of FREGAT database and the provision of data.

The membership list of the FREGAT Working Group

Hôpital Huriez, CHU Lille, Lille; (Guillaume Piessen, Anthony Turpin, Florence Renaud)

Centre Oscar Lambret, CLCC, Lille; (Farid Elhajbi, Williams Tessier)

Centre Hospitalier Lyon Sud, Pierre Benite; (Olivier Glehen, Benoit You, Delphine Vaudoyer)

Hôpital Croix-Rousse, Lyon; (Olivier Glehen, Benoit You, Delphine Vaudoyer)

Hôpital E Herriot, Lyon; (Olivier Glehen, Benoit You, Delphine Vaudoyer)

CHU Hôpital Nord, Marseille; (Xavier Benoit D’journo, Laetitia Dahan, Pascal Alexandre Thomas)

Institut Gustave Roussy, CCLC, Villejuif; (Leonor Benhaim, Diane Goere, Frédéric Dumont, Valérie Boige)

CHU Haut Leveque, chirurgie thoracique, Bordeaux; (Jacques Jougon)

CHU Haut Leveque, chirurgie viscérale Bordeaux; (Caroline Gronnier, Denis Collet, Eric Terrebonne, Damien Bourriez)

Hôpital Rangueil, CHU Toulouse; (Nicolas Carrere, Rosine Guimbaud, Guillaume Père)

CHU Strasbourg; (Cécile Brigand, Marlène Nguimpi-Tambou, Benoit Romain)

Hôpital St Eloi, CHU Montpellier; (Jean Michel Fabre, Régis Souche, Eric Assenat)

Institut du Cancer de Montpellier; (Antoine Adenis)

Hôpital St Antoine, Paris; (Thibault Voron, François Paye, Romain Cohen, Jérémie H Lefevre)

Hôpital Avicenne, Bobigny; (Jean-Marc Sabate, Thomas Aparicio)

Hôpital Kremlin Bicêtre; (Christophe Penna)

Hôpital Lariboisière, Paris; (Marc Pocard, Jean Marc Gornet, Clarisse Eveno)

Hôpital Ambroise Paré, Boulogne-Billancourt; (Frédérique Peschaud, Cindy Neuzillet)

CHU, Clermont Ferrand; (Johan Gagniere, Denis Pezet, Morgane Helyon)

Centre Jean Perrin, Clermont Ferrand; (Céline Benoit, Joseph Fabre)

CHU, Nîmes; (Fréderic Borie, Valérie Phoutthsang)

CHU, Nancy; (Adeline Germain)

Centre Alexis Vautrin, CLCC, Nancy; (Thierry Conroy, Frédéric Marchal)

CHU, Reims; (Olivier Bouche, Marine Perrier, Sophie Deguelte)

CHU, Dijon; (Antoine Drouillard, Côme Lepage, Paul Rat)

CHU, Amiens; (Jean Marc Regimbeau, Vincent Hautefeuille)

CHU, Limoges; (Muriel Mathonnet, Sophie Geyl, Niki Christou)

CHU, Nantes; (Nicolas Regenet, Tamara Mathysiak)

Centre F. Baclesse, CLCC, Caen; (Marie Pierre Galais)

CHU, Caen; (Gilles Lebreton)

CHU, Rouen; (Fréderic Di Fiore)

CHU, Grenoble; (Pierre-Yves Brichon, Victoire Granger)

CHU, Tours; (Medhi Ouaissi, Driffa Moussata, Nicolas Michot)

Hôpital Louis Mourier, Colombes; (David Moszkowicz, Simon Msika, Benoit Coffin)

CHU Rennes; (Damien Bergeat, Bernard Meunier, Astrid Lievre)

Hôpital Cochin, Paris; (Bertrand Dousset, Maximilien Barret)

Hôpital Saint Louis, Paris; (Jean Marc Gornet, Pierre Cattan)

CHU Jean Minjoz, Besançon; (Brice Paquette, Angélique Vienot, Pierre Mathieu)

Funding

This research was funded by the SIRIC (SIte de Recherche Intégrée sur le Cancer) ONCOLille, Grant INCa-DGOS-Inserm 6041. This study was supported by an INCa (Institut National du Cancer) doctoral grant awarded to Lucie Gehenne. FREGAT was funded with support from the Institut National du Cancer (INCa), and CHU de Lille is the sponsor of the FREGAT study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Consortia

Contributions

Conception, design, analysis, and interpretation of data: Lucie Gehenne, Sophie Lelorain, Clarisse Eveno, Guillaume Piessen, Christophe Mariette, and Véronique Christophe.

Data acquisition: Lucie Gehenne, Olivier Glehen, Xavier D’journo, Muriel Mathonnet, Nicolas Regenet, Bernard Meunier, and Anne-Sophie Baudry.

Drafting the article and revising: all authors.

Final approval: all authors.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Lucie Gehenne or Véronique Christophe.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, the French regulation on clinical trials, and authorizations from the “Comité de Protection des Personnes Nord Ouest IV” (Ethics Committee, project number: 13/67).

Consent to participate

All participants provided written informed consent.

Consent for publication

N/A

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Christophe Mariette is deceased.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gehenne, L., Lelorain, S., Eveno, C. et al. Associations between the severity of medical and surgical complications and perception of surgeon empathy in esophageal and gastric cancer patients. Support Care Cancer 29, 7551–7561 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-021-06257-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-021-06257-y

Keywords

Navigation