Crossref Citations
This Book has been
cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by Crossref.
Turney, J.
2001.
Science Communication in Theory and Practice.
Vol. 14,
Issue. ,
p.
47.
Cahn, Robert W.
2001.
Genesis by definition.
Nature,
Vol. 410,
Issue. 6826,
p.
307.
de Regt, Henk W
2001.
Spacetime Visualisation and the Intelligibility of Physical Theories.
Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics,
Vol. 32,
Issue. 2,
p.
243.
Ziman, John
2001.
Getting scientists to think about what they are doing.
Science and Engineering Ethics,
Vol. 7,
Issue. 2,
p.
165.
Cohen, Laurie
McAuley, John
and
Duberley, Joanne
2001.
Continuity in Discontinuity: Changing Discourses of Science in a Market Economy.
Science, Technology, & Human Values,
Vol. 26,
Issue. 2,
p.
145.
Moore, Rob
and
Young, Michael
2001.
Knowledge and the Curriculum in the Sociology of Education: Towards a reconceptualisation.
British Journal of Sociology of Education,
Vol. 22,
Issue. 4,
p.
445.
Locke, Simon
2002.
The Public Understanding of Science—A Rhetorical Invention.
Science, Technology, & Human Values,
Vol. 27,
Issue. 1,
p.
87.
2002.
Book reviews.
The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought,
Vol. 9,
Issue. 3,
p.
464.
Loasby, Brian J.
2002.
The evolution of knowledge: beyond the biological model.
Research Policy,
Vol. 31,
Issue. 8-9,
p.
1227.
Spier, Raymond
2002.
Reflections on ‘Real science: What it is, and what it means’ by John Ziman.
Science and Engineering Ethics,
Vol. 8,
Issue. 2,
p.
235.
Newson, Malcolm D
2002.
Geomorphological concepts and tools for sustainable river ecosystem management.
Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems,
Vol. 12,
Issue. 4,
p.
365.
Lunn, Stephen
2002.
‘What We Think We Can Safely Say…’: Primary teachers’ views of the nature of science.
British Educational Research Journal,
Vol. 28,
Issue. 5,
p.
649.
Solomon, Joan
2002.
Science Stories and Science Texts: What can they do for our students?.
Studies in Science Education,
Vol. 37,
Issue. 1,
p.
85.
Loasby, Brian J.
2002.
Decision Premises, Institutions and Organisation.
Économie et Institutions,
p.
145.
Bjarnason, Thoroddur
and
Sigfusdottir, Inga Dora
2002.
Nordic Impact: Article Productivity and Citation Patterns in Sixteen Nordic Sociology Departments.
Acta Sociologica,
Vol. 45,
Issue. 4,
p.
253.
Romme, A. Georges L.
2003.
Making a Difference: Organization as Design.
Organization Science,
Vol. 14,
Issue. 5,
p.
558.
MacFarlane, A. G. J.
and
Ziman, John
2003.
Emerging out of nature into history: the plurality of the sciences.
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences,
Vol. 361,
Issue. 1809,
p.
1617.
Scott, Peter
2003.
The ethical implications of the new research paradigm.
Science and Engineering Ethics,
Vol. 9,
Issue. 1,
p.
73.
Ziman, John
2003.
Non-instrumental roles of science.
Science and Engineering Ethics,
Vol. 9,
Issue. 1,
p.
17.
Solomon, Joan
2003.
Risk: Why Don't They Listen to Us?.
Studies in Science Education,
Vol. 39,
Issue. 1,
p.
125.