Skip to main content
Log in

Drought indices as drought predictors in the south-central USA

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Natural Hazards Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Drought is among the most insidious types of natural disasters and can have devastating economic and human health impacts. This research analyzes the relationship between two readily accessible drought indices—the Palmer Drought Severity Index (PDSI) and Palmer Hydrologic Drought Index (PHDI)—and the damage incurred by such droughts in terms of monetary loss, over the 1975–2010 time period on monthly basis, for five states in the south-central USA. Because drought damage in the Spatial Hazards Events and Losses Database for the United States (SHELDUS™) is reported at the county level, statistical downscaling techniques were used to estimate the county-level PDSI and PHDI. Correlation analysis using the downscaled indices suggests that although relatively few county–months contain drought damage reports, drought indices can be useful predictors of drought damage at the monthly temporal scale extended to 12 months and at the county-level spatial scale. The varying time lags between occurrence of drought and reporting of damage, perhaps due to varying resilience to drought intensity and duration by crop types across space, along with differing irrigation schedules and adaptation measures of the community to drought over space and time, may contribute to weakened correlations. These results present a reminder of the complexities of anticipating the effects of drought, but they contribute to the effort to improve our ability to mitigate the effects of incipient drought.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alley WM (1984) The Palmer Drought Severity Index: limitations and assumptions. J Clim Appl Meteorol 23:1100–1109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Botzan TM, Marino MA, Necula AI (1998) Modified de Martonne aridity index: application to the Napa Basin, California. Phys Geogr 19:55–70

    Google Scholar 

  • Burke EJ, Brown SJ (2008) Evaluating uncertainties in the projection of future drought. J Hydrometeorol 9:292–299

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dai A (2011) Characteristics and trends in various forms of the Palmer Drought Severity Index (PDSI) during 1900–2008. J Geophys Res 116:D12115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dai A (2013) Increasing drought under global warming in observations and models. Nat Clim Change 3:52–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ESRI (2012) ArcGIS Desktop: Release 10.1 Redlands, CA: Environmental System Research Institute

  • Gall M, Borden KA, Cutter SL (2009) When do losses count? Six fallacies of natural hazards loss data. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 90:799–809

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodchild MF, Lam NSN (1980) Areal interpolation: a variant of the traditional spatial problem. Geo-Processing 1:297–312

    Google Scholar 

  • Guttman NB (1991) A sensitivity analysis of the Palmer Hydrologic Drought Index. Water Resour Bull 27:797–807

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guttman NB (1998) Comparing the Palmer Drought Index and the standardized precipitation index. J Am Water Resour As 34:113–121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haque MM, Hagare D, Rahman A, Kibria G (2014) Quantification of water savings due to drought restrictions in water demand forecasting. J Water Res Pl-ASCE 140(11):04014035. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0000423

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayes MJ (2015) http://drought.unl.edu/Planning/Monitoring/ComparisonofIndicesIntro.aspx. Accessed 9/12/2015

  • Hazards & Vulnerability Research Institute (2014) The Spatial Hazard Events and Losses Database for the United States, Version 13.1 [Online Database]. Columbia, SC: University of South Carolina. http://www.sheldus.org

  • Heim RR Jr (2000) Drought indices: a review. In: Wilhite DA (ed) Drought: a global assessment (Routledge Hazards and Disasters Series, volume 1). Routledge, London, pp 159–167

    Google Scholar 

  • Heim RR Jr (2002) A review of twentieth-century drought indices used in the United States. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 83:1149–1165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karl TR (1986) The sensitivity of the Palmer Drought Severity Index and Palmer’s Z-index to their calibration coefficients including potential evapotranspiration. J Clim Appl Meteorol 25:77–86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krivoruchko K, Gribov A, Krause E (2011) Multivariate areal interpolation for continuous and count data. Procedia Environ Sci 3:14–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lam NSN (1983) Spatial interpolation methods: a review. Am Cartogr 10:129–149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ma MW, Song SB, Ren LL, Jiang SH, Song JL (2013) Multivariate drought characteristics using trivariate Gaussian and Student t copulas. Hydrol Process 27:1175–1190. doi:10.1002/hyp.8432

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ma MW, Ren LL, Yuan F, Jiang SH, Liu Y, Kong H, Gong LY (2014) A new standardized Palmer drought index for hydro-meteorological use. Hydrol Process 28:5645–5661. doi:10.1002/hyp.10063

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mather JR (1979) Use of the climatic water budget to estimate streamflow. In: Mather JR (ed) Use of the climatic water budget in selected environmental water problems. C.W. Thornthwaite Associates, Laboratory of Climatology, Publications in Climatology, vol 32, no 1, Elmer, NJ, pp 1–52

  • McCabe GJ, Markstrom SL (2007) A monthly water-balance model driven by a graphical user interface: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File report 2007–1088, 6 pp. http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2007/1088/pdf/of07-1088_508.pdf

  • Mechler R, Bouwer LM (2015) Understanding trends and projections of disaster losses and climate change: is vulnerability the missing link? Clim Change 133:23–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Drought Mitigation Center (2013) University of Nebraska. http://drought.unl.edu/. Accessed 07/28/2015

  • Oliver MA, Webster R (1990) Kriging: a method of interpolation for geographical information systems. Int J Geogr Inf Syst 4:313–332

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palmer WC (1965) Meteorologic drought. U.S. Weather Bureau Research Paper No. 45, 58 pp

  • Quiring SM, Papakryiakou TN (2003) An evaluation of agricultural drought indices for the Canadian Prairies. Agric For Meteorol 118:49–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds SJ, Rohli RV, Johnson JK, Waylen PR, Francek MA (2015) Exploring physical geography. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Shahabfar A, Eitzinger J (2013) Spatio-temporal analysis of droughts in semi-arid regions by using meteorological drought indices. Atmosphere 4:94–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith AB, Matthews JL (2015) Quantifying uncertainty and variable sensitivity within the US billion-dollar weather and climate disaster cost estimates. Nat Hazards 77:1829–1851

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stein ML (2012) Interpolation of spatial data: some theory for kriging. Springer Science & Business Media, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Svoboda M, LeCompte D, Hayes M, Heim R, Gleason K, Angel J, Rippey B, Tinker R, Palecki M, Stooksbury D, Miskus D, Stephens S (2002) The drought monitor. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 83:1181–1190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Szinell CS, Bussay A, Szentimrey T (1998) Drought tendencies in Hungary. Int J Climatol 18:1479–1491

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thornthwaite CW (1948) An approach toward a rational classification of climate. Geogr Rev 38:55–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • United States Geological Survey (2015) Thornthwaite monthly water balance model. http://wwwbrr.cr.usgs.gov/projects/SW_MoWS/Thornthwaite.html. Accessed 7/28/2015

  • Wang G (2005) Agricultural drought in a future climate: results from 15 global climate models participating in the IPCC 4th assessment. Clim Dyn 25:739–753

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang H, Lin H, Liu D (2014) Remotely sensed drought index and its responses to meteorological drought in southwest China. Remote Sens Lett 5:413–422

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilhite DA, Glantz MH (1985) Understanding the drought phenomenon: the role of definitions. Water Int 10:111–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woli P, Jones J, Ingram K, Paz J (2013) Forecasting drought using the agricultural reference index for drought (ARID): a case study. Weather Forecast 28:427–443

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This material is based upon work supported by a research grant from United States Geological Survey/South Central Climate Science Center (Award No. G14AP00087). Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the funding agencies.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Robert V. Rohli.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rohli, R.V., Bushra, N., Lam, N.S.N. et al. Drought indices as drought predictors in the south-central USA. Nat Hazards 83, 1567–1582 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-016-2376-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-016-2376-z

Keywords

Navigation