Skip to main content
Log in

Acute phase proteins and inflammatory factors: the peri-operative changes in on-pump versus off-pump cardiac surgery

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Indian Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objectives

Off-pump cardiac bypass grafting (OPCABG) has reduced in numbers as some studies suggest no clinical benefit and greater technical difficulty compared to on-pump operations. We examined the inflammatory changes due to extracorporeal circulation and compared the outcomes of patients undergoing OPCABG, on-pump CABG and single cardiac valve replacement with mechanical one.

Methods

Sixty-six elective patients who had severe coronary vessel disease requiring coronary artery bypass were allocated to two groups. The 1st group underwent OPCAB and the other one on-pump coronary artery bypass. A third group of 33 patients presented with single valve disease and underwent mechanical valve replacement were included in our study. Pre- and postoperative serum levels of 15 markers of acute phase inflammatory response were analysed. Postoperative complications were also recorded.

Results

Both on-pump and off-pump coronary bypass techniques provoked biochemical and enzymatic alterations, with more systemic inflammations which correlate with more complications and worse outcome in the on-pump group. Mechanical valve implantation also provoked more systemic inflammation, possibly due to foreign bodies in the systemic circulation.

Conclusion

Our results suggest that off-pump bypass induce a lesser inflammatory response and have better outcomes to on-pump bypass and valve replacement operations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Gruys E, Toussaint MJM, Niewold TA, Koopmans SJ. Acute phase reaction and acute phase proteins. J Zhejiang Univ Sci B. 2005;6:1045–56.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Preeshagul I, Gharbaran R, Jeong KH, et al. Potential biomarkers for predicting outcomes in CABG cardiothoracic surgeries. J Cardiothorac Surg. 2013;8:176.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Kim T, Arnaoutakis GJ, Bihorac A, et al. Early Blood Biomarkers Predict Organ Injury and Resource Utilization Following Complex Cardiac Surgery. J Surg Res. 2011;168:168–72.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Fontes ML, Amar D, Kulak A, et al. Increased preoperative white blood cell count predicts postoperative atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass surgery. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2009;23:484–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Gravlee GP, Davis RF, Kurusz M. Cardiopulmonary bypass: Principles and practise. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Onorati F, Rubino AS, Nucera S, et al. Off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery versus standard linear or pulsatile cardiopulmonary bypass: endothelial activation and inflammatoryresponse. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2010;37:897–904.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Gäbel J, Westerberg M, Bengtsson A, Jeppsson A. Cell salvage of cardiotomysuction blood improves the balance between pro- and antiinflammatory cytokines after cardiac surgery. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2013;44:506–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Drapalova J, Kopecky P, Bartlova M, et al. The influence of deep hypothermia on inflammatory status, tissue hypoxia and endocrine function of adipose tissue during cardiac surgery. Cryobiology. 2014;68:269–75.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Sepehripour AH, Harling L, Ashrafian H, Casula R, Athanasiou T. Does off-pump coronary revascularization confer superior organ protection in re-operative coronary artery surgery? A meta-analysis of observational studies. J Cardiothorac Surg. 2014;9:115.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Puskas J, Cheng D, Knight J, et al. Off-pump versus conventional coronary artery bypass grafting: A meta-analysis and Consensus Statement from the 2004 ISMICS consensus conference. Innovations (Phila). 2005;1:3–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Gasz B, Benkö L, Jancsó G, et al. Comparison of inflammatory response followingcoronary revascularization with or without cardiopulmonary bypass. Exp Clin Cardiol. 2004;9:26–30.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Laffey JG, Boylan JF, Cheng DC. The systemic inflammatory response to cardiac surgery: implications for the anaesthesiologist. Anesthesiology. 2002;97:215–52.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Prieto MA, Guash S, Mendez JC, Munoz C, Planas A, Reyes G. Does use of cell saver decrease the inflammatory response in cardiac surgery? Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann. 2013;21:37–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Rogers CA, Pike K, Angelini GD, et al. An open randomized controlled trial of median sternotomy versus anterolateral left thoracotomy on morbidity and health care resource use in patients having off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery: the Sternotomy Versus Thoracotomy (STET) trial. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2013;146:306–16.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Yuruk K, Bezemer R, Euser M, et al. The effects of conventional extracorporealcirculation versus miniaturized extracorporeal circulation on microcirculation during cardiopulmonary bypass-assisted coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2012;15:364–70.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Kuss O, Börgermann J. Do higher-risk patients benefit from off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting? Evidence from an ecologic analysis of randomized trials. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2011;142:e117–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Ng CS, Arifi AA, Wan S, et al. Ventilation during cardiopulmonary bypass: impact on cytokine response and cardiopulmonary function. Ann Thorac Surg. 2008;85:154–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Ji Q, Ding W, Mei Y, Wang X, Feng J, Cai J. Protective effects of tight glucose control during cardiopulmonary bypass on myocardium in adult nondiabetic patients undergoing valve replacement. Can J Cardiol. 2014;30:1429–35.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Duncan AE, Abd-Elsayed A, Maheshwari A, Xu M, Soltesz E, Koch CG. Role of intraoperative and postoperative blood glucose concentrations in predicting outcomes after cardiac surgery. Anesthesiology. 2010;112:860–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Hebert PC, Wells G, Blajchman MA, et al. A multicenter, randomized, controlled clinical trial of transfusion requirements in critical care. Transfusion Requirements in Critical Care Investigators, Canadian Critical CareTrials Group. N Engl J Med. 1999;340:409–17.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Quattara A, Lecomte P, Le Manach Y, et al. Poor intraoperative blood glucose control is associatedwith a worsened hospital outcome after cardiac surgery in diabeticpatients. Anesthesiology. 2005;103:687–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Gandhi GY, Nuttall GA, Abel MD, et al. Intraoperative hyperglycemia and perioperativeoutcomes in cardiac surgery patients. Mayo Clin Proc. 2005;80:862–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Maccallum NS, Finney SJ, Gordon SE, Quinlan GJ, Evans TW. Modified criteria for the systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) improves their utility following cardiac surgery. Chest. 2014;145:1197–203.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Our acknowledgments are to the staff of the Immunopathology Laboratory of Onassis Cardiac Surgery Centre of Athens, Greece for their unselfish help.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Serafeim Chlapoutakis.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Funding

This research was not supported by external funding.

Additional information

The research was carried out at Hippokrateio General Hospital of Athens, Greece.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chlapoutakis, S., Singh, S.A., Trakas, N. et al. Acute phase proteins and inflammatory factors: the peri-operative changes in on-pump versus off-pump cardiac surgery. Indian J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 33, 205–212 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12055-017-0544-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12055-017-0544-8

Keywords

Navigation