References
Baveye, P.C., J. Berthelin, D. Tessier, and G. Lemaire. 2018. The ‘‘4 per 1000’’ initiative: A credibility issue for the soil science community? Geoderma 309: 118–123.
de Vries, W. 2018. Soil carbon 4 per mille: A good initiative but let’s manage not only the soil but also the expectations: Comment on Minasny et al. (2017). Geoderma 292: 59–86.
Rumpel, C., F. Amiraslani, C. Chenu, M.G. Cardenas, M. Kaonga, L.-S. Koutika, J.K. Ladha, B. Madari, et al. 2019. The 4p1000 initiative: Opportunities, limitations and challenges for implementing soil organic carbon sequestration as a sustainable development strategy. Ambio. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-019-01165-2.
White, R.E., B. Davidson, S.K. Lam, and D. Chen. 2018. A critique of the paper ‘‘Soil carbon 4 per mille’’ by Minasny et al. (2017). Geoderma 309: 115–117.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Baveye, P.C., White, R.E. The “4p1000” initiative: A new name should be adopted. Ambio 49, 361–362 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-019-01188-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-019-01188-9