Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Contextmapping in primary design and technology education: a fruitful method to develop empathy for and insight in user needs

  • Published:
International Journal of Technology and Design Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Human-centered design is of growing importance for professional designers and in the past two decades a series of techniques for designers to develop understanding of and empathy with a diversity of users has been developed within this field. In the second half of the twentieth century, intended users were involved late in the design process, i.e. during the testing of products or prototypes. More recently, the user is involved in the early phases, when the direction is set. Users have rich local contextual knowledge and can work together with professional designers. Although these techniques are now entering mainstream design education at the university level, they have not yet reached Design and Technology Education in primary and secondary schools. Most teachers do not yet provide opportunities for pupils to conduct research to uncover the needs, wishes, and experiences of specific user groups. However, this understanding of users belongs in D&T education, because artifacts have a dual nature: a physical and an intentional nature. In this paper we describe a Contextmapping method for pupils (aged 9–12 years) and illustrate this with a design project. The assignment for the pupils was to “design a playground in which children and elderly people are active together” in which the pupils developed an understanding of elderly people through Contextmapping.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Boeijen, G., Kneepkens, B., & Thijssen, J. (2011). Natuurkunde en techniek voor de basisschool. Een domeinbeschrijving als resultaat van een cultuurpedagogische disussie. Arnhem: CITO. (Physics and Technology in Primary Education; A description of the field as a result of a pedagogical discussion).

  • Bras-Klapwijk, R. M. (2005). Technology as social design; new study and career paths for young people, summary. The Hague: Netherlands Study Centre for Technology Trends.

    Google Scholar 

  • Druin, A. (2002). The role of children in the design of new technology. Behaviour & Information Technology, 21(1), 1–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eijkelhof, H. M. C., & Krüger, J. (2009). Improving the quality of innovative science teaching materials. ESERA 2009 Conference Istanbul.

  • Haven, K. (2007). Story proof. The science behind the startling power of story. Westport: Libraries Unlimited.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, A. M. (1998). Problem solving in real-life contexts: An alternative for design in technology education. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 8(3), 203–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jarvis, T., & Pell, A. (2004). Primary teachers’ changing attitudes and cognition during a two-year science in-service programme and their effect on pupils. International Journal of Science Education, 26(19), 1787–1811.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kimbell, R. (1994). Tasks in technology: An analysis of their purposes and effects. International Journal of Design and Technology Education, 4, 241–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klapwijk, R., & Rommes, E. (2009). Career orientation of secondary school students (m/f) in the Netherlands. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 19, 403–418.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koski, M. I., Klapwijk, R., & De Vries, M. (2011). Connecting domains in concept-context learning: A model to analyse education situations. Design and Technology Education: An International Journal, 16(3), 50–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kroes, P. (2002). Design methodology and the nature of technical artefacts. Design Studies, 23, 287–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kroes, P., & Meijers, A. (2006). The dual nature of technical artefacts. Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science, 37, 1–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liem, A., & Sanders, E. B. (2013). Human-centred design workshops in collaborative strategic design projects: An educational and professional comparison. Design and Technology Education: An International Journal, 18(1), 72–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maguire, M. (2001). Methods to support Human Centered Design. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 55, 587–634.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Education, Culture and Science (MECW). (2004). Deltaplan Béta/Techniek. Den Haag: OCW.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Education, Culture and Science (MECW) (2006). Core objectives primary education. Den Haag: OCW. (Appendix to the Kerndoelenboekje 2006).

  • Murphy, C., Neil, P., & Beggs, J. (2007). Primary science teacher confidence revisited: Ten years on. Educational Research, 49(4), 415–430.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nicholl, B., Hosking, I., Elton, E., Lee, Y., Bell, J., & Clarkson, P. (2012). Inclusive design in the Key Stage 3 classroom: An investigation of user-centred design principles in design and technology. International Journal of Technology and Design Education,. doi:10.1007/s10798-012-9221-9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Qualifications and Curriculum Authority (QCA). 2007. Design and technology. Programme for key stage 3 and attainment target. www.qca.org.uk/curriculum.

  • Read, J., Gregory, P., MacFarlane, S., McManus, B., Gray, P., & Patel, R. (2002). An investigation of participatory design with children: informant, balanced and facilitated design. Interaction design and Children pp 53–64.

  • Sleeswijk Visser, F., Stappers, P. J., van der Lugt, R., & Sanders, E. B. N. (2005). Contextmapping: Experiences from practice. CoDesign, 1(2), 119–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Doorn, F., Stappers, P. J., & Gielen, M. (2013). Design research by proxy: Using children as researchers to gain contextual knowledge about user experience. CHI Conference Paris.

  • Van Graft, M., Klein Tank, M., & Beker, T. (2014). Wetenschap & technologie in het basis- en speciaal onderwijs, Richtinggevend leerplankader bij het leergebied Oriëntatie op jezelf en de wereld, SLO (Dutch Framework for Teaching Science and Technology in Primary Schools).

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank the “Wetenschapsknooppunt Delft” of the TU Delft for facilitating this project. This research is part of the ProFit project, which is funded by the European Union, under the Interreg IVB North West Europe program.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Remke Klapwijk.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Klapwijk, R., Van Doorn, F. Contextmapping in primary design and technology education: a fruitful method to develop empathy for and insight in user needs. Int J Technol Des Educ 25, 151–167 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-014-9279-7

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-014-9279-7

Keywords

Navigation