Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Sulfur Nutrition and Food Security

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Sulfur Metabolism in Plants

Part of the book series: Proceedings of the International Plant Sulfur Workshop ((PIPSW,volume 1))

Abstract

Food security is an issue that will continue to challenge agricultural production and the distribution of produce. While access to food has improved in the past couple of years the challenges of a changing climate, urbanization, and resource security will require attention to improving productivity within the current land resource. Fertilizers enable half the world’s food to be produced. Sulfur is important as an essential plant nutrient that assists with both the quantity and the quality of a range of plant products. It is also critical for animal nutrition. In crops, nitrogen and sulfur nutrition are closely tied and changes in N/S ratio can result in changes in grain quality. This balance, along with the role of nitrogen and phosphorus, indicate that sulfur is a key part of a balanced plant nutrition program to meet future food security. Grains represent the major depletion of sulfur in a national sulfur audit, followed by livestock, and a national audit suggests an annual sulfur removal of 0.4 kg S ha−1, similar to an audit from 1995. This is balanced by the input of sulfur containing fertilizer as well as the use of agricultural gypsum and manures and inputs from sulfur in irrigation water and the atmosphere. Much of the sulfur in soils is present in organic matter, which must be mineralized before plants can access it. Sulfate ions remain in soil solution and are readily leached, and with changing farming systems, the number of sulfur deficient soils is increasing. As a result, there has been a steady increase in the demand for sulfur for crop nutrition. There is a global supply of around 50 Mt of sulfur, with nearly all recovered from S-rich oil and gas with a growth of around 5% per annum predicted. 85% of sulfur is used for sulfuric acid production including the manufacture of a range of sulfur containing fertilizers such as ammonium sulfate and single superphosphate, although newer sulfur fortified products are entering the market. Attention to using the appropriate source of sulfur at the right rate and at the right time and place will be key strategies to help with sustainable food production now and in the future.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Alves ME, Lavorenti A (2004) Sulfate adsorption and its relationships with properties of representative soils of the São Paulo State, Brazil. Geoderma 118:89–99

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Australian Bureau of Agricultural and Resource Economics and Sciences (2010) Australian commodity statistics. Australian Bureau of Agricultural and Resource Economics and Sciences, Canberra

    Google Scholar 

  • Blair GJ (2002) Sulfur fertilisers: a global perspective. Proceedings No.498. International Fertiliser Society, York

    Google Scholar 

  • Blair GJ, Chinoim N, Lefroy RDB, Anderson GC, Crocker GJ (1991) A soil sulfur test for pastures and crops. Aust J Soil Res 29:619–626

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Blair GJ, Anderson G, Crestani M, Lewis D (1997) Soil sulphur status, sulphur fertiliser responses and rainfall sulphur accessions trial sites in the National Reactive Phosphorus Rock Project. Aust J Exp Agric 37:995–1001

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Brennan RF, Bell RW, Raphael C, Ealick H (2010) Sources of sulfur for dry matter, seed yield and oil concentration of canola grown in sulfur deficient soils of south-western Australia. J Plant Nutr 33:1180–1194

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Brosnan JT, Brosana ME (2006) The sulfur-containing amino acids: an overview. J Nut 136:1636S–1640S

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bruulsema T, Lemunyon J, Herz B (2009) Know your fertilizer rights. Crop Soil 42:13–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Byers M, Franklin J, Smith SJ (1987) The nitrogen and sulphur nutrition of wheat and its effect on the composition and baking quality of the grain. Aspects Appl Biol, Cereal Qual 15:337–344

    Google Scholar 

  • Cassman KG (1999) Ecological intensification of cereal production systems: Yield potential, soil quality, and precision agriculture. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 96:5952–5959

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ceccotti SP, Messick DL (1994) Increasing plant nutrient sulphur use in the European fertilizer industry. Agro-Food-Industry Hi-Tech 5:9–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Connor DJ, Loomis RS, Cassman KG (2011) Crop ecology: productivity and management in agricultural systems, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Donald CM (1965) The progress of Australian agriculture and the role of pastures in environmental change. Aust J Sci 27:187–198

    Google Scholar 

  • Dorsch W, Wagner H (1991) New antiasthmatic drugs from traditional medicine? Int Arch Allergy Appl Immunol 94:262–265

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Eaton SV, Eaton JH (1926) Sulfur in rainwater. Plant Physiol 1:77–87

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fertilizer Industry Federation of Australia (2010) 2009 fertilizer sales statistics. The Fertilizer No.7, April 2010. FIFA, Canberra

    Google Scholar 

  • Food and Agriculture Organisation (2010) The state of food insecurity in the world. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome

    Google Scholar 

  • Food and Agriculture Organisation (2011) FAO food price index. http://www.fao.org/worldfoodsituation/wfs-home/foodpricesindex/en/. Accessed 22 Dec 2011

  • Good AJ, Glendinning J (1998) Canola needs sulfur. Better Crop 12:6–8

    Google Scholar 

  • Gourley CJP, Melland AR, Waller RA, Awty IM, Smith AP, Peverill KI, Hannah MC (2007) Making better fertilizer decisions for grazed pastures in Australia. Victorian Government, Department of Primary Industries, Melbourne, 18 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Gowariker V, Krishnamurthy VN, Gowariker S, Dhanorkar M, Paranjape K (2009) The fertilizer encyclopedia. John Wiley & Sons Inc. Hoboken, Jew Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  • Grains Research and Development Corporation (2011) Investment plan(open and multi-stage tenders), 2012–13. GRDC, Canberra

    Google Scholar 

  • Grattan SR, Grieve CM (1999) Salinity-mineral nutrient relations in horticultural crops. Sci Hortic 78:127–157

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Haneklaus S, Bloem E, Hayfa S, Schnug E (2005) Influence of elemental sulphur and nitrogen fertilisation on the concentration of essential micronutrients and heavy metals in Eropaeolum majus L. FAL – Agric Res 286:25–35

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hawkesford M (2000) Plant responses to sulfur deficiency and the genetic manipulation of sulfate transporters to improve S‐utilization efficiency. J Exp Bot 501:131–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heffer P, Prud’homme M (2010) Fertilizer outlook 2010–2014. International Fertilizer Industry Association (IFA), Paris, 11pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Hocking PJ, Pinkerton A, Good A (1996) Recovery of field grown canola from sulfur deficiency. Aust J Exp Agric 36:79–85

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Holloway B, McLaughlin M, McBeath T (2008) Fluid fertilizers: A South Australian manual. Fluid Fertilizer Foundation. http://www.fluidfertilisers.com.au/index.php?page=newsletter. Accessed 22 Dec 2011

  • International Fertilizer Development Centre (2009) Maize Intensification in Mozambique (MIM) project. Economic analysis 2008–2009. Interim project report prepared for the international plant nutrition, the International Fertilizer Industry Association, the International Potash Institute, and The Sulphur Institute by the International Fertilizer Development Center. October 2009 (unpublished data)

    Google Scholar 

  • International Fertilizer Industry Association (2009) The global “4R” nutrient stewardship framework. AgCom/09/44, International Fertilizer Industry Association (IFA), 10 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • International Plant Nutrition Institute (2010) A preliminary nutrient use geographic information system (NuGIS) for the US. IPNI Publication No. 30-3270, Norcross

    Google Scholar 

  • International Plant Nutrition Institute (2011) Nutrient source specifics, No 8. Thiosulfate. International Plant Nutrition Institute, Norcross

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirkby CA, Kirkegaard JA, Richardson AE, Wade LJ (2011) C:N:P:S ratios in soil humus and implications for soil organic matter sequestration. In: Proceedings of the Grains Research and Development Corporation Advisor Updates, Adelaide, pp 215–219, 23 & 24 Feb 2011

    Google Scholar 

  • Leustek T, Saito K (1999) Sulfate transport and assimilation in plants. Plant Physiol 120:637–643

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lund E (2003) Non-nutritive bioactive constituents of plants: dietary sources and health benefits of glucosinolates. Int J Vitam Nutr Res 73:135–143

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Macleod JA, Gupta UC, Stanfield B (1997) Molybdenum and sulphur relationships in plants. In: Gupta UC (ed) Molybdenum in agriculture. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom

    Google Scholar 

  • McCaskill MR, Blair GJ (1988) Development of a simulation model of sulfur cycling in grazed pastures. Biogeochemisty 5:165–181

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • McGrath RG, Zhao FJ, Blake-Kalff MMA (2002) History and outlook for sulphur fertilizers in Europe. Proceedings No. 497. International Fertilizer Society, York, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • McNeill AM, Eriksen J, Bergstrom L, Smith KA, Marstorp H, Kirchmann H, Nilsson I (2005) Nitrogen and sulphur management: challenges for organic sources in temperate agricultural systems. Soil Use Manag 21:82–93

    Google Scholar 

  • Millennium Project (2008) Global Challenges for Humanity, State of the Future, Millennium Project. http://www.millennium-project.org/millennium/challeng.html. Accessed 22 Dec 2011

  • Mkware B, Marsh D (2011) Effects of maize fertilizer subsidies on food security in Malawi. Department of Economics working paper in Economics 14/11, Waikaito University, New Zealand, 18 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Moss HJ, Wrigley CW, MacRitchie F, Randall PJ (1981) Sulfur and nitrogen fertilizer effects on wheat. II. Influence on grain quality. Aust J Agric Res 32:213–226

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • National Heritage Trust (2001) Nutrient balance in regional farming systems and soil nutrient status. National Land and Water Resources Audit Project, Version 1.1, May 2001. National Heritage Trust, Canberra, 89 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Norton RM (2011) 4R approach to nutrient best management practice, Nitrogen application in wheat in south-eastern Australia. International Plant Nutrition Institute, Norcross, 8 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Peverill KI, Briner GP (1974) Correlation for soil tests for sulfur with pasture response in the national soil fertility pasture project in Victoria. In: Australian soil science conference working papers, La Trobe University, Melbourne. Canberra. Soil Science Society of Australia, Canberra, pp 3(a)-1–3(a)-5

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinkerton A, Hocking PJ (1987) Effects of applying sulfur to sulfur-deficient linseed and rapeseed. In: Proceedings of the 4th Australian agronomy conference. La Trobe University, Melbourne, VC, p 267 (Australian Society of Agronomy, Parkville, VC)

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinkerton A, Hocking PJ, Good A, Sykes J, Lefroy RBD, Blair GJ (1993) A preliminary assessment of plant analysis for diagnosing S deficiency in canola. In: Proceedings of 9th Australian research assembly on Brassicas, Wagga Wagga, pp 21–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Pratley JE, McFarlane JD (1974) The effect of sulfate on the selenium content of pasture plants. Aust J Exp Agric Anim Husb 14:533–538

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rahman K (2003) Garlic and aging, new insights into an old remedy. Ageing Res Rev 2:39–56

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Randall PJ, Spencer K, Freney JR (1981) Sulfur and nitrogen fertilizer effects on wheat. I. Concen‑trations of sulfur and nitrogen and nitrogen to sulfur ratio in grain in relation to the yield response. Aust J Agric Res 32:203–212

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rayment GE, Higginson FR (1992) Australian laboratory handbook of soil and water chemical methods. Inkata Press, Melbourne, 314 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Research R (2006) Guide to the classical and other long-term experiments, datasets and sample archive. Lawes Agricultural Trust, Harpenden, 52 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Reuter DJ, Robinson JB (1997) Plant analysis: an interpretative manual, 2nd edn. CSIRO Publishing, Collingwood

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheales T, Gunning-Trant C (2009) Global food security and Australia, ABARE report, Canberra, December

    Google Scholar 

  • Shinmachi F, Buchner P, Stroud JL, Parmar S, Zhao FJ, McGrath SP, Hawkesford MJ (2010) Influence of sulfur deficiency on the expression of specific sulfate transporters and the distribution of sulfur, selenium and molybdenum in wheat. Plant Physiol 153:327–336

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Smolders A, Roelofs JGM (1993) Sulphate-mediated iron limitation and eutrophication in aquatic ecosystems. Aquat Bot 46:247–253

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Spencer K (1975) Sulfur requirements of plants. In: McLachlan KD (ed) Sulfur in Australasian agriculture. Sydney University Press, Sydney, pp 98–108

    Google Scholar 

  • Spencer K, Freney JR (1980) Assessing the sulfur status of field grown wheat by plant analysis. Agron J 72:469–472

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stewart WM, Dibb DW, Johnston AE, Smyth TJ (2005). The contribution of commercial fertilizer nutrients to food production. Agron J 97:1–6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stout PR, Meagher WR (1948) Studies of the molybdenum nutrition of plants with radioactive molybdenum. Science 108:471–473

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Summers R, Clarke M, McCafferty P, Pope T (2003) A slowly soluble sulfur fertilizer from a by-product of mineral sands processing. Aust J Soil Res 41:1213–1227

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • The Sulphur Institute (2011) Sulphur 101, The Sulphur Institute. http://www.sulphurinstitute.org/learnmore/ sulphur101.cfm. Accessed 22 Dec 2011

  • Till AR (2010) Sulfur and sustainable agriculture. International Fertilizer Industry Association, Paris, France, 71 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • United States Department of Agriculture (2011) World agricultural supply and food demand estimates (WASDE – 501), Dec 2011 USDA, 40 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • United States Geological Survey (2011) Gypsum. U.S. Geological Survey, Mineral Commodity Summaries, Jan 2011, p 70

    Google Scholar 

  • Watkinson JH, Kear MJ (1996) Sulfate and mineralisable organic sulfur in pastoral soils of New Zealand. II. A soil test for mineralisable organic sulfur. Aust J Soil Res 34:405–412

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Weegel PL, Hamer RJ, Schofield JD (1996) Functional properties of wheat glutenin. J Cereal Sci 23:1–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White RE (2006) Principles and practice of soil science: the soil as a natural resource, 4th edn. Blackwell Publishing, Malden, MA, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams RJB (1975) The chemical composition of water from land drainage at Saxmundham and Woburn (1970–1975). Rothamstead Experimental Station report, Part 2, pp 37–62

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams CH, Williams EG, Scott NM (1960) Carbon, nitrogen, sulphur and phosphorus in some Scottish soils. J Soil Sci 11:334–346

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wong MT, Wittwer K (2009) Positive charge discovered across Western Australian wheat belt soils challenges key soil and nitrogen management assumptions. Aust J Soil Res 47:127–135

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yang Z-H, Stoven K, Haneklaus S, Singh BR, Schnug E (2010) Elemental sulfur oxidation by Thiobaccillus spp and aerobic heterotrophic sulfur-oxidising bacteria. Pedosphere 20:71–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yeates JS, Clarke MF (1993) Developing alternatives to phosphate fertilizers of high water solubility. Fert Res 36:141–150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao FJ, Hawkesford MJ, McGrath SP (1999) Sulfur assimilation and effects on yield and quality of wheat. J Cereal Sci 30:1–17

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The author would like to acknowledge the soil test data supplied by the Nutrient Advantage Laboratories (Mr. Phil Hoult), and the support and discussions with Mr. Charlie Walker (Incitec Pivot Fertilizers) and Dr. Sam Stacey (ex-Adelaide University). I would also like to acknowledge input through discussion with Prof. Mike McLaughlin (CSIRO/University of Adelaide) as well as my IPNI colleague Dr. Rob Mikkelsen.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. International Plant Nutrition Institute, 54 Florence St, Horsham, VIC, 3400, Australia

    Robert M. Norton

Authors
  1. Robert M. Norton
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Robert M. Norton .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. , Laboratory of Plant Physiology, University of Groningen, Nijenborgh 7, Groningen, 9747 AG, Netherlands

    Luit J. De Kok

  2. CSIRO Plant Industry, --, Canberra, 2601, Aust Capital Terr, Australia

    Linda Tabe

  3. , Dept. of Forest and Ecosystem Science, University of Melbourne, Water Street, Creswick, 3363, Australia

    Michael Tausz

  4. , Plant Science Department, Rothamsted Research, --, Harpenden, AL5 2JQ, Hertfordshire, United Kingdom

    Malcolm J. Hawkesford

  5. fuer Molekulare Pflanzenphysiologie, Department of Molecular Physiology, Max-Planck-Institut, Am Muehlenberg 1, Golm, 14476, Germany

    Rainer Hoefgen

  6. , Institute of Molecular BioSciences, Massey University, --, Palmerston North, New Zealand

    Michael T. McManus

  7. , Australia and New Zealand, International Plant Nutrition Institute, Florence Street Horsham 54, Horsham, 3400, Victoria, Australia

    Robert M. Norton

  8. , Institut f. Forstbotanik Baumphysiologie, Universitaet Freiburg, Georges-Koehler-Allee 53/54, Freiburg, 79110, Germany

    Heinz Rennenberg

  9. , Yokohama Research Promotion Division, RIKEN Yokohama Institute, Suehiro-cho, Tsurumi-ku 1-7-22, Yokohama City, 230-0045, Kanagawa, Japan

    Kazuki Saito

  10. , Institute for Crop and Soil Science, Julius Kuehn-Institut (JKI), Bundesallee 50, Braunschweig, 38116, Germany

    Ewald Schnug

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this paper

Cite this paper

Norton, R.M. (2012). Sulfur Nutrition and Food Security. In: De Kok, L., et al. Sulfur Metabolism in Plants. Proceedings of the International Plant Sulfur Workshop, vol 1. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4450-9_24

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation