Skip to main content
Log in

Clinical Muscle Testing Compared with Whole-Body Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Facio-scapulo-humeral Muscular Dystrophy

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Clinical Neuroradiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

The objective of this study was to evaluate the clinical usefulness of whole-body magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in facio-scapulo-humeral muscular dystrophy (FSHD).

Methods

In 20 patients with genetically proven FSHD1, we prospectively assessed muscular involvement and correlated the results of semi-quantitative manual muscle testing and other parameters such as disease duration, creatine kinase (CK) levels and repeat length of the D4Z4 locus with whole-body MRI.

Results

Clinical muscle testing revealed the trapezius, pectoralis and infraspinatus as the most severely affected muscles in the shoulder, and the knee flexors and gluteus medius in the hip girdle. MRI revealed the trapezius and serratus anterior muscles in the shoulder, and the hamstrings and adductor muscles in the hip girdle, as the most severely affected muscle groups. Overall, degrees of fatty degeneration on MRI scans correlated significantly with clinical weakness. Moreover, we could detect clear affection of the trunk muscles. Corresponding to earlier reports, asymmetric involvement was frequent in both clinical examination and MRI scoring. Moreover, MRI revealed inhomogeneous muscle degeneration in a considerable proportion of both, muscles and patients. Both clinical and MRI scores significantly correlated to disease duration, but not to fragment size or CK levels.

Conclusion

Fatty degeneration in whole-body MRI correlates well to clinical muscle testing of the extremities but gives more information on deeper or trunk muscles. It shows structural changes in muscular disorders and may become an excellent tool for assessment of muscle involvement and follow-up studies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Emery AEH. Population frequencies of inherited neuromuscular diseases: a world survey. Neuromuscul Disord. 1991;1:19–29.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Sacconi S, Salviati L, Desnuelle C. Facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2014;1852(4):607–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Pandya S, King WM, Tawil R. Facioscapulohumeral dystrophy. Phys Ther. 2008;88(1):105–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Wijmenga C, Frants RR, Brouwer OF, Moerer P, Weber JL, Padberg GW. Location of the fascioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy gene on chromosome 4. Lancet. 1990;336:651–3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Van der Maarel SM, Tawil R, Tapscott SJ. Facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy and DUX4: breaking the silence. Trends Mol Med. 2011;17(5):252–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Kan HE, Janssen BH, Voet NBM. Fascioscapulohumeral dystrophy. In: Wattjes MP, Fischer D, editors. Neuromuscular imaging. Springer; 2013. pp. 295–304.

  7. Lunt PW, Jardine PE, Koch MC, Maynard J, Osborn M, Williams M, Harper PS, Upadhyaya M. Correlation between fragment size at D4F104S1 and age of onset or at wheelchair use, with a possible generational effect, accounts for much phenotypic variation in 4q35-facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy (FSHD). Hum Mol Genet. 1995;4:951–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Tawil R, Forrester J, Griggs RC, Mendell J, Kissel J, McDermott M, King W, Weiffenbach B, Figlewicz D. Evidence for anticipation and association of deletion size with severity in facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy. The FSH-DY Group. Ann Neurol. 1996;39(6):744–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Ricci E, Galluzzi G, Deidda G, Cacurri S, Colantoni L, Merico B, Piazzo N, Servidei S, Vigneti E, Pasceri V, Silvestri G, Mirabella M, Mangiola F, Tonali P, Felicetti L. Progress in the molecular diagnosis of facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy and correlation between the number of KpnI repeats at the 4q35 locus and clinical phenotype. Ann Neurol. 1999;45:751–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Padberg GW, Lunt PW, Koch M, Fardeau M. Diagnostic criteria for facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy. Neuromuscul Disord. 1991;1(4):231–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Dahlqvist JR, Vissing CR, Thomsen C, Vissing J. Severe paraspinal muscle involvement in facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy. Neurology. 2014;83(13):1178–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Sacconi S, Desnuelle C. Facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy type 2. Rev Neurol (Paris). 2013;169(8–9):564–72.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Reilich P, Schramm N, Schoser B, Schneiderat P, Strigl-Pill N, Müller-Höcker J, Kress W, Ferbert A, Rudnik-Schöneborn S, Noth J, Lochmüller H, Weis J, Walter MC. Facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy presenting with unusual phenotypes and atypical morphological features of vacuolar myopathy. J Neurol. 2010;257:1108–18.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Rijken NH, van Engelen BG, de Rooy JW, Geurts AC, Weerdesteyn V. Trunk muscle involvement is most critical for the loss of balance control in patients with facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2014;29(8):855–60.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Awerbuch GI, Nigro MA. Beevor’s sign in facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy. Arch Neurol. 1990;47:1208–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Olsen DB, Gideon P, Jeppesen TD, Vissing J. Leg muscle involvement in facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy assessed by MRI. J Neurol. 2006;253:1437–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Weber MA, Essig M, Kauczor HU. Radiologische Diagnostik von Muskelerkrankungen. RöFo. 2007;179:712–20.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Wattjes MP, Kley RA, Fischer D. Neuromuscular imaging in inherited muscle diseases. Eur Radiol. 2010;20:2447–60.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Janssen BH, Voet NBM, Nabuurs CI, Kan HE, de Rooy JW, Geurts AC, Padberg GW, van Engelen BG, Heerschap A. Distinct disease phases in muscles of facioscapulohumeral dystrophy patients identified by MR detected fat infiltration. PLoS One. 2014;9(1):e85416.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Friedman SD, Poliachik SL, Otto RK, Carter GT, Budech CB, Bird TD, Miller DG, Shaw DW. Longitudinal features of STIR bright signal in FSHD. Muscle Nerve. 2014;49(2):257–60.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Weber MA, Jappe U, Essig M, Krix M, Ittrich C, Huttner HB, Meyding-Lamadé U, Hartmann M, Kauczor HU, Delorme S. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound in dermatomyositis and polymyositis. J Neurol. 2006;253:1625–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Kan HE, Scheenen TWJ, Wohlgemuth M, Klomp DW, van Loosbroek-Wagenmans I, Padberg GW, Heerschap A.Quantitative MR imaging of individual muscle involvement in facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy. Neuromuscul Disord. 2009;19(5):357–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Compston A. Aids to the investigation of peripheral nerve injuries. Medical Research Council: Nerve Injuries Research Committee. His Majesty’s Stationery Office: 1942; pp. 48 (iii) and 74 figures and 7 diagrams; with aids to the examination of the peripheral nervous system. By Michael O’Brien for the Guarantors of Brain. Saunders Elsevier: 2010; pp. [8] 64 and 94 Figures. Brain. 2010;133:2838–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. May DA, Disler DG, Jones EA, Balkissoon AA, Manaster BJ. Abnormal signal intensity in skeletal muscle at MR imaging: patterns, pearls, and pitfalls. Radiographics. 2000;20:S295–315.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Amarteifio E, Nagel AM, Kauczor HU, Weber MA. Functional imaging in muscular diseases. Insights Imaging. 2011;2(5):609–19.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Schäbitz WR, Glatz K, Schuhan C, Sommer C, Berger C, Schwaninger M, Hartmann M, Hilmar Goebel H, Meinck HM. Severe forward flexion of the trunk in Parkinson’s disease: focal myopathy of the paraspinal muscles mimicking camptocormia. Mov Disord. 2003;18(4):408–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Tasca G, Pescatori M, Monforte M, Mirabella M, Iannaccone E, Frusciante R, Cubeddu T, Laschena F, Ottaviani P, Ricci E. Different molecular signatures in magnetic resonance imaging-staged facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy muscles. PLoS One. 2012;7(6):e38779.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Quijano-Roy S, Avila-Smirnow D, Carlier RY. Whole body muscle MRI protocol: pattern recognition in early onset NM disorders. WB-MRI muscle study group. Neuromuscul Disord. 2012;22(Suppl. 2):S68–84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Schramm N, Born C, Weckbach S, Reilich P, Walter MC, Reiser MF. Involvement patterns in myotilinopathy and desminopathy detected by a novel neuromuscular whole-body MRI protocol. Eur Radiol. 2008;18(12):2922–36.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Kornblum C, Lutterbey GG, Czermin B, Reimann J, von Kleist-Retzow JC, Jurkat-Rott K, Wattjes MP. Whole-body high-field MRI shows no skeletal muscle degeneration in young patients with recessive myotonia congenita. Acta Neurol Scand. 2010;121(2):131–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Kesper K, Kornblum C, Reimann J, Lutterbey G, Schröder R, Wattjes MP. Pattern of skeletal muscle involvement in primary dysferlinopathies: a whole-body 3.0-T magnetic resonance imaging study. Acta Neurol Scand. 2009;120(2):111–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Kottlors M, Kress W, Meng G, Glocker FX. Facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy presenting with isolated axial myopathy and bent spine syndrome. Muscle Nerve. 2010;42(2):273–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Jordan B, Eger K, Koesling S, Zierz S. Camptocormia phenotype of FSHD: a clinical and MRI study on six patients. J Neurol. 2011;258(5):866–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Tasca G, Monforte M, Iannaccone E, Laschena F, Ottaviani P, Leoncini E, Boccia S, Galluzzi G, Pelliccioni M, Masciullo M, Frusciante R, Mercuri E, Ricci E. Upper girdle imaging in facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy. PLoS One. 2014;9(6):e100292.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Tawil R, Van Der Maarel SM. Facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy. Muscle Nerve. 2006;34(1):1–15.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J.U. Regula MD.

Additional information

J.U. Regula and L. Jestaedt contributed equally to this work.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Regula, J., Jestaedt, L., Jende, F. et al. Clinical Muscle Testing Compared with Whole-Body Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Facio-scapulo-humeral Muscular Dystrophy. Clin Neuroradiol 26, 445–455 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00062-015-0386-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00062-015-0386-y

Keywords

Navigation