Skip to main content
Log in

An operational measure of routing flexibility in a multi-stage multi-product production system

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The high degree of variety in customer demands causes mass production to become outdated and flexible production to be favored. Routing flexibility can be found in systems that implement general-purpose machines, alternative or identical machines, redundant machine tools, or the versatility of material handling systems. It is recognized that routing flexibility can be treated as a tool for enhancing system performance, such as lead time and inventory reduction. However, its implementation entails a huge cost of installation of flexible machines, automated tool changers and fixtures, and machine operators possessing multiple skills. Therefore, system managers must determine the appropriate level of routing flexibility for a specific system configuration in order to balance benefits and costs incurred. This paper presents a background to and a rational for a routing flexibility measure for a multi-stage flow shop. Instead of merely counting the number of available routes, this measure takes into account the loading balance between machines. Therefore, a manufacturing system with overloaded machines will have less routing flexibility as compared with one that is not overloaded, when both systems have the same number of available routes. An example for demonstrating the applicability of the proposed measure is also illustrated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Sethi AK, Sethi SP (1990) Flexibility in manufacturing: a survey. Int J Flex Manuf Syst 2:289–328 doi:10.1007/BF00186471

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Clark K, Hayes R, Wheelwright S (1988) Dynamic manufacturing: creating the learning organization. Free Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  3. Browne J, Dubois D, Rathmill K, Sethi SP, Stecke KE (1984) Classification of flexible manufacturing systems. FMS Mag 2(2):114–117

    Google Scholar 

  4. Yao D, Pei F (1990) Flexible parts routing in manufacturing systems. IIE Trans 22:48–55 doi:10.1080/07408179008964157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Benjaafar S, Ramakrishnan R (1993) The effect of routing and machine flexibility on performance of manufacturing systems. Second Industrial Engineering Research Conference Proceedings, pp 445–450

  6. Carter MF (1986) Designing flexibility into automated manufacturing systems. Proceedings of the second ORSA/TIMS conference on flexible manufacturing systems: operations research models and application, pp 107–118

  7. Bobrowski PM, Mabert VA (1988) Alternate routing strategies in batch manufacturing: an evaluation. Decis Sci 19(4):713–733 doi:10.1111/j.1540-5915.1988.tb00297.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. French S (1982) Sequencing and scheduling: an introduction to the mathematics of the job-shop. Wiley, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Garavelli AC (2001) Performance analysis of a batch production system with limited flexibility. Int J Prod Econ 69:39–48 doi:10.1016/S0925-5273(00)00043-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. ElMekkawy TY, ElMaraghy HA (2003) Real-time scheduling with deadlock avoidance in flexible manufacturing systems. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 22:259–270 doi:10.1007/s00170-002-1468-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Nasr N, Elsayed EA (1990) Job shop scheduling with alternative machines. Int J Prod Res 28(9):1595–1609 doi:10.1080/00207549008942818

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Stecke KE, Kim I (1988) A study of FMS part type selection approaches for the short-term production planning. Int J Flex Manuf Syst 1(1):7–29 doi:10.1007/BF00713157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Chatterjee A, Cohen MA, Maxwell WC (1984) Manufacturing flexibility: models and measurement. Proceedings of the First ORSA/UMS special interest conference, pp 49–64

  14. Chung CH, Chen IJ (1989) A systematic assessment of the value of flexibility for an FMS. Proceedings of the third ORSA/TIMS conference on flexible manufacturing systems: operations research models and applications, pp 27–32

  15. Bernardo J, Mohamed Z (1992) The measurement and use of operational flexibility in the loading of flexible manufacturing systems. Eur J Oper Res 60:144–155 doi:10.1016/0377-2217(92)90089-R

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Das SK, Nagendra P (1993) Investigations into the impact of flexibility on manufacturing performance. Int J Prod Res 31(10):2337–2354 doi:10.1080/00207549308956861

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Kumar V (1987) Entropic measures of manufacturing flexibility. Int J Prod Res 25(7):957–966 doi:10.1080/00207548708919888

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Piplani R, Wetjens D (2007) Evaluation of entropy-based dispatching in flexible manufacturing systems. Eur J Oper Res 176:317–331 doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2005.06.066

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Chang A-Y (2007) On the measurement of routing flexibility: a multiple attribute approach. Int J Prod Econ 109:122–136 doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2006.11.011

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Min-Chun Yu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Yu, MC., Greene, T.J. An operational measure of routing flexibility in a multi-stage multi-product production system. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 43, 357–364 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-008-1711-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-008-1711-2

Keywords

Navigation