Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Feasibility of telemetric ICP-guided valve adjustments for complex shunt therapy

  • Technical Note
  • Published:
Child's Nervous System Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Object

The advances in shunt valve technology towards modern adjustable differential pressure (DP) valves and adjustable gravitational assisted valves result in an increasing complexity of therapeutical options. Modern telemetric intracranial pressure (ICP) sensors may be helpful in their application for diagnostic purposes in shunt therapy. We present our first experiences on telemetric ICP-guided valve adjustments in cases with the combination of an adjustable DP valve and adjustable gravitational unit.

Methods

Four consecutive cases were evaluated in a retrospective review who had received a proGAV adjustable, gravitational assisted DP valve with secondary in-line implantation of an adjustable shunt assistant (proSA), together with a telemetric ICP sensor (Neurovent-P-tel) between December 2010 and June 2012 in our institution. The measured ICP values and the corresponding valve adjustments were analyzed in correlation with the clinical course and the cranial imaging of the patients.

Results

No surgery-related complications were observed after implantation of the proSA and the telemetric ICP sensor additional to the proGAV. ICP values could actively be influenced by adjustments of the respective valve units. An increase of the position depending resistance of the proSA resulted in significant attenuated negative ICP values for the standing position, while adjustments of the proGAV could be detected not only in a supine position but also in a standing position. A clinical improvement could be achieved in all cases.

Conclusion

The combination of adjustability in the differential pressure valve and the gravitational unit reveals a complex combination which may be difficult to adapt only according to clinical information. Telemetric ICP-guided valve adjustments seem to be a promising tool as an objective measure according to different body positions. Further investigations are needed to select the patients for these costly implants.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Allin DM, Czosnyka ZH, Czosnyka M et al (2006) In vitro hydrodynamic properties of the Miethke proGAV hydrocephalus shunt. Cerebrospinal Fluid Res 3:9. doi:10.1186/1743-8454-3-9

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Bergsneider M, Miller C, Vespa PM, Hu X (2008) Surgical management of adult hydrocephalus. Neurosurgery 62(Suppl 2):643–659. doi:10.1227/01.neu.0000316269.82467.f7, discussion 659–660

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bergsneider M, Yang I, Hu X et al (2004) Relationship between valve opening pressure, body position, and intracranial pressure in normal pressure hydrocephalus: paradigm for selection of programmable valve pressure setting. Neurosurgery 55:851–858, discussion 858–859

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Czosnyka M, Czosnyka Z, Pickard JD (2012) Programmable shunt assistant tested in Cambridge shunt evaluation laboratory. Acta Neurochir Suppl 113:71–76. doi:10.1007/978-3-7091-0923-6_15

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Eide PK, Sorteberg W (2008) Changes in intracranial pulse pressure amplitudes after shunt implantation and adjustment of shunt valve opening pressure in normal pressure hydrocephalus. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 150:1141–1147. doi:10.1007/s00701-008-0138-8, discussion 1147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Freimann FB, Sprung C (2012) Shunting with gravitational valves—can adjustments end the era of revisions for overdrainage-related events? J Neurosurg 117(6):1197–1204. doi:10.3171/2012.8.JNS1233

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Freimann FB, Vajkoczy P, Sprung C (2013) Patients benefit from low-pressure settings enabled by gravitational valves in normal pressure hydrocephalus. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 115(10):1982–1986. doi:10.1016/j.clineuro.2013.06.010

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Gebert AF, Schulz M, Haberl H, Thomale U-W (2013) Adjustments in gravitational valves for the treatment of childhood hydrocephalus-a retrospective survey. Childs Nerv Syst 29(11):2019–2025. doi:10.1007/s00381-013-2160-2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Kajimoto Y, Ohta T, Miyake H et al (2000) Posture-related changes in the pressure environment of the ventriculoperitoneal shunt system. J Neurosurg 93:614–617. doi:10.3171/jns.2000.93.4.0614

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kiefer M, Antes S, Leonhardt S et al (2012) Telemetric ICP measurement with the first CE-approved device: data from animal experiments and initial clinical experiences. Acta Neurochir Suppl 114:111–116. doi:10.1007/978-3-7091-0956-4_20

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kiefer M, Antes S, Schmitt M et al (2011) Long-term performance of a CE-approved telemetric intracranial pressure monitoring. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2011:2246–2249. doi:10.1109/IEMBS.2011.6090426

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Kulkarni AV, Riva-Cambrin J, Butler J et al (2013) Outcomes of CSF shunting in children: comparison of Hydrocephalus Clinical Research Network cohort with historical controls. J Neurosurg Pediatr 12(4):334–338. doi:10.3171/2013.7.PEDS12637

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Lemcke J, Meier U (2010) Improved outcome in shunted iNPH with a combination of a Codman Hakim programmable valve and an Aesculap-Miethke ShuntAssistant. Cen Eur Neurosurg 71:113–116. doi:10.1055/s-0029-1241179

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Lemcke J, Meier U, Müller C et al (2013) Safety and efficacy of gravitational shunt valves in patients with idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus: a pragmatic, randomised, open label, multicentre trial (SVASONA). J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatr 84:850–857. doi:10.1136/jnnp-2012-303936

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. O’Hayon BB, Drake JM, Ossip MG et al (1998) Frontal and occipital horn ratio: a linear estimate of ventricular size for multiple imaging modalities in pediatric hydrocephalus. Pediatr Neurosurg 29:245–249

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Orakcioglu B, Beynon C, Kentar MM et al (2012) Intracranial pressure telemetry: first experience of an experimental in vivo study using a new device. Acta Neurochir Suppl 114:105–110. doi:10.1007/978-3-7091-0956-4_19

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Rohde V, Haberl E-J, Ludwig H, Thomale U-W (2009) First experiences with an adjustable gravitational valve in childhood hydrocephalus. J Neurosurg Pediatr 3:90–93. doi:10.3171/2008.11.PEDS08154

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Sprung C, Schlosser H-G, Lemcke J et al (2010) The adjustable proGAV shunt: a prospective safety and reliability multicenter study. Neurosurgery 66:465–474. doi:10.1227/01.NEU.0000365272.77634.6B

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Toma AK, Tarnaris A, Kitchen ND, Watkins LD (2011) Use of proGAV® shunt valve in normal-pressure hydrocephalus. Neurosurgery 68:245–249. doi:10.1227/NEU.0b013e318214a809

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Thomale U-W, Gebert AF, Haberl H, Schulz M (2013) Shunt survival rates by using the adjustable differential pressure valve combined with a gravitational unit (proGAV) in pediatric neurosurgery. Childs Nerv Syst 29:425–431. doi:10.1007/s00381-012-1956-9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Weinzierl MR, Rohde V, Gilsbach JM, Korinth M (2008) Management of hydrocephalus in infants by using shunts with adjustable valves. J Neurosurg Pediatr 2:14–18. doi:10.3171/PED/2008/2/7/014

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Welschehold S, Schmalhausen E, Dodier P et al (2012) First clinical results with a new telemetric intracranial pressure-monitoring system. Neurosurgery 70:44–49. doi:10.1227/NEU.0b013e31822dda12, discussion 49

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Zemack G, Romner B (2008) Adjustable valves in normal-pressure hydrocephalus: a retrospective study of 218 patients. Neurosurgery 62(Suppl 2):677–687. doi:10.1227/01.neu.0000316272.28209.af

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Neurosurgery, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany

    Florian Baptist Freimann

  2. Division of Pediatric Neurosurgery, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany

    Matthias Schulz, Hannes Haberl & Ulrich-Wilhelm Thomale

Authors
  1. Florian Baptist Freimann
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Matthias Schulz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Hannes Haberl
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Ulrich-Wilhelm Thomale
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ulrich-Wilhelm Thomale.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Freimann, F.B., Schulz, M., Haberl, H. et al. Feasibility of telemetric ICP-guided valve adjustments for complex shunt therapy. Childs Nerv Syst 30, 689–697 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-013-2324-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-013-2324-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation