Skip to main content
Log in

Aggression, interference, and the functional response of coral-feeding butterflyfishes

  • Community ecology – original research
  • Published:
Oecologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Functional responses describing how foraging rates change with respect to resource density are central to our understanding of interspecific interactions. Competitive interactions are an important determinant of foraging rates; however, the relationship between the exploitation and interference components of competition has received little empirical or theoretical consideration. Moreover, little is known about the relationship between aggressive behavioural interactions and interference competition. Using a natural gradient of consumer and resource densities, we empirically examine how aggressiveness relates to consumer–consumer encounter rates and foraging for four species of Chaetodon reef fish spanning a range of dietary niche breadths. The probability of aggression was most strongly associated with both total consumer and resource densities. In contrast, total encounter rates were best predicted by conspecific consumer density, and were highest for the most specialised consumer (Chaetodon trifascialis), not the most aggressive (Chaetodon baronessa). The most specialised consumer, not the most aggressive, also exhibited the largest reduction in foraging rates with increasing consumer density. Our results support the idea of a positive link between the exploitation and interference components of competition for the most specialised consumer. Moreover, our results caution against inferring the presence of ecological interactions (competition) from observations of behaviour (aggression and agonism) alone.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abrams PA (2015) Why ratio dependence is (still) a bad model of predation. Biol Rev 90:794–814. doi:10.1111/brv.12134

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Abrams PA, Ginzburg LR (2000) The nature of predation: prey dependent, ratio dependent or neither? Trends Ecol Evol 15:337–341

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Adams ES (2001) Approaches to the study of territory size and shape. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 277–303

  • Aljetlawi AA, Sparrevik E, Leonardsson K (2004) Prey–predator size-dependent functional response: derivation and rescaling to the real world. J Anim Ecol 73:239–252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arditi R, Ginzburg LR (1989) Coupling in predator-prey dynamics: ratio-dependence. J Theor Biol 139:311–326

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beddington JR (1975) Mutual interference between parasites of predators and its searching efficiency. J Anim Ecol 44:331–340

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berumen ML, Pratchett MS (2006) Effects of resource availability on the competitive behaviour of butterflyfishes (Chaetondontidae). In: Proceedings of the 10th international coral reef symposium, pp 644–650

  • Blowes SA, Pratchett MS, Connolly SR (2013) Heterospecific aggression and dominance in a guild of coral-feeding fishes: the roles of dietary ecology and phylogeny. Am Nat 182:157–168

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Burnham KP, Anderson DR (2002) Model selection and multi-model inference: a practical information-theoretic approach. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Case TJ (2000) An illustrated guide to theoretical ecology. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Chesson P (2000) Mechanisms of maintenance of species diversity. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 31:343–366

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cole AJ, Pratchett MS, Jones GP (2008) Diversity and functional importance of coral-feeding fishes on tropical coral reefs. Fish Fish 9:286–307

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeAngelis DL, Goldstein RA, O’Neill RV (1975) A model for trophic interaction. Ecology 56:881–892

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeLong JP, Vasseur DA (2011) Mutual interference is common and mostly intermediate in magnitude. BMC Ecol 11:1

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • DeLong JP, Vasseur DA (2013) Linked exploitation and interference competition drives the variable behavior of a classic predator–prey system. Oikos 122:1393–1400

    Google Scholar 

  • Feinsinger P (1976) Organization of a tropical guild of nectarivorous birds. Ecol Monogr 46:257–291

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fletcher QE et al (2010) The functional response of a hoarding seed predator to mast seeding. Ecology 91:2673–2683

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fryxell JM, Lundberg P (1998) Individual behavior and community dynamics. Chapman & Hall, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Graham MH (2003) Confronting multicollinearity in ecological multiple regression. Ecology 84:2809–2815

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harmelin-Vivien ML, Bouchon-Navaro Y (1983) Feeding diets and significance of coral feeding among chaetodontid fishes in Moorea (French Polynesia). Coral Reefs 2:119–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hassell MP, Varley GC (1969) New inductive population model for insect parasites and its bearing on biological control. Nature 223:1133–1137

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Irons D (1989) Temporal and areal feeding behavior of the butterflyfish, Chaetodon trifascialis, at Johnston Atoll. Environ Biol Fishes 25:187–193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lima SL, Dill LM (1990) Behavioral decisions made under the risk of predation: a review and prospectus. Can J Zool 68:619–640

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maher CR, Lott DF (2000) A review of ecological determinants of territoriality within vertebrate species. Am Midland Naturalist 143:1–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCullagh P, Nelder JA (1989) Generalized linear models. Chapman & Hall/CRC, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Myrberg AA Jr, Thresher RE (1974) Interspecific aggression and its relevance to the concept of territoriality in reef fishes. Am Zool 14:81–96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park T (1954) Experimental studies of interspecies competition II: temperature, humidity, and competition in two species of Tribolium. Physiol Zool 27:177–238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peiman KS, Robinson BW (2010) Ecology and evolution of resource-related heterospecific aggression. Q Rev Biol 85:133–158

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pratchett MS (2007) Dietary selection by coral-feeding butterflyfishes (Chaetodontidae) on the Great Barrier Reef, Australia. Raffles Bull Zool 14:155–160

    Google Scholar 

  • Pratchett MS, Berumen ML, Kapoor BG (eds) (2014) Biology of butterflyfishes. CRC Press, Boca Raton

    Google Scholar 

  • Reese ES (1975) A comparative field study of the social behavior and related ecology of reef fishes of the family Chaetodontidae. Z Tierpsychol 37:37–61

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Reese ES (1977) Coevolution of corals and coral feeding fishes of the family Chaetodontidae. In: Proceedings of the third international coral reef symposium, vol. 1, pp 267–274

  • Roberts CM, Ormond RFG (1992) Butterflyfish social behaviour, with special reference to the incidence of territoriality: a review. Environ Biol Fishes 34:79–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Root RB (1967) The niche exploitation pattern of the blue-gray gnatcatcher. Ecol Monogr 37:317–350

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salt GW (1974) Predator and prey densities as controls of the rate of capture by the predator Didinium nasutum. Ecology 55:434–439

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siepielski AM, McPeek MA (2010) On the evidence for species coexistence: a critique of the coexistence program. Ecology 91:3153–3164

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Skalski GT, Gilliam JF (2001) Functional responses with predator interference: viable alternatives to the Holling type II model. Ecology 82:3083–3092

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smallegange IM, van der Meer J, Kurvers RHJM (2006) Disentagling interference competition from exploitative competition in a crab-bivalve system using a novel experimental approach. Oikos 113:157–167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stier A, White JW (2014) Predator density and the functional responses of coral reef fish. Coral Reefs 33:235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turchin P (2003) Complex population dynamics: a theoretical/empirical synthesis. Princeton University Press, New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  • White JW, Samhouri JF, Stier AC, Wormald CL, Hamilton SL, Sandin SA (2010) Synthesizing mechanisms of density dependence in reef fishes: behavior, habitat configuration, and observational scale. Ecology 91:1949–1961

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Whiteman EA, Cote IM (2004) Monogamy in marine fishes. Biol Rev 79:351–375

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wood S (2006) Generalized additive models: an introduction with R. CRC Press, Boca Raton

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood SN, Scheipl F (2014) gamm4: generalized additive mixed models using mgcv and lme4. R package version 0.2–3. http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=gamm4

  • Wood SN, Scheipl F, Faraway JJ (2013) Straightforward intermediate rank tensor product smoothing in mixed models. Stat Comput 23:341–360. doi:10.1007/s11222-012-9314-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yabuta S, Kawashima M (1997) Spawning behavior and haremic mating system in the corallivorous butterflyfish, Chaetodon trifascialis, at Kuroshima Island, Okinawa. Ichthyol Res 44:183–188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zuur AF, Ieno EN, Walker NJ, Saveliev AA, Smith GM (2009) Mixed effects models and extensions in ecology with R. Springer, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank James Cook University and the Australian Research Council for financial support; SAB was also supported by a Queensland Smart State Ph.D. fellowship. We thank E. Graham, S. Montanari, K. Nicolet, M. Norstad, and the staff of the Lizard Island Research Station for assistance in the field. We thank Craig Osenberg, Jeffrey Shima, and anonymous reviewers for constructive criticism that significantly improved this manuscript, and the JCU Ecological Modelling Research Group for support and feedback.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

SAB, MSP and SRC conceived and designed the research; SAB and MSP conducted the fieldwork; SAB analysed the data and wrote the first draft of the manuscript, and all authors contributed to revisions.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shane A. Blowes.

Additional information

Communicated by Joel trexler.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 1697 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Blowes, S.A., Pratchett, M.S. & Connolly, S.R. Aggression, interference, and the functional response of coral-feeding butterflyfishes. Oecologia 184, 675–684 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-017-3902-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-017-3902-8

Keywords

Navigation