Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Long-term consequences of ovarian ablation for premenopausal breast cancer

  • Epidemiology
  • Published:
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The TEXT and SOFT trials concluded that an aromatase inhibitor (AI) with ovarian ablation (OA) yields a higher 5-year disease-free survival than tamoxifen alone in premenopausal ER+ high-risk early breast cancer. However, the long-term health consequences and costs of OA, either by GnRH agonist or oophorectomy, have not been evaluated. The objective was to conduct a cost-effectiveness analysis comparing tamoxifen to OA with AI. Markov Monte Carlo simulation model estimated the costs and benefits of 3 endocrine strategies: (1) tamoxifen; (2) GnRH agonist with AI (GnRHa-AI); (3) bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy with AI (BSO-AI). Effectiveness was measured in life expectancy gain (years), and costs were averaged over a lifetime (USD 2015). Adverse events and deaths from each strategy were modeled in the United States population over a time horizon of 40 years. For women without prior chemotherapy (low-risk), tamoxifen alone was more effective (18.03 years) and less costly ($1566) than GnRHa-AI (17.66 years, $93,692) or BSO-AI (17.63 years, $25,892). For those with prior chemotherapy (high-risk), BSO-AI was more costly but more effective (16.78 years, $25,368) than tamoxifen alone (16.55 years, $1523) with an ICER of $102,290, while GnRHa-AI yielded an ICER of $443,376. The simulation estimated 787 and 577 deaths attributable to OA among 9320 high-risk women after BSO-AI and GnRHa-AI, respectively. There may be a role for ovarian ablation in premenopausal women with ER+ high-risk early breast cancer; however, this analysis raises concerns about the long-term health consequences of ovarian ablation and the potential effects on overall survival.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Francis PA, Regan MM, Fleming GF, Lang I, Ciruelos E, Bellet M, Bonnefoi HR, Climent MA, Da Prada GA, Burstein HJ et al (2015) Adjuvant ovarian suppression in premenopausal breast cancer. N Engl J Med 372(5):436–446

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Pagani O, Regan MM, Walley BA, Fleming GF, Colleoni M, Lang I, Gomez HL, Tondini C, Burstein HJ, Perez EA et al (2014) Adjuvant exemestane with ovarian suppression in premenopausal breast cancer. N Engl J Med 371(12):107–118

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Lokkegaard E, Jovanovic Z, Heitmann BL, Keiding N, Ottesen B, Pedersen AT (2006) The association between early menopause and risk of ischaemic heart disease: influence of hormone therapy. Maturitas 53(2):226–233

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Parker WH, Feskanich D, Broder MS, Chang E, Shoupe D, Farquhar CM, Berek JS, Manson JE (2013) Long-term mortality associated with oophorectomy compared with ovarian conservation in the nurses’ health study. Obstet Gynecol 121(4):709–716

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Rocca WA, Grossardt BR, de Andrade M, Malkasian GD, Melton LJ 3rd (2006) Survival patterns after oophorectomy in premenopausal women: a population-based cohort study. Lancet Oncol 7(10):821–828

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Fair PriceTM search tool. https://healthcarebluebook.com/

  7. King JT Jr, Tsevat J, Lave JR, Roberts MS (2005) Willingness to pay for a quality-adjusted life year: implications for societal health care resource allocation. Med Decis Mak 25(6):667–677

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Weinstein MC, Siegel JE, Gold MR, Kamlet MS, Russell LB (1996) Recommendations of the panel on cost-effectiveness in health and medicine. JAMA, J Am Med Assoc 276(15):1253–1258

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. United States Life Tables (2010) http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nvsr/nvsr63/nvsr63_07.pdf

  10. Del Mastro L, Boni L, Michelotti A, Gamucci T, Olmeo N, Gori S, Giordano M, Garrone O, Pronzato P, Bighin C et al (2011) Effect of the gonadotropin-releasing hormone analogue triptorelin on the occurrence of chemotherapy-induced early menopause in premenopausal women with breast cancer: a randomized trial. JAMA, J Am Med Assoc 306(3):269–276

    Google Scholar 

  11. Fornier MN, Modi S, Panageas KS, Norton L, Hudis C (2005) Incidence of chemotherapy-induced, long-term amenorrhea in patients with breast carcinoma age 40 years and younger after adjuvant anthracycline and taxane. Cancer 104(8):1575–1579

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Lambertini M, Boni L, Michelotti A, Gamucci T, Scotto T, Gori S, Giordano M, Garrone O, Levaggi A, Poggio F et al (2015) Ovarian suppression with triptorelin during adjuvant breast cancer chemotherapy and long-term ovarian function, pregnancies, and disease-free survival: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA, J Am Med Assoc 314(24):2632–2640

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Liem GS, Mo FK, Pang E, Suen JJ, Tang NL, Lee KM, Yip CH, Tam WH, Ng R, Koh J et al (2015) Chemotherapy-related amenorrhea and menopause in young chinese breast cancer patients: analysis on incidence, risk factors and serum hormone profiles. PLoS ONE 10(10):e0140842

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Valentini A, Finch A, Lubinski J, Byrski T, Ghadirian P, Kim-Sing C, Lynch HT, Ainsworth PJ, Neuhausen SL, Greenblatt E et al (2013) Chemotherapy-induced amenorrhea in patients with breast cancer with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation. J Clin Oncol 31(31):3914–3919

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Yoo C, Yun MR, Ahn JH, Jung KH, Kim HJ, Kim JE, Park JY, Park KO, Yoon DH, Kim SB (2013) Chemotherapy-induced amenorrhea, menopause-specific quality of life, and endocrine profiles in premenopausal women with breast cancer who received adjuvant anthracycline-based chemotherapy: a prospective cohort study. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 72(3):565–575

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. SEER stat fact sheets: breast cancer. http://seer.cancer.gov/statfacts/html/breast.html

  17. Anderson WF, Katki HA, Rosenberg PS (2011) Incidence of breast cancer in the United States: current and future trends. J Natl Cancer Inst 103(18):1397–1402

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Actuarial life table. http://www.socialsecurity.gov/OACT/STATS/table4c6.html

  19. O’Farrell S, Garmo H, Holmberg L, Adolfsson J, Stattin P, Van Hemelrijck M (2015) Risk and timing of cardiovascular disease after androgen-deprivation therapy in men with prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol 33(11):1243–1251

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Domchek SM, Friebel TM, Singer CF, Evans DG, Lynch HT, Isaacs C, Garber JE, Neuhausen SL, Matloff E, Eeles R et al (2010) Association of risk-reducing surgery in BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation carriers with cancer risk and mortality. JAMA, J Am Med Assoc 304(9):967–975

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Finch AP, Lubinski J, Moller P, Singer CF, Karlan B, Senter L, Rosen B, Maehle L, Ghadirian P, Cybulski C et al (2014) Impact of oophorectomy on cancer incidence and mortality in women with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation. J Clin Oncol 32(15):1547–1553

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Rebbeck TR, Friebel T, Wagner T, Lynch HT, Garber JE, Daly MB, Isaacs C, Olopade OI, Neuhausen SL, van’t Veer L et al (2005) Effect of short-term hormone replacement therapy on breast cancer risk reduction after bilateral prophylactic oophorectomy in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers: the PROSE Study Group. J Clin Oncol 23(31):7804–7810

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Haldar K, Giamougiannis P, Wilson C, Crawford R (2011) Laparoscopic salpingo-oophorectomy for ovarian ablation in women with hormone-sensitive breast cancer. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 113(3):222–224

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Bernhard J, Luo W, Ribi K, Colleoni M, Burstein HJ, Tondini C, Pinotti G, Spazzapan S, Ruhstaller T, Puglisi F et al (2015) Patient-reported outcomes with adjuvant exemestane versus tamoxifen in premenopausal women with early breast cancer undergoing ovarian suppression (TEXT and SOFT): a combined analysis of two phase 3 randomised trials. Lancet Oncol 16(7):848–858

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Park IH, Han HS, Lee H, Lee KS, Kang HS, Lee S, Kim SW, Jung S, Ro J (2012) Resumption or persistence of menstruation after cytotoxic chemotherapy is a prognostic factor for poor disease-free survival in premenopausal patients with early breast cancer. Ann Oncol 23(9):2283–2289

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Vanhuyse M, Fournier C, Bonneterre J (2005) Chemotherapy-induced amenorrhea: influence on disease-free survival and overall survival in receptor-positive premenopausal early breast cancer patients. Ann Oncol 16(8):1283–1288

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Janice S. Kwon.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare they have no conflicts of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kwon, J.S., Pansegrau, G., Nourmoussavi, M. et al. Long-term consequences of ovarian ablation for premenopausal breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 157, 565–573 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-016-3842-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-016-3842-8

Keywords

Navigation