Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Deradicalization: not soft, but strategic

  • Published:
Crime, Law and Social Change Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The present article considers deradicalization programs. It is observed that deradicalization is primarily a strategic tool, that it was already used in the 1970s, that it can occur spontaneously, and that is should be differentiated from physical disengagement. An evaluation of existing deradicalization programs lead to the propositions that 1) deradicalization programs in the area of right-wing extremism primarily focus on changing behavior not thoughts, that 2) currently there is insufficient insight in what motives people to deradicalize, and 3) that insights from psychology are still insufficiently used to increase effectiveness of deradicalization. Research can make an important contribution to optimize efficiency of deradicalization for counterterrorism purposes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. See e.g. Bjorgo and Horgan ([3])

  2. See e.g. Neuman ([2])

References

  1. Ripley, A. (2007). Future revolutions: Reverse radicalism. Time. http://www.time.com/time/specials/2007/article/0,28804,1720049_1720050_1722062,00.html. Accessed 8 September 2010.

  2. Neuman, R. (2010). Prisons and terrorism. Radicalisation and de-radicalisation in 15 countries. Londen: International Centre for the Study of Radicalisation and Political Violence.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bjorgo, T., & Horgan, J. (Eds.). (2009). Leaving terrorism behind: Individual and collective disengagement. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  4. McCauley, C. (2006). Jujitsu politics: Terrorism and response to terrorism. In P. R. Kimmel & C. E. Stout (Eds.), Collateral damage: The psychological consequences of America’s war on terrorism (pp. 45–65). Westport: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Kruglanski, A. (2002). Inside the terrorist mind. Paper presented to the National Academy of Science, at its annual meeting, April 29, 2002, Washington, D.C.

  6. Gumber, A. (2007). Woman’s diary of a jungle guerrilla’s life. The independent. http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/womans-diary-of-a-jungle-guerrillas-life-401531.html. Accessed 8 September 2010.

  7. Horgan, J. (2009). Disengaging from terrorism. In D. C. Canter (Ed.), The faces of terrorism: Cross-disciplinary investigations (pp. 258–276). London: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Horgan, J. (2009). Walking away from terrorism: Accounts of disengagement from radical and extremist movements. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Stern, J. (2010). Mind over martyr. Foreign Affairs, 89, 95–108.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kosloff, S., Greenberg, J., Schmader, T., Dechesne, M., & Weise, D. (2010). Smearing the opposition: Implicit and explicit stigmatization of the 2008 U.S. Presidential candidates and the current U.S. President. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 139, 383–398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mark Dechesne.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dechesne, M. Deradicalization: not soft, but strategic. Crime Law Soc Change 55, 287–292 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10611-011-9283-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10611-011-9283-8

Keywords

Navigation