Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

High platelet reactivity after P2Y12-inhibition in patients with atrial fibrillation and coronary stenting

  • Published:
Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

High platelet reactivity (HPR) after P2Y12-inhibition in patients undergoing coronary stenting is associated with an increased risk for thromboembolic events and coronary death. So far it is not known how HPR affects the clinical outcome of different treatment strategies in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) undergoing coronary stenting. In this single centre, observational study the antiplatelet effect of P2Y12-inhibitors in AF patients undergoing coronary stenting was investigated using impedance aggregometry. Patients received either dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) or triple therapy (TT). HPR was defined as the ratio of ADP-to TRAP-induced aggregation (r-ADP-agg) ≥50 %. Thromboembolic and bleeding events were assessed within the first 30 days after stenting. Out of 910 screened patients 167 patients were available for the present analysis. HPR was found in 5 of 43 (12 %) patients treated with DAPT and in 18 of 124 (15 %) patients treated with TT. In patients receiving TT, HPR was not a risk factor for thromboembolic events compared to patients with adequate response to P2Y12-inhibitors (6 vs. 8 %, p = 0.712). There was a trend for less bleeding events in patients with HPR compared to r-ADP-agg <50 % in the TT group (0 vs. 16 %, p = 0.077). Our data suggest that HPR after P2Y12-antagonism in patients receiving TT due to AF and coronary stenting might protect from bleeding without increasing thromboembolic risk. Future studies will need to investigate if patients with AF receiving coronary stenting benefit from a reduction of antithrombotic therapy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Steinberg BA, Kim S, Piccini JP et al (2013) Use and associated risks of concomitant aspirin therapy with oral anticoagulation in patients with atrial fibrillation: insights from the Outcomes Registry for Better Informed Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation (ORBIT-AF) Registry. Circulation 128:721–728

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Flegel KM, Shipley MJ, Rose G (1987) Risk of stroke in non-rheumatic atrial fibrillation. Lancet 1:526–529

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Lip GY, Nieuwlaat R, Pisters R et al (2010) Refining clinical risk stratification for predicting stroke and thromboembolism in atrial fibrillation using a novel risk factor-based approach: the euro heart survey on atrial fibrillation. Chest 137:263–272

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. January CT, Wann LS, Alpert JS et al (2014) 2014 AHA/ACC/HRS guideline for the management of patients with atrial fibrillation: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines and the Heart Rhythm Society. J Am Coll Cardiol 64:e1–e76

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Grines CL, Bonow RO, Casey DE Jr et al (2007) Prevention of premature discontinuation of dual antiplatelet therapy in patients with coronary artery stents: a science advisory from the American Heart Association, American College of Cardiology, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, American College of Surgeons, and American Dental Association, with representation from the American College of Physicians. Circulation 115:813–818

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Wijns W, Kolh P, Danchin N et al (2010) Guidelines on myocardial revascularization. Eur Heart J 31:2501–2555

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Moser M, Olivier CB, Bode C (2014) Triple antithrombotic therapy in cardiac patients: more questions than answers. Eur Heart J 35:216–223

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Sambola A, Mutuberria M, Garcia Del Blanco B et al (2016) Impact of triple therapy in elderly patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. PLoS One 11:e0147245

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Hansen ML, Sorensen R, Clausen MT et al (2010) Risk of bleeding with single, dual, or triple therapy with warfarin, aspirin, and clopidogrel in patients with atrial fibrillation. Arch Intern Med 170:1433–1441

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Lip GY, Windecker S, Huber K et al (2014) Management of antithrombotic therapy in atrial fibrillation patients presenting with acute coronary syndrome and/or undergoing percutaneous coronary or valve interventions: a joint consensus document of the European Society of Cardiology Working Group on Thrombosis, European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA), European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI) and European Association of Acute Cardiac Care (ACCA) endorsed by the Heart Rhythm Society (HRS) and Asia-Pacific Heart Rhythm Society (APHRS). Eur Heart J 35:3155–3179

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Faxon DP, Eikelboom JW, Berger PB et al (2011) Consensus document: antithrombotic therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing coronary stenting. A North-American perspective. Thromb Haemost 106:572–584

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Sofi F, Marcucci R, Gori AM et al (2010) Clopidogrel non-responsiveness and risk of cardiovascular morbidity. An updated meta-analysis. Thromb Haemost 103:841–848

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Olivier CB, Schnabel K, Brandt C et al (2014) A high ratio of ADP–TRAP induced platelet aggregation is associated more strongly with increased mortality after coronary stent implantation than high conventional ADP induced aggregation alone. Clin Res Cardiol 103:968–975

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Muller I, Besta F, Schulz C et al (2003) Prevalence of clopidogrel non-responders among patients with stable angina pectoris scheduled for elective coronary stent placement. Thromb Haemost 89:783–787

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Windecker S, Kolh P, Alfonso F et al (2014) 2014 ESC/EACTS Guidelines on myocardial revascularization: the task force on myocardial revascularization of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS) developed with the special contribution of the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI). Eur Heart J 35:2541–2619

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Olivier CB, Meyer M, Bauer H et al (2016) The ratio of ADP-to TRAP-induced platelet aggregation quantifies P2Y12-dependent platelet inhibition independently of the platelet count. PLoS One 11:e0149053

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Olivier CB, Diehl P, Schnabel K et al (2014) Third generation P2Y12 antagonists inhibit platelet aggregation more effectively than clopidogrel in a myocardial infarction registry. Thromb Haemost 111:266–272

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Olivier CB, Schnabel K, Weber S et al (2016) Platelet reactivity after administration of third generation P2Y12-antagonists does not depend on body weight in contrast to clopidogrel. J Thromb Thrombolysis 42(1):84–89. doi:10.1007/s11239-016-1340-9

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Olivier CB, Weik P, Meyer M et al (2016) TRAP-induced platelet aggregation is enhanced in cardiovascular patients receiving dabigatran. Thromb Res 138:63–68

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Lamberts M, Olesen JB, Ruwald MH et al (2012) Bleeding after initiation of multiple antithrombotic drugs, including triple therapy, in atrial fibrillation patients following myocardial infarction and coronary intervention: a nationwide cohort study. Circulation 126:1185–1193

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Chesebro JH, Knatterud G, Roberts R et al (1987) Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) Trial, Phase I: a comparison between intravenous tissue plasminogen activator and intravenous streptokinase. Clinical findings through hospital discharge. Circulation 76:142–154

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Mehran R, Rao SV, Bhatt DL et al (2011) Standardized bleeding definitions for cardiovascular clinical trials: a consensus report from the Bleeding Academic Research Consortium. Circulation 123:2736–2747

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Diehl P, Olivier C, Halscheid C et al (2010) Clopidogrel affects leukocyte dependent platelet aggregation by P2Y12 expressing leukocytes. Basic Res Cardiol 105:379–387

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Saheb KJ, Deng BQ, Hu QS et al (2013) Triple antithrombotic therapy versus double antiplatelet therapy after percutaneous coronary intervention with stent implantation in patients requiring chronic oral anticoagulation: a meta-analysis. Chin Med J 126:2536–2542

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Gao F, Zhou YJ, Wang ZJ et al (2011) Meta-analysis of the combination of warfarin and dual antiplatelet therapy after coronary stenting in patients with indications for chronic oral anticoagulation. Int J Cardiol 148:96–101

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Uchida Y, Mori F, Ogawa H et al (2010) Impact of anticoagulant therapy with dual antiplatelet therapy on prognosis after treatment with drug-eluting coronary stents. J Cardiol 55:362–369

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Rubboli A, Magnavacchi P, Guastaroba P et al (2012) Antithrombotic management and 1-year outcome of patients on oral anticoagulation undergoing coronary stent implantation (from the Registro Regionale Angioplastiche Emilia-Romagna Registry). Am J Cardiol 109:1411–1417

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Kang DO, Yu CW, Kim HD et al (2015) Triple antithrombotic therapy versus dual antiplatelet therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing drug-eluting stent implantation. Coron Artery Dis 26:372–380

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Smith JG, Wieloch M, Koul S et al (2012) Triple antithrombotic therapy following an acute coronary syndrome: prevalence, outcomes and prognostic utility of the HAS-BLED score. EuroIntervention 8:672–678

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Azoulay L, Dell’Aniello S, Simon T et al (2013) The concurrent use of antithrombotic therapies and the risk of bleeding in patients with atrial fibrillation. Thromb Haemost 109:431–439

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Halg C, Brunner-La Rocca HP, Kaiser C et al (2009) Early and late increased bleeding rates after angioplasty and stenting due to combined antiplatelet and anticoagulanttherapy. EuroIntervention 5:425–431

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Manzano-Fernandez S, Pastor FJ, Marin F et al (2008) Increased major bleeding complications related to triple antithrombotic therapy usage in patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing percutaneous coronary artery stenting. Chest 134:559–567

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Tantry US, Bonello L, Aradi D et al (2013) Consensus and update on the definition of on-treatment platelet reactivity to adenosine diphosphate associated with ischemia and bleeding. J Am Coll Cardiol 62:2261–2273

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Gremmel T, Calatzis A, Steiner S et al (2010) Is TRAP-6 suitable as a positive control for platelet reactivity when assessing response to clopidogrel? Platelets 21:515–521

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Badr Eslam R, Lang IM, Koppensteiner R et al (2013) Residual platelet activation through protease-activated receptors (PAR)-1 and -4 in patients on P2Y12 inhibitors. Int J Cardiol 168:403–406

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Siller-Matula JM, Trenk D, Schror K et al (2013) Response variability to P2Y12 receptor inhibitors: expectations and reality. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 6:1111–1128

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Wallentin L, Becker RC, Budaj A et al (2009) Ticagrelor versus clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes. N Engl J Med 361:1045–1057

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Wiviott SD, Braunwald E, McCabe CH et al (2007) Prasugrel versus clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes. N Engl J Med 357:2001–2015

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Wiviott SD, Trenk D, Frelinger AL et al (2007) Prasugrel compared with high loading- and maintenance-dose clopidogrel in patients with planned percutaneous coronary intervention: the Prasugrel in comparison to clopidogrel for inhibition of platelet activation and aggregation-thrombolysis in myocardial infarction 44 trial. Circulation 116:2923–2932

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Connolly SJ, Ezekowitz MD, Yusuf S et al (2009) Dabigatran versus warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med 361:1139–1151

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Patel MR, Mahaffey KW, Garg J et al (2011) Rivaroxaban versus warfarin in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med 365:883–891

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Camm AJ, Lip GY, De Caterina R et al (2012) 2012 focused update of the ESC Guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation: an update of the 2010 ESC Guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation–developed with the special contribution of the European Heart Rhythm Association. Europace 14:1385–1413

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Olivier CB, Weik P, Meyer M et al (2016) Dabigatran and rivaroxaban do not affect AA- and ADP-induced platelet aggregation in patients receiving concomitant platelet inhibitors. J Thromb Thrombolysis 42(2):161–166. doi:10.1007/s11239-016-1350-7

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Snoep JD, Hovens MM, Eikenboom JC et al (2007) Clopidogrel nonresponsiveness in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention with stenting: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am Heart J 154:221–231

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Mehran R, Baber U, Steg PG et al (2013) Cessation of dual antiplatelet treatment and cardiac events after percutaneous coronary intervention (PARIS): 2 year results from a prospective observational study. Lancet 382:1714–1722

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Gao F, Zhou YJ, Wang ZJ et al (2010) Comparison of different antithrombotic regimens for patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing drug-eluting stent implantation. Circ J 74:701–708

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Dewilde WJM, Oirbans T, Verheugt FWA et al (2013) Use of clopidogrel with or without aspirin in patients taking oral anticoagulant therapy and undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: an open-label, randomised, controlled trial. Lancet 381:1107–1115

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Lamberts M, Gislason GH, Olesen JB et al (2013) Oral anticoagulation and antiplatelets in atrial fibrillation patients after myocardial infarction and coronary intervention. J Am Coll Cardiol 62:981–989

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christoph B. Olivier.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

C. Olivier, P. Diehl, Q. Zhou and M. Moser are investigators in PIONEER AF-PCI. P. Diehl received speaker’s fees from Lilly Deutschland GmbH and Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma GmbH & Co. C. Bode received speaker’s fees from Merck, AstraZeneca, Sanofi und Bayer. M. Moser received speaker’s fees from Bayer Vital GmbH, AstraZeneca GmbH, Daiichi Sankyo Deutschland GmbH, Pfizer/Bristol-Myers Squibb, Berlin Chemie AG, Lilly Deutschland GmbH, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma GmbH & Co. and KG Sanofi-Aventis Deutschland GmbH.

Additional information

Philipp Diehl and Christoph B. Olivier have equally contributed to this work.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rilinger, J., Meyer, M., Schnabel, K. et al. High platelet reactivity after P2Y12-inhibition in patients with atrial fibrillation and coronary stenting. J Thromb Thrombolysis 42, 558–565 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11239-016-1397-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11239-016-1397-5

Keywords

Navigation