Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Integral assessment of estrogenic potentials in sediment-associated samples

Part 2: Study of estrogen and anti-estrogen receptor-binding potentials of sediment-associated chemicals under different salinity conditions using the salinity-adapted enzyme-linked receptor assay

  • AREA 6.4 • MONITORING / FATE OF PERSISTENT CHEMICALS • RESEARCH ARTICLE
  • Published:
Environmental Science and Pollution Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background, aim, and scope

The enzyme-linked receptor assay (ELRA) detects estrogenic and anti-estrogenic effects at the molecular level of receptor binding and is a useful tool for the integrative assessment of ecotoxicological potentials caused by hormonally active agents (HAA) and endocrine disrupting compounds (EDC). The main advantage of the ELRA is its high sample throughput and its robustness against cytotoxicity and microbial contamination. After a methodological adaptation to salinity of the ELRA, according to the first part of this study, which increased its salinity tolerance and sensitivity for 17-β-estradiol, the optimised ELRA was used to investigate 13 native sediments characterised by different levels of salinity and chemical contamination. The applicability of the ELRA for routine analysis in environmental assessment was evaluated. Salinity is often a critical factor for bioassays in ecotoxicological sediment assessment. Therefore, salinity of the samples was additionally adjusted to different levels to characterise its influence on elution and binding processes of receptor-binding substances.

Materials and methods

The ELRA was carried out with the human estrogen receptor α (ER) in a 96-well microplate format using the experimental setup known from the competitive immunoassay based on ligand–protein interaction. It is an important improvement that a physiologically relevant receptor was used as a linking protein instead of an antibody. The microplates were coated with a 17-β-estradiol-BSA conjugate, and dilution series of estradiol and of native sediment samples were added and incubated with the ER. After a washing step, a biotinylated mouse anti-ER antibody was added to each well. Receptor binding to estradiol, agonistic and antagonistic receptor binding, were determined by a streptavidin-POD-biotin complex with subsequent measurement of the peroxidase activity at the wavelength of 450 nm using a commercial ELISA multiplate reader. The sediment elutriates and pore water samples of sediments were tested in a dilution series to evaluate at which dilution step the receptor-binding potential ends. In the elution process (see Section 2.1 to 2.2), a method was developed to adjust the salinity to the levels of the reference testings, which offers an appropriate option to adjust the salinity in both directions. Statistical evaluation was made with a combination of the Mann–Whitney U test and the pT-method.

Results

This part of the study characterised the environmental factor ‘salinity’ for prospective applications of the ELRA. Using reference substances such as 17-β-estradiol, the ELRA showed sigmoid concentration-effect relations over a broad range from 0.05 μg/l to 100 μg/l under physiological conditions. After methodological optimisation, both sensitivity and tolerance of the assay against salinity could be significantly raised, and the ELRA became applicable under salinity conditions up to concentrations of 20.5‰. The mean relative inter-test error (n = 3) was around 11% with reference substances and below 5% for single sediments elutriates in three replicates each. For sediment testings, the pore water and different salinity-adjusted elutriates of 13 sediments were used. A clear differentiation of the receptor-binding potential could be reached by application of the pT-method. Thereby, pT-values from one to six could be assigned to the sediments, and the deviation caused by the different salinity conditions was one pT-value. The mean standard deviation in the salinity adaptation procedure of the elutriates was below 5%.

Discussion

Although the ELRA has already been used for assessments of wastewater, sludge and soil, its applicability for samples to different salinity levels has not been investigated so far. Even if the ELRA is not as sensitive as the E-screen or the YES-assay, with regard to reference substances like 17-β-estradiol, it is a very useful tool for pre-screening, because it is able to integrate both estrogenic as well as anti-estrogenic receptor-binding effects. According to the results of sediment testing, and given the integrative power to detect different directions of effects, the ELRA shows sufficient sensitivity and salinity tolerance to discriminate receptor-binding potentials in environmental samples.

Conclusions

The optimised ELRA assay is a fast, cost-effective, reliable and highly reproducible tool that can be used for high-throughput screening in a microplate format in detecting both estrogenic and anti-estrogenic effects. Additionally, the ELRA is robust against microbial contaminations, and is not susceptible towards cytotoxic interferences like the common cell-culture methods. The general applicability and sufficient sensitivity of the ELRA was shown in freshwater environments. Marine and brackish samples can be measured up to salinity levels of 20.5‰.

Recommendations and perspectives

In view of the proven sensitivity, functionality and the fastness of the ELRA, it is recommendable to standardise the test method. At the moment, no adequate in vitro test procedure exists which is standardised to DIN or ISO levels. The E-screen and the yeast estrogen/androgen screens (YES/YAS) sometimes underlie strong cytotoxic effects, as reported in the first part of this study. Further development of an ELRA assay using human androgen receptors appears to be very promising to gain information about androgenic and anti-androgenic effects, too. This would offer a possibility to use the ELRA as a fast and reliable pre-screening tool for the detection of endocrine potentials, thus minimising time and cost-expensive animal experiments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ankley G, Mihaich E, Stahl R, Tillitt D, Colborn T, McMaster S, Miller R, Bantle J, Campbell P, Denslow N, Dickerson R, Folmar L, Fry M, Giesy J, Gray E, Guiney P, Hutchinson T, Kennedy S, Kramer V, LeBlanc G, Mayes M, Nimrod A, Patino R, Peterson R, Purdy R, Ringer R, Thomas P, Touart L, van der Kraak G, Zacharewski T (1998) Overview of a workshop on screening methods for detecting potential (anti-) estrogenic/androgenic chemicals in wildlife. Environ Toxicol and Chem 17(1):68–87

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Blaise C, Gagne F, Salazar M, Salazar S, Trottier S, Hansen PD (2003) Experimentally-induced feminisation of freshwater mussels after long-term exposure to a municipal effluent. Fresen Environ Bull 12(8):865–870

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cespedes R, Lacorte S, Raldua D, Ginebreda A, Barcelo D, Pina B (2005) Distribution of endocrine disruptors in the Llobregat river basin (Catalonia, NE Spain). Chemosphere 61(11):1710–1719

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • DIN 38415–6 (2003) Deutsche Einheitsverfahren zur Wasser-, Abwasser- und Schlammbehandlung—Suborganismische Testverfahren (Gruppe T)—Teil 6: Giftigkeit gegenüber Fischen, Bestimmung der nicht akut giftigen Wirkung von Abwasser auf die Entwicklung von Fischeiern über Verdünnungsstufen (T6)

  • Dizer H, Fischer B, Sepulveda L, Loffredo E, Senesi N, Santana F, Hansen PD (2002) Estrogenic effect of leachates and soil extracts from lysimeters spiked with sewage sludge and reference endocrine disruptors. Environ Toxicol 17(2):105–1112

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Eroschenko VP, Palmiter RD (1980) Estrogenicity of kepone in birds and mammals. In: McLachlan JA (ed) Estrogens in the Environment. Elsevier, New York, pp 305–325

    Google Scholar 

  • Fossi MC, Casini S, Marsili L (2006) Endocrine disruptors in Mediterranean top marine predators. Environ Sci Pollut Res 13(3):204–207

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fox GA (2001) Effects of endocrine disrupting chemicals on wildlife in Canada: past, present and future. Walter Qual Res J Canada 36(2):233–251

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gracia T, Jones PD, Higley EB, Hilscherova K, Newsted JL, Murphy MB, Chan AKY, Zhang X, Hecker M, Lam PKS, Wu RSS, Giesy JP (2008) Modulation of steroidogenesis by coastal waters and sewage effluents of Hong Kong, China using the H295R assay. Environ Sci Pollut Res 15(4):332–343

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guillette LJJ, Gross TS, Mason GR, Matter JM, Percival HF, Woodward AR (1994) Developmental abnormalities of the gonad and abnormal sex-hormone concentrations in juvenile alligators from contaminated and control lakes in Florida. Environ Health Perspect 102:680–688

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hecker M, Hollert H, Cooper R, Vinggard A-M, Akahori Y, Murphy M, Nellemann C, Higley E, Newsted, Wu R, Lam P, Laskey J, Buckalew A, Grund S, Nakai M, Timm G, Giesy J (2007) The OECD validation program of the H295R steroidgenesis assay for the identification of in vitro inhibitors or inducers of testosterone and estradiol production. Phase 2: inter laboratory pre-validation studies. Environ Sci Pollut Res 14(Spec Issue):23–30

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hollert H, Dürr M, Holtey-Weber R, Islinger M, Brack W, Färber H, Erdinger L, Braunbeck T (2005) Endocrine disruption of water and sediment extracts in a non-radioactive dot blot/RNAse protection-assay using isolated hepatocytes of rainbow trout. Environ Sci Pollut Res 12(6):347–360

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Huschek G, Hansen P-D (2006) Ecotoxicological classification of the Berlin river system using bioassays in respect to the European Water Framework Directive. Environ Monit Assess 121(1–3):15–31

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • ISO 10253: (2006) Water quality—marine algal growth inhibition test with Skeletonema costatum and Phaeodactylum tricornutum

  • Kase R, Hansen P-D, Fischer B, Manz W, Heininger P, Reifferscheid G (2008) Integral assessment of estrogenic potentials of sediment-associated samples. Part 1: the influence of salinity on the in vitro tests ELRA, E-Screen and YES. Env Sci Pollut Res 15(1):75–83

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Krebs F (2001) Ökotoxikologische Baggergutuntersuchung, Baggergutklassifizierung und Handhabungskategorien für Baggergut. In: Calmano W (ed) Untersuchung und Bewertung von Sedimenten. Springer, Heidelberg

    Google Scholar 

  • Krebs F (2005) In: Blaise C, Ferard J-F (eds) The pT-method as a hazard assessment scheme for sediments and dredged material, Small-scale freshwater toxicity investigations. vol. 2. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 281–304

  • Länge R, Hutchinson TH, Croudace CP, Siegmund F, Schweinfurth H, Hampe P, Pante GH, Sumpter JP (2001) Effects of the synthetic estrogen 17-α-ethinylestradiol on the life-cycle of the fathead minnow (Pimephales promelas). Environ Toxicol and Chem 20(6):1216–1227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lutz I, Kloas W (1999) Amphibians as a model to study endocrine disruptors: l. Environmental pollution and estrogen receptor binding. Sci Total Environ 225(1–2):49–57

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lutz I, Kloas W, Einspanier R (1999) Amphibians as a model to study endocrine disruptors: II. estrogenic activity of environmental chemicals in vitro and in vivo. Sci Total Environ 225(1–2):59–68

    Google Scholar 

  • Pane L, Giacco E, Corra C, Greco G, Mariotini GL, Varisco F, Faimali M (2008) Ecotoxicological evaluation of harbour sediments using organisms from different trophic levels. J Soils Sediments 8(2):74–79

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Petermeier A, Schöll F, Tittizer T (1996) Die ökologische und biologische Entwicklung der deutschen Elbe. Lauterbornia 24, ISSN 0935–333X

  • Rastall AC, Getting D, Goddard J, Roberts DR Erdinger L (2006) A biomimetic approach to the detection and identification of estrogen receptor agonists in surface waters using semipermeable membrane devices (SPMDs) and bioassay-directed chemical analysis. Environ Sci Pollut Res 13(4):256–267

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Reincke H, Löffler J, Wolff S, Bergemann M (1999):Wassergütedaten der Elbe Zahlentafel. ISSN 0931–2153

  • Rodbard D (1971) Statistical aspect of radioimmunoassay. In: Odell WD, Daughaday JB, Lipincott JB (eds) Principles of competitive protein binding assays. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, pp 204–259

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodbard D, Hutt DM (1974) Statistical analysis of radioimmunoassays and immunoradiometric (labelled antibody) assay: a generalized weighted, iterative, least-squares method for logistic curve fitting. Radio-immunoassay and related procedures in Medicine 1:165–192

    Google Scholar 

  • Sachs L (1999) Angewandte Statistik. Anwendung statistischer Methoden, 9. überarbeitete Auflage, Springer

  • Seibert H (1996) Störungen der Entwicklung und Funktion des männlichen Reproduktionssystems. Umweltwiss Schadst Forsch 8(5):275–284

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Seifert M (1999) Bestimmung von Oestrogenen und Xenooestrogenen mit einem Rezeptorassay. Dissertation zur Erlangung des Grades eines Doktors der Naturwissenschaften an der Technischen Universität München

  • Seifert M (2003) Luminescent enzyme linked receptor assay for estrogenic compounds. Anal Bioanal Chem 378(3):684–687

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Seifert M, Haindl S, Hock B (1998) In vitro analysis of xenoestrogens byenzyme linked receptor assays (ELRA). Adv Exp Med Biol 444:113–117

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Seifert M, Haindl S, Hock B (1999) Development of an enzyme linked receptor assay (ELRA) for estrogens and xenoestrogens. Elsevier: Anal Chim Acta 386:191–199

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stifani S, George R, Schneider WJ (1988) Solubilization and characterization of the chicken oocyte vitellogenin receptor. Biochem J 250:467–475

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Voutsa D, Hartmann P, Schaffner C, Giger W (2006) Benzotriazoles, alkylphenols and bisphenol A in municipal wastewaters and in the Glatt River, Switzerland. Environ Sci Pollut Res 13(5):333–341

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

We are grateful for editorial support by Bernd Uebelmann, Federal Institute of Hydrology.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Robert Kase.

Additional information

Responsible editor: Jan Schwarzbauer

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kase, R., Hansen, P.D., Fischer, B. et al. Integral assessment of estrogenic potentials in sediment-associated samples. Environ Sci Pollut Res 16, 54–64 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-008-0060-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-008-0060-x

Keywords

Navigation