Skip to main content
Log in

A systematic benchmarking approach for geologic CO2 injection and storage

  • Special Issue
  • Published:
Environmental Earth Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The idea of this paper is twofold. On one hand, we propose a general systematic for benchmarking of CO2 modelling. On the other hand, we integrate material from the CLEAN project into this framework to demonstrate its applicability (Kühn et al. in Environ Earth Sci, this issue 2011). Benchmarks are an important instrument to gain a better understanding of interacting physico-chemical processes and they are a necessary tool to verify the algorithms and the software dedicated to simulate the separated and differently coupled thermo-hydro-mechanical/chemical processes during injecting and storing CO2 in the subsurface. In general we distinguish between process- and site-related test cases. Process-related benchmarks deal with the required complexity of process coupling as well as equations of state for fluids and constitutive laws for geologic formations. Site-specific benchmarks represent different geological settings for potential CO2 reservoirs, e.g., depleted gas and oil reservoirs as well as deep saline aquifers. The data basis for benchmarking mainly comes from experimental work in the CLEAN project as well as from literature. The benchmarking systematic is aimed at serving as basis for process studies, experimental design as well as for code inter-comparison purposes not only for numerical tools having used by the CLEAN partners but also for upcoming international benchmarking initiatives as well.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21
Fig. 22
Fig. 23

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bauer S, Beyer C, Kolditz O (2006) Assessing measurement uncertainty of first-order degradation rates in heterogeneous aquifers. Water Resour Res 42(1):W01420. doi:10.1029/2004WR003878

  • Bauer S, Class H, Ebert M et al (2011) Modeling and parameterization of CO2 storage in deep saline formations for dimension and risk analyses: The CO2-MoPa project. Environ Earth Sci, this issue

  • Beinhorn M, Dietrich P, Kolditz O (2005) 3-d numerical evaluation of density effects on tracer tests. J Contam Hydrol 81(1–4):89–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beyer C, Li D, de Lucia M, Kühn M, Bauer S (2011) Modelling CO2 induced fluid-rock interactions in the Altensalzwedel gas reservoir: part 2 coupled reactive transport simulation. Environ Earth Sci this issue

  • Böttcher N, Taron J, Kolditz O, Park CH, Liedl R (2011) Evaluation of equations of state for CO2 in numerical simulations. Environ Earth Sci, this issue

  • Centler F, Shao H, De Biase C, Park CH, Regnier P, Kolditz O, Thullner M (2010) GeoSysBRNS-A flexible multidimensional reactive transport model for simulating biogeochemical subsurface processes. Comput Geosci 36(3):397–405

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Class H, Ebigbo A, Helmig R, Dahle H, Nordbotten J, Celia MPA, Darcis M, Ennis-King J, Fan Y, Flemisch B, Gasda S, Jin M, Krug S, Labregere D, Beni A, Pawar R, Sbai A, Thomas S, Trenty L, Wei L (2009) A benchmark study on problems related to CO2 storage in geologic formations: summary and discussion of the results. Comput Geosci 13(4):409–434

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Lucia M, Albrecht D, Bauer S, Beyer C, Kühn M, Nowak T, Pudlo D, Stadler S (2011) Modelling CO2 induced fluid-rock interactions in the Altensalzwedel gas reservoir: part 1 from experimental data to a reference geochemical model. Environ Earth Sci, this issue

  • Duan Z, Sun R (2003) An improved model calculating CO2 solubility in pure water and aqueous NaCl solutions from 273 to 533 K and from 0 to 2000 bar. Chem Geology 193:253–271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duan Z, Sun R, Zhu C, Chou I (2006) An improved model for the calculation of CO2 solubility in aqueous solutions containing Na+, K+, Ca2+, Mg2+, Cl, and SO 2−4 . Marine Chem 98(2–4):131–139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Görke UJ, Park CH, Wang W, Singh A, Kolditz O (2011) Numerical simulation of multiphase hydro-mechanical processes induced by CO2 injection in deep saline aquifers. Oil Gas Sci Technol 66(1):105–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hou M, Gou Y, Taron J, Görke UJ, Kolditz O (2011) Thermo-hydro-mechanical modeling of CO2-EGR: results and code comparison. Environ Earth Sci, this issue

  • Hou M, Wundram L, Meyer R, Schmidt M, Schmitz S, Were P (2012) Development of a long-term wellbore sealing concept based on numerical simulations and in-situ-testing in the Altmark natural gas field. Environ Earth Sci this issue

  • Kalbacher T, Wang W, McDermott C, Kolditz O, Taniguchi T (2005) Development and application of a CAD interface for fractured rock. Environ Geol 47(7):1017–1027

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalbacher T, Delfs JO, Shao H et al (2011) The IWAS-ToolBox: software coupling for an integrated water resources management. Environ Earth Sci 65(5):1367–1380

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kolditz O (1995) Modelling flow and heat transfer in fractured rocks: conceptual model of a 3-d deterministic fracture network. Geothermics 24(3):451–470

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kolditz O, Diersch HJ (1993) Quasi-steady-state strategy for numerical simulation of geothermal circulation in hot dry rock fractures. Int J Non-Linear Mech 28(4):467–481

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kolditz O, Bauer S, Bilke L et al (2012a) OpenGeoSys: an open source initiative for numerical simulation of THMC processes in porous-fractured media. Environ Earth Sci. doi:10.1007/s12665-012-1546-x

  • Kolditz O, Görke UJ, Shao H, Wang W (eds) (2012b) Thermo-hydro-mechanical-chemical processes in porous media: benchmarks and examples. Lecture Notes in Computational Science and Engineering, vol 86, Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-27177-9

  • Kühn, Görke U, Birkholzer J, Kolditz O (2011) CLEAN Thematic issue editorial. Environ Earth Sci, this issue

  • Kunz H, Zhao HG, Nowak T, Shao H, Bräuer V (2006) A comprehensive solution for THMC-coupled processes in the field of nuclear waste disposal—application of the numerical tools GINA/ROCKFLOW to the Chinese Beishan site. In: Proc 2nd International Conference on Coupled T-H-M-C processes in geo-systems, GeoProc 2006, May 22–24, 2006, Nanjing, China

  • Lamert A, Geistlinger H, Werban U, Schütze C, Peter A, Hornbruch G, Pohlert M, Kalia S, Beyer M, Schulz A, Dahmke A, Dietrich P (2012) Geolelectrical monitoring and multi-phase modelling for process understanding of gaseous CO2 injection into a shallow aquifer. Environ Earth Sci, this issue

  • Martens S, Kempka T, Liebscher A, Lüth S, Möller F, Myrttinen A, Norden B, Schmidt-Hattenberger C, Zimmer M, Kühn M (2011) Europe’s longest-operating on-shore CO2 storage site at Ketzin, Germany: A progress report after three years of injection. Environ Earth Sci, this issue

  • McDermott C, Bond A, Wang W, Kolditz O (2011) Front tracking using a hybrid analytical finite element approach for two-phase flow applied to supercritical CO2 replacing brine in a heterogeneous reservoir and cap rock. Trans Porous Media 90(2):545–573

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mukhopadhyay S, Birkholzer J, Nicot JP, Hosseini S (2011) A Model Comparison Initiative for a CO2 injection field test: an Introduction to Sim-SEQ. Environ Earth Sci, this issue

  • Mykkeltvedt T, Nordbotten J (2011) Representing convective mixing in coarse models: field case study. Environ Earth Sci, this issue

  • Palandri J, Kharaka Y (2004) A compilation of rate parameters of water–mineral interaction kinetics for application to geochemical modeling: U.S. Geological Survey Water-Resources Investigations Report 04-1068. Tech. rep

  • Park CH, Boettcher N, Wang W, Kolditz O (2011a) Are upwind techniques in multi-phase flow models necessary? J Comp Physics 230(22):8304–8312. doi:10.1016/j.jcp.2011.07.030

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park YC, Huh DG, Park CH (2011b) A pressure monitoring method to warn CO2 leakage in geological storage sites. Environ Earth Sci, this issue

  • Peng D, Robinson D (1974) A new two-constant equation of state. Ind Eng Chem Fund 15:59–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peter A, Lamert H, Beyer M et al (2011) Investigation of the geochemical impact of CO2 on shallow groundwater: design and implementation of a CO2 injection test in Northeast Germany. Environ Earth Sci, this issue

  • Petersen S, Hack K (2007) The thermochemistry library ChemApp and its applications. Int J Mat Res 98(10):935–945

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pruess K, García J (2002) Multiphase flow dynamics during CO2 injection into saline aquifers. Environ Geol 42:282–295

    Google Scholar 

  • Pruess K, García J, Kovscek T, Oldenburg C, Rutqvist J, Steefel C, Xu T (2004) Code intercomparison builds confidence in numerical simulation models for geologic disposal of CO2. Energy 29:1431–1444

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pudlo D, Reitenbach V, Albrecht D, Ganzer L, Gernert U, Wienand J, Kohlhepp B, Gaupp G (2012) The impact of diagenetic fluid-rock reactions on Rotliegend sandstone composition and petrophysical properties (Altmark area, central Germany). Environ Earth Sci, this issue

  • Qiao X, Li G, McDermott C, Wu R, Haszeldine S (2010) An overview of CO2 geological storage in China. Environ Eng Manag J 9(7):889–897

    Google Scholar 

  • Redlich O, Kwong J (1949) On the thermodynamics of solutions. V. an equation of state: fugacities of gaseous solutions. Chem Rev 44(1):233–244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rink K, Kalbacher T, Kolditz O (2012) Visual data management for hydrological analysis. Environ Earth Sci 65(5):1395–1403

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rutqvist J, Tsang CF (2002) A study of caprock hydromechanical changes associated with CO2 injection into a brine formation. Environ Geol 42:296–305

    Google Scholar 

  • Rutqvist J, Barr D, Birkholzer JT, Chijimatsu M, Kolditz O, Liu Q, Oda Y, Wang W, Zhang C (2008) Results from an international simulation study on coupled thermal, hydrological, and mechanical processes near geological nuclear waste repositories. J Nucl Technol 163(1):101–109

    Google Scholar 

  • Schütze C, Sauer U, Beyer B, Lamert H, Strauch G, Bräuer K, Flechsig C, Kämpf H, Dietrich P (2012) Natural analogues—a potential approach for developing reliable monitoring methods to understand subsurface migration processes. Environ Earth Sci, this issue

  • Shao H, Dmytrieva S, Kolditz O, Kulik D, Pfingsten W, Kosakowski G (2009) Modeling reactive transport in non-ideal aqueous-solid solution system. Appl Geochem 24(7):1287–1300

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh A, Baumann G, Hennings J, Görke UJ, Kolditz O (2011a) Thermal analysis of the Altmark gas field for carbon dioxide injection with enhanced gas recovery. Environ Earth Sci, this issue

  • Singh A, Görke UJ, Kolditz O (2011b) Numerical simulation of non-isothermal compositional gas flow: application to carbon dioxide injection into gas reservoirs. Energy 36:3446–3458

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh A, Pilz P, Zimmer M, Kalbacher T, Görke UJ, Kolditz O (2011c) Numerical simulation and geophysical monitoring of tracer transport in the Altmark gas field. Environ Earth Sci, this issue

  • Span R, Wagner W (1996) A new equation of state for carbon dioxide covering the fluid region from triple point temperature to 1100 K and at pressure up to 800 MPa. J Phys Chem Ref Data 25(6):1509–1596

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sulis M, Meyerhoff S, Paniconi C, Maxwell R, Putti M, Kollet S (2010) A comparison of two physics-based numerical models for simulating surface water–groundwater interactions. Adv Water Resour 33(4):456–467

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsang CF, Stephansson O, Jing L, Kautsky F (2009) DECOVALEX Project: from 1992 to 2007. Environ Geol 57(6):1221–1237

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang W, Rutqvist J, Görke U-J, Birkholzer JT, Kolditz O (2011) Non-isothermal flow in low permeable porous media: a comparison of Richards’ and two-phase flow approaches. Environ Earth Sci 62(6):1197–1207

    Google Scholar 

  • Watanabe N, Wang W, McDermott C, Taniguchi T, Kolditz O (2010) Uncertainty analysis of thermo-hydro-mechanical coupled processes in heterogeneous porous media. Comput Mech 45(4):263–280

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xie M, Agus S, Schanz T, Kolditz O (2004) An upscaling method and a numerical analysis of swelling/shrinking processes in a compacted bentonite/sand mixture. Int J Numer Anal Methods Geomech 28(15):1479–1502

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xie M, Bauer S, Kolditz O, Nowak T, Shao H (2006) Numerical simulation of reactive processes in an experiment with partially saturated bentonite. J Contam Hydrol 83(1–2):122–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The presented work has been funded by the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) in the frame of the GEOTECHNOLOGIEN Program, CLEAN (grant ID: 03G0704S) and MONACO projects (grant ID: 03G0785A), KETEP grant by Ministry of Knowledge Economy (MKE) of Korea (2010T100100963) and the Helmholtz Association ("Earth and Environment” program). The conceptual part of this work is also incorporated into the A-DuR (grant ID: 02E10588) and CO2BENCH (grant ID: 03G0797D) projects funded by BMBF. We appreciate the excellent project management by GFZ (Maja Tessmer, Peter Pilz, Michael Kühn) for this research. Finally we cordially thank the reviewers for their expert comments for manuscript improvement.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Olaf Kolditz.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kolditz, O., Bauer, S., Beyer, C. et al. A systematic benchmarking approach for geologic CO2 injection and storage. Environ Earth Sci 67, 613–632 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-012-1656-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-012-1656-5

Keywords

Navigation