Reduced nitrate leaching from an Irish cropland soil under non-inversion tillage with cover cropping greatly outweighs increased dissolved organic nitrogen leaching

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2018.06.031Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Non-inversion tillage + cover crop reduced nitrate leaching by over 80%.

  • Non-inversion tillage + cover crop increased DON leaching by 59%.

  • Consideration of DON losses can be crucial for cropland N balance assessments.

Abstract

Reduced tillage and cover cropping are common measures to minimize leaching losses of nutrients from cropland soils. While the efficiency of these measures for reducing inorganic N leaching has been studied intensively, their effect on dissolved, organically-bound nitrogen (DON) remains unclear. In this study, leaching of nitrate, ammonium and DON from spring barley-based cropping systems, subject to either conventional management (CT = inversion tillage with a winter fallow period), or non-inversion tillage with a winter mustard cover crop (NIT + CC), were assessed using suction cup sampling and modelled drainage volumes. Total dissolved nitrogen losses with drainage from the NIT + CC treatment (2.5 ± 0.2 g N m−2 yr−1) were considerably smaller than those from the conventional treatment with fallow (13.9 ± 0.7 g N m−2 yr−1). As drainage volumes were similar between treatments, differences in total N leaching were mainly associated with larger nitrate concentrations under CT (23.0 ± 1.1 mg N L−1) than under the NIT + CC treatment (5.1 ± 0.3 mg N L−1). The average contribution of DON to total dissolved nitrogen concentration was 3% within the CT treatment, but rose to 19% within the NIT + CC treatment, which was primarily due to the strong reduction in nitrate and to a lesser extent due to the higher concentrations of DON within the NIT + CC treatment (NIT + CC: 0.52 ± 0.04, CT: 0.33 ± 0.04 mg N L−1). Averaged over the two-year study period, the CT system showed a net loss of 9.4 g N m−2 yr1 whilst an N surplus of 1.7 g N m−2 yr−1 was observed for the NIT + CC system. Here DON accounted for 11% of total N leaching, supporting the notion that it can be an important component of dissolved N losses in agroecosystems. By neglecting DON leaching the N-surplus under NIT + CC would have been overestimated by 18%. In conclusion, our results show that the capacity of winter cover cropping in combination with non-inversion tillage to reduce nitrate leaching far outweighed the higher leaching losses of DON observed. The quantification of DON losses, however, may be essential for a complete picture of the N balance of these and similar cropping systems.

Introduction

Management interventions are an important approach for reducing the environmental impacts of intensive agricultural production systems (Power, 2010) and are a key factor in achieving many of the sustainable development goals outlined by the United Nations (General Assembly, 2015). The objectives of the development goals include the mitigation of global climate change, whilst ensuring food security (Lal, 2010, 2004), as well as the sustainable management of nutrients (Drinkwater and Snapp, 2007) and soils (White et al., 2012).

Two common management practices utilised to enhance carbon sequestration, whilst also improving soil quality and nutrient, particularly nitrogen retention, are reduced tillage and cover cropping during fallow periods (Paustian et al., 2016). Whilst the effect of such management practices on dissolved inorganic nitrogen (DIN) leaching has been intensively studied in the past, less is known about dissolved organic nitrogen (DON) losses despite evidence that the contribution of DON to total N leaching is larger than that of dissolved ammonium which is generally considered in analyses addressing potential N leaching (Jiao et al., 2004; McKenzie et al., 2016; Perakis and Hedin, 2002).

In a review on DON in agroecosystems, van Kessel et al. (2009) cited 16 publications that have assessed DON as well as nitrate losses. However, only six of these referred to croplands (Lawes et al., 1881; Murphy et al., 2000; Saarijärvi et al., 2007; Shuster et al., 2003; Siemens et al., 2003; Vinther et al., 2006), with the contribution of DON to total N-leaching varying widely from 1 to 65%. Since then only a limited number cropland studies have reported both inorganic N and DON losses, mostly from contrasting rotation systems and/or in response to soil and fertiliser management practices with the contribution of DON to total N-leaching again varying widely from 1 to 74% (Böhm et al., 2009; Huang et al., 2011; Undurraga et al., 2009). Consequently, for the development and assessment of more sustainable management practices, information on DON concentrations and fluxes is needed for the improved assessment of agro-ecosystem N cycling and associated budgets.

In this study, we quantified the effects of non-inversion tillage in combination with a cover crop on N leaching from an Irish arable soil under spring barley cultivation with a particular focus on DON. We hypothesized that when compared to a conventionally tilled system without a cover crop this combination would result in i) a reduction in inorganic N leaching due to the enhanced uptake of residual mineral N during the winter by the cover crop and ii) an increase in organic N leaching due to the additional inputs of organic matter by the cover crop in combination with reduced soil aeration and thus lower mineralisation. Finally, we hypothesized that both these effects lead to an increase in the contribution of DON to total dissolved N in the soil solution, justifying the need to include DON leaching in field-scale N budgets.

Section snippets

Study site and agricultural management

The study site (“Pump Field”) was located at the Teagasc, Oak Park Crop Research Centre, Ireland (52°51′N and 6°55′W; 56 m asl), which has been the location of numerous field studies in the past. The region is characterised by a temperate Atlantic climate (MAP 823 mm, MAT 9.3 °C), with precipitation distributed relatively evenly across the year and with minimum monthly sums of 51 mm in June and maximum monthly precipitation of 89 mm in December for the period 1961–1990 (Davis et al., 2010).

Concentrations of dissolved nitrate nitrogen

The mean concentrations of NO3-N per sampling date were in the range 3.5–58.3 mg L–1 for the CT and 0.6–18.6 mg L–1 for the NIT + CC treatment (Fig. 3b). The concentrations of NO3 within the NIT + CC plot were significantly lower than those in the CT plot (p < 0.001; Table 1). On average, this difference amounted to 17.9 mg N L–1 equating to a 78% reduction in NO3 and a 76% reduction in TDN concentration due to non-inversion tillage and cover-cropping.

The concentrations of NO3 showed

Concentrations of dissolved inorganic nitrogen

As hypothesized, the presence of a winter cover crop in combination with non-inversion tillage led to a highly significant 78% reduction in nitrate concentrations compared to the CT treatment. The positive N-uptake effect of cover cropping as a means of reducing nitrate leaching is well known and has been widely documented (Constantin et al., 2012, 2011; Di and Cameron, 2002; Hansen et al., 2015, 2010; Hansen and Djurhuus, 1997; Thomsen, 2005; Valkama et al., 2015). It has also been shown that

Conclusions

Consistent with our hypothesis, the implementation of non-inversion tillage and cover cropping led to increased DON leaching. This increase, however, was more than compensated for by a significant reduction in nitrate leaching, resulting in a net retention of N at the field-scale, compared to a large annual N-loss within the conventionally managed treatment. The combined effects of non-inversion tillage and cover cropping on nitrate and DON led to an increase in the contribution of DON to TDN

Acknowledgements

This project was funded by the Environmental Protection Agency of Ireland (grant 2005-PHD5-S-4) and the German Research Foundation (grants SI 1106/2-1, KA 1673/7-1). We would like to thank all the Teagasc staff at the Oak Park Research Station, Carlow, involved in the management of the field plots.

References (60)

  • A. Premrov et al.

    Effects of over-winter green cover on groundwater nitrate and dissolved organic carbon concentrations beneath tillage land

    Sci. Total Environ.

    (2012)
  • G.H. Ros et al.

    Dynamics of dissolved and extractable organic nitrogen upon soil amendment with crop residues

    Soil Biol. Biochem.

    (2010)
  • D. Scheiner

    Determination of ammonia and Kjeldahl nitrogen by indophenol method

    Water Res.

    (1976)
  • J. Siemens et al.

    Dissolved organic matter induced denitrification in subsoils and aquifers?

    Geoderma

    (2003)
  • I.K. Thomsen

    Nitrate leaching under spring barley is influenced by the presence of a ryegrass catch crop: results from a lysimeter experiment

    Agric. Ecosyst. Environ.

    (2005)
  • D.C. Walmsley et al.

    Dissolved carbon leaching from an Irish cropland soil is increased by reduced tillage and cover cropping

    Agric. Ecosyst. Environ.

    (2011)
  • Y. Anbessa et al.

    Review: strategies to increase nitrogen use efficiency of spring barley

    Can. J. Plant Sci.

    (2012)
  • L.G. Blackwood

    Analyzing censored environmental data using survival analysis: single sample techniques

    Environ. Monit. Assess.

    (1991)
  • C. Böhm et al.

    Effects of two contrasting agricultural land-use practices on nitrogen leaching in a sandy soil of Middle Germany

    J. Plant Nutr. Sci.

    (2009)
  • M.J. Conry et al.
  • J. Constantin et al.

    Cumulative effects of catch crops on nitrogen uptake, leaching and net mineralization

    Plant Soil

    (2011)
  • H.J. Di et al.

    Nitrate leaching in temperate agroecosystems: sources, factors and mitigating strategies

    Nutr. Cycl. Agroecosyst.

    (2002)
  • L.E. Drinkwater et al.

    Nutrients in agroecosystems: rethinking the management paradigm

  • D. Graeber et al.

    Technical Note: comparison between a direct and the standard, indirect method for dissolved organic nitrogen determination in freshwater environments with high dissolved inorganic nitrogen concentrations

    Biogeosciences

    (2012)
  • E.M. Hansen et al.

    Nitrate leaching, yields and carbon sequestration after noninversion tillage, catch crops, and straw retention

    J. Environ. Qual.

    (2015)
  • M. Heinz et al.

    Comparison of organic matter composition in agricultural versus Forest affected headwaters with special emphasis on organic nitrogen

    Environ. Sci. Technol.

    (2015)
  • D. Helsel

    Much Ado about next to nothing: incorporating nondetects in science

    Ann. Occup. Hygn.

    (2010)
  • K.V. Hooker et al.

    Evaluation of cover crop and reduced cultivation for reducing nitrate leaching in Ireland

    J. Environ. Qual.

    (2008)
  • M. Huang et al.

    Leaching losses of nitrate nitrogen and dissolved organic nitrogen from a yearly two crops system, wheat-maize, under monsoon situations

    Nutr. Cycl. Agroecosyst.

    (2011)
  • IUSS Working Group WRB

    World reference base for soil resources 2006

    World Soil Resources Reports No. 103

    (2006)
  • Cited by (19)

    • Cover crop mixtures: A powerful strategy to reduce post-harvest surplus of soil nitrate and leaching

      2022, Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment
      Citation Excerpt :

      However, the significantly lower soil nitrate concentration due to cover cropping for the fall, over-winter, and post-planting periods did not translate into a significantly lower nitrate leaching, an effect likely explained by decreased statistical power due to the spatial variations that are common in studies on N dynamics (Kravchenko and Robertson, 2015; Kurunc et al., 2011; Machado et al., 2021a, 2021b). The potential of single species to reduce NO3- leaching was previously reported in the literature for cereal (Vogeler et al., 2019; García-González et al., 2018; Meisinger and Ricigliano, 2017; Valkama et al., 2015), crucifer (Vogeler et al., 2021, 2019; Munkholm et al., 2017; Walmsley et al., 2018), and leguminous catch crops (De Notaris et al., 2021, 2018; Vogeler et al., 2019). A crucifer-legume mixture was shown to reduce soil NO3- by 59%, a percentage equivalent to when crucifers were used alone (Couëdel et al., 2018).

    • Shift of lakeshore cropland to buffer zones greatly reduced nitrogen loss from the soil profile caused by the interaction of lake water and shallow groundwater

      2022, Science of the Total Environment
      Citation Excerpt :

      However, two interesting phenomena appeared in our results: 1) We found that the ON was the dominant N form lost in the effluent. Although some studies have reported that the DON loss in soil was only a small part of the N loss compared with the IN loss (Walmsley et al., 2018), the results of Chen et al. (2018b) and Xin et al. (2019) showed that the DON loss might be a great contributor to the soil N loss. Alternating flooding and drying accelerated the leaching of the DON (Gao et al., 2020) because the soil microbial metabolism and enzymatic activities were decreased by drying soil, which even caused soil microbial death; the N cycle was impacted (Sun et al., 2017), the IN and DON in the soil were desorbed (Kalbitz et al., 2000) and the microbial exoenzymatic activity and N mineralization were accelerated (Evans et al., 2016) by rewetting that disturbed the soil environment so that the DON loss was increased.

    • Effect of soluble calcium on enhancing nitrate retention by biochar

      2020, Journal of Environmental Management
      Citation Excerpt :

      Contamination of shallow aquifers by NO3−-containing infiltrating water from the overlying soil layers could cause human health problem where the affected groundwater is used as a source of drinking water (Ward, 2005; Vrzel et al., 2016). As such, efforts have been made to minimize the export of NO3− from soils using various NO3− retention technologies (Dinnes et al., 2002; Walmsley et al., 2018; Sanford et al., 2019). Among the methods for NO3− retention, the use of sorbents to bind NO3− is a promising method for NO3− immobilization (Bhatnagar and Sillanpää, 2011).

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    1

    Present address: Institute of Ecology, Leuphana University Lüneburg, Universitätsallee 1, 21335 Lüneburg, Germany.

    2

    Present address: ERM GmbH, Siemensstr. 9, 63263 Neu-Isenburg, Germany.

    3

    Present address: School of Natural Sciences, Trinity College Dublin, College Green, D2, Dublin, Ireland.

    View full text