The role of dissolved organic and inorganic nitrogen for growth of macrophytes in coastal waters of the Baltic Sea
Introduction
The nutritional pollution through human activity and agriculture in catchment areas of coastal zones and estuaries have led to the increasing eutrophication of coastal waters and thus to a shift in plant communities, from macrophytes to phytoplankton dominated systems (Gocke et al., 2003, Kovtun et al., 2009, Munkes, 2005, Schumann et al., 2006). Macrophytes can therefore be used as an indicator species in assessments of the good environmental status of a water body. However, to do so requires a detailed understanding of the mechanisms underlying nutrient uptake and the growth of these key species. Abiotic factors such as light limitation and sedimentation were shown to indirectly influence growth (Angelstein et al., 2009, Kovtun-Kante et al., 2014, Schaible and Schubert, 2008). Another important aspect is the competition for nutrients between macrophytes and phytoplankton. A number of studies have examined the role of phosphorus as a limiting factor (Angelstein and Schubert, 2008, Reid et al., 2000, Rip et al., 2007). Although nitrogen limitation is less well explored, it has been documented in freshwater and marine environments (Bianchi and Engelhaupt, 2000, Elser et al., 2007, Guildford and Hecky, 2000).
In examining the mechanisms of nitrogen limitation, both the sources (sediment vs. water column) of the different nitrogen species and the ability of primary producers to assimilate them must be considered. The two forms of nitrogen, dissolved organic nitrogen (DON) and inorganic nitrogen (DIN), differ in their availability (Stepanauskas et al., 2000). DON accounts for anywhere between 20 and 90% of the total nitrogen pool (Petrone et al., 2009, Seitzinger and Sanders, 1997). However, its concentration was previously thought to be small and was usually not included in studies of the nitrogen uptake by phototroph organism. In addition, 20–30 years ago DON was considered to be largely refractory and was thus ignored as a nutrient source. This erroneous conclusion was based on the complex composition of DON, which includes the poorly decomposable humic and fulvic fractions. However, once DON was identified as a nutrient source the conversion of DON into biomass by phytoplankton and microorganisms was demonstrated on short time by several groups (Andersson et al., 2006, Berg et al., 1997, Berman and Chava, 1999, Bronk et al., 1994, Fiedler et al., 2015). The uptake of DON by macrophytes is of particular interest only since then Tyler et al. (2005) showed that the nitrogen requirement of non-rooted red and green algae can be satisfied to a significant extent by DON. Subsequently, the uptake of DON was also demonstrated in seagrasses (La Nafie et al., 2014, Van Engeland et al., 2011, Vonk et al., 2008) and seaweeds (Phillips and Hurd, 2004), but whether it also occurs in other rooted macrophytes is unknown. Unlike phytoplankton, which derives their nutrients only from the water column, rooted submerged macrophytes are also able to use nutrients from the sediments. Thus, studies of the uptake of nutrients by macrophytes must consider both the roots and shoots. Nutrient uptake by the roots of submerged aquatic plants and the mechanism of nutrient transport has been often discussed, but are still subjects of debate in the literature (Agami and Waisel, 1986a, Takayanagi et al., 2012, Wilson et al., 1988).
In comparative terms, the roots of submerged vascular macrophytes often comprise ≤ 10% of the total algal biomass (Brenkert and Amundsen, 1982). This low biomass of roots compared to shoots suggests that main function is to anchor plants in the sediments, with nutrient acquisition playing only a minor role (Sutcliffe, 1959). Many studies have provided support for this hypothesis, by showing that the nitrogen requirement of macrophytes can be fulfilled solely by uptake via the shoots (Madsen and Cedergreen, 2002). By contrast others have shown that both shoots and roots substantially contribute to the nutrient supply (Carignan and Kalff, 1980, Nichols and Keeney, 1976), albeit in different, species-specific proportions. Due to the lack of transpiration in submerged plants, nutrient transport must rely on alternative mechanisms (Raven, 2003) as e.g. cytoplasmatic streaming. Most submerged macrophytes have vascular bundles, which in rooted macrophytes allow the transport of phosphorus e.g. in both directions, downwards (basipetal) and upwards (acropetal) (Angelstein and Schubert, 2008, Littlefield and Forsberg, 1965). In plants such as Characeae, which lack vascular bundles, nitrogen uptake mechanism via cell wall and intracellular translocation remains to be explained.
Previous studies on uptake of nutrients have either disregarded or at least tried to remove the biofilm before the experiments. To our knowledge, there is no possibility to obtain the macrophytes axenic. In this study, under natural conditions occurring biofilm (belong to the bacteria, diatoms and attached algae) gathered at least quantitatively. Which proportions the bacterial biofilm is involved in the uptake of nitrogen components, was not an aim of this experiment. Macrophytes and its bacterial biofilm were considered together.
We hypothesized that: (1) DON provides an alternative to DIN as a nitrogen source that allows the successful growth of macrophytes, as suggested in other studies (Mozdzer et al., 2010). (2) The uptake of either nitrogen source is achieved via roots and also shoots in same ratios. Thus, the aims of this study were (1) to demonstrate the uptake of DON vs. DIN (nitrate and ammonium) by rooted submerged macrophytes. (2) to determine whether both, shoots and roots, are responsible for nutrient uptake and (3) whether transport occurs from roots to shoots and vice versa. We used 15N-labeled ammonium, nitrate, and an amino-acid mixture (as DON) and examined the uptake and translocation of these nitrogen sources in three common macrophytes found in inner coastal, heavily eutrophic waters. In addition, the microbial biofilm in nutrient uptake was considered.
Section snippets
Cultivation of macrophytes
Representative species of the three most abundant communities of macrophytes were collected at the Darss-Zingster-Bodden chain (DZBK), an inner coastal basin of the southern Baltic Sea: Chara aspera C.L. Willdenow, 1809 (small Characeae community), Chara tomentosa Linnaeus, 1753 (large Characeae community), and Stuckenia pectinata (syn. Potamogeton pectinatus) (Potamogeton–Myriophyllum community) (Schubert et al., 2003). The plants were collected in spring, when the presence of undesirable
Uptake of nitrogen components
The results showed that 15N enrichment occurred in all treatments except in the case of nitrate in the roots of C. aspera and of ammonium in roots of C. tomentosa (p > 0.05, t-test). For all other treatments 15N enrichment occurred and based on these values, uptake rates could be calculated. These uptake rates (with respect to biomass, incubation time, and available substrate concentrations) ranged from 0.07 to 0.3%15N mg DW− 1 h− 1 (Fig. 4). Ammonium was generally preferred as substrate with a mean
Uptake rates and translocation of DIN and DON
Nitrogen is an essential macronutrient and a potentially limiting factor for the growth and distribution of submerged rooted aquatic plants (Kosten et al., 2009, Meyer et al., 2013). This study examined the uptake and translocation of dissolved organic and inorganic dissolved nitrogen compounds by the roots and shoots of three common species of the Baltic Sea and quantified for the first time the microbial biofilm of non-vascular rooting charophytes.
All three species of rooted macrophytes were
Conclusions
This study demonstrates the uptake of DON originated from the water column and also the sediment in charophytes and the angiosperm macrophyte S. pectinata. Moreover the ability to translocate inorganic nitrogen up- and downwards is important in a limiting system and leads to a competitive advantage over phytoplankton. Bacterial biofilm was considered qualitative, but its negative or positive impact on uptake and hence growth of macrophytes have to be investigated further. However, the fact that
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank the FAZIT foundation for financial support provided to C. Volkmann, Aisha Degen-Smyrek for help in the set-up of the experiment, and Iris Liskow for the mass spectrometry measurements and advice in the lab. S. Halbedel was supported by the German Research Foundation (DFG, AN 777/2-1). We also would like to thank Arie Vonk and the two other reviewers for their constructive and positive advices. [SW]
References (67)
- et al.
The effect of amino acids on ammonium utilization and regeneration by heterotrophic bacteria in the subarctic Pacific
Deep Sea Res. Part A
(1989) - et al.
Uptake of nitrogen from compound pools by the seagrass Zostera noltii
J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol.
(2014) - et al.
Long-term observations on salinity dynamics in a tideless shallow coastal lagoon of the Southern Baltic Sea coast and their biological relevance
J. Mar. Syst.
(2006) - et al.
Cytoplasmic streaming in plants
Curr. Opin. Cell Biol.
(2004) Active phosphate uptake by Nitella translucens. Biochim. Biophys. Acta (BBA)-biophysics incl
Photosynthetica
(1966)- et al.
Nitrogen uptake and translocation by Chara
Aquat. Bot.
(2003) - et al.
Ecophysiology of roots of submerged aquatic plants
Physiol. Végétale
(1986) - et al.
The ecophysiology of roots of submerged vascular plants
Physiol. Veg.
(1986) - et al.
Uptake of dissolved inorganic nitrogen, urea and amino acids in the Scheldt estuary: comparison of organic carbon and nitrogen uptake
Aquat. Microb. Ecol.
(2006) Phosphate uptake by the component parts of Chara hispida
Br. Phycol. J.
(1987)
Source—sink characteristics of carbon transport in Chara hispida
Plant Cell Environ.
Elodea nuttallii: uptake, translocation and release of phosphorus
Aquat. Biol.
The influence of different sediment nutrient contents on growth and competition of Elodea nuttallii and Myriophyllum spicatum in nutrient-poor waters
Fundam. Appl. Limnol./Arch. Hydrobiol.
Organic nitrogen uptake and growth by the chrysophyte Aureococcus anophagefferens during a brown tide event
Mar. Biol.
Algal growth on organic compounds as nitrogen sources
J. Plankton Res.
Cyanobacterial blooms in the Baltic Sea: natural or human-induced?
Limnol. Oceanogr.
Response of aquatic plants to abiotic factors: a review
Aquat. Sci.
Intercellular transport in plants II. Cyclosis and the rate of Intercellular transport of chloride in chara
J. Exp. Bot.
The uptake of nitrate and ammonium nitrogen in Chara hispida L.: the contribution of the rhizoid
Plant. Cell Environ.
Intercellular transport and cytoplasmic streaming in Chara hispida
J. Exp. Bot.
Plant-substrate interactions and below substrate biomass dynamics: a continuation of studies concerning potential restriction of the introduced aquatic weed “Myriophyllum spicatum” I. (Eurasian water mifoil) II
Dynamics of DON
Nitrogen uptake, dissolved organic nitrogen release, and new production
Science
Nitrogen cycling in sediments with estuarine populations of Potamogeton perfoliatus and Zostera marina
Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser.
Phosphorus sources for aquatic weeds: water or sediments?
Science
Heterotrophic bacterial mediation of ammonium and dissolved free amino acid fluxes in the Mississippi River plume
Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser.
Global analysis of nitrogen and phosphorus limitation of primary producers in freshwater, marine and terrestrial ecosystems
Ecol. Lett.
Growth response of four freshwater algal species to dissolved organic nitrogen of different concentration and complexity
Freshw. Biol.
A technique for studying absorption and translocation in submersed plants
Weeds
Hydrographische, chemische und mikrobiologische Untersuchungen im Längsprofil der Schlei
A physical perspective on cytoplasmic streaming
Interface Focus
Total nitrogen, total phosphorus, and nutrient limitation in lakes and oceans: is there a common relationship?
Limnol. Oceanogr.
Epiphytic bacterial community composition on two common submerged macrophytes in brackish water and freshwater
BMC Microbiol.
Cited by (11)
Ecosystem models indicate zooplankton biomass response to nutrient input and climate warming is related to lake size
2022, Ecological ModellingCitation Excerpt :As shown in Types 1 & 3 of Fig. 8, zooplankton biomass increased significantly in larger lakes under the scenarios of excessive organic nitrogen. This is likely due to the mutual transformation of organic and inorganic forms of nitrogen to promote biological absorption (Volkmann et al., 2016). Then the N:P ratio was reduced to such a degree that cyanobacteria are no longer growing under optimal conditions (type 1 & 3, Fig. 8d, g, j), and zooplankton tend to enhance the top-down control of the algal community on this occasion.
Bioavailability of dissolved organic nitrogen and its uptake by Ulva prolifera: Implications in the outbreak of a green bloom off the coast of Qingdao, China
2019, Marine Pollution BulletinCitation Excerpt :The absolute uptake rate of four different forms of N in this study was of the same order of magnitude as the uptake by macroalgal chlorophyte species of Caulerpa prolifera in the Bay of Cadiz, Spain (Engeland and Bouma, 2013). Although the capacity and rates of N uptake are taxon- and compound-specific, the ranking in the uptake rate of the four forms of N by U prolifera in the present study was also generally consistent with previous results obtained using the isotopic tracer method (Engeland and Bouma, 2013; Naldi and Wheeler, 2002; Tyler et al., 2005; Volkmann et al., 2016). Ammonium-N is generally preferentially taken up over NO3-N and urea, because NH4-N requires less energy to assimilate by phytoplankton than other forms of N (Hanisak, 1983; Liu and Dong, 2001; Fan et al., 2014).
Fresh meteoric versus recirculated saline groundwater nutrient inputs into a subtropical estuary
2016, Science of the Total EnvironmentCitation Excerpt :Previous studies have showed that DON uptake can rival DIN in some cases and that DON can play a major role in eutrophication (Bronk et al., 1998; Antia et al., 1991). Some recent studies have suggested that DON provides an alternative to DIN as a nitrogen source that allows the successful growth of macrophytes (Mozdzer et al., 2010; Volkmann et al., 2016). Previous studies have used either inorganic or total dissolved forms of nutrient to calculate N:P ratios (Santos et al., 2014; Slomp and Van Cappellen, 2004) with little discussion on whether N:P ratios should be based on inorganic or total nutrients.
Epilithic algae from an urban river preferentially use ammonium over nitrate
2020, International Aquatic Research