Gastroenterology

Gastroenterology

Volume 151, Issue 5, November 2016, Pages 822-835
Gastroenterology

AGA Clinical Practice Update: Expert Review
Diagnosis and Management of Low-Grade Dysplasia in Barrett’s Esophagus: Expert Review From the Clinical Practice Updates Committee of the American Gastroenterological Association

https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2016.09.040Get rights and content

The purpose of this clinical practice update expert review is to define the key principles in the diagnosis and management of low-grade dysplasia (LGD) in Barrett’s esophagus patients.

The best practices outlined in this review are based on relevant publications, including systematic reviews and expert opinion (when applicable).

Practice Advice 1: The extent of Barrett’s esophagus should be defined using a standardized grading system documenting the circumferential and maximal extent of the columnar lined esophagus (Prague classification) with a clear description of landmarks and visible lesions (nodularity, ulceration) when present.

Practice Advice 2: Given the significant interobserver variability among pathologists, the diagnosis of Barrett’s esophagus with LGD should be confirmed by an expert gastrointestinal pathologist (defined as a pathologist with a special interest in Barrett’s esophagus–related neoplasia who is recognized as an expert in this field by his/her peers).

Practice Advice 3: Expert pathologists should report audits of their diagnosed cases of LGD, such as the frequency of LGD diagnosed among surveillance patients and/or the difference in incidence of neoplastic progression among patients diagnosed with LGD vs nondysplastic Barrett’s esophagus.

Practice Advice 4: Patients in whom the diagnosis of LGD is downgraded to nondysplastic Barrett’s esophagus should be managed as nondysplastic Barrett’s esophagus.

Practice Advice 5: In Barrett’s esophagus patients with confirmed LGD (based on expert gastrointestinal pathology review), repeat upper endoscopy using high-definition/high-resolution white-light endoscopy should be performed under maximal acid suppression (twice daily dosing of proton pump inhibitor therapy) in 8–12 weeks.

Practice Advice 6: Under ideal circumstances, surveillance biopsies should not be performed in the presence of active inflammation (erosive esophagitis, Los Angeles grade C and D). Pathologists should be informed if biopsies are obtained in the setting of erosive esophagitis and if pathology findings suggest LGD, or if no biopsies are obtained, surveillance biopsies should be repeated after the anti-reflux regimen has been further intensified.

Practice Advice 7: Surveillance biopsies should be performed in a four-quadrant fashion every 1–2 cm with target biopsies obtained from visible lesions taken first.

Practice Advice 8: Patients with a confirmed histologic diagnosis of LGD should be referred to an endoscopist with expertise in managing Barrett’s esophagus–related neoplasia practicing at centers equipped with high-definition endoscopy and capable of performing endoscopic resection and ablation.

Practice Advice 9: Endoscopic resection should be performed in Barrett’s esophagus patients with LGD with endoscopically visible abnormalities (no matter how subtle) in order to accurately assess the grade of dysplasia.

Practice Advice 10: In patients with confirmed Barrett’s esophagus with LGD by expert GI pathology review that persists on a second endoscopy, despite intensification of acid-suppressive therapy, risks and benefits of management options of endoscopic eradication therapy (specifically adverse events associated with endoscopic resection and ablation), and ongoing surveillance should be discussed and documented.

Practice Advice 11: Endoscopic eradication therapy should be considered in patients with confirmed and persistent LGD with the goal of achieving complete eradication of intestinal metaplasia.

Practice Advice 12: Patients with LGD undergoing surveillance rather than endoscopic eradication therapy should undergo surveillance every 6 months times 2, then annually unless there is reversion to nondysplastic Barrett’s esophagus. Biopsies should be obtained in 4-quadrants every 1–2 cm and of any visible lesions.

Practice Advice 13: In patients with Barrett’s esophagus–related LGD undergoing ablative therapy, radiofrequency ablation should be used.

Practice Advice 14: Patients completing endoscopic eradication therapy should be enrolled in an endoscopic surveillance program. Patients who have achieved complete eradication of intestinal metaplasia should undergo surveillance every year for 2 years and then every 3 years thereafter to detect recurrent intestinal metaplasia and dysplasia. Patients who have not achieved complete eradication of intestinal metaplasia should undergo surveillance every 6 months for 1 year after the last endoscopy, then annually for 2 years, then every 3 years thereafter.

Practice Advice 15: Following endoscopic eradication therapy, the biopsy protocol of obtaining biopsies in 4 quadrants every 2 cm throughout the length of the original Barrett’s esophagus segment and any visible columnar mucosa is suggested.

Practice Advice 16: Endoscopists performing endoscopic eradication therapy should report audits of their rates of complete eradication of dysplasia and intestinal metaplasia and adverse events in clinical practice.

Abbreviations used in this paper

BE
Barrett’s esophagus
CE-IM
complete eradication of intestinal metaplasia
CI
confidence interval
EAC
esophageal adenocarcinoma
ER
endoscopic resection
GI
gastrointestinal
HGD
high-grade dysplasia
HR
hazard ratio
LGD
low-grade dysplasia
NBI
narrow band imaging
OR
odds ratio
RFA
radiofrequency ablation

Cited by (0)

Reprint requests Address requests for reprints to: Chair, Clinical Practice Updates Committee, AGA National Office, 4930 Del Ray Ave, Bethesda, MD 20814. E-mail: [email protected]. Phone: (301) 941-2618.

View Abstract