skip to main content
research-article

A PSPACE-complete first-order fragment of computability logic

Published:06 March 2014Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

In a recently launched research program for developing logic as a formal theory of (interactive) computability, several very interesting logics have been introduced and axiomatized. These fragments of the larger Computability Logic aim not only to describe what can be computed, but also provide a mechanism for extracting computational algorithms from proofs. Among the most expressive and fundamental of these is CL4, known to be (constructively) sound and complete with respect to the underlying computational semantics. Furthermore, the ∀, ∃-free fragment of CL4 was shown to be decidable in polynomial space. The present work extends this result and proves that this fragment is, in fact, PSPACE-complete.

References

  1. Andreas Blass. 1992. A game semantics for linear logic. Ann. Pure Appl. Logic 56, 183--220.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Jaakko Hintikka. 1996. The Principles of Mathematics Revisited. Cambridge University Press, New York, NY. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Giorgi Japaridze. 2003. Introduction to computability logic. Ann. Pure Appl. Logic 123, 1--99.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Giorgi Japaridze. 2006a. From truth to computability I. Theor. Comput. Sci. 357, 1, 100--135. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tcs.2006.03.014 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Giorgi Japaridze. 2006b. Introduction to cirquent calculus and abstract resource semantics. J. Log. Comput. 16, 4, 489--532. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/logcom/exl005 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Giorgi Japaridze. 2006c. Propositional computability logic I. ACM Trans. Comput. Logic 7, 2, 302--330. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1131313.1131318 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Giorgi Japaridze. 2006d. Propositional computability logic II. ACM Trans. Comput. Logic 7, 2, 331--362. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1131313.1131319 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Giorgi Japaridze. 2007. From truth to computability II. Theor. Comput. Sci. 379, 1--2, 20--52. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tcs.2007.01.004 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Giorgi Japaridze. 2009a. In the beginning was game semantics. In Games: Unifying Logic, Language and Philosophy, Ondrej Majer, Tero Tulenheimo, and Ahti-Veikko Pietarinen, Eds., Springer, Chapter 11, 249--235.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Giorgi Japaridze. 2009b. Ptarithmetic. CoRR abs/0902.2969 (2009).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Giorgi Japaridze. 2010a. Introduction to clarithmetic II. CoRR abs/1004.3236 (2010).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Giorgi Japaridze. 2010b. Introduction to clarithmetic III. CoRR abs/1008.0770 (2010).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Giorgi Japaridze. 2011a. Introduction to clarithmetic I. Inf. Comput. 209, 10, 1312--1354. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ic.2011.07.002 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. P. Lincoln and A. Scedrov. 1992. First-order linear logic without modalities is NEXPTIME-hard. Theor. Comput. Sci. 135, 1, 139--153. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0304-3975(94)00107-3 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Michael Sipser. 2006. Introduction to the Theory of Computation (2nd Ed.). Thomson Course Technology, Boston, MA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Wenyan Xu and Sanyang Liu. 2012. Soundness and completeness of the cirquent calculus system CL6 for computability logic. Logic J. IGPL 20, 317--330.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. A PSPACE-complete first-order fragment of computability logic

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in

        Full Access

        • Published in

          cover image ACM Transactions on Computational Logic
          ACM Transactions on Computational Logic  Volume 15, Issue 1
          February 2014
          279 pages
          ISSN:1529-3785
          EISSN:1557-945X
          DOI:10.1145/2590829
          Issue’s Table of Contents

          Copyright © 2014 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 6 March 2014
          • Accepted: 1 March 2013
          • Revised: 1 September 2012
          • Received: 1 January 2012
          Published in tocl Volume 15, Issue 1

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article
          • Research
          • Refereed
        • Article Metrics

          • Downloads (Last 12 months)2
          • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

          Other Metrics

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader