Abstract
Objective
Residency programs compete for applicants and commit extensive resources to the recruitment process. After failing to fill in the match for 5 years (1999–2004), this program decided to make changes in its recruitment process. The authors describe one program’s experience in improving recruitment outcomes.
Methods
The new training director surveyed other program directors, reviewed medical student feedback, and evaluated previous recruitment processes, developing and implementing a new plan. Tracked outcome measures included USMLE scores, COMLEX scores, match results, and American graduate ratios.
Results
After implementation of the new process in 2004–2005, the program has filled all six positions every year. Average median COMLEX 1 and 2 scores increased from 35.0 to 77.5 (p<0.012). The American graduate-to-International medical graduate ratio (AMG/IMG ratio) for the program changed from 7/16 in 1999 to 19/5 for Years 2006–2009.
Conclusion
Changes in the recruitment process can favorably alter match outcomes.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Weissman S: After-Match Residenncy Report, 2009. NRMP 2009–2010. Post-Match Report
Miller MA, Salas-Lopez D, Ippolito T, et al: Suburban vs. urban: does it matter where the residency interview begins? J Assoc Acad Minor Phys 2000; 11:60–63
Reiser LW, Sledge WH, Edelson M: Four-year evaluation of a psychiatry clerkship: 1982–1986. Am J Psychiatry 1988; 145:1122–1126
Yudofsky SC, Rosenbaum CP, Leon RL, et al: Reports from departments of psychiatry at medical schools with high recruitment into psychiatry J Psychiatr Educ 1981; 5:88–100
Weintraub W, Plaut SM, Weintraub E: Recruitment into psychiatry: increasing the pool of applicants. Can J Psychiatry 1999; 44:473–477
Zimny GH, Sata LS: Influence of factors before and during medical school on choice of psychiatry as a specialty. Am J Psychiatry 1986; 143:77–80
Sacks MH, Karasu S, Cooper AM, et al: The medical student’s perspective of psychiatry residency selection procedures. Am J Psychiatry 1983; 140:781–783
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
MacLean, L., Pato, M.T. Changing Recruitment Outcomes: The “Why” and The “How”. Acad Psychiatry 35, 241–244 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ap.35.4.241
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ap.35.4.241