Skip to main content
Log in

Changing Recruitment Outcomes: The “Why” and The “How”

  • Brief Reports
  • Published:
Academic Psychiatry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

Residency programs compete for applicants and commit extensive resources to the recruitment process. After failing to fill in the match for 5 years (1999–2004), this program decided to make changes in its recruitment process. The authors describe one program’s experience in improving recruitment outcomes.

Methods

The new training director surveyed other program directors, reviewed medical student feedback, and evaluated previous recruitment processes, developing and implementing a new plan. Tracked outcome measures included USMLE scores, COMLEX scores, match results, and American graduate ratios.

Results

After implementation of the new process in 2004–2005, the program has filled all six positions every year. Average median COMLEX 1 and 2 scores increased from 35.0 to 77.5 (p<0.012). The American graduate-to-International medical graduate ratio (AMG/IMG ratio) for the program changed from 7/16 in 1999 to 19/5 for Years 2006–2009.

Conclusion

Changes in the recruitment process can favorably alter match outcomes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Weissman S: After-Match Residenncy Report, 2009. NRMP 2009–2010. Post-Match Report

  2. http://www.nrmp.org/data/chartingoutcomes2009v3.pdf

  3. Miller MA, Salas-Lopez D, Ippolito T, et al: Suburban vs. urban: does it matter where the residency interview begins? J Assoc Acad Minor Phys 2000; 11:60–63

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Reiser LW, Sledge WH, Edelson M: Four-year evaluation of a psychiatry clerkship: 1982–1986. Am J Psychiatry 1988; 145:1122–1126

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Yudofsky SC, Rosenbaum CP, Leon RL, et al: Reports from departments of psychiatry at medical schools with high recruitment into psychiatry J Psychiatr Educ 1981; 5:88–100

    Google Scholar 

  6. Weintraub W, Plaut SM, Weintraub E: Recruitment into psychiatry: increasing the pool of applicants. Can J Psychiatry 1999; 44:473–477

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Zimny GH, Sata LS: Influence of factors before and during medical school on choice of psychiatry as a specialty. Am J Psychiatry 1986; 143:77–80

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Sacks MH, Karasu S, Cooper AM, et al: The medical student’s perspective of psychiatry residency selection procedures. Am J Psychiatry 1983; 140:781–783

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. http://www.medfriends.org/match_statistics/

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lisa MacLean M.D..

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

MacLean, L., Pato, M.T. Changing Recruitment Outcomes: The “Why” and The “How”. Acad Psychiatry 35, 241–244 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ap.35.4.241

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ap.35.4.241

Keywords

Navigation