Skip to main content
Log in

High resistive state retention in room temperature solution processed biocompatible memory devices for health monitoring applications

  • Articles
  • Published:
MRS Advances Aims and scope Submit manuscript

    We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

    Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Abstract

Wearable and bio-implantable health monitoring applications require flexible memory devices that can be used to locally store body vitals prior to transmission or to support local data processing in distributed smart systems. In recent years, non-volatile resistive random access memories composed of oxide-based insulators such as hafnium oxide and niobium pentoxide have attracted a great deal of interest. Unfortunately, hafnium and niobium are not low-cost materials and may also present health challenges. In this work, we have explored the alternative of using titanium dioxide as the insulating oxide using a low-cost solution-phase deposition process. Aqueous sol deposited thin films were deposited on standard RCA-cleaned commercial thermal silicon dioxide (500 nm) wafer (500 μm). Patterned bottom contacts Cr/Au (~200/300 Å) using shadow masks were deposited on the substrate using successive DC sputtering, and thermal evaporation, respectively at 5 × 10-6 Torr. A sol was prepared using titanium (IV) butoxide as precursor hydrolysed under water and ethanol to form a colloidal solution (sol) at 50°C under constant stirring. Powder X-Ray Diffraction (PXRD) scans of calcined (from sol at 750°C) nanoparticles show a mixture of anatase and rutile phases, confirming the composition of the material. The sol was slowly cooled to room temperature before being spin coated at low rotational speeds on to the substrate in multiple steps involving several spin coating and drying steps to form a uniform film. Top contacts (Ag) of thickness (~500 Å) were deposited on the sol-deposited thin films using thermal evaporation. The resulting devices were coated with a thick layer of polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) using a 10:1 ratio of base elastomer and curing agent respectively. After drying the PDMS, resistance measurements were carried out. A high resistance state was detected prior to electroforming in the air at ~5 MΩ which remains nearly unchanged (~4.3 MΩ) when dipped in a ~7.4 pH phosphate buffer solution (equivalent to human blood’s pH (reference average value ~7.4 pH)). Unencapsulated devices (UM1) were further characterized in air using a Keithley 4200-SCS semiconductor parameter analyzer in dual sweep mode to observe repeatable hysteresis behavior with a large difference between trace and retrace R-V characteristics (~50±3% over a pristine device), which compares favorably with recent data in the literature on high-performance sputtered TiO2 memristors. Unchanged retention ratio using biocompatible device materials and encapsulation suggests that these devices can be used for biomedical implantable sensor electronics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Y. Wang, C. Zhu, R. Pfattner, H. Yan, L. Jin, S. Chen, F. Molina-Lopez, F. Lissel, J. Liu, N.I. Rabiah, Z. Chen, J.W. Chung, C. Linder, M.F. Toney, B. Murmann, and Z. Bao, Sci. Adv. 3, e1602076 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. J. Park, Y. Lee, J. Hong, Y. Lee, M. Ha, Y. Jung, H. Lim, S.Y. Kim, and H. Ko, ACS Nano 8, 12020 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. G.-T. Hwang, H. Park, J.-H. Lee, S. Oh, K.-I. Park, M. Byun, H. Park, G. Ahn, C.K. Jeong, K. No, H. Kwon, S.-G. Lee, B. Joung, and K.J. Lee, Adv. Mater. 26, 4880 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. H. Kim, J. Yoon, G. Lee, S. Paik, G. Choi, D. Kim, B.-M. Kim, G. Zi, and J.S. Ha, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 8, 16016 (2016).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. M.T. Penella and M. Gasulla, in 2007 IEEE Instrum. Meas. Technol. Conf. IMTC 2007 (2007), pp. 1–5.

  6. N. Gergel-Hackett, B. Hamadani, B. Dunlap, J. Suehle, C. Richter, C. Hacker, and D. Gundlach, IEEE Electron Device Lett. 30, 706 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. J.L. Tedesco, L. Stephey, M. Hernández-Mora, C.A. Richter, and N. Gergel-Hackett, Nanotechnology 23, 305206 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. V.K. Nagareddy, M.D. Barnes, F. Zipoli, K.T. Lai, A.M. Alexeev, M.F. Craciun, and C.D. Wright, ACS Nano 11, 3010 (2017).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. H. Liu, T. Zhao, W. Jiang, R. Jia, D. Niu, G. Qiu, L. Fan, X. Li, W. Liu, B. Chen, Y. Shi, L. Yin, and B. Lu, Adv. Funct. Mater. 25, 7071 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. W. Zeng, L. Shu, Q. Li, S. Chen, F. Wang, and X.-M. Tao, Adv. Mater. 26, 5310 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. B.-Y. Kim, W.-H. Lee, H.-G. Hwang, D.-H. Kim, J.-H. Kim, S.-H. Lee, and S. Nahm, Adv. Funct. Mater. 26, 5211 (2016).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. F. Verbakel, S.C.J. Meskers, R.A.J. Janssen, H.L. Gomes, M. Cölle, M. Büchel, and D.M. de Leeuw, Appl. Phys. Lett. 91, 192103 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Y. Li, S. Long, Q. Liu, H. Lü, S. Liu, and M. Liu, Chin. Sci. Bull. 56, 3072 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. F. Pan, C. Chen, Z. Wang, Y. Yang, J. Yang, and F. Zeng, Prog. Nat. Sci. Mater. Int. 20, 1 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. S. Stathopoulos, A. Khiat, M. Trapatseli, S. Cortese, A. Serb, I. Valov, and T. Prodromakis, Sci. Rep. 7, 17532 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. H. Baek, C. Lee, J. Choi, and J. Cho, Langmuir 29, 380 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. C.H. Hsu and S.F. Yan, IET Micro Nano Lett. 6, 799 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. C. Lee, I. Kim, H. Shin, S. Kim, and J. Cho, Nanotechnology 21, 185704 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. E. Covi, S. Brivio, A. Serb, T. Prodromakis, M. Fanciulli, and S. Spiga, in 2016 IEEE Int. Symp. Circuits Syst. ISCAS (2016), pp. 393–396.

  20. A.A. Ansari and A. Qadeer, J. Phys. Appl. Phys. 18, 911 (1985).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. E. Gale, R. Mayne, A. Adamatzky, and B. de Lacy Costello, Mater. Chem. Phys. 143, 524 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. A. Ishihara, Y. Tamura, M. Chisaka, Y. Ohgi, Y. Kohno, K. Matsuzawa, S. Mitsushima, and K. Ota, Catalysts 5, 1289 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. G. Dearnaley, D.V. Morgan, and A.M. Stoneham, J. Non-Cryst. Solids 4, 593 (1970).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. D.S. Jeong, R. Thomas, R.S. Katiyar, J.F. Scott, H. Kohlstedt, A. Petraru, and C.S. Hwang, Rep. Prog. Phys. 75, 076502 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. T. Conard, K. Arstila, T. Hantschel, A. Franquet, W. Vandervorst, E. Vecchio, S. Burgess, and F. Bauer, MRS Online Proc. Libr. Arch. 1184, (2009).

  26. A. Mishra, S. Saha, C.K. Jha, V. Agrawal, B. Mitra, A. Dixit, and M. Singh, J. Electron. Mater. (2019). doi.org/10.1007/s11664-019-06975-4

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mishra, A., Saha, S., Devi, H.S. et al. High resistive state retention in room temperature solution processed biocompatible memory devices for health monitoring applications. MRS Advances 4, 1409–1415 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1557/adv.2019.161

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1557/adv.2019.161

Navigation